St Joseph-LR021028FIELD DENSITY TESTING
Report Number: 94021187.0165
Service Date: October 22, 2002
Client: St. Joseph Village, Inc.
Attn: Joseph Dingman
13223 Glad Acres Drive
Dallas TX 75234
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Report Date: October 28, 2002
Project: St. Joseph Village
1201 East Sandy Lake Rd
Coppell, TX 75019
Project Number: 94021187
Material Information
Material Laboratory
No. Test Method
Description and Classification
Lab Test Data Prelect Requirements
Optimum Max. Lab Water
Water Dry Unit Content Minimum Dry
Content Weight Range Unit Weight
(%) (pcf) (%) (% compaction)
1.211870015 ASTM D 698 Dk brown & gray clay
Field Test Data Probe
Test Lift/ Mat. Depth
No. Test Location Elevation No. (inches)
N Entrance Bridge Backfill, N Side
838 5' N & 10' E of NW cor. of Bridge 4' BBD 1 8
839 10' N & 50'E of NW cor. of Bridge 4' BBD 1 8
840 5' N & 90' E of NW cor. of Bridge 4' BBD 1 8
Datum: BBD = Below top of bridge deck
20.9 101.5 -1/+3 95
Water Dry Unit Dry Unit
Content Weight Weight
(%) (pcf) (% compaction)
23.4 96.0 95
22.7 99.7 98
23.8 98.4 97
Comments:
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Services - Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine degree of compaction and material moisture
condition.
Field Test Method:ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Gauge ID: 1614
- .~, .............. ~j, ,0
'-...,
?2/'7(
Technician: B~an C. Hughes
Repo~ Distribution: ~ HBO En~in~
(1) St. Joseph Village, Inc. (1) Ci~ of Coppell Engineering
(1)Agui~eCo~o~tion (1) St Andr.s Management Reviewed by: b%~ ~. ~
(1) Centex- Jobsite (1) St Andes Management - ~ Lyndon~. Cox, P,~.
(1) Ci~ of Coppe[I - Bldg Insp E Princi~ Engineer
The tests were pedormed in general accordance ~ applicable ASTM, ~SHTO, or DOT test methods. This repo~ is exclusive~for the use of ~e client
indicated above and shall not be reprodu~d except in full wi~out ~e wriEen approval of Te~con. Test resul~ transmi~ed herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and am not necessarily indi~tive of the prope~es of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 1 of 1 o~-~.~
FIELD DENSITY TESTING
Report Number: 94021187.0166
Service Date: October 23, 2002
Client: St. Joseph Village, Inc.
Attn: Joseph Dingman
13223 Glad Acres Drive
Dallas TX 75234
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Report Date: October 28, 2002
Project: St. Joseph Village
1201 East Sandy Lake Rd
Coppell, TX 75019
Project Number: 94021187
Material Information
Material Laboratory
No. Test Method
Description and Classification
Lab Test Data Project Requirements
Optimum Max. Lab Water
Water Dry Unit Content Minimum Dry
Content Weight Range Unit Weight
(%) (pcf) (%) (% compaction)
1. 211870015 ASTM D 698 Dk brown & gray clay
20.9 101.5 -1/+3 95
Field Test Data Probe
Test Lift/ Mat. Depth
No. Test Location Elevation No. (inches)
N Entrance Bridge Backfill, N & S Sides
of Bridge
841 5' N & 10' W of NE cor. of Bridge 3' BTOB 1 8
842 8' N & 70' W of NE cor. of Bridge 3' BTOB I 8
843 6' N & 15' W of NE cor. of Bridge 2' BTOB 1 8
844 10' N & 65' W of NE cor. of Bridge 2' BTOB 1 8
845 8' S & 15' W of SE cor. of Bridge 4' BTOB I 8
846 10' S & 45' W of SE cor. of Bridge 4' BTOB I 8
Datum: BTOB = Below top of bridge
Water Dry Unit Dry Unit
Content Weight Weight
(%) (pcf) (% compaction)
20.9 99.0 98
21.6 98.3 97
21.2 97.6 96
22.0 97.2 96
21.7 97.4 96
22.3 96.9 95
Comments:
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Services - Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine degree of compaction and material moisture
condition.
Field Test Method:ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Gauge ID:
Technician: Bryan C. Hughes
Report Distribution: /'~ HBC En in e~__~
1) Aguirre Corporation (1) S g Reviewed by:
(1) Centex - Jobsite (1) St Andrews Management - /] L d J
(1)CityofCoppell-Bidglnsp i'.,/ LPY~ncOi~ai'I:°X' P'E',711 ngineer
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusivel'~ f~
the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the wdtten approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein"~i ~ only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 1 of 1
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94021187.0132
Service Date: September 27, 2002
, ~) 8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100
'~'"-~-~, Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: St. Joseph Village, Inc. L .... ~rt Date: October28, 2002
Attn: Joseph Dingman
13223 Glad Acres Drive
Dallas TX 75234
Material Information
Specified Strength: 3500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 7:20am Plant: 29
Supplier: Hanson
Truck No: 1883
Mix I.D. No.: 7750
Field Test Data
Test
Ticket No: 320011
'ectPr°ject: St. Joseph-Village,
1201 East Sandy La~e Rd
Coppell, TX 7501~//
Number: 94~
Sample Information
Sample Time: 7:59am
Technician: Arthur Tinoco
Weather Conditions: Clear
Accumulative Yards: 320
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See attached sketch
Placement Location: Paving @ SW Loop Road
Date Cast: September 27, 2002
Result Specification Test Method
Slump, inches: 5.50 3-5 ASTM C-143
Air Content, %: 3.4 3-6 ASTM C-231
Concrete Temperature,o F: 82 ASTM C1064
Ambient Temperature, o F: 65 ASTM C-1064
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Laboratory Test Data
Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (lbs) (psi)
1 I 6.00 28.27 10/04/2002 7 93,570 3,310
1 2 6.00 28.27 10/04/2002 7 94,060 3,330
Average 3,320
1 3 6.00 28.27 10/25/2002 28 121,270 4,290
1 4 6.00 28.27 10/25/2002 28 120,710 4,270
Average 4,280
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials
Page 1 of 4
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94021187.0132
Service Date: September 27, 2002
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: St. Joseph Village, Inc.
Attn: Joseph Dingman
13223 Glad Acres Drive
Dallas TX 75234
Report Date: October 28, 2002
Project: St. Joseph Village
1201 East Sandy Lake Rd
Coppell, TX 75019
Project Number: 94021187
Material Information
Specified Strength: 3500 psi ~ 28 Days
Batch Time: 7:20am Plant: 29
Supplier: Hanson
Truck No: 1883
Mix I.D. No.: 7750
Field Test Data
Test Result
Slump, inches: 6.00
Air Content, %: 3.8
Concrete Temperature, o F: 80
Ambient Temperature, o F: 79
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Ticket No: 320011
Sample Information
Sample Time: 9:09am Date Cast: September 27, 2002
Technician: Arthur Tinoco
Weather Conditions: Clear, sunny
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See attached sketch
Placement Location: See page 1
Specification
Test Method
3-5 ASTM C-143
3-6 ASTM C-231
ASTM C 1064
ASTM C-1064
Laboratory Test Data
Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (lbs) (psi)
2 1 6.00 28.27 10/04/2002 7 97,530 3,450
2 2 6.00 28.27 10/04/2002 7 98,660 3,490
Average 3,470
2 3 6.00 28.27 10/25/2002 28 127,540 4,510
2 4 6.00 28.27 10/25/2002 28 128,750 4,550
Average 4,530
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of ether apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 2 of 4 0,.LLW,,.,
.CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94021187.0132
Service Date: September 27, 2002
ENGINEJ~RI~
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: St. Joseph Village, Inc.
Attn: Joseph Dingman
13223 Glad Acres Drive
Dallas TX 75234
Report Date: October 28, 2002
Project: St. Joseph Village
1201 East Sandy Lake Rd
Coppell, TX 75019
Project Number: 94021187
Material Information
Specified Strength: 3500 psi ~ 28 Days
Batch Time: 9:23am Plant: 29
Supplier: Hanson
Truck No: 827
Mix I.D. No.: 7750
Ticket No: 216556
Sample Information
Sample Time: 10:31 am Date Cast: September 27, 2002
Technician: Arthur Tinoco
Weather Conditions: Clear, sunny
Accumulative Yards: 320
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See attached sketch
Placement Location: See page 1
Field Test Data
Test Result Specification Test Method
Slump, inches: 6.50 3-5 ASTM C-143
Air Content, %: 3.9 3-6 ASTM C-231
Concrete Temperature,c F: 83 ASTM C1064
Ambient Temperature, o F: 83 ASTM C-1064
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Laboratory Test Data
Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No. ID (inches) (.sq. inches) Tested (days) (lbs) (psi)
3 1 6.00 28.27 10/04/2002 7 99,510 3,520
3 2 6.00 28.27 10/04/2002 7 101,760 3,600
Average 3,560
3 3 6.00 28.27 10/25/2002 28 124,650 4,410
3 4 6.00 28.27 10/25/2002 28 121,820 4,310
Average 4,360
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This repod is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 3 of 4 o~.Lw~0~ ~,~,~,y
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94021187.0132
Service Date: September 27, 2002
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: St. Joseph Village, Inc.
Attn: Joseph Dingman
13223 Glad Acres Drive
Dallas TX 75234
Report Date: October 28, 2002
Project: St. Joseph Village
1201 East Sandy Lake Rd
Coppdl, TX 75019
Project Number: 94021187
Material Information
Specified Strength: 3500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 9:41am Plant: 29
Supplier: Hanson
Truck No: 1015
Mix I.D. No.: 7750
Ticket No: 216559
Sample Information
Sample Time: 11:13am Date Cast:September 27, 2002
Technician: AdhurTinoco
Weather Conditions: Clear, sunny
Accumulative Yards: 320
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See attached sketch
Placement Location: See page 1
Field Test Data
Test Result Specification Test Method
Slump, inches: 6.50 3-5 ASTM C-143
Air Content, %: 3.8 3-6 ASTM C-231
Concrete Temperature,° F: 83 ASTM C1064
Ambient Temperature, o F: 86 ASTM C-1064
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Laboratory Test Data
Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (lbs) (psi)
4 1 6.00 28.27 10/04/2002 7 91,640 3,240
4 2 6.00 28.27 10/04/2002 7 91,890 3,250
Average 3,250
4 3 6.00 28.27 10/25/2002 28 108,730 3,850
4 4 6.00 28.27 10/25/2002 28 109,970 3,890
Average 3,870
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
..-~,-,,~.......-; ...... :~;
£..'-'" ~ ",.T. °',,
£, .." ~ "... ~
.~ ...... .......................... :....
,, LYNDON J. COX
~....;. ......................... .:....,,
t ,,~_... 66401
Technician: Arlhur Tinoco ""<:"J-~,/,-~ ~X ['
Report Distribution: //') HBC En~ineerin~/'~
(1) SI. Joseph Village, Inc. (1) City of CoppelJ Engineering /J J J'~
(1) St Andrews Management Reviewed by: /,~,~,,.,_-.._~ , ~
(1) Aguirre Corporation
(1) St Andrews Managemen, V ~ ~ /
(1) City of Coppell - Bldg Insp
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively f ~ ' nt
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 4 of 4 ,~-~w~-,,~. ~.~