Waterside P2-AG 920414 AGENDA REQUEST FORM
CITY CO~L ~S~NG April 14,
Consideration of a request to delay the payment of $6 ~
of the development fees associated with Waterside --- ~
exceed one year.
EVALUATION OF ITEM:
DATE: April 6, 1992
The City has received a request from William Anderson with Dan Dowdey &
Associates to delay the payment of a portion of the development fees for
Waterside Estates No. 2. This request is based on the fact that the
development is being built in two phases, even though the entire property
was platted at one time. Typically, fees are required to be paid when the
property is platted. If the delay is approved, the payment of
approximately 51% of the required fees will be delayed until Phase II
develops. This is based on the fact that only 64 out of 132 lots are
included in Phase I. The 51% works out to a delay in payment of
$65,589.23 plus the street light assessment and the 2% inspection fee.
The fee to be paid for Phase I is $61,662.00 plus the street light
assessment and the 2% inspection fee.
The concept of phasing has been used on other projects in the past. Most
recently, the Devonshire Addition phased their construction even though
the entire area was platted at one time. In the case of the Devonshire
Addition, all the fees were paid when the property was platted not when
the property developed.
Staff will be available to answer any questions at the Council meeting.
BUDGET AMT.
AMT +/- BUDGET
COMMENTS;
AMT. ESTIMATED
FINANCIAL REVIEW BY
LEGAL REVIEW BY:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM REVISED 1/91
J{..~v.' 4-24-~{M ~. PORT DOCUMENTATION FOR AGENDA
STAMP R'ECEIVED BY CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE:
SUPFORT D~TATION SUBMITTED WITtt AGENDA ITEM:
MEbtOS~ORTS/BILLS/MINUTES:
CONTt~CT/AGREEMENT ................. :
C I P CONTRACT :
CHANGE ORDERS .......................
NO. OF ORIGINALS REqUIR~,D
1 each ~
3 originals for signaturebxjk~az~
6 originals for mignatnre
3 originals for signature
ORDINANCE ........................... :
CAPTION ............................. :
RESOLUTION .......................... :
PROCLAMATION ........................ :
1 blueback for signature + 3 copies
1 blueback for signature + 3 copies
2 bluebacks for signature + 1 copy
2 bluebacks for signature + 1 copy
i each
LOCATION MAPS ....................... :
ZONING PLANS ........................ :
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLATS ............. :
SITE PLANS .......................... :
LANDSCAPE PLANS ..................... :
ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS ............ :
12
12
12
12
12
12
DATE PUBLISHED IN THE CITIZENS~ADVOCATE:
NOTIFICATION TO:
DATE/METtIOD OF CONTACT:
NO%ES
2NI) SItEET.0588DS
CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION FOR AGENDA ITEM
I. Item #22
City Council Agenda Dated: 4/14/92
II. Comments/Recommendation-
We wish to express our opposition to the request by the
developers of Waterside Estates to delay the payment of
approximately 50% of assessments until Phase II is ready for
development. We are concerned as to the precedents that
might be established.
Mr. Gary Seib
Planning Director
City of Coppell
255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas 75019
DAN M. DOWDEY AND ASSOCIATES, ~C.
CIVIL ENGINEERS
16250 DALLAS PARKWAY SUITE 100
DALLAS, TEXAS 75248
(214) 931-0694 FAX (214) 931-9538
March 31, 1992
Re: Waterside Estates No. 2
Fee Schedule
We have received the fee schedule for Waterside Estates Phase
Two. As you know, we are proposing to construct the project
in two phases. Due to the complex utility construction, i.e.
shallow sanitary sewer main and the existing lake areas, we
designed the entire 132 lot plans and prepared the final plat.
We are requesting that the City Council allow us to pay for
construction related fees when phase two is developed since
street lights, water meters, street signs, etc. are not
anticipated to be needed currently.
Attached is a revised fee schedule that we respectfully request
be honored.
I appreciate your help in this matter and would like to be on
the April 14, 1992 City Council Agenda regarding this matter.
Very truly yours,
William A. Anderson, P.E.
WAA:hc
Enc.
!
2
8
g'
10
12
4
6~
To APP.,
3o!
35I ~'
36
7
C WILSON JONES COMPANY
ilIr FINAL PLAT FOR LllAL,
DIMENIIONI OF EACH LOT
'OONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN
WATERSIDE ESTATES NO. 2
LOTS OWNER
ST&NDARD PACIFIC OF TEXAS)L.P.
April 6, 1992
Mr. Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E.
City of Coppell
Engineering Department
P.O. Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019
RE:
Waterside Estates No. II
Development Fee Assessment
Dear Mr. Griffin:
As requested by your letter on January 27, 1992, the fees for Waterside Estates are due at the
time of final plat approval. We have sent a request to ask the City of Coppell City Council to
allow us to pay only the fees associated with Phase One construction. T/fs
rhis council meeting is scheduled for April 14, 1992.
We will pay Phase One fees at this time to complete the requirements for approval of the
construction plans. If the City Council denies our request we agree to pay the remaining fees,
which relate to Phase Two as stated in your letter. We will submit a check no later than April
16, 1992, to the City of Coppell for those remaining fees.
Sincerely,
Michael W. Brady
President
Standard Pacific of Dallas
CC:
Michael Dowdey
Dan M. Dowdey & Associates, Inc.
q-32q MA(;AICI'tt[-t{ I3I,VD . S1 ITE q~(~. IR\'IN(;, TX --5~)38 ~21 t) 5~,() (I.-~20 FAX: (21~) 550:'89l
Councilman Morton moved to approve Item 20 as submitted with two
conditions as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Councilman Cowman seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0 with
Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas, Morton,
Cowman and Robertson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 21
Consideration of a request to delay the payment of
$65,589.23, which is a portion of the development fees
associated with Waterside Estates II for a period not to
exceed one year.
Councilman Cowman moved to deny the delay of payment of $65,589.23.
Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon seconded the motion. The motion carried
6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas,
Morton, Cowman and Robertson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 22 Status report regarding Paragon Cable, presented by
Chairman of the Cable Committee, Mayor Pro Tem
Smothermon.
Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon addressed the Council and recognized Bill
Coppola, a Coppell citizen, who served on the Cable Committee.
Following discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon requested Council
consensus to use information provided by the Cable Committee as a
basis to go to Paragon Cable with in renegotiating their contract.
Council consensus was to proceed as requested by Mayor Pro Tem
Smothermon. Councilman Cowman stated he was in favor of a three-
year or five-year contract in lieu of a 15-year contract.
Councilman Cowman also stated his concern of Paragon Cable wanting
to delete a channel and to raise their rates. No action on this
item was required at this time.
Item 23
Consider approval of an expenditure in the amount of $160
to Beachler Enterprises for the purchase of twenty "Keys
to the City" - requested by Mayor Wolfe
Mayor Wolfe stated that he desires keys to be presented to various
individuals, groups, or organizations as the appropriate occasion
occurs. Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon moved to approve Item 23 as
submitted. Councilman Cowman seconded the motion. The motion
carried 6-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver,
Thomas, Morton, Cowman and Robertson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 24 Mayor's Report
ao
Mayor Wolfe announced that the Woman of the Year application
deadline is May 1, 1992, and appointment is May 5, 1992.
Mayor Wolfe announced there will be a special-called Council
meeting on May 5, 1992 to canvass returns of election.
Discussion on the permit application on the Carrollton
landfill will be presented in the spring of 1993 to the Water
Commission.
Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon will replace Councilman Cowman as the
Red Ribbon Campaign representative.
Mayor Wolfe complimented staff in regard to the two new fire
captains.
Councilman Robertson explained the YMCA did open on April 6,
1992, and that there will be a grand opening on April 25,
1992. The YMCA requested to have a campfire for the opening
and to have the $50 fee for a burn permit be waived. Council
consensus was to waive the fee.
Councilman Robertson stated he had a concern on zoning issues,
and that recently there are only four members present instead
of the seven members of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
He would like to see full participation on this board.
CM041492
Page 6 of 9
Date~19~~
Received From ~ ~'~ '~ ·
Address~
__Dollars