ST9801-CS000829 (3)AUG-29-2000 14: 05 FN I DALLAS
P. 02
FREESE *' NICHOLS
Simon W. Freese,
Mnv4n c. Nithob,
1~0-1990
18~1969
Memorandum
TO:
Larry Davis
FROM:
Scott Maughn, B.I.T.
Coppell Rd
DATE:
August 29, 2000
Copy to: Mike Martin
After our phone conversation last week, I searched through our files we have on the project. I tried
to address everything wc talked about, and what Mike Martin had asked me W look for, also.
As for the charges through the August 12m, I did find some questions and concerns on.quantities.
Please see the following concerns:
You had asked about the over-charges for 12" PVC Water line. You asked about 114 LF over-
charge from Ed Bell, but I find they only have over-charged 7 LF. They show a bid quantity of
5582LF, and charged for 5589 LF. Please verify these quantifies with me so we can coordinate on
the correct amounts.
I also noticed that there was an extra ~m hydrant charged for that wasn't discussed in our phone
conversation last week. Please let me know about this item, also.
hems #15, and 18, we discussed on the phone, and we agreed these were justifiable charges.
On the paving section, I saw over-charges for Rein #'s 8, 10, 16 and 57. Numbers 8 and 10 arc
referring to the lime, which may be explained by the requested change of pavement (please see
attached sheets concerning this request). Then, Item #16 in for driveway pavement, and is somewhat
understandable due to the changes requested at the drives for the resident near Sand Lake Rd, The
difference is 72 SY of pavement, which seems slightly excessive for those drives. Please let me
know if you have more knowledge of what exactly was charged for. Item #57 is for tree removal,
and the charge was for 18 trees over the original bid quantity. These could be for the trees in the
bike trail area, but they hadn't been removed as of this letter. So, unless you have other knowledge
of tree removal, I do not know what the over-charge is for on this item.
PREF, SE AND NICHOLS · 1701 N. MARKET STREEr, SUITE SO0 LB 51 · DALLAS, TEXAS 75202-2001
~ON'E,: 214-920-2500 · FAX: 214-920-2,565
AUG-29-2000 14: 05 FN ! DALLAS
P. 03
Memorandum to
Aug..lst 29, 2000
As I previously stated, I am attaching copies of a few things I found in our files on the concrete
paving changes that were requested during the project. Thee documents were all I could find that
dealt with the pavement and stabilized subgrade. I do not know for sure if Ed Bell has this same
information, though. This probably need to be looked into in more detail about information being
sent to Ed Bell on this matter.
Also, Mike Martin asked me to look at the additional number of days added to the connctors
allotted time for project completion. I have enclosed a leUcr that has information concerning
additional days and time. I did not include copies of change orders with additional days requested
due to the fact that the City of Coppell should have the copies of those chan.-~ .~ ca file. I found
makes a total of 256 days. Then Change Order #1 requested and additional 14 days, which brings
the total to 270 days. Then on May 12~, 4 days were requested for water line and box culvert issues,
but I do not believe that these 4 days were added. Then, on June 15"', 15 days were added with
Chanffe Order ~e2, which bwught the total to 285 days. Then Change OTder#3 added another7 days,
which brings us to the total of 292 days, which is what Ed Bell shows on their latest project schedule.
I believe Ed Bell is correct on the number of days for completion that they indicated. But, I believe,
which Mike stated in the last Construction Meeting, that a satisfactoW "completion" needs to be
clarified to all parties.
Thank you
AND NICHOLS · I'~01 N. MARKET STRIBT, $UITE 500 LB 51 · DAJ, LAS, TgXAS ~5202-2001
I~,~PHONB: 214-920-2500 · )~AX: 214-920-2565
RUG-29-2000 14:06
FNI DALLAS
P. 04
V
lnebmsry 1.2000
~ D. Web=
P.O. Box 54078?
Dallas, TX ?531d-07S?
RE: Coppoll Road RmmtruCtfQu - ffgMl
This letter is ine~cled to serve as a progrns rgFofi for th~ ~ lb>sd
Regons~n project in the City of Colspell. Dotalmentcd herein ars several key dates
with decisions thst have been l~viousiy undecmnc~ted. Also included is a curt~t
tabulation of days tmcd and current total d b~!ed project charge, with cxplmatimas u
needrod.
The Coppe, Road R~on projegt was begun on O~tobsr 4, 19~9 as per
the rneeti~ minutes dMsl ltel~enber 27, 1999. This date was set to be mn days ai~cr ~be
Notice to Proceed on September 2:2, 1999. The project length was bid at 240 days, which
would eatct the pmjcct onlYlay 30, 2000, As of Fcbnmry 1, 2000, 117 project days have
bc,:n used (48.75% of project), leaving 123 days to complete the project.
Bd ~11 ~n ttdivo~d a lctlm' on O ctot~ 6, ] 999 requesting that time b~
stopped due to water line supply problems. To da~ attfiicient doGUmmtatimt to mppt~
the supp|y pmbksm has not been dcllvered. Hem;c, time was not stopped for the days
Ed Bell Constng~on sobanirted a lettea on October l& 1999 requestinS that time
be suspended due to legal issu. reSarding gasemcSs a/onS the wcst side of Cotspell
Road. Thee iranee wm~ resolved on Novmnber 2, 1991). During the time that tlrac iumr.$
w~re ~ ~lv~I, suDlcignt work cxis~ on me pmjsct to r.~mt~ wodt However, in
a spiri~ of ~ ~ City will Fant Ed Ball C, onstns~oo a stopps~ or proje~'t time
~nn Octobgr 18, I~ to Novamber 2, I9~9, a total of ~ (16') days, The~ days ~
be added to the md of the proj~.~, tires giving arm, iscd completitm dm of/une IS, 2000.
With this revissd completion date, Ed Be~ has used q~mximately 46% of the project
ti~.
]Stt Bell Construction has m,b,,d,ted requesta to t~ City requesting that time net
Ix e. batScd du~ ao a ha of resohnion reprdiNg etmsm3ction of b box mdvm.
Syr_inca~/, Ed Brm hss diopu~ the mr. thod of bo~ cuiv, rt e, onsm~tm requir::d by ~
p43e'CN
AUG-29-2000 ld:10 FNI DALLAS P.05/11
Fin~Uy, as of January 4, 2000 ]Sd Br,/l has billed The City for a tota/of
$417,732j~ of project ehar~. The total project cost acconing to the conU~t
eontra~tdoc~.ts is $2,000,949.75. Cla~es to date r~oresm approximmly 21% of the total
you have any ques~ or concerns r~gard~ th~s leuct~ pieMe conUtct me at
(972)304-7019.
Raspecfftdly.
AUG-29-2000 14:10 FNI DALLAS P.06/11
April 10, 2000
Mr. Keyin C. Young, E.I.'r.
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
1701 N. Market, Suite 500, LB 51
Dallas, Texas 75201
Re~
Coppell Road Reconstruction
SH 121 to Sandy Lake Road
Coppell Project #: ST 98-01
Dear Mr. Youug:
It is our understanding that the City of Coppell intends to issue a change order deleting the lime
stabilization from ,qH 12 1 w the vicinity of the box culvert crossing and add ~ sack of cement to the
concrete utilized for the concrete pavement in that area. If the lime stabilization item is deleted from the
contract, then we wilt need a subgrade preparation item added to the change order. Our price for
subgrade preparation is $1.26 per SY. I have enclosed our basis of estimate sheets for your review,
AdditionalIy, it is our understanding that the sandy material that will ultimately become the subgrade for
the roadway ha~ no PI v~iue, W'e are'aWare that se'veral engineers have reviewed that data relevant to
this issue and have approved the proposed course of action; however, we are concerned about the
following issues should the City ultimately decxde to pursue this copse of action:
1, Placement of a rigid pavement directly on top of an untreatcd flexible subgrade will create
differential stress loading that could ultimately lead to early failure of the pavement.
2. Based upon testing by the City, the raw subgTade in question has no cohesive value. Any
number of circumstances could cause the subgrade to mignte leading to the formation of voids under the
pavement. A stabilized layer of subgrade will add an additional factor of protection for the pavement
and help to prevent early failure of the pavement.
· cerely,
k.t. ell Constructi~ ,,~ompany
Robert I~. Weber
Project Engineer
xc: Mr. Kent Collin~i P.E., E~lgtneenng ~lnid P~bli~'W~ks;'City ~f'C0ppell " "' .... :
'255 Parkw'a~, Blvd., Coppell, Texas ?~'61~2a,0'9~
AN EQUAL OPPOR'rVNI'rY EMPLOYER
AUG-29-2000 ld:ll FNI DALLAS P.07/11
CITY OF COPPE~L
" L~BOR CLASSIFICATION
INDEX
SUPERINTENDENT
FOREMAN
BLADE OP~RATOR
LOADER OPERATOR
COMPACTQR O~ERATOR
WATER TRUCK OPERATOR
COMPACTOR OPERATOR
LABORER
PLUS LABOR B6RDEN (TAxES,
TOTAl. z,,~o~ coS~rs
~SUm~NCE,
OPERATES
EQ. #
1
3
6
4
ETC,)
HOURLY
RATE
$23.13
$21,00
$14.00
S13.00
$11.50
$11.06
$11.00
$9.50
$0.oo
$0.00
$0.oo
APPROX.
16
32
48
48
48
48
0
0
TOTAL
S370.08
8672-00
$672.00
$624.00
$553.00
$528.00'
8528.00
$456.00
SO.O0
$0.00
$0.00
$O.O0
$0.00
S0.00
SO.O0
~0.00
$0,00
S0.00
$0.00
~0.00
$O.O0
SO,O0
50.00
ss.'oot
SHEET 1 (LABOR)
$o.oo
5o.oo
so.oo
$4,402,08
$2,421.14
$6,823,22
AUG-29-2000 1~:11 FN! DALLAS P,0~/11
e
EQUI~E4ENT DESCRIPTION
EQ e
SUPERINTENDENT PICKUP
FOREM~ PICKUP
CA~ 14b MOTOR e~%ZR
WATER TRUCK
'6AT 9se LOAo[R '
REX 3-40 COMPACTOR
BROS 9 WMZ~ ROLLER '*
1
5
TOTAL EQeIPMENT COSTS
RENTAL RAT~ BLUE BOOK ~
{MONTHLY RATE X ADJUST FACTOR X REGIONAL FACTOR)
176
HOURLY
RATE
$9.84
$53.98
$22-83
$37.61
$45.26
$29.14
$0.03
$~.o0
$o.o0
APPROX.
#HRS
16
32'
24
24
24
0
0
0
TOTAL
$193.76
8314.88
$1,295.52
$547.92
$902.6~
$1,086.24
$699.36
SO .'00
$0.00
$O.O0
$0.00
$0.00
sO.oO
$0. O0
~0.00
sO.~o
$0.00
SO.O0
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
S0.00
$0.00
$0.00
SO.O0
S'O.oo
'~s,p40.32
+ OPER COSTS
SHEET 2 (EQUIP)
AUG-29-2000 14:12 FN! DALLAS P.09/11
Ii
MATERIAL
R~NTED DUMP T~UCK
UNIT OF
MEASURE
MR
EST
QTY
80
0
0
0
0
d~IT TOTAL
PRICE
09_0 S35.00
000 SO. O0 80. O0
000 $'0-'00 SO. 00'
000 $0.00 $0.00
ooo 'sO.O0 sO.O0
ObO $o. oo '" So. oo
000 '~0.00 I" ~.0~
........ $o.oo
......... $0.00
$0.00
so1 oO
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
.... i ']E"T ......... $0. OO
, $16,936.39
TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS
I. TOTAL COST OF LABOR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS
'.PLUS INDIRECT COSTS (OVERMEAD. BOND, ETC.)
i PLUS PROFIT
UNIT PRICE ............................... ~ ' '
....................... _ ................... L ........... Sl.26
FNI
- GEOT~{HHI~AL O~II. LIN;
DALLAS
P, 10/11
April 0,4, 2000
P, one Report G8-4066-01
Mr. Kevm Young. P.E.
170 i Noah Mrarket Street
Suite 500 LB 51
Dallas. Texas 75202
Re: Coppell Road. C,~ppell. Texas
Dear Sir:
with regard to subgrade preparation the question has been raised as to the
advisability of using a section of a non-lime stabilized subgrade with a concrete
section oir eight inches comprised of 5,5 sacks of cement per yard versus a time
stabilized subgrade with a seven inch concrete section comprised of five sacks of
cement per yard. It is our opinion the eight-inch. 5.5 sack section is superior.
The added one-half sack ,viii translate to higher Icnsile strength wl~ich has merit
in pavement pert'om~ance, 'Fhe additional inch in see,on will add years t. the
serviceable li/~ of the pavemen~ given a constant cyclic load.
Even thnugh tl~e subgrade is not ,;tabflized. it should still be searifled to tile ti. dl
six-inch depth and recompactcd at proper moisture and density. Addifionatl),. it
is prudent practice ro seal the concrete at its joints and ahmg any cracks that may
occur. One advanlaae or' limc.stabrlizatmn is that ~t rm~,'ide.~ :m added IFlt~asurt~
oF protectran a.uam~t loss of sub~radc strength due to ,;atucaled conditions. Ir file
pavement is maintained. such that cracks are sealed. the possibility of saturating
the subgrade is mimmized.
You Dosed allOther question as to the mcmlin~ of "non-plastic". We coil,cider that
term as precise. that is. we could not measure a plasticity in a particular soil. We
will report a plasticity index. however low. if it can bc measured. Obviously a
non-plastic material is substantially devoid of clay, thus it is a gravel. sand or sill.
f&~lMfL~ ZIe-eaQ-$II9
Regards.
.::/,.x, /
Senior Geotcchnical Engineer
..... Hosilrordr~dsshon/d**
Ix~ cliowed to travel put ~ cuJve~ under Westmjnslcr Way at any time dudng consInaction.
Letters ofzcquest will be needed by the City by the Wednesday prior to any weekend work,
*The cemcnl-stabiJizatjon cby appll ca~ion is a concern for subgrddc Irealmcnt. due to the dual I hal
woaldbectcatcdduringplacemenl. EBCCdoe.snotcun'cntJyhavcthccapibililyfor~velCSB
applicalion, Applicat~onofthelmaranentatnigbtis aconcemduclolhehjghnoisefactor. tnorder
~o ~ ni mize impact on the surtosndi ng pu bi ic, the City world like to explore the possibi lit y of
ch~r~gingthepav~n~mmsec~i~ntoa5-~/2sack~3~5~psimixdcsign~in~ieu~fsubgrade~te~tm~n~
Costs for ~fferent options will be provided by EBCC.
I J. Lime Izeal/'nent shall bc used from Sandy I. Ake Road and cad aL box culvcz~.
12. Public intczfacc Ires been succgssNI. To this poinl, there have been no dozen complaints.
13.
14.
q'Tbe Cily requests thai EBCC add a "one wa~ sign on 121.
*TI~ City reque, sts that F.3CC con'~ I he enoneo~s al st artcos on the box dotoar signs and Io a~d
a 20 mph sign ahead on the furthest distance sign from the detour (o pi~vide motorists with more
forewarning.
15, r'rbe Cil7 needs submind of a revised cr~Lical path schedule.
16, Good Friday will not be an official holiday for the City,
17. ThcCitybasconcemsaboulthedrainagcpipcbeneaLhthcnewdetourmadandquestion~BCC
about ~a.innge capacily. EBCC has exFessecl thc~r confidence in the pipe, which is a 16" DIP.
Lr)
._1
_1
C/:
*Action Item
- END -
FI~t. SE AND NIC}{OLS · 11131 M, MAaKiTSI'1~EiET. SUITE Se0 ·DALLAS, TEXAS '~S2~2-;'0OI
TELEIq!ONg: 2J. 4.-92D-2500 m FAX~234-g20-2~65 · FORM DAI3B: I
AUG-~9-~000 1~:05
F, RF. ESE ' NICHOLS
· ' Ariadon
Cons~rucdon M:ma~n'~nc
Dams & ~pillways
D~nage
Elec~'ic=.l En~needng
~-xvironmenu. l 3cienc~
Fire Protection
Rood M:magement
Levees &
Mec.hlnical EaFne-'nng
Rumbing Design ·
Pump Station Design
Remediation
5itt Development
$~etx &
Teleco~~o~
3olid Wute F~fiides
Wa~r ~curc~ Pl~nmg
P.ol
FN I DALLAS
Mar!< oss. 1701 N. Market Street, 8uit["'9~0 LB 51, Dallas, Texan 7~1202
~.~'214/920-2500 · FAX 214/920-2565 · www.fmese. com.
FAX TRANSMITTAL SB ET
To:
Fax No.:
From;
Daze: SI~
Total number of pages, including transmittal sheet:
Cha~g~: ('_~t..rfsqq'7 q. I
Commen~:
~' AVe
-e
R' there is a problem receiving =y pages,
ple:ue call 214.920.2500.
.... 7"'*:, ..... ED BELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ....... MONTHLY ESTIMATE [ ,,~
· JOB NO. 946 ESTIMATE N 9 4 ' ~~ ~ ,_~
PROJECT_ COPPELL ROAD iX' '
JUNE 1 2000 k ~ )
LOCATION SANDY LAKE ROAD TO SH 121 FROM - t ! i
BID DATE_ FEBRUARY 25. 1999 TO JUNE 3~
ENGINEER FREESE NICHOLS. tNC
OWNER CITY OF COPPELL '"
ITEM UNIT BID DESCRIPTION BID TOTAL QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT
QU~TI~ --- PRICE COST THIS MONTH ..... TO DATE .....
,..,.
PART A - WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS
'~" ~; .-,* ' ' ~ r~n f, nr'~l~l117t, Tl(';~ ~. DFMOB ' 140,000,00 140,000.00 ' 000" ' 0O0' '677.5~ 1'0~.000.00
2625 341.25
'-_-¢,
___ 75000 79,~9
,000.00
,100.00 0,00
.200.00 a.s00,0o
.80000 1 .abboo
125 7.251 25
~.00' 6,049 95
000
000
o 00
0 00
0 00
0 00
71.013 06
16,500.00
10,000;00
300 00
00O
000
_
2,97800 14,89000
360.00 900.00
o oo' 06o
0 00 0 0O
0 00 0 00
0 00 000
5.865 60 134,55686
PART B-
.0oo.do' '
,000.00
3 EA 28 00 ADJ EXI51 w I H VALV~ D'J^ 15O,OO
.... '4 EA 500'ADJ EXISt' MH RIMS TO GRA 500.00 ~ .......
' "{~,&, 20O 'AbJ EXIST WTR METER BOXE 150.00 300 00 0,00
~"(~,'Y ' 11,654 00~dNCLASS ST EXCAQA ....... 5%06"' '~5'8,27~.0~' ' 0,00
~' ~Y ' ~]~6000 COMPACT FICL .... 2,5~ {~,650.0(5' 0~00"
8'~ ~Y 10~:295 00 ~8" LIME STAB ' 1.~0+ 15,44250 0.00'
9' SY 3.042 00 6" LIME STAB 2.60 6,~8~'00' b O~
10' TN 21600 LIME FOR RD~'AY SUBGRADE 100'00' 21.600 0~ 5 D0
11 ' '" o' 6 400.55 o60
12 4' 518,902 80 3,095 60
20 '
I 5 8 .S O0
33 0 1
34
35 6' 62 ~ ~ ~0
37 LF 10 S~ CL Ill RCP 18' ' 5~0' 5C
39 LF 89 00 CL HI RCP 24" 40~0 ' 3.5~ u u 8900' 3,560 00
40 LF 1900 CLHIRCP27" 4i50 89300 060' 000 1900 89300
41 LF 85300 CLIIIRCP30" ~00' 41.79900' ~60' b0h 85300 41.79700
42 LF 35 00 CL H, RCP 96" ~bdoo' ~4.06560' 0 do' 0 oo 3500 ~4.000.00
43 LF 299 00 3-10'x6' MULTI C-i-P CON 800 00' 239,200 0O 7050 56.400,00 220,00 176.000.00
44 CY 14 00 3-10'X6' MULT~ BOX CULVE ~60 00 5.600 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 ' 000
45 SY 50 00 6" REff; CCNC APRON 42 0O 2.100 00 0 00 0 00 0,00 0 00
· JOB NO. 946
ESTIMATE N 9
· PROJECT COPPELL ROAD ""
--,,. LOCATIOI~ SANDY LAKE ROAD TO SH 121 FROM JUNE 1, 2000 ~
BID DATE FEBRUARY 25, 1999 TO JUNE 30, 2000
ENGINEE~ FREESE NICHOLS, INC.
OWNER CITY OF COPPELL
............................... ;7. .............................................................................................. ,
ITEM UNIT BID DESCRIPTION BID TOTAL QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT
- - QUANTITY -- PRICE COST THIS MONTH -- TO DATE
..................................................................................................................................................................................
PART A - WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS
7' I ~ LS* __ 1.00 MOBILIZATION & DEMOB
', 2' LF 13.00 6" C900 CL 200 DR14 PVC
3 ~ LF 196.00 8' C900 CL 200 DR14 PVC
4 LF 4.00 10" C900 CL 200 DR14 PVC
9 ",-,,,,-=row 5 LF _'. 5,,~82.00 12" C900 CL 150 DRlS PVC
~. 6 LF 20.00 16" C900 CL 150 DR18 PVC
: 7 TN
8 EA
9i EA
10: EA
11~ EA
12 EA
. 13! EA
14, EA
t.__ 15: EA
16: EA
3.20 DI FITTINGS
1.00 6' GATE VALVE & BOX
11.00 8' GATE VALVE & BOX
15.00.12" GATE VALVE & BOX
1.00.16' GATE VALVE & BOX
2.00 ;AIR REL VALVE 2
16.00. FIRE HYDRANT ASSY & 6 G
1.00 RELOC EXIST FIRE HYDRANT
2.00 RECONNECT EXIST WTR SERV
14,00CONNECT TO EXIST 8 WTR
140,000.00 140,000.00
26.25' 341.25
28.70 5,625.~~~~,
88.30 353.20 .~.
22,95 128 106 90 ' F
700.00,
1,400.00 i 21.000.00
5,000.00: 5,000.00
1,800.00 ~ 3.600.00
750.00, 750.00
550.00: 1,100.00
1,000.00 14,000.00
" 17; EA ..... ZOO CONNECT TO EXIST 10 WTR 1,100.00: 2,200.00
18 EA 2.00 CONNECT TO EXIST 12 WTR 1,200.00 2,400.00
19 EA tOO CONNECT TO EXIST 16 WTR 1,800.00 1,800.00
"' 2~' 't:~ 5.'977.00 TRENCH SAFETY FOR WTR LI .... 1.25 7,471.25
21 SY° 750.00 TEMP 6" HMAC RDWAY MATL 15.00 11,25000
PART B - PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
....... T'LS 1.00 'PRE~P ROW 50,000.00 50,000.00
' 2 L~" ' "1 .o6"Ei~b'~ &~D'I'~ENT CTRL 20,000.00 20,000.00
31 EA 28.00 ADJ EXIST WTR VALVE BOX 150.00 4,200.00
4: EA 5.00 ADJ EXIST MH RIMS TO GRA 500.00 2,500.00
5~ EA 2.00 ADJ EXIST WTR METER BOXE 150.00 300.00;
6 CY 11,654.00 UNCLASS ST EXCAVA 5.00 58,270.00
7 CY 5,060.00 'COMPACT FILL 2.50 12,650.00
1.50 15,442.50
2.00 6,084.00
8' SY 10,295.00'8*LIMESTAB
...... ~. S""~"" 3~2~6'~ii,4E STAB
10 TN 216.00 LIME FOR RDWAY SUBGRADE
11 TN 64.00 LIME FOR TRAIL SUBGRADE
0.00 ___ 0.00, 0.75 105,000.00
0.00 0.00 12.00 315.00
0.00 0.00 180.00 5,166.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 __ +~0.00 5,589.00 128,267.55
0.00 0.00 20.00 ~
0.00 0.00 3.20
0.00 0.00 1.00 1,100.00
0.00 0.00 11.00 7,700.00
0.00 0.00 14.00 ~ 19,600.00
0.00 0.00 1.00 5,000.00
0.00 0.00, 2.0__0 3,600.00
0.00 0.00' 17.00 32,300.00
0.00 0.00 1.00 750.00
0.00 0.00 5.00 2,750.00
0.00 0.00, "4.00 4,000.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0,00 0.00 3.00 3,600.00
0.00 0.00 1.00 1,800.00
0.00 '" ' 0.0~' 5,801.00 7:~,~1 .~'5
60.00 900.00 403.33 6,049.95
0.00 0.00
0.25 5,000.00
2.00 300.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00'
0.00 0.00'
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
100.00 21,600.00 ..... 0.0"'~"~
100.00 ~ ' 6,400.~" "0.'~d' ' 0.00'
0.33 16,500.00
0.50 10,000.50
2.00 300.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2,978,00 14,890.00
360.00 900.00
0.00 0.00
0,00 0.00
0.'0~ .... b.00'
0.00 0,00
12 SY'
14 SY
15 SY 157.00 6 GRAVEL DRWAY TRANSITI 15.00 2,355.00
16' SY 362.00 '6 REINF'CO~I~;'D~/~Y' ........ 32.~" 11,584.50
' 17' L.S 1.0~) '6 R~NF D~L:C'(SN'C'D~W~ ...... 7,500.00" 7,~Q.00
~8 '~Y ' ' 4.00~ hEiNF C~NC ~LEY PAVE 1~.~ 4~.~
21 SY' 817.~ 6 H~C TY B BASE COURSE 15.~ 12,255.00
22 LF 332.~. 3" SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT 10.~ 3,320.~
~20.00 '6" REINF CONC HIKE &BIKE 24.00 60,4~6.~6 .... 0.0~" 0.00
911.00 4' REINF CONC SIDEWALK 22.00 20,042.00 0.00 0.~
0.00 0.~
0.~ 0.~
0.00 0.~
3~.66 1,633.~
326.66 4,8~.~_
5:865.6d'
0.00'
o:~o"
0.00
434.00
0.00
0.00
-
326.66
326.66
134,556.86
0.00
0.00
o.0~'
13,888;00
0.00
0.00
1,633.30
4,899.90
0.00
24 EA 2.00 ~ I BARRIER FREE RAMP 600.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.~ 0.~ 0.00
~' ~A 6.00 'T~ ~ MOOIF' B~RIER F~ 6~.00 3,900.00 0.00 0,~ d.0~' 0~0~'
27' LS 1.00'T~FF CTRL i ~AR~6AD~ ' ' +2~2~0.06" 25.000.~ ...... 0.~'d 2,506.~" '0,8'6" 20.00b:d0'
29' EA ' 4.00:6.~AINTED plhE BOL~RD~' ' 2~0.00 ' '8~.0~" ~.~' 0.~' p:p0;7 0b0
30' EF 160.00 18" THERMO STOP ~A'R~ ~ 6.30 1,008.00 0.00'
31 EA 2,8~.00 4" YEL NON REF BUTTON 3.15 8,990.10 0.00 0.~ 0.~ 0.~
32' 'EA
~3' EA
34 EA
~5' LF
~6' LF
37' LF
38 LF
39' LF
4O LF
41 LF
42 LF
43 LF
44 CY
45 SY
456.O0'4'YELREFBU:FTON __: : ..... 1_ .:_.__'7~'~_~___ 3~:~_26~_._'+___~__~).0.'~.':_ .... ~._'~__'_ .~__0._.~:' _
25.~' 4" WHITE NON REF BUTTON 3.15 78.75 0.00 0.~ 0.00 0.00
17.0d' ~ ~LUE R~F~O~ .......... ~.~ ~ 3~.~' ...... 0~0~ .... 0.~ .... ~7~' ' ' b.0~'
130.b0'~EM~ DISP 0F ~1~ MfL' ............... 5.~ ....... ~0~ .... ~Sd.b~' ...... 6~.~ ..... ~3~.~ ..... 6~.~0
613.00 'T~b~T PR-~ ~IEI~G ........... 75.00 '4~,~7~.0~" 0.~ 0,~ ' "~:~ .... 0,~"
~0.O0 'cE'ln RCP 18" ............. ~.00 "'~bO:0~ ....... 0.0~ ........ 0.~ ' ~0.0~" ' ~00.~0'
8900 CL III RCP 24' 40.~ 3,~0.~ 0.00 0.~ 89.00 3,560.00
19.00 CL III RCP 27" 47.~ ~.~ 0.00 0.00 19:00' 893.00
853.00 CL III RCP 30" 49.~ 41,797.~ 0.~ 0.~ 853.~ 41,797.00
35 00 CL III RCP 96' 4~.~ 14,~0.~ 0.~ 0.~ 35.00 14:~.00"
299 00 3-10'X6' MULTI C-I-P CON a'~:~ 239,200.~ 7~.'~' ' 56,4d0.~' ~20.~' 1~6~00'0.~'
14 oo 3-10'x6' MULTI BOX CULVE 4'~:~' "~7~.~' 0~ ' " 0.~ 0.00' 0.00
5000 6" REIN CONC APRON 4~:~" 2,1~.~' ~.~' 0.~ 0.~' 0.00
t 46 EA 6.00 REINF CONC ENErgY DISSIP
47 EA 5.00' 4' SQ STD STRM DRAIN MH
4~ EA ~5.00 10' RECESS CURB INLET
49 EA 1.00 10' STD CURB INLET
"' 50 EA 1.00 4' SQ DROP INLET W/CONC
'~ 51 LF ' ';4~0.00 EARTHEN DRAIN SWALE
52 LF 6.00 JACK & BORE 24 RCP UNDE
.... 53 LF" 2,"~08.00 TRENCH SAFETY FOR STRM D
54 CY 560.00 UNCLASS CHANNEL EXCAVA
"' 55 SY* 1,176.00 12' GROUTED ROCK RIP RAP
56 SY' 376.00 6' REIN CONC RIP RAP
' 57 EA 142.00 TREE REMOVAL & DISPOSAL
56 EA 25.00 TREE REMOVAL & REPL
59 EA 15.00 5 GAL RED TIP PHOTINIA S
60 SY 10,288.00 HYDROMULCH SEEDING
61 SY 8,620.00. BERMUDA BLOCK SOD
62 LF 2,076.00. REM/REP EX BARB WIRE FENCE
63 LF 190.00 REM/REP EX WOOD SPLIT RAIL FEN
64 EA 20.00 ADJ EXIST IRRIGA SPRINKL
65 EA 1.00 SLOPED END TREATMENT FOR
Change Order #1 .....
.......... SV ' ~'~36.~X)'CEM'ENT STABILIZATION_.
TN 282.00 CEMEN=I' (SLURRY)
Change Order #2
LS 1.00 RECONSTRUCT CHANNEL
SY 395.00 1',2' GROUTED ROCK RIPRAP
EA 1.00 REM 26' PECAN TREE
600.00 4 3,600.00' 0.00 ..... 0.00 0.00
2,200.00' 11,000.00= 0.00 0.00 5.00 11,000
2,000,00 ] 30,000.00: 2.00 4,000.oo 11.00 _ _._2_2,_000=0c
2,000,00 ~ 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0C
2,500.00! 2,500.00 __0._0~_. 0.00 0.56 1,25QOC
7,00 ~ 3,010.00 ..... 0.00 ~.06' "~.0"~ ..... 0'~0~
300.00, 1.800.00' ' ...... o.o"~' 0~60' ~,.~ ...... ~ .b~o;~:
1.75 i "4,739.00 "~'~.~6' 6,0~' 2,409.00 4,215.75
6.00 1 3,360.00 Q00 0.~)0' 560.00 3,360.0C
38.00 1 44,688.00 0.00 .... 0.00~ 470.00 17,860.0C
44,00 ! 16,544.00: 0.00 O.OO 67.00 2,946.0C
160.00 i 22,720.00 i 0.00 0.00 160 O0 25,600.0e
200.00 ~ 5,000.00 '. 0.00 .... 0.00' "0.00 0.0C
5o.00~ 75o.oo: 0.00 ...... _o.9_o' _ 0.00 o.oc
0,75i 7,716.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0DC
2.75 ~ 23,705.00 i 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.0C
4.00~ 8,304.00. 0.00 0.00 ~'.076.00 8,304.0C
14.00i 2,660.00= 0.00 0.00 170.00 2,380.0~
250.00 ~ 5,000.00= 0.00 000 0.00 , 0.0C
5,000.00! 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 5,000.0:
3.91 52,534.76 0.00' 0.00' 6:750.00 26,392.5:
144.00, 40,608,.00 0.00 .... _0.05)__' 141.75 20,412.0.:_
7.9o0.00i 7,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.0~) 0.0c
38.00} 15,010.00 130.00 4,940.00 _ 130.00 4,940,C,T
160.00 i 100.00 i 1.00 160.00 1.00 160 .oc. '
2,028,660.31 MONTH 167,927.06 TO DATE
DEDUCTIONS 0.00 DEDUCTIONS
SUB TOTAL 167,927.06 SUB TOTAL
0C':
, ~,ooo.~os.::~ofr/3
RETAINAGE RETAINAGE
5% 8,396.35 5%
PREV PAY
t SUB TOT~ 159.530.71
~T DUE
Ed D~nst~tion Comp
/
. . - . . g.,.: g]~ e ,
RO~ D, Weber. ProieCt EQgin~r
2