Amberpoint BP-LR020325FIELD DENSITY TESTING
Report Number: 94021029.0127
Service Date: March 15, 2002
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100
Daltas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: Transwestem Commercial Services
Attn: Jim Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd. Suite 600W
Dallas TX 75244
Report Date: March 25, 2002
Project: Amberpoint Building No. 1
Amberpoint Bus. Pk. ~ Coppell
Coppell, Texas
Project Number: 94021029
Material Information
Material Laboratory
No. Test Method
Description and Classification
Lab Test Data Project Requirements
Optimum Max, Lab Water
Water Dry Unit Content Minimum Dry
Content Weight Range Unit Weight
(%) (pcf) (%) (% compaction)
1. 210290099 ASTM D-698 Dk &med brown, tan & It brown clay
Field Test Data
Test Lift/
No. Test Location Elevation __
24.6 92.3 -1/+3 95
Probe Water Dry Unit Dry Unit
Mat. Depth Content Weight Weight
No. (inches) (%) (pc0 (% compaction)
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
Storm Sewer
Sta. 0+50, Line A
Sta. 0+50, Line A
Sta. 1+10, Line A
Sta. 1+10 Line A
Sta. 2+20 Line A
Sta. 2+20 Line A
Sra. 3+50 Line A
Sta. 3+50 Line A
Sra. 0+30 Line A-1
Sta. 0+30 Line A-1
1st 1 6 23.9 88.7 96
2nd 1 6 24.1 88.9 96
1 st 1 6 24.8 90.6 98
2nd 1 6 24.6 91.4 99
1st 1 6 25.1 88.8 96
2nd 1 6 24.2 88.3 96
1st 1 6 23.8 89.8 97
2nd 1 6 24.6 91.4 99
1st 1 6 24.5 88.6 96
2nd 1 6 25.3 90.6 98
Comments:
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Services - Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine degree of compaction and material moisture
condition.
Field Test Method;ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Gauge ID:
Field Results Reported To: Contractor, Brian
Technician: Brad Rengstorff
Report Distribution:
(1) Transwestern Commercial Services (1) City of Coppell - BIdg Insp
(1) O'Brien & Associates Inc (1) Hill & Wilkinson Ltd
(1) TechniStructures Inc (1) Halff Associates
Reviewed by:
HBC Engi~.~
Eugene Harbour
(1) City of Coppell - Constr Insp (1) State Farm Insurance Principal
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not bo reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon, Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
CONCRETE COMPRleSSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Service Date: March 15, 2002
Client: Transwestern Commercial Services
Attn: Jim Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd. Suite 600W
Dallas TX 75244
89Ol Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Report Date: March 25, 2002
Project:
Project Number: 94021029
Material Information
Specified Strength: 4000 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 12:42pm
Supplier: LMC
Truck No: 737
Mix I.D. No.: 44
Plant: 7
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches:
Air Content, %:
Concrete Temperature,O F:
Ambient Temperature, o F:
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Laboratory Test Data
Result
3.50
4.5
69
59
Set Specimen Diameter Area
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches)
1 1 6.00 28.27
1 2 6.00 28.27
1 3
1 4
Ticket No: 7114506
Sample Information
Sample Time: 3:00pm Date Cast: March 15, 2002
Technician: Steve Campbell
Weather Conditions: Cloudy
Accumulative Yards: 7
Placement Method: Crane & Bucket
Sample Locations: See placement location
Placement Location: Manhole Sta. 00+00, pour #2
Specification
Test Method
2.0 Max ASTM C-143
3-5 ASTM C-231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C-1064
Age at Maximum Compressive
Date Test Load Strength
Tested (days) (lbs) (psi)
03/22/2002 7 114,230 4,040
03/22/2002 7 115,520 4,090
Average 4,070
04/12/2002 28
04/12/2002 28
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
Technician: Steve Campbell
Report Distribution:
(1) Transwestern Commercial Services
(1) O'Brien & Associates Inc
(1) TechniStructures Inc
(1) City of Coppell - Constr Insp
(1) City of Coppell - BIdg Insp
(1) Hill & Wilkinson Ltd
(1) Halff Associates
(1) State Farm Insurance
Reviewed by:
Principal
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test resutts transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
LABORATORY COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL
Report Number: 94021029.0132
Service Date: March 16, 2002
8901 Carpenter Fn,vy., Suite #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: Transwestern Commemial Services
Attn: Jim Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd. Suite 600W
Dallas TX 75244
Report Date: March 25, 2002
Project: Amberpoint Building No. 1
Amberpoint Bus. Pk. @ Coppell
Coppell, Texas
Project Number: 94021029
Material Information
Contractor: Hill & Wilkinson
Soume of Material: On-site
Proposed Use: Building Subgrade
Laboratory Test Data
Test Procedure:
Test Method:
Sample Preparation:
Rammer Type:
Maximum Dry Unit Weight, pcf:
Optimum Water Content, %:
Sample Information
Sampled By: Rengstorff, Brad
Sample Location: Building Pad, 2' overburden, grid line
K/9.5
Sample Description: Brown & dk reddish brown clay mix
(lime treated)
ASTM D 698 Liquid Limit:
ASTM D 698 Plastic Limit:
ASTM D 698 Plasticity Index:
ASTM D 698 % Passing #200:
97.0 % Passing #40:
22.2 USCS:
Moisture Density Relations
Zero Air Voids Curve for assumed specific gravity 2.65
Result Specifications
50
32
18
/ :
\ :
Services- Moisture-Density Relations
Technician: Brad Rengstodf
Report Distribution:
(1) Transwestem Commercial Services
(1) O'Bden & Associates
(1) TechniStructuras thc
(1) City of Coppell - Constr thsp
(1) City of Coppell - Bldg Insp
(1) Hill & Wilkinson Ltd
(1) Halff Associates
(1) State Farm Insurance
Reviewed by:
HBC Eng~
Eugene Harbour
Principal
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparantiy similar or identical
materials.
LABORATORY COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL
Report Number: 94021029.0135
Service Date: March 16, 2002
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: Transwestern Commercial Services
Attn: Jim Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd. Suite 600W
Dallas TX 75244
Report Date: March 25, 2002
Project: Amberpoint Building No. 1
Amberpoint Bus. Pk. @ Coppell
Coppell, Texas
Project Number: 94021029
Material Information
Contractor: Hill & Wilkinson
Source of Material: On-site
Proposed Use: Building Subgrade
Laboratory Test Data
Test Procedure:
Test Method:
Sample Preparation:
Rammer Type:
Maximum Dry Unit Weight, pcf:
Optimum Water Content, %:
Sample Information
Sampled By: Rengstorff, Brad
Sample Location: Building Pad, 2' overburden, grid line
P/8.0
Sample Description: Brown clay (lime treated)
Result Specifications
ASTM D 698 Liquid Limit: 63
ASTM D 698 Plastic Limit: 40
ASTM D 698 Plasticity Index: 23
ASTM D 698 % Passing #200:
93.0 % Passing #40:
24.6 USCS:
Moisture Density Relations
Zero Air Voids Curve for assumed specific gravity 2.65
Services- Moisture-Density Relations
Technician: Brad Rengstorff
Report Distribution:
(1) Transwestem Commercial Services
(1) O'Brien & Associates Inc
(1) TechniStructures Inc
(1) City of Coppell - Constr Insp
(1) City of Coppell - BIdg Insp
(1) Hill & Wilkinson Ltd
(1) Halff Associates
(1) Slate Farm Insurance
Reviewed by:
HBC Engineer~
Eugene Harbour
Principal
The tests were pedormed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use ef the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the propedies of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 1 of 1 ~.~,.~K.~