ST0001-CS020104 (4)Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
Consultants m Landscape Architecture · Engineering ° Planning
January4,2002
Ms. Suzan Taylor
City of Coppell
Engineering Dept.
P.O. Box 476
Coppell, Texas 75019
Viclor W. Baxter, ASLA
Kent E Besley, ASIA
Joseph E Bradley, PE
lerrv T Cheek, ASLA
Terry E. Cullender
Daniel B. [lartman, PE
Delherl W. Hirst, ASLA
5antord P [aHue, Jr, PE
Hershel R. Lindly, APA
David K McCaskil[, ASLA
Robert M. Otey, PE
Albert W Rollins, PE
Christian Schnitger, PE
Gene S(hrickt'[, FASLA
Suzanne C. Sweek, ASLA
RE: Creekview Drive and Freeport Parkway
SRA has reviewed the Contractors revised price submittal (2-2-02) for the 800 LF of
pipe/cable fence along State Road. The costs showr~ for the removal, reconstruction
and painting of the pipe/cable fence ($16/LF) appear to be in line with current market
prices. 3'his linear foot cost does not include 15% overhead and profit.
I am also enclosing in this letter a copy of the latest comments from the Texas
Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) for you files. A copy of these
comments was faxed to ISI on January 3~.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to give
me a call.
Yours truly,
SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Schnitger, P.E.
CS/cs/4~ 26
H :\J ob\4126\Corresp\Letter\Taylor. 1.04.02 .doc
11~1 Corporat~ Drive\~,est Suite200 Arlingt0n, Texas,6006 · f817)64q~216Melro(817)6408212'FAX{817)6497645
Schrickel, Rollins and Associates, Inc.
Consuhants in Landscape Architecture · Engineering · Planning
January 4, 2002
Mr. Philip Bennett
Infrastructure Services Inc.
P.O. Box 496448
Garland, Texas 75049
V~ctor W. Baxter, ASLA
Kent £. Besiey, ASLA
Joseph E. Bradley, PE
Terry T. Cheek, ASLA
Terry E, Cullender
Dino l, Ferralli, PE
Daniel B. Hartman, PE
Delbert W. Hirst, ASLA
Saniord P. LaHue, Jr., PE
Hershel R. Lindly, APA
David K. McCaskill, ASLA
Robert M. Otey, PE
Albert W. Rollins, PE
Christian Schnitger, PE
Gene Schdckel, FASLA
Suzanne C, Sweek, ASLA
RE: Creekview Drive and Freeport Parkway
SRA has reviewed the revised price submittal (2-2-02) for the 800 LF of pipe/cable
fence along State Road. The costs shown for the removal, reconstruction and painting
of the pipe/cable fence ($16/LF) appear to be in line with current market prices, fi.his
linear foot cost does not include 15% overhead and profit.)
On behalf of the City this letter will also serve notice that Lighting Improvement Bid
Items 603 & 604 (single and double arm luminairs) are being removed from the
contract and will be installed by TXU through a contract with the City.
Both the fence and the lighting issues will be addressed in Change Order No. 1. If you
should have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to give me a
call.
Yours truly,
SCHRICKEL, ROLLINS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chris Schnitger, P.E.
CS/cs/4~2o
CC: Suzan Taylor - City of Coppell
H:\Job\4126\Corresp\Letter\Ben nett. 1.04.02.doc
1161 Corporate Drive West · Suite 200 · Arlington, Texas 76006 · (817) 649-3216 Metro (8! 7) 640~212/FAX (817) 649-7645
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION
Code Review and Inspections/ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS
O. Box 12157 Austin, Texas 78711 (512)463-3211 (877)278-0999 FAX(512)475-2886
ail Address: architecturaLbarrlers~licens&stat~aas Internet Address: www. licens~stat~tx, us
CHRIS SCHNITGER
SCHRICKEL ROLLINS & ASSOC INC
1161 CORPORATE DR W #200
ARLINGTON, TX 76006
DEC-07-2001
Re: CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
ROYAL LN TO STATE RD
COPPELL, TX 75019
EABPRJA1009988
REVISION CORRESPONDENCE DATED 11/6/01 RECEIVED 11/12/01
REVISION DISAPPROVAL
Dear MR. SCHNITGER
The referenced material has been reviewed with respect to the
provisions of Article 9102, Texas Civil Statutes.
The information contained in the transmittal does not adequately
address all deficiencies cited in our review of the construction
documents. Refer to the enclosed report. Although unacceptable items
are still appearing on the report, the referenced project may be
eligible for inspection approval if constructed in accordance with the
Texas Accessibility Standards. Items which are the responsibility of
the owner should be referred to the appropriate person for action.
The building or facility owner must request an inspection from the
Department (or a Department authorized provider of inspection
services) no later than thirty (30) days after the completion of
construction. If the completion date stated on the Project
Registration Form is no longer correct, notify this office (in
writing) of the revised completion date, as soon as possible.
Please reference the Department assigned project number in all future
correspondence pertaining to this project. Questions concerning this
matter should be directed to NANCY L. FOSTER
at (512)463-3211.
ENCLOSURE
:NLF
Austin Headquarters: E.O. Thompson State -Office Building · 920 Colorado · Austin, Te_r_q~_ 78701
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW WORKSHEET
Article 9102, T.C.S.
PROJECT NO.: EABPRJA1009988
REVIEW : EAB2002050372R
REVISION OF: EAB2002049538R
PAGE: 1
PROJECT:
FACILITY:
OWNER:
ARCHITECT:
REVIEWER:
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT pARKWAY
CITY OF COPPELL
SCHRICKEL ROLLINS & ASSOC INC
FOSTER, NANCY L.
DATE: 12/06/01
UNACCEPTABLE
4 ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS AArD SPACES: TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW MUNICIPAL SIDEWALKS AND CURB RAMPS
PROJECT APPLICATION: 4.1.2 ACCESSIBLE SITES ~ EXTERIOR FACILITIES:
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ITEMS NOTED AS "UNACCEPTABLE", WHICH ARE BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER/BUILDER, SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO THE OWNER/TENANT
FOR ACTION.
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CANNOT BE CONSIDERED APPROVED UNTIL ALL
"UNACCEPTABLE" ITEMS ARE RESOLVED.
======================================================================
THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS ARE BASED ON CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED 11/12/01.
COMPLIA/~CE WITH TAS WILL BE DETERMINED UPON INSPECTION.
======================================================================
4.3 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
(2) Connecting Routes
**NOTE: PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE SIDEWALK CONNECTS IN AN ACCESSIBLE
MANNER TO THE EXISTING ROUTE AT STA. -0+09.59 CREEKVIEW DRIVE
AArD AT WHAT APPEARS TO BE A FUTURE CONNECTION AT STA. 36.03.22
AT FREEPORT PARKWAY. (REFER TO SHEETS 2 AND 8.)
**COMPLIANCE REQUIRED**
REVISION RESPONSE
pLANs ~ SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW WORKSHEET
Article 9102, T.C.S.
PROJECT NO.: EABPRJA1009988
REVIEW : EAB2002050372R
REVISION OF: EAB2002049538R
PAGE: 2
PROJECT:
FACILITY:
REVIEWER:
CREEk"VIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
FOSTER, NANCY L.
DATE: 12/06/01
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED 11/12/01 DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.
4.3.5 Head Room
Accessible routes shall comply with 4.4.2.
**NOTE: PLEASE REFER TO THE COGENT UNDER 4.4.2 REGARDING ITEMS THAT
MIGHT INFRINGE ON THE REQUIRED 80" ABOVE THE SIDEWALK.
REVISION RESPONSE
CORRESPONDENCE RECEII~D 11/12/01 DOES NOT ADDRESS THIE ISSUE.
4.3.6 Surface Textures
The surface of an accessible route shall comply with 4.5.
**NOTE: PLEASE ENSURE THAT TEE SURFACE SHALL BE SLIP-RESISTANT (PLEASE
REFER TO 4.5).
**COMPLIANCE REQUIRED**
4.3.7 Slope
An accessible route with a running slope greater than 1:20 is a ramp
and shall comply with 4.8. Nowhere shall the cross slope of an
accessible route exceed 1:50.
**NOTE: PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE SIDEWALK COMPLIES WITH THE SLOPE
REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE RAIL SECTION
ALONG CREEKVIEW DRIVE AND THE CROSSWALK ALONG FREEPORT
PARKWAY AT THE ENTRANCE TO WAGON WHEEL PARK.
THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS ARE BASED ON CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED 11/12/01.
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED STATES THAT THIS ITEM COMPLIES WITH TAS.
4.4 PROTRUDING OBJECTS
4.4.1 General
Objects projecting from walls (for exa~le, telephones) with their
leading edges between 27 in and 80 in (685 mm and 2030 mm) above the
PI~S AN-D SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW WORKSHEET
Article 9102, T.C.S.
PROJECT NO.: EABPRJA1009988
REVIEW : EAB2002050372R
REVISION OF: EAB2002049538R
PAGE: 3
PROJECT:
FACILITY:
REVIEWER:
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
CREEK'VIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
FOSTER, NANCY L.
DATE: 12/06/01
UNACCEPTARLE
finished floor shall protrude no more than 4 in (100 mm) into walks,
halls, corridors, passageways, or aisles (see Fig. 8(a)). Objects
mounted with their leading edges at or below 27 in (685 mm) above the
finished floor may protrude any amount (see Fig. 8(a) and 8(b)).
Free-standing objects mounted on posts or pylons may overhang 12 in
(305 mm) maximum from 27 in to 80 in (685 m~ to 2030 mm) above the
ground or finished floor (see Fig. 8(c) and 8(d)). Protruding objects
shall not reduce the clear width of an accessible route or maneuvering
space (see Fig. 8(e)).
**NOTE: THIS REVIEWER DID NOT FIND ANY PROTRUDING OBJECTS ALONG THE
ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. PLEASE ENSURE THERE ARE NO ITEMS WHICH
FUNCTION AS PROTRUDING OBJECTS ALONG THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE.
4.4.2 Head Room
**NOTE: THIS REVIEWER DID NOT FIND ~ TREES OR OTHER OBJECTS WHICH
INTRUDE ON THE REQUIRED 80" HEAD ROOM. PLEASE ENSURE THERE
ARE NO OBJECTS WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE REQUIRED HEAD ROOM.
4.5 GROUND AND FLOOR SURFACES
4.5.1 General
Ground and floor surfaces along accessible routes and in accessible
rooms and spaces including floors, walks, ramps, stairs, and curb
ramps, shall be stable, firm, slip-resistant, and shall comply with
4.5. Soft or loose materials such as sand, gravel, bark, mulch or
wood chips are not suitable. Cobblestone and other irregular surfaces
having a texture that constitutes an obstacle or hazard, such as
improperly laid flagstone, shall not be a part of accessible routes,
spaces and elements.
**NOTE: INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE CROSS WALKS' AND SIDE
WALKS' SURFACES. PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH 4.5.1.
**COMPLIANCE REQUIRED**
REVISION RESPONSE
THIS REVIEWER NOTES THE SPECIFICATION FOR PAVESTONE'S "UNI-COR" A/gD
"HOLLAND" PAVERS. PLEASE ENSURE THE PAVERS ARE PROPERLY INSTALLED.
COMPLIANCE WITH TAS WILL BE DETERMINED ON INSPECTION. PLEASE REFER
TO 4.5.2.
======================================================================
4.5.2 Changes in Level
pLA~S ~ SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW WORKSHEET
Article 9102, T.C.S.
PROJECT NO.: EABPRJA1009988
REVIEW : EAB2002050372R
REVISION OF: EAB2002049538R
PAGE: 4
PROJECT:
FACILITY:
REVIEWER:
CREEk'VIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
FOSTER, NANCY L.
DATE: 12/06/01
UNACCEPTABLE
Changes in level up to 1/4 in (6 mm) may be vertical and without edge
treatment (see Fig. 7(c)). Changes in level between 1/4 in and 1/2 in
(6 mm and 13 mm) shall be beveled with a slope no greater than 1:2
(see Fig. 7(d)). Changes in level greater than 1/2 in (13 mm) shall
be accomplished by means of a ramp that complies with 4.7 or 4.8.
**NOTE: INSUFFICIENT INFOPJ~ATION REGARDING THE JUNCTIONS OF SURFACES
AT THE CURB ~%MPS, AND AT OLD AND NEW SIDEWALK SEGMENTS.
PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH 4.5.2.
**COMPLIANCE REQUIRED**
REVISION RESPONSE
THERE IS NO INFORMATION IN THE SUBMISSION RECEIVED 11/12/01 REGARDING
THE LEVEL CHANGES AT THE ISLAND IN THE CROSSWALK. PLEASE ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH 4.5.2. PLEASE ALSO REFER TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR
FLUSH 0~/NCTIONS IN 4.7.2.
4.6 PARKING ~ PASSENGER LOADING ZONES
4.7 C~I~B RAMPS
4.7.2 Slope
Slopes of curb ramps shall comply with 4.8.2. The slope shall be
measured as shown in Fig. 11. Transitions from ramps to walks,
gutters, or streets shall be flush and free of abrupt changes. Maximum
slopes of adjoining gutters, road surface immediately adjacent to the
curb ramp, or accessible route shall not exceed 1:20.
**NOTE: INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE SIDE WALK ADJOINING THE
CI/RB P~AMPS, AND THE ROAD SURFACE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE
CURB RAMPS {SEE SHEET 22). ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH 4.7.2.
THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS ARE BASED ON CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED 11/12/01.
COMPLIANCE WITH TAS WILL BE DETERMINED UPON INSPECTION.
(1) Texture
Textures shall consist of exposed crushed stone aggregate, roughened
concrete, rubber, raised abrasive strips, or grooves extending the
full width and depth of the curb ramp. Surfaces that are raised,
etched, or grooved in a way that would allow water to accumulate are
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW WORKSHEET
Article 9102, T.C.S.
PROJECT NO.: EABPRJA1009988
REVIEW : EAB2002050372R
REVISION OF: EAB2002049538R
PAGE: 5
PROJECT:
FACILITY:
REVIEWER:
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
FOSTER, NANCY L.
DATE: 12/06/01
prohibited.
**NOTE: INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION REGARDING T~E CUI~B P, AMP AND CROSS
WALK TEXTLrRES. pLEASE ENSLrRE COMPLIANCE WITH 4.7.4(1).
**COMPLIANCE REQUIRED**
REVISION RESPONSE
THERE IS INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON THE TEXTURE OF THE CURB RAMPS IN
THE "BARRIER FREE RAMP DETAILS" ON SHEET SDT.
(2) Contrast
For purposes of warning, the full width and depth of curb ramps shall
have a light reflective value and texture that significantly contrasts
with that of adjoinin~ pedestrian routes.
**NOTE: INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION REGARDING THE REQUIRED LIGHT
REFLECTIVE VALUE AND SIGNIFICANTLY CONTRASTING TEXTURE OF THE
PROPOSED CURB RAMP. PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH 4.7.4(2).
**COMPLIANCE REQUIRED**
REVISION RESPONSE
T~rERE IS INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON T~E LIGHT RELECTIVE VALUE AND
CONTR3%STING TEXT%TRE FOR THE "BARRIER FREE R3%MP DETAIL" ON SHEET SDT.
4.7.9 Location at Marked Crossings
Curb ramps at marked crossings shall be wholly contained within the
markings, excludin~ any flared sides (see Fi~. 15).
**NOTE: IF THERE ARE MARKED CROSSINGS, THE CURB RAMPS AT THOSE
CROSSINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH 4.7.9.
**COMPLIANCE REQUIRED**
REVISION RESPONSE
THERE IS INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO DETERMINE IF THE CROSSINGS ARE
MARKED.
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW WORKSHEET
Article 9102, T.C.S.
PROJECT NO.: EABPRJA1009988
REVIEW : EJkB2002050372R
REVISION OF: EAB2002049538R
PAGE: 6
PROJECT:
FACILITY:
REVIEWER:
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
CREEk'VIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
FOSTER, NANCY L.
DATE: 12/06/01
4.7.10 Diagonal Curb Ramps
If diagonal (or corner type) curb ramps have returned curbs or other
well-defined edges, such edges shall be parallel to the direction of
pedestrian flow. The bottom of diagonal curb ramps shall have 48 in
(1220 mm) minimum clear space as shown in Fig. 15(c) and 15(d). If
diagonal curb ramps are provided at marked crossings, the 48 in (1220
mm) clear space shall be within the markings (see Fig. 15(c) and
15(d)). If diagonal curb ramps have flared sides, they shall also
have at least a 24 in (610 mm) long segment of straight curb located
on each side of the curb ramp and within the marked crossing (see Fig.
zs(c)).
**NOTE: IF THE CURB RAMP AT THE WESTEP, NMOST PORTION OF THE SIDEWALK
AT CREEKVIEW FUNCTIONS AS A DIAGONAL CURB P, AMP, PLEASE ENSURE
THAT IT COMPLIES WITH 4.7.10.
**COMPLIANCE REQUIRED**
REVISION RESPONSE
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED WITH THE REVISION RESPONSE
MATERIALS RECEIVED 11/12/01.
4.7.11 Islands
Any raised islands in crossings shall be cut through level with the
street or have curb ramps at both sides and a level area at least 48
in (1220 mm) long between the curb ramps in the part of the island
intersected by the crossings (see Fig. 15(a) and 15(b)).
**NOTE: IF THERE ARE ISLANDS AT THE CROSS WALKS ALONG FREEPORT
PARKWAY, THEY SHALL COMPLY WITH 4.7.11.
**COMPLIANCE REQUIRED**
REVISION RESPONSE
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED WITH THE REVISION RESPONSE
MATERIAL OF 11/12/01.
======================================================================
4.8 RAMPS
4.8.1 General
PLANS ~ SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW WORKSHEET
Article 9102, T.C.S.
PROJECT NO.:
REVIEW :
REVISION OF:
PAGE: 7
EA~PRJA1009988
EAB2002050372R
EAB2002049538R
PROJECT:
FACILITY:
REVIEWER:
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
CREEk'VIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
FOSTER, NANCY L.
DATE: 12/06/01
**NOTE: IF THE SLOPE OF THE SIDE WALK AT CREEk'VIEW OR PARKWAY,
ESPECIALLY BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE GABION AREA ON CREEKVIEW,
IS THAT OF A RAMP, THERE SHALL BE RAMP AND RAILING WHICH
COMPLY WITH 4.8.
**COMPLIANCE REQUIRED**
======================================================================
REVISION RESPONSE
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED WITH REVISION MATERIALS
RECEIVED 11/12/01.
======================================================================
4.9 STAIRS
4.10 ELEVATORS
4.11 PLATFORM LIFTS (Wheelchair Lifts)
4.12 WIArDOWS
4.13 DOORS
4.14 ENTRANCES
4.15 DRINKING FOUNTAINS AND WATER COOLERS
4.16 WATER CLOSETS
4.17 TOILET STALLS
4.18 URINALS
4.19 LAVATORIES AND MIRRORS
4.20 BATHTUBS
4.21 SHOWER STALLS
4.22 TOILET ROOMS
4.23 BATHROOMS, BATHING FACILITIES, AND SHOWER ROOMS
4.24 SINKS
4.25 STORAGE
PLANS ~ SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW WORKSHEET
Article 9102, T.C.S.
PROJECT NO.: EABPRJA1009988
REVIEW : EAB2002050372R
REVISION OF: EAB2002049538R
PAGE: 8
PROJECT:
FACILITY:
REVIEWER:
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
FOSTER, NANCY Lo
DATE:
4.26 HANDRAILS, GRAB BARS, AND TUB AND SHOWER SEATS
4.27 CONTROLS AND OPERATING MECHANISMS
4.28 AI~%RMS
4.29 DETECTABLE WILRNINGS
4.30 SIGNAGE
4.31 TELEPHONES
4.32 FIXED OR BUILT-IN SEATING AND TABLES
4.33 ASSEMBLY AREAS
4.34 AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINES
4.35 DRESSING AND FITTING ROOMS
5 RESTAURANTS, CAFETERIAS, SNACK BARS, AND VENDING AREAS
5.1 GENERAL
5.2 COUNTERS ARD BARS
5.3 ACCESS AISLES
5.4 DINING AREAS
5.5 FOOD SERVICE LINES
5.6 TABLEWARE AND CONDIMENT AREAS
5.7 RAISED PLATFORMS
5.8 VENDING MACHINES AND OTHER EQUIPMENT
5.9 QUIET AREAS (Reserved)
6 MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES
6.1 GENERAL
6.2 ENTRANCES
6.3 PATIENT BEDROOMS
6.4 PATIENT TOILET ROOMS
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW WORKSHEET
Article 9102, T.C.S.
PROJECT NO.: EABPRJA1009988
REVIEW : El%B2002050372R
REVISION OF: EAB2002049538R
PAGE: 9
PROJECT:
FACILITY:
REVIEWER:
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
FOSTER, NANCY L.
DATE: 12/06/01
6.5 SIZE OF AREAS OF RESCUE ASSISTANCE
6.6 INFORMATION COUNTERS AND NURSES STATIONS
7 BUSINESS AND MERCANTILE
7.1 GENERAL
7.2 SALES AND SERVICE COUNTERS, TELLER WINDOWS, INFORMATION COUNTERS
7.3 CHECK-OUT AISLES
7.4 SECURITY BOLLARDS AND TURNSTILES
8 LIBP. ARIES
8.1 GENERAL
8.2 READING AND STUDYAREAS
8.3 CHECK-OUT AREAS
8.4 CARD CATALOGS AND MAGAZINE DISPLAYS
8.5 STACKS
9 ACCESSIBLE TRANSIENT LODGING
9.1 HOTELS, MOTELS, INNS, BOARDING HOUSES, DOP, MITORIES, RESORTS, ETC
9.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBLE UNITS, SLEEPING ROOMS AND SUITES
9.3 VISUAL AJ~AP. MS, NOTIFICATION D~;ICES AATD TELEPHOATES
9.4 OTHER SLEEPING ROOMS D/gD SUITES
9.5 SHELTERS, HALFWAY HOUSES, GROUP HOMES, OTHER ESTABLIS}~4EN~fS.
10 TR3tNSPORTATION FACILITIES
10.1 GENER3%L
**NOTE: IF PUBLIC TRAIgSPORTATION IS TO BE PROVIDED ALONG THE
PROPOSED SIDE WALKS, PLEASE ENSURE IT COMPLIES WITH TAS
SECTION 10.
10.2 BUS STOPS ~ TERMINAJLS
PI~S ~ SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW WORKSHEET
Article 9102, T.C.S.
PROJECT NO.: EABPRJA1009988
REVIEW : EA~2002050372R
REVISION OF: EAB2002049538R
PAGE: 10
PROJECT:
FACILITY:
REVIEWER:
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT PARKWAY
CREEKVIEW DRIVE & FREEPORT pARKWAY
FOSTER, NANCY L.
DATE: 12/06/01
10.3 FIXED FACILITIES AND STATIONS
10.4 AIRPORTS
10.5 BOAT AKD FERRY DOCKS (Reserved)