Loading...
Amberpoint BP-LR020327FIELD DENSITY TESTING Report Number: 94021029.0139 Service Date: March 17, 2002 Client: Transwestem Commercial Services Attn: Jim Gaspard 5001 Spring Valley Rd. Suite 600W Dallas TX 75244 Report Date: March 27, 2002 Project: Amberpoint Building No. 1 ~mberpoint Bus. Pk. @ Coppell Coppell, I ex,=~ ' Project Number." '94021029 8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Material Information Lab Test Data Project Requirements Optimum Max. Lab Water Water Dry Unit Content Minimum Dry Material Laboratory Content Weight Range Unit Weight No. Test Method Description and Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (% compaction) 1. 210290099 ASTM D-698 Dk & med brown, tan & It brown clay 24.6 92.3 -1/+3 95 Field Test Data Probe Water Dry Unit Dry Unit Test Lift/ Mat. Depth Content Weight Weight No. Test Location Elevation No. (inches) (%) (pCf) (% compaction) E Parking Lot 177 30' E of gdd line Q/3 at Grade 1 6 23.9 90.6 98 178 40' E of grid line Q/4 at Grade 1 6 23.7 91.4 99 179 55' E of grid line Q/5 at Grade 1 6 24.2 90.1 98 Comments: Test results on this report meet project specification. Services - Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine degree of compaction and material moisture condition. Field Test Method:ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 Gauge ID: Field Results Reported To: Contractor/Brian Technician: Brad Rengstorff Report Distribution: (1) Transwestem Commercial Services (1) O'Brien & Associates Inc (1) TechniStmctums thc (1) City of Coppell - Constr Insp (1) City of Coppell - Bidg Insp (1) Hill &Wilkinson Ltd (1) Haiti' Associates (1) State Farm Ir~surance Reviewed by: HBC Engi~ Eugene Ha~our Pdndpal The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exciusk'ely for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results b'ansmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 1 of 1