SS9901A-LR020904FIELD DENSITY TESTING
Report Number: 94021187.0082
Service Date: August 22, 2002
Client: St. Joseph Village, Inc.
Attn: Joseph Dingman
13223 Glad Acres Drive
Dallas TX 75234
8901 Carpenter Frwy., Suite #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Report Date: . September 04, 2002
Project: St. Joseph Village
1201 East Sandy Lake Rd
Coppell, TX 75019
Project Number: 94021187
Material Information
Material Laboratory
No. Test Method
Description and Classification
1.211870003 ASTM D 698 Reddish tan &med brown silty sandy clay
Field Test Data Probe
Test LiW Mat. Depth
No. Test Location Elevation No. (inches)
30" Force Main Backfill, W Side of
Jobsite
724 Sra. 18+65
725 Sra. 19+00
726 Sra. 18+80
Datum: BEG = below existing grade
Lab Test Data Project Requirements
Optimum Max. Lab Water
Water Dry Unit Content Minimum Dry
Content Weight . Range UnitWeight
(%) (pcf) (%) (% compaction)
13.2 117.1 -1/+3 95
Water Dry Unit Dry Unit
Content Weight Weight
(%) (pcf) (% compaction)
2'BEG 1 6 14.7 114.9 98
1'BEG 1 !6 13.8 116.1 99
Final 1 6 13.1 118.5 101
Comments:
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Services - Perform in-place density an.d moisture content tests to determine degree of compaction and material moisture
condition.
Field Test Method:ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Gauge ID: 2077
Field Results Reported To: ContractoflForest w/Centex
Technician: Bryan C. Hughes
Report Distribution:
(1) St, Joseph Village, Inc. (I) City of Copcell Engineering
~ ~HBC Ej~j:~inee/~/
(1) Aguin"e Corporation (1) St Andrews Managernent Reviewed by:
(1) Cents~ - Jobsite (I) St Andrews Management '-[ Lyndon J/¥ox, P,E.
(1) City of Coppell - Bldg Insp Princip~ll I~ngineer
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively~M' the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicabl~
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 1 of 1