ST9301-CS020124~e~n Gnffin - RE: Iow point inlet
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Ken Griffin
Alleg ro5:"Debbie. Kiger@jacobs.com"@Alleg ro5.h ub 05
1/24/02 5:48PM
RE: Iow point inlet
Debbie
Keeping the Iow point in its same location and grading the paving is not acceptable. That always results in
a "birdbath" in the paving. The inlet must be moved. We do not use grate inlets in the road, especially
when we can redesign now to avoid it.
As to the point about compensation, we are not directing or paying for any changes. All changes are at
the direction of the developer to the south and any additional cost should be paid by the developer.
I do not know what financial arrangements you worked out with the developer but, again, all changes are
at his costs.
ken griffin
>>> "Kiger, Debbie" <Debbie. Kiger@jacobs.com> 01/24/02 02:18PM >>>
Ken,
After reading point ¢f-4 from your 1/22/02 letter regarding the new Trinity
Shores Development revisions to Sandy Lake Rd, we have the following
comment.
* It was our intention to keep the Iow point in the same location on
the profile and have the contractor grade the pavement area to drain into
the inlet.
* A second option is to keep the Iow point and inlet in the same
location but utilize a grate inlet instead of a curb inlet.
* The option that you mentioned in your letter, moving the curb inlet
and revising the Sandy Lake Rd profile to move the Iow point, is much more
time consuming and we would require additional compensation for this work.
Please review this issue and advise which option is the acceptable
alternative.
Thank you for your help,
Debbie Kiger
NOTICE - This message may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the
intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the
message and deleting it from your computer.