Loading...
Freeport NIP(2.2)-LR011011 CONCRETE COMF;RESSJVE STRENGTH TEST 8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100 Report Number: 94011204.0042 Dallas, Texas 75247 Service Date: October 3, 2001 (214) 63O-lOlO Client: TNA North American, Inc. Report Date: October 11, 2001 Attn: Terry Raley Project: Sales Office & Warehouse Fac. 1321 Valwood Parkway, Suite 440 Coppell, Texas Carrollton TX 75006 Project Number: 94011204 Material Information Sample Information Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 Days Sample Time: 4:14pm Date Cast: October 3, 2001 Technician: Marlo Garcia Batch Time: 3:21pm Plant: 41 Weather Conditions: Cool and cloudy w/cool breeze Supplier: TXI Accumulative Yards: 40 Truck No: 59 Ticket No: 2993550 Placement Method: Direct Discharge Mix I.D. No.: 9506 Sample Locations: PierAJ1 Placement Location: Piers N2.3, A/l, D/7 Field Test Data Test Result Specification Test Method Slump, inches: 5.00 5-7 ASTM C-143 Air Content, %: Concrete Temperature, o F: 82 ASTM Cl 064 Ambient Temperature, o F: 80 ASTM C-1064 Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: Laboratory Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (lbs) (psi) I 1 6.00 28.27 10/10/2001 7 94,790 3,350 1 2 6.00 28.27 10/10/2001 7 98,250 3,470 Average 3,410 1 3 10/31/2001 28 1 4 10/31/2001 28 Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive strength samples. Technician: Marlo Garcia Report Distribution: ~mg,' Inc. (1) TNA North American, Inc. (1) FACServices Inc (1) Carrell Poole & Yost Architecture (1) David Kent Reviewed by: (1) R L Goodson Consulting Engineers (1) City of Coppell - Bldg Insp Edc J. Cleveland, P.E. (1) Pacific Builders Inc (1) City of Coppell - Constr Insp Senior Project Engineer The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 1 of 1 Servi~'D~ite:;, Octobe,~ 2001 (214) 630-1010 Clie~'t: TNA North Amen, Inc. Report Date: October 11,2001 ~ Attn: Terry~l~y Project: Sales Office & Warehouse Fac. ~1321~od Parkway, Suite 440 Coppell, Texas ~i~on TX 75006 Project Number: 94011204 Services: Drilled belled pier inspection. On this date, an HBC Engineering technician arrived at the above referenced jobsite as scheduled for drilled belled pier inspection. See the attached sheet(s) for recorded data. Technician: Marlo Garcia Repod Distribution: Inc. (1) TNA North American, Inc. (1) FACServices Inc (1) Carrell Poole & Yost Architecture (1) David Kent Reviewed by: (1) R L Goodson Consulting Engineers (1) City of Coppell - Bldg Insp Eric J. Cleveland, P.E. (1) Pacific Builders Inc (1) City of Coppell - Constr Insp Senior Project Engineer The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracen. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the lecation(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 1 of 1 REPORT OF DRILLED BELLED PIERS ENGINEERING, INC 8901 Carpenter Fm'y., Suite #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 Project: Sales Office &: Warehouse Fac. Report No.: 940 Coppell, Texas Date of Service: ] 0/03/01 Project No,: 940 ] ] 204 Technician: M. Garcia Driller: Auger Drilling Page: ] of 2 Pier Identification A/6 A/5.5 A/4.9 A/4.2 A/3.6 A/3 A/2.3 A/1 D/7 Pier Diameter (in.) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Bell Diameter (in.) 72 72 78 78 78 78 72 66 72 *Top of Pier Elevation (fi) 96.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 96.0 96.0 Req, Depth from Exist, Grade (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 Initial Depth of Pier from Existing Grade (ft) 15.3 14.7 14.0 14.0 13.7 12.8 13.3 15.0 16.0 Final Depth of Pier from Existing Grade (fi) 15.3 14.7 14.0 14.0 13.7 12.8 13.0 15.0 16.0 Depth from Top of Concrete (ft) 15.1 14.2 13.0 13.5 12.6 12.7 13.0 15.3 14.6 Condition of Bottom (wet or dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes or no) No No No No No No No No No Casing Diameter (in) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ,, , Cased Depth (ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Number of Vertical Bars,(ea.) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Length of Vertical Bars (,ff,) 14.8 14.0 13.4 13.4 13.0 12.3 14.8 12.2 14.0 Time Drilling was Completed 7:57a.m. 8:17a.m. 8:38a.m. 9:12a.m. 9:45a.m. 10:20a.m. 10:40a.m. 10:54a.m. 11:08a.m. Time Concrete was Placed 9:22a. m. 9:26a.m. 10:18a.m. 10:22a.m. 10:28a.m. 11:34a.m. 4:57p.m. 5:09p.m 5:24p.m. *Elevation was provided by others. REPORT OF DRILLED BELLED PIERS ENG--, ]NC 8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 Project: Sales Office & Warehouse Fac. Report No.: 940] ]204.004! Coppell, Texas Date of Service: Project No.: 94011204 Technician: M. Garcifl Drmer: Auger Drilling Page: 2of2 Pier Identification .8N6.9 .6A/6.6 ,5N6.5 .8A/5.9 .0A/5.3 N1.9 N2.1 Pier Diameter (in.) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Bell Diameter (in.) 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 *Top of Pier Elevation (fi) 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 94.0 94.0 94,0 Req. Depth from Exist. Grade (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 Initial Depth of Pier from Existing Grade (fi) 16.0 15.0 16.0 15.0 15.0 15,4 14.0 Final Depth of Pier from' Existing' Grade (fi) 16.0 15.0 16.0 15.0 15.0 , ,, 15.4 14.0 Depth from Top of Concrete (ft) 14,8 13.5 15.3 14.7 15.0 13.6 14.0 Condition of Bottom (wet or dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes or no) No No No No No No No Casing Diameter (in) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cased Depth (fi) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Number of Vertical Bars (ea.) 5 ,, 5 5 5 5 5 5 Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 .... Length of Vertical Bars (ft.) 14.3 13.9 14.5 14.5 14.2 13.3 13.0 Time Drilling was Completed 10:45 a,m. 10:57 a.m. 11:04 a.m. 10:36 a.m. 10:25 a.m. 11:20 a.m. 11:28 a.m. ,,. Time Concrete was Placed 11:33a.m. 11:38a.m. 11:40a.m, 11:44a.m. 11:47a.m. 3:59p. m. 3:57p.m. *Elevation was provided by others. REPORT OF DRILLED BELLED PIER INSPECTION ENIGIN EERII~G, INC. 8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100 Report Number: 94011204.0037 Dallas, Texas 75247 Service Date: October 1,2001 (214) 63o-1010 Client: TNA Nodh American, Inc. Report Date: October 11,2001 Attn: Terry Raley Project: Sales Office & Warehouse Fac. 1321 Valwood Parkway, Suite 440 Coppell, Texas Carrollton TX 75006 Project Number: 94011204 Services: Drilled belled pier inspection. On this date, an HBC Engineering technician arrived at the above referenced jobsite as scheduled for drilled belled pier inspection. See the attached sheet(s) for recorded data. Technician: Marlo Garcia /.~l/~~ng, Inc. Report Distribution: (1) TNA North American, Inc. (1) FACServices Inc (1) Carrell Poole & Yost Architecture (1) David Kent Reviewed by: _ (1) R L Goodson Consulting Engineers (1) City of Coppell - Bldg Insp Eric J. Cleveland, P.E. (1) Pacific Builders Inc (1) City of Coppell - Constr Insp Senior Project Engineer The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 1 of 1 g~so~-,~ REPORT OF DRILLED BELLED PIERS ENGINEERII~, 1NC. 8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 Project: Sales Office & Warehouse Fac. Report No.: 94011204.0037 Coppell, Texas Date of Service: 10/01/01 ProlectNo.: 94011204 Technician: M. Garcia Driller: Auger Drilling page: 1 of 3 Pier Identification C.2/6 C.4/6 C.7/6 C.9/6 C/6.2 C/6.5 C/6.8 B/7.1 B.2/7.1 B.6/7 Pier Diameter (in.) 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 Bell Diameter (in.) 36 48 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 *Top of Pier Elevation (ft) 97.4 97.4 97.4 97.4 97.4 95.0 95.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 Req, Depth from Exist. Grade (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 Initial Depth of Pier from Existing Grade (ft) 16.0 15.5 15.1 15.0 15.5 15.9 16,1 16.7 16.5 16.4 Final Depth of Pier from Existing Grade (ft) 15.5 15.2 15.8 15.3 15.0 15.6 15.9 16.3 16.1 16.0 Depth from Top of Concrete (ft) 14.5 14.2 14.8 14.3 14.0 14.6 14.9 15.7 15.5 15.0 Condition of Bottom (wet or dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes or no) No No No No No No No No No No Casing Diameter (in) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cased Depth (ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Number of Vertical Bars (ea.) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Length of Vertical Bars (ft.) 15.9 14.6 14.7 14.4 14.8 13.1 13.0 15.8 15.8 15.7 Time Drilling was Completed 8:15 a.m. 8:58 a.m. 7:42 a.m. 7:56 a.m. 9:18 a.m. 9:33 a.m. 9:48 a.m. 10:14 a.m. 10:48 a.m. 10:35 a.m. Time Concrete was Placed 9:13a.m. 9:23a.m. 9:04a.m. 9:02a.m. 9:28a.m. 9:40a.m. 9:57a.m. 11:08a,m. 11:16a.m. 11:03a.m. *Elevation was provided by others. REPORT OF DRILLED BELLED PIERS ENGINEERII~, INC. 8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #10~ Dallas, Texas 75247 Project: Sales Office & Warehouse Fac. Report No.: 940! 1204.0037 Coppe]l, Texas Date of Service: 10/01/01 Project No.: 94011204 Technician: M. Garcia Driller: Auger Drilling Page: 2 of 3 Pier Identification B. 1/7 A.5/7 C.3/7 A/7 B.2/7 C/7 C.6/7 D/4 D/4.4 D/4.9 D/5.4 Pier Diameter (in.) 24 24 24 30 30 30 30 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in.) 66 60 66 60 60 60 60 60 66 66 66 *Top of Pier Elevation (ft) 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 Re(]. Depth from Exist. Grade (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 Initial Depth of Pier from Existing Grade (fi) 15.9 15.5 16.0 15.5 15.9 16.0 15.8 16.4 16.7 16.0 16.3 Final Depth of Pier from Existing Grade (ft) 15.4 15.5 16.0 15.3 15.7 16.0 15.6 16.0 16.4 15.8 16.3 Depth from Top of Concrete (ft) 14.8 15.1 14.0 15.3 15.3 15.0 14.6 15.0 15.4 14.8 15.6 Condition of Bottom (wet or dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes or no) No No No No No No No No No No No Casing Diameter (in) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cased Depth (ft) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Number of Vertical Bars (ea.) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 Length of Vertical Bars (ft.) 15.0 14.8 15.4 15.0 14.6 14.8 14.8 15.3 14.8 14.8 14.8 Time Drilling was Completed 11:13a.m. 11:30a.m. 1:30p.m. 11:59a.m. 12:25p.m. 12:05p.m. 11:43a.rn. 1:49p.m. 2:15p.m. 2:40p.m. 3:05p.m. Time Concrete was Placed 11:22 a.m. 2:38 p.m. 1:58p.m. 2:42 p.m. 2:30 p.m. 1:47 p.m. 1:53 p.m. 3:34 p.m. 3:37 p.m. 3:41 p.m. 4:09 p.m. *Elevation was provided by others. REPORT OF DRILLED BELLED PIERS .i. J-~ ENGINEERING, INC. 8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 Project: Sales Office & Warehouse Fac. Report No.: 94011204.0037 Coppell, Texas Dateof Service: 10/01/01 Project No.: 94011204 Technician: M. Garcia Driller: Auger Drilling Page: 3 of 3 Pier Identification C.2/6.2 C.2/6.4 C.6/6.6 Pier Diameter (in.) 18 18 18 Bell Diameter (in.) 48 36 48 *Top of Pier Elevation (ft) 97.4 93.0 95.0 Req. Depth from Exist. Grade (ft) 15.0 15.0 15.0 Initial Depth of Pier from Existing Grade (fi) 15.5 15.6 15.9 Final Depth of Pier from Existing Grade (ft) 15.4 15.6 15.7 ,,. Depth from Top of Concrete (ft) 14.4 14.6 14.7 Condition of Bottom (wet or dry) Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes or no) No No No Casing Diameter (in) N/A N/A N/A Cased Depth (ft) N/A N/A N/A Number of Vertical Bars (ea.) 5 5 5 Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6 6 6 Length of Vertical Bars (ft.) 15.3 10.9 14.8 Time Drilling was Completed 2:48 p.m. 2:25 p.m. 2:14 p.m. Time Concrete was Placed 4:23 p.m. 4:18 p.m. 4:15 p.m. *Elevation was provided by others. CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST 8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100 Report Number: 94011204.0028 Dallas, Texas 75247 Service Date: September 12, 2001 (214) 630-1OLO Client: TNA North American, Inc. Report Date: October 11,2001 Attn: Terry Raley Project: Sales Office & Warehouse Fac. 1321 Valwood Parkway, Suite 440 Coppell, Texas Carrollton TX 75006 Project Number: 94011204 Material Information Sample Information Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 Days Sample Time: 2:00pm Date Cast: September 12, 2001 Technician: Terry L. Smith Batch Time: Plant: 1 Weather Conditions: Warm, cloudy Supplier: Redi-Mix Accumulative Yards: 5 Truck No: 273 Ticket No: 10817 Placement Method: Direct discharge Mix I.D. No.: 722 Sample Locations: Sta. 0+36.1 Placement Location: Sewer, Manholes, Sra. 3+39, Sra. 0+32.1, Sra. 0+00, Sra. 0+36.1 Field Test Data Test Result Specification Test Method Slump, inches: 5.50 3-5 ASTM C-143 Air Content, %: Concrete Temperature, o F: 95 ASTM C1064 Ambient Temperature, o F: 85 ASTM C-1064 Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: Laboratory Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (lbs) (psi) 1 1 6.00 28.27 09/19/2001 7 83,240 2,940 1 2 6.00 28.27 09/19/2001 7 81,440 2,880 Ave rage 2,9'10 I 3 6.00 28.27 10/10/2001 28 109,790 3,880 1 4 6.00 28.27 10/10/2001 28 110,630 3,910 Average 3,900 Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive strength samples. Report Distribution: c. (1) TNA North American, Inc. (1) FACServices Inc (1) Carrell Poole & Yost Architecture (1) David Kent Reviewed by: (1) R L Goodson Consulting Engineers (1) City of Coppell- Bldg Insp Edc J. Cleveland, P.E. (1) Pacific Builders Inc (1) City of Coppell- Constr Insp Senior Project Engineer The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 1 of 1 O,-LLW,~.K.y