Villages of CC 6-CS 940915 CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE: VILLAGE OF COTTONWOOD CREEK,
SECTION VI, REPLAT
P & Z HEARING DATE: September 15, 1994
C. C. HEARING DATE: October 11, 1994
LOCATION: East of Coppell Road, north of Parkway Blvd.
SIZE OF AREA: 62.45 acres for 188 single-family lots
CURRENT
ZONING: SF-7
REQUEST: Replat approval of a 188 lot subdivision
APPLICANT: Jim Sowell Company Tipton Engineering, Inc.
3131 McKinney, //200 6330 Beltline Rd., #C
Dallas, TX 75204 Garland, TX 75043
(214) 871-3320 (214) 226-2967
HISTORY: This property was recently zoned from MF-1 and MF-2 to
SF-9. On June 28, 1994 the Coppell City Council rezoned the
property to SF-7.
TRANSPORTATION: Coppell Road is a C2U with 60 feet of r.o.w, currently
unimproved; Parkway Blvd. is an existing four-lane divided
(C4D) thoroughfare.
Item 8
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North - Vacant; SF-7 and MF-2 zoning
South - Existing single-family; Planned Development SF-7 & 9
East Vacant; SF-7 zoning
West - Vacant; HC & LI zoning
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Plan showed this area to be utilized for high density
(apartments) and flood plain; however, the Planning
Commission has recently determined that single-family is
the best use for this land.
ANALYSIS: Staff supports the request to subdivide this property in a configuration
which tracks with the recent Commission and Council recommendation
to rezone the property to single-family uses, there are a number issues
the applicant needs to address. For example:
-An off site easement will be required for the discharge of your
drainage improvements to Lot 13.
-Some type of slope easement will be required adjacent to Lots
~ 13 through 58.
~ -Escrow will be required for Coppell Road.
-All existing easements, along with the volume and page number
~=z' should be shown on the face of the plat.
-Provide the proposed centerline radius of your sanitary
sewer plan and insure that they meet our SubDiv. Regs.
-The 90~ RCP does not have the capacity to convey the 100
storm runoff. Therefore, the applicant should be evaluating
ways to provide positive overflow through this subdivision. This
will be addressed during the construction plan review.
-additional comments included in Engineering attachment (nos.
~,,~,, and 9)
-street names need to be changed (Layton for Wrotham, for
example)
Assuming the applicant can address to staff's satisfaction these issues,
we would recommend approval of the preliminary plat.
ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve the Replat 2) Deny the Replat
3) Modify the Replat
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Replat
2) landscaping plans
3) Departmental comments