Freeport NIP(7.0)-LR030415RoneEn Ineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Arm: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Report No.: 174181
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/03/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Project:
Services:
Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field testing, cast compressive strength samples and bring
simples back to the laboratory for curing and testing in accordance wi[h applicable standards.
STRENGTH:
SLUMP (in):
AIR (%):
TEST METHOD:
CONTRACTOR: Duke Realty Services, LP
CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Potter Concrete Ltd.
PLANT: On site
SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
4000 psi ~ 28 Days
5" - ?"
NA
ASTM C-172
ASTM C-31
ASTM C-143
ASTM C-231
ASTM C-1064
ASTM C-138
ASTM C-39
PROJECT DATA
MIX DESIGN i.D.: 9361
PLACEMENT DATE: 04/03/2003
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Overcast
TIME SAMeLED: 12:35pm BATCaTIME: 12:19pm
TEMPERATURE {F) - AIR 72 F CONCRETE: 78 F
TRUCK NO: 101 TICRET NO: 113561
AIR CONTENT (%): NA UNIT WEIGHT (pc0: NA
OVERALL PLACEMENT LOCATION:
Drilled pier locations at office area/section #l
SAMPLE LOCATION:
REPORT OF TEgT~g
Pier locations E.4/3, D.9/3
and D.5/3
.... x 12" (area 28.27 sq. in.)
Concrete Compressive Cyhnder 6
CYLINDER MEASURED MAXIMUM 'COMPRESSIVE
MARKED SLUMP DATE AGE LOAD STRENGTH FRACTURE
SET NO. (inches) TESTED (days) Obs. force) (psi) TYPE
1 1 5.25 04/10/2003 7
1 2 5.25 05/01/2003 28
1 3 5.25 05/01/2003 28
1 4 5.25 05/29/2003 56
Water added at site: 5 gallons
See report #174180 for technician time.
Technician: Rick Smith
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(l) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Potter Concrete
Started: Finished:
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
119140
4210 Unbonded Cap
Unbonded Cap
Unbonded Cap
Unbonded Cap
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented hen:in were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
repons are for the e~xclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
01DK Page 1 of 1
gineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Atto: Mr. Jeff.Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Ctppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report No.: 174772
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/12/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 3
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(I) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m.
- 11:00 a.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no controI. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa~e 1 of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174772
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/12/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 3
Co ~ell, TX
., DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO NIA
· Specific gravit)/of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 X
2. Lime slurry was continuously a~litated X
3. Surfactant was added to each load X
4. The injection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of injection x
5. Intervals of 12" were achieved during iniection process until refusal X
B. Total depth of iniection - 10 feet x
7. Max. spacin~ of iniection probes was recorded to be 5 ft. x
8. Free lime on surface x
9. Square feet iniected on this date 62,400
10. Location of iniection Building pad, area 6-F
Remarks: Completed 5th pass of reinjection
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time:
Technician:
6:30 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.
L. Gist
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, per[ormance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without
the wdtten approval of Rone Engineers, Inc.
RoneEng neers. .
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9519 (fax)
REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
C6ppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report No.: 174504
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/09/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 3
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Pacheeo Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Lu:I.
99DD Page 1 of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174504
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/9/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 3
Coppell, TX
-- DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO N/A
1. Specific gravity of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 X
_~. Lime slurr7 was continuously agitated X
3. Surfactant was added to each load x
¢. The iniection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of iniection x
5. Intervals of 12" were achieved during iniection process until refusal X
9. Total depth of iniection -- 10 feet X
7. Max. spacing of iniection probes was recorded to be 5 ft. X
9. Free lime on surface X
9. Square feet iniected on this date 70,000
10. Location of iniection Building pad, area 5-E
Remarks: Completed 5th pass, reinjection area 5-E
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time: 6:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
Technician: L. Gist
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without
the wdtten approval of Rone Engineers, Inc,
· I
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-981.9 (fax)
REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Atto: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Ctppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report No.: 174415
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/08/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 3
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(I) Duke Realty Services, LP
(i) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
( 1 ) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients m whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Page 1 of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174415
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/8/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 3
Coppell, TX
.- DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO NIA
1. Specific gravity of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 X
2. Lime slurry was continuously a~litated X
3. Surfactant was added to each load X
4. The injection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of injection x
5. Intervals of 12" were achieved durin~t injection process until refusal x
6. Total depth of iniection -- 10 feet X
7. Max. spacin~l of iniection probes was recorded to be 5 ft. X
8. Free lime on surface x
9. Square feet iniected on this date 70,000
10. Location of injection Building] pad, area 5-E
Remarks: Began reinjection of 5-E, 4th pass
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time: 6:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
Technician: L. Gist
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without
the written approval of Rone Engineers, Inc.
.I
R°neEngineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF REINFORCING STEEL INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. Jeff`Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Cbppell, TX
Services: Reinforcing Steel Inspection
Report No.: 174740
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/11/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Reinforcing Steel Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time: 3:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.
Page 1 of 2
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(I) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The teat results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa~e 1 of I
RoneEn '
;ers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
121 North Rayner
Fort Worth, Texas 76111
(817) 831-6211
Report of
Reinforcing Steel Inspection
Client: j~),~ e~ Report No.: [ 7/2/ 7 qt9
Project No.: (.9 3 7 33 3
Project:.. ~ce~a/~c / o Date of Service: ~-//-~, J
Page ~L of "L
Locations and Items Inspected:
Items Inspected: Conforming Non Items Inspected: Conforming Non Items Inspected: Conforming Non
Conforming Conforming Conforming
Placing Drawings ~ Bar Length Column Ties Properly
Approved and Shape ~ Tied and Spaced
Bar Size ~ ' Proper Bar Placement ~ Stirrup Spacing and Type ~
Bar Grade ~ Properly Tied ~ Lapped Splices ~
Barn Clean ~ Dowel Bars in Place ~ Welded Splices ~ ,-
Form Clean ~ Proper Bar Supports ~ Mechanical Splices ~
Number Bars ~ Proper Cover ~
Discrepancies/Comments:
Inspector's Signature: ,~, ~/~-~ Time:
Client/Contractor Signature:r~/c';J;~;:'/~dx Client/Contracto~ ~,,pi~. ~iI~ o.Results:. Yes/No
ineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630=9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
C6ppell, TX
Services: Drilled Pier Inspection
Report No.: 174508
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/09/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to assist
primary Rone Engineers field representative with the inspection of drilled piers
and sampling/testing of concrete.
See drilled pier inspection report #174506 and concrete compressive strength
report ~174507 for additional information.
Technician Time: 6:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Page 1 of 1
Technician: Arty Nickonov
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Page I of 1
ROneEng,neers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Atto: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Services: Drilled Pier Inspection
Report No.: 174610
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/10/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to assist
primary Rone Engineers field representative with the inspection of drilled piers
and sampling/testing of concrete.
See drilled pier inspection report ~174608 and concrete compressive strength
report #174609 for additional information.
Technician Time: 6:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Page 1 of 1
Technician: Arty Nickonov
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Paeheco Koch Consulting Engineers
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
- '1~. Scott Watson -
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented heroin were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
repons are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Page 1 of 1
gineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION
CHent:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Ctppell, TX
Services: Drilled Pier Inspection
Report No.: 174700
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/11/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to assist
primary Rone Engineers field representative with the inspection of drilled piers
and sampling/testing of concrete.
See drilled pier inspection report #174698 and concrete compressive strength
report ~174699 for additional information.
Technician Time: 6:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
Page 1 of 1
Technician: Arty Nickonov
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Pacheeo Koch Consulting Engineers
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DB Page 1 of 1
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF WATER INJECTION INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Cbppell, TX
Services: Water Injection Inspection
Report No.: 174696
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/11/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Water Injection Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 3
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(I) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. and
3:30 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
( 1 ) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppetl Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full withom the written appmval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa~e 1 of 1
WATER
INJECTION OBSERVATION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.:
Project No.:
Project: Date of Service:
Page 2 of 3
174696
· DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION YES NO NIA
1. Specific ~ravib/of lime was checked and found to be 1.14 and 1.17 X
2. Lime slurry was continuously agitated , x
3. Surfactant was added to each load X
4. The injection pressure was kept between 50 to 100 psi at point of iniection X
5. Intervals of 12" were achieved during injection process until refusal X
6. Total depth of iniection -- 10 feet X
7. Max. spacing of injection probes was recorded to be 5 ft. X
8. Free lime on surface X
9. Square feet iniected on this date 62,400
10. Location of injection Building pad, area 6-F
037333
Freeport 10 4/11/2003
500 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Remarks: 4th pass, reinjection
See attached for sketch of injected area, pass number for each area, dimension of injection area, and amount of lime
used on this date.
Time:
Technician:
6:30 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. and 3:30 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
L. Gist
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for
variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we
have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without
the written approval of Rone Engineers, Inc.
.I-
· I
ROneEng!neers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION CANCELLATION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. Jeff.Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Cbppell, TX
Services: Drilled Pier Inspection Cancellation
Report No.: 174355
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/07/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Cancellation
On this date, a Rone Engineering, Ltd. representative arrived on-site as
scheduled to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. Upon arrival, the technician was
informed of job cancellation.
Technician time: 6:30 a.m. - 8:00 a.m.
Page 1 of 1
Technician: Arty Nickonov
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our leaers and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be ~produced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Paae 1 of 1
ROneEn g neer
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING
Client:
Project:
Services:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. JeffLangston
5495 Belt Liae Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Coppell, TX
Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards.
Report No.: 174607
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/10/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
PROJECT DATA
CONTRACTOR: Duke Realty Services, LP Standard Counts
Gauge: Troxler 3430
Test Methods: ASTM D-2922 Moisture Density
ASTM D-3017 Gauge Serial No: 32720 Current: 653 Currant: 3084
Test Mode: DT
Previous: 656 Previous: 3077
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Maximum Project Requirements
M/D No. Description Moisture % Density pcf Moisture Density
1 Dark Brown Clay 19.5 104.5 Optimum +4 95 min
FIELD DENSITY TESTS
TEST
NO TEST LOCATION
PROBE MID MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
DEPTH No. (%) (pcf) (PC0 (% max}
Backf'fll
1 8" waterline, west parking lot, 200' north of 6" 1 21.6 123.5 101.6 97
southwest comer building, 1' below
BackYfll
2 8" waterline, west parking lot, 200' north of 6" 1 22.8 127.0 103.4 99
southwest comer building, 2' below
BackYlll
3 8" waterline, west parking lot, 75' north of 6" 1 22.1 121.9 99.8 96
southwest comer building, 1' below
Backfill
4 8" waterline, west parking lot, 75' north of 6" 1 22.9 125.4 102.0 98
southwest comer building, 2' below
Backf'ffi
5 8" waterline, southwest parking lot, 30' east 6" 1 21.3 124.6 102.7 98
of southwest comer building, 1' below
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
07DD Page 1 of 2
Report No.: 174607 RoneEngineers
Project No.: 037333 Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Jill
TEST PROBE
NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH
MID MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
No. (%) (pcf) (pcf) (% max)
Backf'fll
6 8" waterline, southwest parking lot, 30' east
of southwest comer building, 2' below
Backfill
7 8" waterline, southwest parking lot, 200'
east of southwest comer building, 1' below
Backfill
8 8" waterline, southwest parking lot, 200'
east of southwest comer building, 2' below
Technician: Lanny Gist
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(I) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6" 1 20.2 121.9 101.4 97
6" 1 19.7 119.8 100.1 96
6" 1 20.4 121.4 100.8 96
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Eng/neers, Ltd.
07DD Page 2 of 2
RoneEngineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(n4) 6~0-9~9 (fax)
REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
C~ppell, TX
Services: Drilled Pier Inspection
Report No.: 174506
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/09/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 8
Technician: Rick Smith
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Paeheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results pmsented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports am for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they am addressed and shall not be reproduced except in flail without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa~,e 1 of 1
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174506
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/9/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 8
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification C-8 C-9 B.9-10 B.9-12 B.9-11
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (f~) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (it) 11.60 11.50 11.50 11.60 11.40
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (f~)* 12.50 11.50 11.70 11.70 11.80
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (f~) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (It) 11.5 10.4 10.5 10.8 10.4
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:56 AM 8:52 AM 10:24 AM 10:14 AM 9:30 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 9:40 AM 9:45 AM 10:48 AM 10:36 AM 9:52 AM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (1t) 12.00 11.00 11.20 11.30 11.30
Elevation: Surface (It)** 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.40 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (It)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (It) ** 87.00 88.00 87.80 87.70 87.70
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174507 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. .
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top o£bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
Note 1: Minimum depth 12' or top of sand whichever is first.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc,) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control.
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of
Rone Engineers, Ltd,
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174506
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/9/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 8
Driller: Liberty
?ier Identification B.9-13 D-14 B.9-14 E-14 F-14
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.80 11.30 11.40 1 I. 10 12.00
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it)* 11.90 11.50 13.80 11.30 12.90
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinfoming Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.9 10.5 12.8 10.5 12.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 10:10 AM 10:50 AM 10:31 AM 10:57 AM 11:41 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 11:40 AM 12:10 PM 12:00 PM 12:18 PM 12:24 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 11.50 11.00 13.30 10.80 12.50
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.40
Elevation: Top of Pier (t~)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.50 88.00 85.70 88.20 86.50
Beating Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
iNote: See report #174507 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
I, Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. .
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality {composition, appearance, perfon'nance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174506
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/9/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 8
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification G- 14 H- 14 J- 14 K- 14 L- 14
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.40 12.40 12.50 12.20 12.00
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 12.40 12.90 12.60 12.20 13.60
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.0 12.5
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 11:38 AM 11:10 AM 12:48 PM 1:01 PM t 1:48 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 12:30 PM 12:38 PM 1:06 PM 1:14 PM 1:20 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 12.00 12.40 12.00 11.80 13.00
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.50 99.60 99.40 99.60
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.00 86.60 87.00 87.20 86.00
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174507 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174506
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport I0 Date of Service: 4/9/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 8
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification M - 14 N- 14 N-3 M-3 D3
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.00 12.00 11.70 11.10 10.70
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 13.90 12.50 11.70 11.20 11.50
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinfoming Steel (ft) 13.0 11.7 10.7 10.0 10.5
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 1:32 PM 12:55 PM 1:37 PM 2:12 PM 2:31 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:50 PM ' 1:56 PM 2:05 PM 3:04 PM 3:20 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 13.50 12.00 11.20 10.70 11.00
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 85.50 87.00 87.80 88.30 88.00
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174507 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. .
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174506
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport l0 Date of Service: 4/9/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 6 of 8
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification K-3 J-3 H-3 G-3 F-3
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.90 9.80 10.20 10.00 10.70
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 12.90 10.00 10.30 10.30 11.00
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (t~) NA NA NA NA NA
qumber of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 12.0 9.0 9.5 9.5 10.0
rime Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 1:38 PM 1:57 PM 3:00 PM 3:10 PM 3:30 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:26 PM 3:31 PM 3:55 PM 4:06 PM 4:15 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 12.50 9.50 9.80 9.80 10.40
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.60
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 86.50 89.50 89.20 89.20 88.60
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report # 174507 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted..
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Reno Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174506
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/9/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 7 of 8
Driller: Liberty
!Pier Identification D-4 E-4 F-4 G-4 I-I4
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12'.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underream!ng (fi) 10.50 10.00 11.30 11.20 11.10
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 11.30 10.30 11.70 11.70 12.70
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinfoming Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.5 9.5 10.7 10.5 12.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 3:24 PM 3:35 PM 3:15 PM 3:33 PM 4:12 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 4:20 PM 4:40 PM 4:45 PM 4:51 PM 4:55 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 10.80 9.90 11.20 11.20 12.30
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.40
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 88.20 89.10 87.80 87.80 86.70
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174507 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted..
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete bom existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test resuRs presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174506
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/9/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 8 of 8
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification J-4 K-4 L-4
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (It) 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fi) 10.40 10.00 10.30
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* I0.90 10.10 11.00
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (it) NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.0 9.0 10.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 3:53 PM 4:30 PM 4:15 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 5:00 PM 5:05 PM 5:10 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 10.40 9.50 10.50
Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.50 99.60 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (it)** 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (It)** 88.60 89.50 88.50
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174507 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. .
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation In
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RoneEngineers
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF D LLED PIER INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
C6ppell, TX
Services: Drilled Pier Inspection
Report No.: 174698
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/11/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 7
Technician: Rick Smith
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Paeheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott Watson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Page 1 of 1
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174698
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/11/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 7
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification E-7 D-7
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.80 11.90
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 12.10 12.30
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (It) NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinfoming Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 11.0 11.4
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 2:18 PM 2:07 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:22 PM 3:31 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (f0 11.60 11.80
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.40 87.20
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report # 174699 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
Note 1: Minimum depth 12' or top of sand whichever is first.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon tho specific samples provided for testing. We assuree no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of sirnilar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control.
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of
Rone Engineers, Ltd.
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty ServiCes, LP Report No.: 174698
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport l0 Date of Service: 4/11/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 7
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification K-7 J-7 H-7 G-7 F-7
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 10.50 11.00 10.80 10.80 11.80
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (fi)* 11.30 11.00 11.20 11.40 12.20
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (fi) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (fi) 10.3 10.0 10.0 10.5 11.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 1:03 PM 1:47 PM 2:09 PM 2:28 PM 2:19 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:09 PM 2:31 PM 2:20 PM 3:01 PM 3:14 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 10.80 10.40 10.70 11.00 11.70
Elevation: Surface (It)** 99.50 99.60 99.50 99.40 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (It)** 88.20 88.60 88.30 88.00 87.30
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174699 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete f~om existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
:luality (composition, appearance, performance, etc,) or any other feature of similar subject rn
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174698
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/11/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 7
Driller: Liberty
Pier Ideofification M-6 N-6 N-7 M-7 L-7
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (it) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fi) 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.40 10.50
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it)* 11.90 11.80 11.60 12.90 10.90
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (It) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 11.0 10.9 10.6 12.0 9.8
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 11:06 AM 11:39 AM 12:45 PM 12:03 PM 1:11 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 11:58 AM 11:44 AM 1:29 PM 1:40 PM 1:52 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ti) 11.40 11.40 11.10 12.40 10.50
Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.40
Elevation: Top of Pier (it)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 87.60 87.60 87.90 86.60 88.50
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174699 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174698
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/11/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 7
Driller: Liberty
Pier Idemification G-6 H-6 J-6 K-6 L-6
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minlmnm Depth (fl) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (it) 11.80 10.80 11.20 10.50 10.60
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it) * 11.80 11.20 11.50 10.60 10.60
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (it) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (it) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.6 10.0 10.5 9.7 9.7
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:40 AM 9:17 AM 9:52 AM 10:19 AM 10:45 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 9:58 AM 10:09 AM 10:17 AM 11:22 AM 11:37 AM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 11.20 10.70 11.00 10.10 10.20
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.60 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.40
Elevation: Top of Pier (it) ** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 87.80 88.30 88.00 88.90 88.80
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174699 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
· Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174698
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/11/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 6 of 7
Driller: Liberty
Pier Ide ,ntification C-2.5 D.2-2.5 B-2.5 A.3-2.5 A.3-3
Pier Diameter (in) 30 30 30 30 30
:Bell Diameter (in) 84 84 84 84 84
Required Minimum Depth (fi) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fi) 10.40 10.50 10.70 11.00 10.90
IDepth of Pier After Underreaming (ii)* 10.50 10.80 10.80 11.10 11.50
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (It) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinfoming Bar Size (#) 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (It) 9.7 9.8 9.8 10.1 10.8
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 9:30 AM 9:04 AM 10:00 AM 10:23 AM 10:50 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 10:52 AM 10:45 AM 11:15 AM 11:22 AM 1:45 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (It) 10.00 10.40 10.30 10.50 11.10
Elevation: Surface (fi)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.60 99.40
Elevation: Top of Pier (It)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (fi)** 89.00 88.60 88.70 88.50 87.90
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174699 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete fi.om existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject rn
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174698
Project NO.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/11/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 7 of 7
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification B-3 A.3-4 B-4 A.3-4.7 B-4.7
Pier Diameter (in) 30 30 30 30 30
Bell Diameter (in) 84 84 84 84 84
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underre~ming (fl) 11.20 10.40 11.00 11.00 10.60
Depth of Pier After Underreamlng (ft)* 12.00 10.40 11.10 11.30 11.20
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (fr) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 11.0 9.5 10.0 10.2 10.3
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 11:17 AM 12:56 PM 11:40 AM 1:16 PM 1:43 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:51 PM 2:00 PM 2:07 PM 2:15 PM 2:24 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 11.50 10.00 10.60 10.80 10.70
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.50 89.00 88.40 88.20 88.30
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174699 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
ineers
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Cbppell, TX
Services: Drilled Pier Inspection
8908 Ambassador Row
DaUas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION
Report No.: 174417
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/08/2003
Report Date: 04/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 6
Technician: Rick Smith
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1} Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m. - 4:45 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
K. Scott
arson
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa~e 1 of 1
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
'Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174417
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/8/2003
500 Freepo~ Parkway Page 2 of 6
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification B.5-7 A.9-7 A.2-7 A-6.5 A-6
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 72 72 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (it) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (it) 13.00 12.80 13.50 13.00 11.00
Depth of Pier Aiter Underreaming (it)* 13.40 13.50 13.50 13.00 11.50
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (it) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (fi) 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.0 9.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:43 AM 9:05 AM 9:22 AM 9:28 AM 9:52 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 9:10 AM 9:20 AM 9:38 AM 10:08 AM 10:15 AM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 11.90 12.00 12.00 11.50 10.00
Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (it)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 86.10 86.00 86.00 86.50 88.00
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174418 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
Note 1: Minimum depth of 12' or top of sand whichever is first.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composifion, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control.
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of
Rone Engineers, Ltd.
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174417
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/8/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 6
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification A-5.5 A-5 A-4.5 A-4 A-3.1
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 60 60
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underre~mlng (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.20 11.60
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 12.00 12.10 12.00 12.60 11.80
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (f~) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 9.3 10.0 10.0 8.6 8.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 9:54 AM 10:20 AM 10:24 AM 10:49 AM 10:55 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 10:20 AM 10:25 AM 10:40 AM 11:20 AM 11:24 AM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (t~) 10.50 10.50 10.40 9.10 8.30
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.60 99.60 99.50 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 96.00 96.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.50 87.50 87.60 86.90 87.70
iBearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174418 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
~emarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the spedfic samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174417
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/8/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 6
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification A-2.7 A-2.4 A-2 A- 1.5 A.2-1
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.60 11.80 12.60 12.00 11.20
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 12.60 12.70 12.90 12.30 11.20
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinfoming Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinfoming Steel (fi) 10.5 10.5 11.0 10.3 9.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 11:33 AM 11:57 AM 11:43 AM 1:00 PM 1:43 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am /pm) 11:49 AM 12:25 PM 12:35 PM 1:50 PM 2:00 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (fi) 11.10 11.20 11.40 10.70 9.60
Elevation: Surface (fi)** 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.60 99.60
Elevation: Top of Pier (f0** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (fi)** 86.90 86.80 86.60 87.30 88.40
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174418 for Compressive Strength Test Specimeas.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the spedfic samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174417
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/8/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 6
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification A.4-1 A.9-1 B. 5-1 C- 1 C.5-1
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (it) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (f0 12.80 I 1.40 11.20 11.10 11.80
Depth of Pier ARer Underreaming (ft)* 12.80 11.50 11.20 11.30 11.80
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (it) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 10.6 9.2 9.2 9.2 10.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 1:02 PM 1:23 PM 1:54 PM 2:18 PM 2:20 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:24 PM 2:05 PM 2:12 PM 2:55 PM 3:00 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 11.20 10.00 9.60 9.70 10.30
Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.60 99.50 99.60 99.60 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (fi)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 86.80 88.00 88.40 88.30 87.70
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174418 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, per[ormance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174417
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/8/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 6 of 6
Driller: Liberty
Pier Ideatification C.7-1 D.2-1 D.5-1 D.9-1 E.4-1.5
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (fi) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.50 11.20 11.00 11.20 11.10
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 11.50 11.20 11.00 11.50 11.60
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 9.5 9.1 8.8 9.6 9.5
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 2:57 PM 2:37 PM 3:13 PM 3:40 PM 3:36 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:23 PM 3:30 PM 3:50 PM 3:55 PM 4:05 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 10.00 9.70 9.40 10.00 10.00
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.50 99.60 99.50 99.60
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 88.00 88.30 88.60 88.00 88.00
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174418 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, pen~ormance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RoneEn g
8908 Ambassador Row
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-9745
(214) 630-9819 (fax)
REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston
5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport 10
500 Freeport Parkway
Cbppell, TX
Services: Drilled Pier Inspection
Report No.: 174608
Project No.: 037333
Date of Service: 04/10/2003
Report Date: (I4/15/2003
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform
Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 6
Technician: Rick Smith
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) City of Coppell Building Dept.
(1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers
6:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
(1) Engineering Analyst
(1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept.
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99DD Pa£e 1 of 1
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174608
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/10/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 6
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification E.2-1.9 D.8-1.9 D.2-1.9 C.6-1.9 C-1.9
Pier Diameter (in) 30 30 30 30 30
Bell Diameter (in) 84 84 84 84 84
Required Minimum Depth (It) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.30 11.00 10.80 11.20 11.50
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 11.30 11.40 11.10 11.30 11.60
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 10.2 10.4 9.8 10.4 10.5
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 9:40 AM 10:09 AM 10:36 AM 10:58 AM 11:24 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 10:52 AM 10:57 AM 11:15 AM 11:22 AM 12:30 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 10.80 10.80 10.70 10.80 11.20
Elevation: Surface (It)** 99.50 99.60 99.40 99.50 99.40
Elevation: Top of Pier (it)** 99.00 .! 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (It)** 88.20 88.20 88.30 88.20 87.80
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174609 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
Notel: 12' minimum depth or top of sand whichever is first.
LIMITATIONS: The test resu[[s presented herein were prepared based upon the spedfic samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, ets.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control.
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the wdtten approval of
Rone Engineers, Ltd.
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174608
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/10/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 6
Driller: Liberty
Pier Ide.ntification B-1.9 A.4-1.9 E.2-2.5 D.8-2.5 C.6-2.5
Pier Diameter (in) 30 30 30 30 30
Bell Diameter (in) 84 84 84 84 84
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (t~) 11.30 11.50 10.80 10.70 11.60
Depth of Pier At~er Underreaming (it)* 11.40 11.80 11.30 I 1.10 12.00
Condition of Bottom (wet / d~) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (f~) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.5 10.8 10.4 10.0 11.0
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 11:56 AM 1:10 PM 2:26 PM 1:47 PM 3:30 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 12:38 PM 2:05 PM 2:42 PM 2:35 PM 4:05 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 11.00 11.30 10.70 10.60 11.50
Elevation: Surface (It)** 99.40 99.50 99.60 99.50 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (It)** 88.00 87.70 88.30 88.40 87.50
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174609 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete fi.om existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174608
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/10/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 6
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification M-4 N-4 N-5 M-5 L-5
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (lc) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.40 11.60 12.00 10.80 10.90
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 11.40 11.70 12.10 11.10 10.90
Condition of Bottom (wet / dr7) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (lc) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.4 10.5 11.0 10.0 9.8
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:38 AM 9:03 AM 9:37 AM 10:10 AM 10:51 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 9:25 AM 9:34 AM 9:48 AM 10:12 AM 12:28 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (lc) 10.90 11.10 11.60 10.50 10.40
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.60 99.50 99.60 99.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (f0** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (lc)** 88.10 87.90 87.40 88.50 88.60
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174609 for Compressive Sirength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174608
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/10/2003
$00 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 6
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification K-5 J-5 H-5 G-5 F-5
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.20 11.00 11.40 10.70 11.10
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 11.30 11.10 11.50 12.30 11.80
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.3 10.0 10.7 11.0 10.7
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 11:31 AM 11:24 AM 12:50 PM 1:03 PM 2:04 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am/pm) 12:39 PM 1:17 PM 1:28 PM 1:43 PM 2:49 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ffi 10.90 10.50 11.00 11.70 11.20
Elevation: Surface (fi)** 99.40 99.60 99.50 99.60 99.60
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 88.10 88.50 88.00 87.30 87.80
.Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174609 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
I* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174608
Project No.: 037333
Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/10/2003
500 Freeport Parkway Page 6 of 6
Driller: Liberty
Pier Identification E-5 D-5 D~6 E-6 F-6
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66
Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.00 11.00 11.40 10.70 11.30
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 11.50 11.50 12.00 11.20 11.70
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (Ir) 10.5 10.5 11.0 10.0 10.5
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 2:37 PM 3:13 PM 3:27 PM 2:50 PM 2:09 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:56 PM 3:22 PM 3:55 PM 3:50 PM 3:12 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (It) 11.00 11.00 11.40 10.60 11.30
Elevation: Surface (fl)** 99.50 99.50 99.60 99.60 99.40
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 88.00 88.00 87.60 88.40 87.70
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay
Note: See report #174609 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted.
Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of
pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and
measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m