Freeport NIP(7.0)-LR030402.oneEn gineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Datlas, Texas 75247=4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
,REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
C~)ppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report No.: 173552
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 03/27/2003
Report Date: 04/02/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
PaGe 1 of 3
Technician: Larmy Gist
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineexs
6:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in f~ll without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa~,e 1 of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 173552
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 3/27/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 3
" DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO N/A
1. Specific ~lravit~ of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 X
2. Lime slurry was continuously a~itated X
3. Surfactant was added to each load x
4. The injection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of injection X
5. Intervals of 12" were achieved durin~ iniection process until refusal X
6. Total depth of injection - 10 feet X
7. Max. spacing of injection probes was recorded to be 5 ft. X
8. Free lime on surface X
9. Square feet injected on this date 134,000
10. Location of injection Building pad 5-E
Remarks:
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time:
Technician:
6:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.
L. Gist
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without
the written approval of Pone Engineers, Inc.
.,i I
! I
--H-½f
'i
ROneEn gineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247-4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Arm: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
C0ppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report No.: 173646
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 03/28/2003
Report Date: 04/02/2003
Report of Ins ~ection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 3
Technician: Eric Goodwin
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa£e 1 of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 173646
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 3/28/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 3
-- DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO N/A
· Specific gravity of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 x
). Lime slurry was continuously a~itated X
3. Surfactant was added to each load x
~,. The iniection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of injection X
5. Intervals of 12" were achieved during iniectJon process until refusal X
6. Total depth of iniection -- 10 feet X
7. Max. spacing of iniection probes was recorded to be 5 ft. X
8. Free lime on surface x
9. Square feet injected on this date 190,600
10. Location of injection 5E 3rd pass/6F 1 st pass
Remarks:
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time:
Technician:
6:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Eric Goodwin
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without
the written approval of Rone Engineers, Inc.
8908 Ambassador Row
Dalla% Texas 75247-4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Atha: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
C~ppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report No.: 173709
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 03/29/2003
Report Date: 04/02/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 3
Technician: Eric Goodwin
Report Distribution:
(I) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appeamoce, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be repmdoced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Page 1 of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 173709
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 3/29/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 3
· DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO NIA
1. Specific ~ravit7 of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 X
2. Lime slurry was continuously agitated X
3. Surfactant was added to each load x
4. The iniection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of iniection x
5. Intervals of 12" were achieved during] iniection process until refusal X
6. Total depth of iniection -- 10 feet X
7'. Max. spacin~l of iniection probes was recorded to be 5 ft. X
6. Free lime on surface x
9. Square feet iniected on this date 167,800
10. Location of injection 6F - 1st pass
Remarks:
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time:
Technician:
6:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
Eric Goodwin
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without
the written approval of Rone Engineers, Inc.
i 1 '
I...4-' ,
!
gineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247-4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport I0
500 Freeport Parkway
C~ppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report No.: 173752
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 03/31/2003
Report Date: 04/02/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative{s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 3
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(I) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use oft. he clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in fidl without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa~e 1 of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 173752
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 3/31/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 3
· DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO N/A
1. Specific gravib/of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 X
2. Lime slurr~was continuously agitated X
3. Surfactant was added to each load X
4. The iniection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of iniection x
5. Intervals of 12" were achieved during iniection process until refusal X
$. Total depth of iniection - 10 feet X
7. Max. spacing of injection probes was recorded to be 5 ft. X
B. Free lime on surface X
9. Square feet injected on this date 106,542
10. Location of iniection Building pad 6-F
Remarks:
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time: 6:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.
Technician: L. Gist
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without
the written approval of Rone Engineers, Inc.
gineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247-4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax}
IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING
Client:
Project:
Services:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards.
Report No.: 173483
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 03/26/2003
Report Date: 04/02/2003
PROJECT DATA
CONTRACTOR: Duke Realty Services, LP
Test Methods: ASTM D-1556
ASTM D-3017
M/D No. Description
Gauge: Troxler 3430
Moisture
Gauge Serial No: 24674 Current: 658
Test Mode: DT
Previous: 654
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Maximum
Moisture % Density pcf
1 Tan Grayish Brown Clay w/Traces of Sand 21.5
103.5
106.5
104.5
2 Dark Brown Clay 18.0
3 Dark Brown Clay 19.5
Standard Counts
Density
Current: 2567
Previous: 2572
Project Requirements
Moisture Density
Optimum + 90 rain
Optimum + 90 min
Optimum + 90 min
FIEI,D DENSITY TESTS
TEST PROBE
NO TESTLOCATION DEPTH
MID MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
No. (%) ~cO ~cO (% ma~
Utility Backfill
1 Fire hydrant tie in #6, 2' below top of 6" 1 24.0 125.7 101.4 98
ground
Utility Backf'tll
2 Fire hydrant tie in #5, 2' below top of 6" I 27.4 124.6 97.8 94
ground
Utility Backffil
3 Fire hydrant tie in #4, 2' below top of 6" 1 22.5 124.6 101.7 98
ground
Utility Backflil
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented heroin were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they am addressed and shall not be repmduead except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
07DD Page 1 of 2
Report No.: 173483 RoneEngJneers
Project No.: 037333 Client: Duke Realty Services, LP t~*~
TEST
NO TEST LOCATION
PROBE
DEPTH
M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
No. (%) (Pc0 (pet') (% max)
4 Fire hydrant tie in #3, 2' below top of 6" 1 23.7 123.2 99.6 96
ground
Utility Backfill
5 Fire hydrant tie in #2, 2' below top of 6" 1 24.5 125.6 100.9 97
ground
Utility Backfill
6 Fire hydrant tie in #1, 2' below top of 6" 1 26.1 128.0 101.5 98
ground
Technician: Eric Goodwin
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Paeheco Koch Consulting Engineers
Test results on this report meet project specific ati°n'i/,~ ~/~ /~~~/~~~ f/~
Started: 6:30am Finished: 1 ;00pm ~ ~., J ~
(1) Engineering Analyst .~l ~r'"' ~ I' ,/x,..,.-rt ..~ ~ ~-- ~
'1 .... ! ..... ";... --r
~, ) cty ofCoppell Englneenng Dept. 1~. scott watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no anntrol. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
07DD Page 2 of 2