Loading...
Wynnpage Plaza-CS011018October 18, 2001 Marc O. Bentley, P.E. Bentley Engineering 702 Gatewood Drive Garland, TX 75043 RE: Wynnpage Plaza South, Lot 1, Block A Construction Plan Review Comments Dear Mr. Bentley: The City of Coppell has reviewed the referenced plans and has the following comments to offer: Sheet A1 - 1. There is a note on the plans stating "onsite fire hydrant to be provided as required." Has the Fire Marshal commented on the need for an onsite fire hydrant? If so, it should be shown on the plans and constructed with this development. If an onsite fire hydrant is not required, then the note should be removed fi.om the plans. 2. Please show the visibility triangle for the fire lane access to Wynnpage Drive to insure there is no conflict with the existing wall. Sheet C1 - 1. Please provide ground elevation information offsite to the south to insure water will flow to the south. You are also showing what appears to be a concentration of water to the south. Will there be any required offsite grading to insure water will drain away fi.om the site? If so, a permission letter will be required from the property owner to the south. Sheet C2 - I. A profile view should be provided for the proposed inlet and storm drain system connecting to the existing 21" RCP. Sheet C3 - 1. Easements should be provided for the proposed fire hydrant on the north side of the fire lane and also for the proposed 8" sanitary sewer along the west side of the property. 2. Would it not be prudent to construct the sanitary sewer service line for the proposed leave- out tract at the comer of Wynnpage Drive and Denton Tap Road? If that service is constructed in the future, it will necessitate boring the fire lane and cutting into the pipe system for a manhole connection. Please reconsider this. 255 PARKWAY dr P O.BOX 479 dr COPPE:LL TX 75019 dr TEL 972/462 0022 dr FAX 9721304 3673 3. There should only be one tap to the existing 8" water line for the irrigation and domestic meter. Once the tap is made, you should tee off of it for the irrigation meter. It may necessitate a larger tap than the 1-½ inch as proposed. There are other minor comments throughout the plans that should also be addressed prior to the re-submittal. Once all comments have been addressed, please m-submit these marked-up plans and two sets of revised plans to the City for review. If you have any questions, please contact this office at your conven/ence. Sincerely, Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E. Director of Engineering & Public Works