Prestwick-LR011029.... ' GEE Consultants I
E ° CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING
10046 Monroe Drive · DaJlas, Texas 75229 · (214) 352-5433 · Fax (214) 352-6972
REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL
Den , 2orr No. 21 (200-0361) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Pa~e of I
Client: B.A.V. Development, Inc. Material Description Maximum Optimum
,,I Dry Moisture
p % Density Content
restwick Court (Lbs/CuFt) Percent
-- i. Yellowish Brown Sandy Clay w/olive gray & occasional
,Test Date: October 26, 2001 (a.m.) limestone Ilia 14.0
2. Light Gray Limestone w/gray sandy clay 106.5 15.7
3. Light Gray & Yellowish Brown Sandy Clay 110.5 14.0
Report Date: October 29, 2001 4. (]ray Sandy Clay w/tan weathered limestone fragments 103.3 18.0
' ' 98.3 20.2
5. Brown Silty Clay 116.2 I 1
6. Brown Clayey Sand
Required Density (%): Min. 95% 7. Dark Brown & Brown Clay 99.4 20.8
8. Light Brown Clay (Lime Treated) 95.9 22.5
98.9 18.7
9. Brown Clay {Lime Treated) 111.3 13.6
Required Moisture (%): Opt + 5% (Clay); 10. Reddish Brown Sandy Clay 109.7 11.8
Opt. +3%(Sand) n. Brown Silty Clay
-- 12. Reddish Brown Clayey Sand 117.5 I 1.2
13. Reddish Brown Sandy Clay 111.2 t3.7
Mat Location/Elevation (and/or) Lift In-Place In-Place Percent
No. Dry Density Moisture Compaction
Test [ Lbs/CuFt) Content (%)
NO.
Probe
Dept
11 Retest of Test No. 53 & 56
57 103.9 7.7 * 94.7 *
6 '
12 Retest of Test No. 54
58 114.8 7.6 * 97.7
I2 Retest of Test No. 55
59 106.1 16.1 * 90.3
6"
13 1' Below Existing Grade
60 Block A, Lot 12 106.4 7.0 * 95.7
13 1st Lift
61 Block A, Lot 5 99.8 13.1 89.7 *
13 tst Lift
62 6" Block A, Lot 4 112.8 10.2 * 101.4
· Test results do not meet project specifications
cc: Mr. Bob Delsanter - B.A.V. Development, Inc.
Mr. Rodney Louviere - Dowdey Anderson & Associates, Inc.
Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell
Mr. Robert Hodges - Angelo Iafrate Construction, L.L.C.
Mr. Royce Caner - H&W Utility Contractor
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed. The use of our name must royal. Our
letters and reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed, and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.