Amberpoint BP 2-LR030114FIELD DENSITY TESTING
Report Number: 94021380.0193
Service Date: December 27, 2002
Client: Transwestern Commercial Services
Attn: James Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600W
Dallas TX 75244
Report Date:
Project: Staples
201 Northpoint
Coppell, TX
Project Number: 94021380
lrerracon
8901 Carpenter Fn,vy, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
January 14, 2003
Material Information
Material Laboratory
No. Test Method
Description and Classification
Lab Test Data Proiect Requirements
Optimum Max. Lab Water
Water Dry Unit Content Minimum Dry
Content Weight Range Unit Weight
(%) (pot') (%) (% compaction)
1. 213800009 ASTM D 698 Lt brown silty clay
19.2 103.8 -1/+3 95
Field Test Data Probe
Test Lift/ Mat. Depth
No. Test Location Elevation No. (inches)
Paving, Fire Lane (~ NE Corner of
Project
948 N Fire Lane, 300' W of Northpoint, 12' S Final 1 6
of N curb
949 N Fire Lane, 150' W of Northpoint, 15' S Final 1 6
of N curb
950 N Fire Lane, 25' W of Northpoint, 9' S of Final 1 6
N curb
951 E Fire Lane, 70' S of Intersection, 28'W Final I 6
of E curb
952 N Fire Lane, 225' W of Northpoint, 6' N of Final I 6
S curb
Water Dry Unit Dry Unit
Content Weight Weight
(%) (pc0 (% compaction)
22.2 100.3 97
20.2 101.3 98
22.1 101.0 97
28.3 * 89.4 86 *
26.1 * 96.3 93 *
Comments:
An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications.
Services - Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine degree of compaction and material moisture
condition.
Field Test Method~,STM D2922, ASTM D3017
Gauge ID: 31787
Field Results Reported To: Contractor
Technician: Roy T. Montgomery
Report Distribution:
(1) Transwestern Commercial Services (1) City of Coppell - Bldg Insp
(1) Hill & Wilkinson, Ltd, (1) City of Coppell - Constr Insp
(1) O'Brien & Associates (1) State Farm Insurance
(1) TechniStructures (1) HBC Engineering
Reviewed by:
HBC/T~;~
Eugene ~arbcur
Principal
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 1 of 1
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94021380.0155
Service Date: December 16, 2002
Client: Transwestern Commercial Services
Attn: James Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600W
Dallas TX 75244
Report Date:
Project: Staples
201 Northpoint
Coppell, TX
'lFerracan
8901 Carpenter Fr',w, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
January 14, 2003
Project Number: 94021380
Material Information
Specified Strength: 4500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 4:02am Plant: 1
Supplier: Potter Concrete
Truck No: 106
Mix I.D. No.: 7753
Ticket No: 12747
Sample Information
sample Time: 4:40am Date Cast: December 16, 2002
Technician: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Cloudy
Accumulative Yards: 40
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See placement location
Placement Location: Paving N & NW of building
(Concrete daily report & sketch attached)
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches:
Air Content, %:
Concrete Temperature, o F:
Ambient Temperature,° F:
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Laboratory Test Data
Set Specimen Diameter
No. ID (inches)
1 1
1 2
1 3
I 4
Result
5.00
5.7
69
55
Area
(sq. inches)
6.00 28.27
6.00 28.27
6.00 28.27
6.00 28.27
Services -
Specification
Test Method
4-5 ASTM C-143
4-8 ASTM C-231
ASTM C 1064
ASTM C-1064
Age at Maximum Compressive
Date Test Load Strength
Tested (days) (lbs) (psi)
12/23/2002 7 126,020 4,460
12/23/2002 7 126,330 4,470
Average 4,470
01/13/2003 28 158,720 5,610
01/13/2003 28 153,160 5,420
Average 5,520
Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods, This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials, Page 1 of 6 0~Lw,.0~.~..~
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94021380.0155
Service Date: December 16, 2002
Client: Transwestern Commercial Services
Attn: James Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600W
Dallas TX 75244
Report Date:
Project: Staples
201 Northpoint
Coppell, TX
lrerracan
8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
January 14, 2003
Project Number: 94021380
Material Information
Specified Strength: 4500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 5:06am Plant: 1
Supplier: Potter Concrete
Truck No: 101
Mix I.D. No.: 7753
Ticket No: 12754
Sample Information
Sample Time: 5:30am Date Cast: December 16, 2002
Technician: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Cloudy
Accumulative Yards: 110
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See page 1
Placement Location: See page 1
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches:
Air Content, %:
Concrete Temperature,° F:
Ambient Temperature, o F:
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Laboratory Test Data
Result
5.50
7.0
68
55
Set Specimen Diameter Area
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches)
2 1 6.00 28.27
2 2 6.00 28.27
2 3 6.00 28.27
2 4 6.00 28.27
Services -
Specification
Test Method
4-5 ASTM C-143
4-8 ASTM C-231
ASTM C 1064
ASTM C-1064
Age at Maximum Compressive
Date Test Load Strength
Tested (days) (lbs) (psi)
12/23/2002 7 101,230 3,580
12/23/2002 7 99,250 3,510
Average 3,550
01/13/2003 28 130,720 4,620
01/13/2003 28 129,890 4,590
Average 4,610
Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials, Page 2 of 6 ~.LW~.0~-F~.
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94021380.0155
Service Date: December 16, 2002
Client: Transwestern Commercial Services
Attn: James Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600W
Dallas TX 75244
Material Information
Report Date:
Project: Staples
201 Northpoint
Coppell, TX
Project Number: 94021380
Sample InfOrmation
'll'erracon
8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #1(30
[:)alias, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
January 14, 2003
Specified Strength: 4500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 5:54am Plant: 1
Supplier: Potter Concrete
Truck No: 110 Ticket No: 12765
Mix I.D. No.: 7753
Sample Time: 6:18am Date Cast: December 16, 2002
Technician: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Cloudy
Accumulative Yards: 220
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See page 1
Placement Location: See page 1
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches:
Air Content, %:
Concrete Temperature,° F:
Ambient Temperature, o F:
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Laboratory Test Data
Result
5.75
7.2
68
56
Set Specimen Diameter Area
No. ID (inches) .(sq. inches)
3 1 6.00 28.27
3 2 6.00 28.27
Specification
4-5
4-8
Date
Tested
12/23/2002
12~23~2002
3 3 6.00 28.27 01/13/2003
3 4 6.00 28.27 01/13/2003
Test Method
ASTM C-143
ASTM C-231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C-1064
Age at Maximum Compressive
Test Load Strength
(days) (lbs) (psi)
7 94,170 3,330
7 93,930 3,320
Average 3,330
28 122,840 4,340.
28 122,300 4,320*
Average 4,330
Comments: * Does not comply with specified strength.
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials. Page 3 of 6 ~ ~w~0~.~,
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94021380.0155
Service Date: December 16, 2002
Client: Transwestern Commercial Services
Attn: James Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600W
Dallas TX 75244
Report Date:
Project: Staples
201 Northpoint
Coppell, TX
'lrerracan
8901 Carpenter Fr~, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
January 14, 2003
Project Number: 94021380
Material Information
Specified Strength: 4500 psi ~ 28 Days
Batch Time: 6:48am Plant: 1
Supplier: Potter Concrete
Truck No: 106
Mix I.D. No.: 7753
Ticket No: 12774
Sample Information
Sample Time: 8:10am Date Cast: December 16, 2002
Technician: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Cloudy
Accumulative Yards: 310
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See page 1
Placement Location: See page 1
Field Test Data
Test
Result
Specification
Slump, inches: 5.50
Air Content, %: 5.5
Concrete Temperature? F: 67
Ambient Temperature, o F: 59
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Laboratorl/ Test Data
Test Method
4-5 ASTM C-143
4-8 ASTM C-231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C-1064
Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (lbs) (psi)
4 1 6.00 28.27 12/23/2002 7 102,070 3,610
4 2 6.00 28.27 12/23/2002 7 103,810 3,670
Average 3,640
4 3 6.00 28.27 01/13/2003 28 133,810 4,730
4 4 6.00 28.27 01/13/2003 28 125,800 4,450*
Average 4,590
Comments: * Does not comply with specified strength.
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials. Page 4 of 6
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94021380.0155
Service Date: December 16, 2002
Client: Transwestern Commercial Services
Attn: James Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600W
Dallas TX 75244
Report Date:
Project: Staples
201 Northpoint
Coppell, TX
'lrerracan
8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 530-I 0t 0
January 14, 2003
Project Number: 94021380
Material Information
Specified Strength: 4500 psi ~ 28 Days
Batch Time: 8:41am Plant: 1
Supplier: Potter Concrete
Truck No: 109
Mix I.D. No.: 7753
Ticket No: 12784
Sample Information
Sample Time: 9:15am Date Cast: December 16, 2002
Technician: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Cloudy
Accumulative Yards: 410
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See page 1
Placement Location: See page 1
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches:
Air Content, %:
Concrete Temperature, o F:
Ambient Temperature, o F:
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Laboratory Test Data
Result
5.75
7.4
68
65
Specification Test Method
4-5 ASTM C-143
4-8 ASTM C-231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C-1064
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date
No. ID - . (inches) (sq. inches) Tested
5 1 6.00 28.27 12/23/2002
5 2 6.00 28.27 12/23/2002
5 3 6.00 28.27 01/13/2003
5 4 6.00 28.27 01/13/2003
Age at Maximum Compressive
Test Load Strength
(days) (lbs) (psi)
7 91,560 3,240
7 94,790 3,350
Average 3,300
28 126,060 4,46~
28 128,770 4,550
Average 4,510
Comments: * Does not comply with specified strength.
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials. Page 5 of 6
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94021380.0155
Service Date: December 16, 2002
Client: Transwestern Commercial Services
Attn: James Gaspard
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600W
Dallas TX 75244
Report Date:
Project: Staples
201 Nodhpoint
Coppell, TX
Project Number: 94021380
'lrerracan
8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
January 14, 2003
Ma terial In formation
Specified Strength: 4500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 9:50am Plant: 1
Supplier: Potter Concrete
Truck No: 114
Mix I.D. No.: 7753
Ticket No: 12794
Sample Information
Sample Time: 10:17am Date Cast: December 16, 2002
Technician: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Cloudy
Accumulative Yards: 510
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See page 1
Placement Location: See page 1
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches:
Air Content, %:
Concrete Temperature,° F:
Ambient Temperature, o F:
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Laboratory Test Data
Result
5.00
6.9
69
65
Set Specimen Diameter Area
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches)
6 1 6.00 28.27
6 2 6.00 28.27
6 3 6.00 28.27
6 4 6,00 28.27
Services -
Specification
Test Method
4-5 ASTM C-143
4-8 ASTM C-231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C-1064
Age at Maximum Compressive
Date Test Load Strength
Tested (days) (lbs) (psi)
12/23/2002 7 105,800 3,740
12/2312002 7 102,980 3,640
Average 3,690
01/13/2003 28 131,300 4,640
01/13/2003 28 129,920 4,590
Average 4,620
Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
Technician: Jose A. Mar[inez
Report Distribution:
(1) Transwestern Commercial Se~'ices
(1) Hill & Wilkinson, Ltd.
(1) O'Brien & Associates
(1) TechniStructures
(1) City of Coppell ~ Bldg Insp
(1) City of Coppell - Constr Insp
(1) State Farm Insurance
(1) HBC Engineering
Reviewed by:
HBCFF~n
Eugene Harbour
Principal
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Terracon. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
Page 6 of 6
._.'ll'erracan
PROJECT: ,,~'"r,¢l P I~.,~ Page of
JOB NO. ~0;~1~0,015"~ Date I~,/Ife/e~, Comp. By CHECKED BY:
b
o 0
0
E
--
o~ o