Freeport NIP(7.0)-LR030409R neEng
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 7524'/=4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
CHent:
Duke Realty Services, LP
At~m: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Cbppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report No.: 174178
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/03/2003
Report Date: 04/09/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 3
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
( l ) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pachoco Koch Consulting Engineers
9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
(1} Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, em.) or any other ~ature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shell not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Patte 1 of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client:
Project:
Duke Realty Services, LP
174178
,Report No.:
Project No.:
Date of Service:
Page 2 of 3
*, DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO NIA
1. Specific ~ravity of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 X
2. Lime slur~ was continuously a~litated x
3. Surfactant was added to each load X
~,. The iniection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of injection x
15. Intervals of 12" were achieved durin~ iniection process until refusal x
16. Total depth of iniection -- 10 feet X
7. Max. spacin~ of iniection probes was recorded to be 5 ff. X
18. Free lime on surface X
9. Square feet injected on this date 41,592
;10. Location of injection Buildin~ pad 6-F
037333
Freeport 10 4/3/2003
500 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Remarks: completed 3rd pass
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time: 9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
Technician: L. Gist
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exc~usive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without
the written approval of Rone Engineers, Inc.
· !
gineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallns, Texas '/5247-4510
(214) 630-9745
(:214) 630-9819 (fax)
IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.:
Arm: Mr. JeffLa~ston Project No.:
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Date of Service:
Pr°jeet:~~kwayDallas TX 75254 i~ / ~ Report Date:
q
, Coppell, TX
Services: Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards.
PROJECT DATA
CONTRACTOR:
Test Methods:
Duke Realty Services, LP
ASTM D-2922 Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture
ASTM D-3017 Gauge Serial No: 32720 Current: 665
Teat Mode: DT Previous: 660
Description
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Maximum
Moisture % Density pcf
M/D No.
Dark Brown Clay (lime treated)
174088
037333
04/02/2003
04/09/2003
Standard Counts
Density
Current: 3053
Previous: 3072
Project Requirements
Moisture Density
20.0 101.0 Optimum + 95-100 rain
FIELD DENSITY TESTS
TEST
NO TEST LOCATION
PROBE M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
DEPTH No. (%) (poi) (peO (% max)
Lime Subgrade
1 Building pad, 450' east x 100' north of
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
2 Building pad, 450' east x 200' north of
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
3 Building pad, 450' east x 300' north of
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
4 Building pad, 450' east x 400' north of
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
5 Building pad, 500' east x 400' north of
southwest comer, final
6" 1 21.9 118.2 97.0 96
6" 1 20.3 117.4 97.6 97
6" 1 20.7 121.7 100.8 100
6" 1 22.3 122.1 99.8 99
6" 1 21.7 117.0 96.1 95
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the vaitten approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
07DD Page I of 2
Report No.: 174088
Project No.: 037333
Client: Duke Real~y Services, LP
RoneEngln~rs
NO
TEST LOCATION
PROBE M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
DEPTH No. (%) (pcf) (PcO (% max)
Lime Subgrade
6 Building pad, 500' east x 300' north of
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
7 Building pad, 500' east x 200' north of
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
8 Building pad, 500' east x 100' north of
southwest comer, final
6" 1 20.0 119.2 99.3 98
6" 1 23.1 121.1 98.4 97
6" 1 22.4 122.4 100.0 99
Test results on this report meet project specification.
See report #174150 for technician time
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke R~lty Services, LP
(1) Duke Reslty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1} Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
Started: Finished:
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
repons are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be ~'produced except in full without the written appwval of R. one Engineers, Ltd.
07DD Page 2 of 2
RoneEn
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Aria: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport I0
.5.00 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Services: Cylinder Collection
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247-4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF CYLINDER COLLECTION
Report No.: 174327
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/05/2003
Report Date: 04/09/2003
Report of Collection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative arrived on site as scheduled
to pick up compressive strength test specimen cast prior to this date.
Technician Time: 8:45 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.
Page 1 of 1
Technician: Ryan Herbrand
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Semites, LP
(1) City of Coppcll Englnceting Dept.
(1) Pucheon Koch Consulting Engineers
(1) Enginersln~ Analyst
( l ) City of Coppen EaNacermg Depc
I -K Scott Watson -
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composilion, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no conU-o]. Our letters and
reports am for the exclusive use of the client~ to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval ofRone Engincem, Ltd.
99DD PaRe I of 1
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Atto: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport I0
~0.0 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Services: Daily Activities
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247=4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (f~x)
REPORT OF DAILY ACTIVITIES
Report No.: 174455
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/03/2003
Report Date: 04/09/2003
Report of Activities
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to assist
primary Rone Engineers field representative with the inspection of drilled Diers
and sampling/testing of concrete.
See drilled pier inspection report #174180 and concrete compressive strength
'report #174181 for additional information.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 1
Technician: Gary Kamrath
Report Distribution:
(I) Duke Realty Sendces, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of CoppeH Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
7:30 a.m. - 1:30 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMrrATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples pwvided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no conlrol. Our letla~ and
reports am for the exclusive use of the cl/ents to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD PaRe 1 of 1
8908 Andmssadnr Row
Dallas, Texas 75247-4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 6~o-9s19 (tax)
REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Service% LP
Arm: Mr. JeffLan~ston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Report No.: 174009
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/01/2003
Report Date: 04/09/2003
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freepox~ Parkxvay
Coppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 3
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheeo Koch Consulting Engineers
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the speeific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any othe~ feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no conlrol. Our letters and
repom are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Paoe I of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174009
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/1/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 3
Coppell, TX
'* ' ' DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO NIA
1. Specific ~lravity of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 X
2. Lime slurr)/was continuously a~litated X
3. Surfactant was added to each load X
4. The injection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of iniection X
5. Intervals of 12' were achieved durin~l iniection process until refusal X
6. Total depth of injection - 10 feet X
7. Max. spacinc, I of iniection probes was recorded to be 5 ft. X
8. Free lime on surface X
9. Square feet iniected on this date 129,992
10. Location of iniection Buildin~l pad 6-F & 4D
Remarks:
Reinjecting areas of 4D, 7th pass applied
continued 2nd and 3rd pass at area 6F
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time: 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Technician: L. Gist
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no resp(mslblllty for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except In full without
the written approval of Rone Engineers, Inc.
RoneEng
Client:
Project:
Services:
Duke Realty Services, LP
At-m: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Linc Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards.
8908 Ambassador Row
Dnlins, Texas 75247-4510
(214) 630=9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING
Report No.: 174010
Project No.: 037333
Date of S~rvice: 04/01/2003
Report Date: 04/09/2003
PROJECT DATA
CONTRACTOR:
Test Methods:
M/D No.
Duke Realty Services, LP
ASTM D-2922
ASTM D-3017
Description
Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture
Gauge Serial No: 32720 Current: 660
Test Mode: DT Previous: 659
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Maximum
Moisture % Density pcf
Dark Brown Clay (lime treated)
20.0 101.0
Standard Counts
Density
Current: 3072
Previons: 3080
Project Requirements
Moisture Density
Optimum + 95-100 rain
FIELD DENSITY TESTS
NO
TEST LOCATION
Lime Subgrade
1 Building pad, 350' east
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
2 Building pad, 350' east
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
3 Building pad, 350' east
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
4 Building pad, 350' east
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
5 Building pad, 375' east
southwest comer, final
PROBE
DEPTH
bl]D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
No. (%) (pc0 (pc0 (% mx)
x 100' north of the 6" 1 20.6 116.5 96.6 96
x 200' north of the 6" 1 22.4 123.4 100.8 100
x 300' north of the 6" 1 24.0 120.5 97.2 96
x 400' north of the 6" 1 23.1 121.0 98.3 97
x 500' north of the 6" 1 21.2 118.7 97.9 97
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific ~ample~ provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by p~sons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
97DD Page 1 of 2
Report No.: 174010
Project No.: 037333
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP
RoneEnginee~
TEST
NO
TEST LOCATION
PROBE M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
DEPTH No. (%) (pcf) (pc0 (% nmx)
Lime Subgrade
6 Building pad, 375' east x 400' north of the 6" 1 22.5 120.7 98.5 98
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
7 Building pad, 375' east x 300' north of the 6" 1 24.6 119.9 96.2 95
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
8 Building pad, 375' east x 200' north of the 6" 1 21.1 120.4 99.4 98
southwest comer, final
-- Test results on this report meet project specffication.
Technician: LannyGist Started: 6:30am Finished: 9:00am /~~R°~~e~*~
Report Distribution:
(1) Dukc Realty Services, LP (1) Enginearing Analysrt
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Panheco Koch Consulting Engineers
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LNvlITATIONS: The test results presentedhcreinwereprepered based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assumeno responsibility forvaria~iou in quality
(composition, appearance,.performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no conlrol. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the cliants to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
07DD Page 2 of 2
S908 Ambassador Row
~ Texas 7S247=4510
(214) 630=9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING
CHent:
Project:
Services:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Atto: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Pen-t'orm In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards.
Report No.: 174179
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/03/2003
Report Date: 04/09/2003
CONTRACTOR:
Test Methods:
No.
Duke Realty Services, LP
ASTM D-2922
ASTM D-3017
PROJECT DATA
Standard Counts
Density
Current: 3077
Previous: 3053
Description
Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture
Gauge Serial No: 32720 Current: 656
Test Mode: DT
Previous: 655
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Maximum Project Requirements
Moisture % Denflty pcf Moisture Density
Dark Brown Clay (lime treated)
20.0 101.0 Optimum + 95-100
FIELD DENSITY TESTS
TEST
NO
TEST LOCATION
Lime Subgrade
1 Building pad, 650' east x 100' north of
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
2 Building pad, 650' east x 200' north of
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
3 Building pad, 650' east x 300' north of
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
4 Building pad, 650' east x 400' north of
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
5 Building pad, 700' east x 500' north of
southwest comer, final
PROBE
DEPTH
M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
No. (%) (.mO ~c0 (%max)
6" 1 20.0 117.4 97.8 97
6" 1 22.1 119.0 97.5 97
6" 1 22.9 124.0 100.9 100
6" 1 20.2 117.7 97.9 97
6" I 23.8 124.2 100.3 99
LIMrrATIONS: The test results presented here/n were prepared based upon the specific samples prey/deal for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no conwol. Our letters and
repons are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addreesed and shall not be reproduced except in full w/thout the wr/t'~l approval of Rone Eng/neers, Ltd.
07DD Page 1 of 2
Report No.: 174179
Project No.: 037333
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP
ROneEngineers
TEST
NO TEST LOCATION
PROBE
DEPTH
bt/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
No. (%) (pcO ~cO (%max)
Lime Subgrade
6 Building pad, 700' east x 400' north of 6" 1 23.4 121.3 98.3 97
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
7 Building pad, 700' east x 300' north of 6" 1 22.8 120.3 98.0 97
southwest comer, final
Lime Subgrade
8 Building pad, 700' east x 200' north of 6" 1 20.9 117.5 97.2 96
southwest comer, final
Technician: Lanny Gist Started: 6:30am Finished: 9:00am Ro
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Se~ces, LP (1) Engineering Analyst
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP (I) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Man~er
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for tearing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearancc,.performance, e.tc.) or any other feature of similar subject rnattur provided by persons or conditions over which we have no consol. Our letters and
repons are for thc exclnslve use of the chents to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
07DD Page 2 of 2
Client:
8908 Ambassador Row
Darius, Texas 752474510
(214) 63O-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Duke Realty Services, LP
Arm: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
C6ppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report No.: 174087
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/02/2003
Report Date: 04/09/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 3
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheeo Koch Consulting Engineers
10:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
CMT 0
gcott Watson
)erafions Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa~e 1 of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.:
Project No.:
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/2/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 3
Coppell, TX
" DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO N/A
1. Specific ~ravit7 of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 X
2. Lime slur~ was continuously ac, litated X
3. Surfactant was added to each load X
4. The injection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of iniection X
5. Intervals of 12" were achieved durin~ iniection process until refusal X
B. Total depth of iniection -- 10 feet X
7. Max. spacin~l of iniection probes was recorded to be 5 ff. X
~. Free lime on surface X
;). Square feet iniected on this date 130,000
10. Location of iniection Buildin~l pad 6-F & 4D
174087
037333
Remarks: completed 8th pass at 4-D reinjection, began 3rd pass at 6-F
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time:
Technician:
10:00 a.m.- 4:30 p.m.
L. Gist
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc,) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no dontrol. Our lettem and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without
the va'itten approval of Rone Engineers, Inc,
I
ineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247-4510
(214) 630=9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax}
REPORT OF DAILY ACTIVITIES
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Arm: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport I0
500 Freeport Parkway
Cbppell, TX
Services: Daily Activities
Report No.: 174182
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/03/2003
Report Date: 04/09/2003
Report of Activities
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to assist
primary Rone Engineers field representative with the inspection of drilled piers
and sampling/testing of concrete.
See drilled pier inspection report %174180 and concrete compressive strength
report %174181 for additional information.
Technician Time: 1:30 pim. - 5:15 p.m.
Page 1 of 1
Technician: Arty Niekonov
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no eontzol. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa.e I of I
wlneers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247-4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING
Client:
Project:
Services:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards.
Report No.: 174150
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/02/2003
Report Date: 04/09/2003
PROJECT DATA
CONTRACTOR: Duke Realty Services, LP
Test Methods: ASTM D,2922
ASTM D-3017
M/D No.
De~dpfion
Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture
Gauge Serial No: 32720 Current: 655
Test Mode: DT
Previous: 660
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Maximum
Moisture % Density pcf
Tan Grayish Brown Clay w/Traces of Sand
Standard Counts
Density
Current: 3053
Previous: 3072
Project Requirements
Moisture Density
21.5 103.5 Optimum +4 95 mia
FIELD DENSITY TESTS
TEST
No TEST LOCATION
PROBE
DEPTH
MID MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
No. (%) (pc0 . (poi) (% max)
Backf'dl
1 Storm lateral 5.2, Station 0+25, 2' below
Backfill
2 Storm lateral 5.1, Station 0+25, 2' below
Backfill
3 Storm lateral 5.0, Station 1+00, 2' below
Backf'fll
4 Sanitary sewer, Line 3, Station 0+50, 3'
below
Backf'dl
5 Sanitary sewer, Line 3, Station 1+50, 2'
below
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Real~y Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6" 1 21.7 119.9 98.5 95
6" 1 22.0 121.1 99.3 96
6" 1 23.1 123.8 100.6 97
6" 1 22.3 123.5 101.0 98
6" 1 21.9 123.9 101.6 98
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Finished: 10:00a
Started: 6:30am
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
repons are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
07DD Page 1 of 1
RoneEngineers
$905 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247=4510
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9519 (fax)
REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION
CHent:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Atm.~Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
C~ppell, TX
Services: Drilled Pier Inspection
Report No.: 174180
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/03/2003
Report Date: 04/09/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s was on site to perform
Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 5
Technician: Rick Smith
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
7:30 a.m. - 5:15 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppoll Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results pmsanted herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other restate of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa-e 1 of 1
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174180
Project No.: 037333
Project: FreepoIt 10 Date of Service: 4/3/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 5
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification E.4-2.4 E.4-2.7 E.4-3 D.9-3 D.5-3
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 72 72 72 72 72
Required Minimum Depth (it) (Note 1) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (It) 11.20 10.50 11.50 11.70 11.50
Depth of Pier After Underreamin[~ (It)* 12.00 11.00 11.50 11.80 11.60
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Ca~in~ Diameter (in) / Casinl~ Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/g6 6/#6 6/86 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (It) 10.0 8.5 10.0 10.0 10.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 10:24 AM 11:09 AM 11:43 AM 11:36 AM 12:09 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 11:20 AM 11:27 AM 12:30 PM 12:35 PM 12:41 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 10.80 9.70 10.40 10.50 10.30
Elevation: Surface (It)** 99.20 99.30 99.10 99.30 99.30
Elevation: Top of Pier (It)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
:Elevation: Bottom of Pier (It)** 87.20 88.30 87.60 87.50 87.70
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
~lote: See report #174181 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: Note 1: Minimum 12' pier depth or top of sand, whichever is first.
** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom
of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings
and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
_IMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for vaflation in
~uality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which v~ have no control,
::)ur letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they ara addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of
;tone Engineers, Ltd.
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174180
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport l0 Date of Service: 4/3/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 5
Driller: Liberty
Pier Id .e/Ofification D.2-3 C.7-3 C.5-3 C-3 C-3.5
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 72 72 72 72 72
Required Minimum Depth (f~) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (f~) 11.90 11.80 11.70 11.40 11.40
Depth of Pier After Underreaminl~ (fi)* 12.40 12.40 11.90 11.70 11.40
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casin~ Lend, th (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcin~ Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Len~h of Reinforcing Steel (f~) 10.5 10.5 9.5 I0.0 9.5
Time Drillin~ was Completed (am / pm) 1:13 PM 1:27 PM 1:36 PM 1:57 PM 2:11 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:17 PM 1:35 PM 1:58 PM 2:07 PM 2:15 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (fi) 10.80 10.80 10.30 10.30 I0.10
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.60 99.60 99.60 99.40 99.30
Elevation: Top of Pier (ii)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.20 87.20 87.70 87.70 87.90
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Cla~'
Note: See report #174181 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Kone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom
of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings
and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174180
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport l0 Date of Service: 4/3/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 5
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification C-4 C-4.5 C-5 C-5.5 C-6
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 72 72 72 72 72
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.40 11.30 11.50 11.50 11.50
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (fl)* 11.80 11.40 11.50 12.30 12.50
Condition of Bottom (wet/dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/g6 6/#6 6/#6 6/~
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.0 9.5 9.5 10.5 10.5
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 2:34 PM 3:07 PM 3:41 PM 2:50 PM 3:40 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:30 PM 3:36 PM 4:00 PM 3:41 PM 4:22 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (fi) 10.20 9.80 9.90 10.80 11.00
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.60 99.60 99.60 99.50 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.80 88.20 88.10 87.20 87.00
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174181 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom
of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings
and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
;IMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for vaflatlon in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP ' Report No.: 174180
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/3/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 5
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification C-6.5 C-7
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 72 72
Required Minimum Depth (fi) 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreamln$ (fi) 11.40 12.10
Depth of Pier After Underreamin$ (ft) 11.70 12.20
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (fi) NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6
Len~h of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.0 10.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 4:00 PM 4:15 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 4:08 PM 4:30 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 10.20 10.70
~levation: Surface (f~)** 99.50 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (R)** 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.80 87.30
Bearinl~ Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174181 for Compressive Stxength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetrai:ion not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom
of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings
and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation In
quality (composition, appoaranco, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m