Townhouses-CS010205 (3) 972 513 0661
FEB-06-2001 TUE 0~:03 PM SITE CONCRETE FAX NO, 972 513 0661 P, 01/02
FAX CO VER SHEET
Site Concrete, Inc.
3332 Roy Orr Boulevard - Grand Prairie, Texas 75050-4207
P.O. Box 154489 -Irving, Texas 75015-4489
OFFICE: 972-313-0733 FAX: 972-513-0825
ESTIMATING F~
~ENT TO:
Company
From:
Attention: Date:
Fax Number
Total Pages, Including Cover Sheet:
Comments:
For Your Information
FEB-06-2001TUE 01:03 PM SITE CONCRETE FRX NO, 972 513 0661 P, 02/02
fSITE CONCRETE, INC.
Street Address: 3332 Roy Orr · Gr,'md Prairie. TX 75050-4207
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 154489 · Irving, Texas 75015-4489
972-313-0733 · Fax 972-513-0825
Estimating Pax 972-5 ! 3-0661
DATE: February 5, 2001 cc: Craig Lcmp
Stcvc Topletz
TO: Garreth Campbell, City of Copp¢ll Mike Daniel
Fax 972-304-3673 Mike Martin
FROM:
Kick VanGuilder, Site Concrete
Fan 972-513-0661
RE:
Townhouses of Copp¢ll
Coppell, Texas
Job # 20-055
I am in receipt of your letter, dated this date, uotifying Site Concrete to suspend construction activities for
the undcrground utilities at thc above referenced project.
As of this writing, I have responded to your issues via ajobsite meeting some two-and-one-half (2.5
hours) upon receipt of your letter. At this meeting, you and I addressed each o£your issues:
1. The pipe described as being laid backwards was laid with the spigots upstream. The
length of pipe itwolved with this error was less than 130 lineal feet and was corrected immediately upon
discovery the same day it occurred.
2. Some compaction testing has been perforated during thc ditchline backfill operations.
However, we were unaware that you required thc testing [ab to be on-site all day during all construction
activities to test each lift as it was placed. This requirement was not addressed in the preeon meeting;
therefore, we were preparing the ditchline for testing after the fact, not as we go along. We will do as
required from this point forward.
3. Regarding thc work performed on Saturday, February 3rd -- Our foreman was not trying
to mislead you. He was not going to be perfolTni,;g work he thought required city inspection or
supervision when he told you no work was going to be performed. His scope of work for this past
Saturday was for clean-up operations aud genera[ backfill activities. This was clearly a misunderstanding
on his part.
4. The trcneh safety plan was submitted to the city at thc prccon meeting. Again, I
apologize for thc miscommunication in not presenting tiffs plan directly to you. As a result of our
mceting, you now have a copy in your possession.
I regret that the lines of communication between you, my jobsite foreman, and myself, during our last few
days of production have resulted in the tone o£ indifference your letter reflects. It is the intent of Site
Concrete and its employees to cooperate fully with the City of CoppclI and its represental.ives in the
completion of this project.
I feel that, in looking back after our meeting, thc issues of your letter were a result ufa misundastanding
based upon miscommunication. I hope that, should any other situations occur in the future, you will
please feel free to coutact mc direct (972-978-9128 mobile or 972-802-1417 pager). I am on this jobsitc a
minimum of every other day.
I look forward to the contlnucd progress of this project with you.