Loading...
DR0001-AG030311T E 1 T T w °. DEPT: Engineering /Public Works /� - `NCENDA REQUEST FORM COPPELL ' � ��' DATE: March 11, 2003 ITEM #: 9/1) ITEM CAPTION: Consider approval of awarding Bid/Contract #Q 1102 -01 for the construction of the MacArthur / Samuel Drainage Project to Site Concrete, Inc., in the amount of $132,395, as provided for in IMF Funds; and authorizing the City Manager to sign. APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL GOAL(S): ' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ON ABOVE DATE II IOU Motion to Approve M - Tunnell S - Peters -7-0 On January 16, 2003 eleven bids were opened for the MacArthur / Samuel Drainage project. The apparent low bidder, RKM Utility Services, failed to include their bid affidavit which in turn rendered their bid an incomplete bid. Based on my evaluation of the low bidder and the attorney's opinion of a non - responsive bid from RKM Utility Services, it is my recommendation that the bid be awarded to the second lower bidder Site Concrete, Inc., in the amount of $132,395. Staff will be available to answer any questions at the Council meeting. FINANCIAL COMMENTS: Funds are available in the Infrastructure Maintenance Fund for this project. .ate o. m i, o•Lry s J U a DIR. REVIEW: K1 ° FIN. REVIEW: CM REVIEW: Vol ,2A,s, 0- Agenda Request Form - Revised 09102 Document Name: #macarthurt -AR MEMORANDUM FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING To: Mayor and City Council From: Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E., Director of Engineering/Public Works Date: March 11, 2003 RE: Consider approval of awarding Bid/Contract #Q1102 -01 for the construction of the MacArthur / Samuel Drainage Project to Site Concrete, Inc., in the amount of $132,395, as provided for in IMF Funds; and authorizing the City Manager to sign. On January 16, 2003 eleven bids were opened for the MacArthur / Samuel Drainage project. The apparent low bidder, RKM Utility Services, failed to include their bid affidavit, which in turn rendered their bid an incomplete bid. This determination was made after discussions with the City Attorney. However, prior to my discussions with the City Attorney, I did request information from RKM Utility Services concerning their qualifications. RKM Utility Services is a new company incorporated as of January 2003 and to this date has not secured or performed any work under the name of RKM Utility Services. The principal in the firm has worked as a job superintendent for various utility companies in the past. In conversations with the principal of the company, it was noted that there was only one other employee, however, I was assured that once the project was awarded that employees would be hired. There was also some confusion whether or not RKM Utility Services had any equipment. The principal assured me that they had equipment. However in discussions with the auditor, I noted that no equipment was listed under assets. The auditor stated if the firm had equipment then it would be listed under their assets. While I was trying to sift through the information provided by RKM, I finally got the opportunity to discuss the bid with Bob Hagar. After Mr. Hagar had the opportunity to review the specifications and what was submitted with the bid, it was his determination that the lack of a bid affidavit rendered the entire bid submission as incomplete and therefore non - responsive. At that point I contacted the second low bidder, Site Concrete, Inc, to obtain information concerning their qualifications. While I am familiar with Site Concrete, Inc., I did want to get a sense of their ability to tackle a complicated project. In my dealings with Site Concrete, Inc. in the past, most of their projects have been new subdivisions. The MacArthur / Samuel Drainage project will be a retrofit drainage system down the median of MacArthur Blvd. from Deforest Road to Samuel Blvd. and there are numerous unknowns. Site Concrete, Inc. has been in business since 1984 and has recently completed construction projects ranging in costs from 1.1 to 7.4 million dollars. "CITY OF COPPELL ENGINEERING - EXCELLENCE BY DESIGN" Funding for this project has been allocated through the Infrastructure Maintenance Fund (IMF) in project year 2001/02. My engineer's estimate for this project using the final quantities was $174,250. There was $310,000 set aside in the IMF fund for this project. That included some miscellaneous and contingency monies in the event that obstructions were encountered during design that would require a more extensive project scope. There was also $45,000 set aside in the IMF for the design of the project. However, the project was designed in- house. Based on my evaluation of the low bidder and the attorney's opinion of a non - responsive bid from RKM Utility Services, it is my recommendation that the City of Coppell award the bid for the MacArthur / Samuel Drainage Project to Site Concrete, Inc. in the amount of $133,395. Staff will be available to answer any questions at the Council meeting. "CITY OF COPPELL ENGINEERING - EXCELLENCE BY DESIGN" a Q z 2 F z Q L a C a F L'. a M O O O O O O O O C O G N ° aI N - J N J_ O ° N � N — c o = 0 0 0 o J o 0 0 o G o J O N G c o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � L _ O _ r O 2 � mpO O 0 O O O_ 0 ry `D O F- L Vi Y O P P M �/ � a P O O O p G N O G O O O O O G O O O O J O J O G O J O r fA N N - ;J C 7 J 5- � � = C E G _• _ _ 11 _ c _ _ a Q z 2 F z Q L a C a F L'. a M z O Q F Q M Q W V Z � O = F vi w C r N G O J b vi O P O O j O P O 'S j O O C S jpp G O O O V O C o O o 0 o J o O o - N N 7 � C � G O •�- Q rl R Q O P CC 'D O S S v G v P O N O O O O O O O O O J G O O r C O O P O O O O O O G O O O O O O G N n R a ❑ S ° S S ° c ° o S ° o S S ° o S S ° o S S ° o ° o S S a r '.T P •^ N 0 N N J U F V N V It 2 :J U J iJ V - O _ N -