The URL can be used to link to this page

Freeport NIP(7.0)-LR030423 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING Client: Project: Services: Duke Realty Services, LP Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards. Report No.: 175013 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/16/2003 Report Date: 04/23/2003 PROJECT DATA CONTRACTOR: Duke Realty Services, LP Test Methods: ASTM D-2922 ASTM D-3017 Standard Counts Density Current: 3075 Previous: 3081 Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture Gauge Serial No: 32720 Current: 667 Test Mode: DT Previous: 655 MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Maximum Project Requirements M/D No. Description Moisture % Density pcf Moisture Density 1 Tarmish Brown Sandy Clay (Lime Treated) 22.0 100.0 Optimum + 9Y- 100 min FIELD DENSITY TESTS TEST PROBE NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY No. (%) OeO OeO (%max) Lime Subgrade 1 Building pad, 900' East by 100' North of 6" 1 22.7 118.0 96.2 96 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 2 Building pad, 900' East by 200' North of 6" 1 23.5 119.4 96.7 97 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 3 Building pad, 900' East by 300' North of 6" 1 24.2 118.6 95.5 96 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 4 Building pad, 900' East by 400' North of 6" 1 22.3 116.4 95.2 95 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 5 Building pad, 900' East by 500' North of 6" 1 25.1 121.8 97.4 97 southwest comer, final LIMITATIONS: The test results presented heroin were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 07DD Page 1 of 2 Report No.: 175013 RoneEngineers Project No.: 037333 Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Technician Time: Technician: Larmy Gist Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineem Test results on this repo~ meet pr~ect specification. 6:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. Started: Finished: (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 07DD Page 2 of 2 RoneEngineers 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houstoo, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING Client: Project: Services: Duke Realty Services, LP Arm: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Freeport I 0 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards. Report No.: 174820 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/14/2003 Report Date: 04/23/2003 PROJECT DATA CONTRACTOR: Duke Realty Services, LP Test Methods: ASTM D-2922 ASTM D-3017 Standard Counts Density Current: 3081 Previous: 3084 Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture Gauge Serial No: 32720 Current: 655 Test Mode: DT Previous: 653 MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Maximum Project Requirements M/D No. Description Moisture % Density pcf Moisture Density 1 Tannish Brown Sandy Clay (Lime Treated) 22.0 100.0 Optimum + 95 rain FIELD DENSITY TESTS TEST NO TEST LOCATION PROBE MfD MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY DEPTH No. (%) (pcf) (pet') (% max) Lime Subgrade 1 Building pad, 800' East by 100' North of 6" 1 23.3 118.2 95.9 96 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 2 Building pad, 800' East by 200' North of 6" 1 23.7 118.9 96.1 96 southwest corner, final Lime Subgrade 3 Building pad, 800' East by 300' North of 6" 1 24.1 118.0 95.1 95 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 4 Building pad, 800' East by 400' North of 6" 1 22.0 115.9 95.0 95 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 5 Building pad, 850' East by 500' North of 6" I 24.8 120.4 96.5 97 southwest comer, final LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and are addressed and shall not be reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 07DD Page 1 of 2 Report No.: 174820 Project No.: 037333 Client: Duke Realty Services, LP RoneEngineers TEST NO TEST LOCATION PROBE M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY DEPTH No. (%) (pcf) (pc0 (% max) Lime Subgrade 6 Building pad, 850' East by 400' North of southwest corner, final Lime Subgrade 7 Building pad, 850' East by 300' North of southwest corner, final Lime Subgrade 8 Building pad, 850' East by 200' North of southwest corner, final Technician: Lanny Gist Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Pacheeo Koch Consulting Engineers 6" 1 25.0 118.9 95.1 95 6" 1 23.2 119.5 97.0 97 6" 1 23.5 121.4 98.3 98 Test results on this report meet project specification. Finished: l:30pm Started: 6:30am (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppefi Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 07DD Page 2 of 2 glneers 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Attn: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway C0ppell, TX Services: Drilled Pier Inspection Report No.: 175196 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/18/2003 Report Date: 04/23/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 7 Technician: Rick Smith Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (I) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers 6:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 99DD Pa~e 1 of 1 RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175196 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport I0 Date of Service: 4/18/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 7 Driller: Liberty Drilling Pier Identification P-3 Q-3 R-3 S-3 T-3 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth o£Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.30 10.80 10.90 11.70 11.70 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (f0* 11.70 10.80 11.10 12.00 11.80 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.8 9.9 10.2 11.0 11.0 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:17 AM 9:05 AM 9:01 AM 9:25 AM 9:39 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 11:50 AM 12:04 PM 12:11 PM 12:20 PM 12:26 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 11.20 10.40 10.70 I 1.50 11.30 Elevation: Surface (fi)** 99.50 99.40 99.40 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (fi)** 87.80 88.60 88.30 87.50 87.70 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan and Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #175197 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: 12' minimum depth or top of sand P-3, P-4, P-5 and P-6 are section 2, balance of piers this date are for section 3. ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surfact elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided f(~r testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175196 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/18/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 7 Driller: Liberty Drilling Pier Identification U-3 V-3 V-4 U-4 T-4 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.80 11.70 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (fi)* 12.00 11.80 11.90 11.80 11.80 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 ' 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 11.0 10.9 11.0 11.0 11.0 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 9:51 AM 9:58 AM 10:13 AM 10:33 AM 10:41 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 12:33 PM 12:40 PM 12:46 PM 12:52 PM 12:58 PM !Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 8.50 8.30 8.50 8.30 8.40 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 96.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.50 87.70 87.50 87.70 87.60 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan and Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #175197 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional P~netration not requested unless noted. Remarks: 12' minimum depth or top of sand ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surfact elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175196 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/18/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 7 Driller: Liberty Drilling :Pier Identification S-4 R-4 Q-4 P-4 P-5 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.10 12.00 11.80 11.60 11.70 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 12.10 12.00 12.40 11.60 12.20 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 11.2 11.0 11.5 10.7 11.4 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 10:59 AM II:07AM I:12PM 11:32 AM 11:58 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:06 PM 2:55 PM 3:01 PM 3:07 PM 3:14 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 11.60 11.50 12.00 11.10 11.70 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (f~)** 87.40 87.50 87.00 87.90 87.30 Beating Stratum (description) Tan and Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #175197 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: 12' minimum depth or top of sand ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing suffact elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in :lualtiy (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175196 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/18/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 7 Driller: Liberty Drilling Pier Identification Q-5 R-5 S-5 T-5 U-5 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.90 11.70 12.20 11.90 11.70 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 12.10 11.70 12.40 12.50 12.40 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry :Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 11.2 10.9 11.5 11.5 11.5 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 12:54 PM 1:21 PM 1:35 PM 1:51 PM 1:57 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:20 PM 3:25 PM 3:29 PM 3:34 PM 3:40 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 11.70 11.20 11.90 12.00 12.00 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.30 87.80 87.10 87.00 87.00 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan and Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #175197 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: 12' minimum depth or top of sand ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surfact elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175196 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/18/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 6 of 7 ~riller: Liberty Drilling Pier Identification V-5 V-6 U-6 T-6 S-6 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.70 11.70 12.30 12.30 12.20 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 11.80 11.80 12.80 12.50 12.40 Condition of Bottom (wet/dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinfoming Steel (ft) 10.9 11.0 11.7 11.6 11.5 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 2:13 PM 2:36 PM 2:07 PM 2:30 PM 2:44 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am /pm) 3:25 PM 3:31 PM 3:38 PM 3:42 PM 3:47 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 11.40 11.30 12.30 12.10 12.00 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.40 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 87.60 87.70 86.70 86.90 87.00 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan and Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report # 175197 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: 12' minimum depth or top of sand ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing sm'fact elevation. LIMfTATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Repo~t No.: 175196 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date o£Service: 4/18/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 7 of 7 Driller: Liberty Drilling Pier Identification R-6 Q-6 P-6 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 ~Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.00 11.70 11.00 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (12)* 12.50 12.30 11.20 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#), 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel fit) 11.6 11.4 10.3 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 3:12 PM 3:03 PM 3:10 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:54 PM 4:13 PM 4:20 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 12.10 11.80 10.80 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.50 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier fit)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 86.90 87.20 88.20 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan and Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #175197 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: 12' minimum depth or top of sand ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing suffact elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subiect m 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214} 630-9745 REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Attn: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway C0ppell, TX Services: Drilled Pier Inspection Report No.: 175014 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/16/2003 Report Date: 04/23/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 5 Technician: Rick Smith Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (I) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers 6:30 a.m. - 4:15 p.m. (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 99DD Pa£e 1 of 1 RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175014 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/16/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 5 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification N-11 M-11 L-11 K-11 J-11 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (it) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (it) 11.20 10.00 10.90 10.40 10.30 Depth of Pier After Underreaminl~ (ft)* 11.50 10.50 11.00 11.10 10.30 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (It) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 10.6 9.5 10.0 10.0 9.4 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:30 AM 8:48 AM 9:06 AM 10:00 AM 10:22 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 11:18 AM 11:33 AM 11:48 AM 12:00 PM 12:09 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 11.10 10.00 10.60 10.60 9.80 Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.40 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (it)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 87.90 89.00 88.40 88.40 89.20 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #175015 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: * 12~ minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first. Section 5 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented heroin were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no respansibility for variation in :luality (nomposition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175014 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/16/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 5 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification H-11 G-11 F-11 E-11 D-11 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (f~) 10.90 10.30 10.90 10.70 10.70 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 11.00 10.40 11.10 11.10 10.70 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA !Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (f0 10.0 9.5 10.0 10.0 9.9 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 10:41 AM 11:05 AM 11:21 AM 11:37 AM 12:01 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 12:15 PM 12:40 PM 12:47 PM 12:56 PM 1:20 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 10.50 10.00 10.60 10.60 10.30 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (f~)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 88.50 89.00 88.40 88.40 88.70 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report # 175015 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: * 12' minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first. Section 5 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top &pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test .suits presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175014 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/16/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 5 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification D- 12 E- 12 F- 12 G- 12 H- 12 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (it) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (It) 10.30 11.00 11.20 10.60 10.90 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it)* 10.50 11.20 11.50 10.80 11.30 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (it) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 9.5 10.4 10.7 9.9 10.4 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 12:51 PM 1:05 PM 1:29 PM 1:03 PM 1:32 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:28 PM 1:34 PM 2:00 PM 2:09 PM 2:17 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (f0 10.00 10.80 11.00 10.40 10.90 Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.40 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 89.00 88.20 88.00 88.60 88.10 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay INote: See report #175015 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: * 12' minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first. Section 5 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete Yom existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for vadafion in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175014 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/16/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 5 Driller: Liberty ., Pier Identification J- 12 K- 12 L- 12 M- 12 N- 12 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 ~66 66' Required Minimum Depth (fi) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fi) 11.10 10.40 10.90 11.50 10.50 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (f0* 11.50 10.70 10.90 12.00 10.80 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA. NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.5 9.9 10.0 11.0 9.9 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 1:52 PM 2:12 PM 2:35 PM 2:00 PM 2:30 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:40 PM 2:50 PM 3:02 PM 3:10 PM 3:30 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (fi) 11.00 10.30 10.40 11.50 10.40 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 88.00 88.70 88.60 87.50 88.60 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #175015 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: * 12' minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first. Section 5 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete fi.om existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject rn 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway C0ppell, TX Services: Drilled Pier Inspection Report No.: 174916 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/15/2003 Report Date: 04/23/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 5 Technician: Rick Smith Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Paeheeo Koch Consulting Engineers 6:30 a.m. - 4:15 p.m. (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports am for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 99DD Pa~e 1 of 1 RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174916 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/15/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 5 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification N-9 M-9 L-9. K-9 J-9 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (It) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fi) 11.50 10.50 10.50 10.40 10.60 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 12.00 11.00 10.80 11.00 10.90 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (fi) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 11.0 I 0.0 9.9 10.0 9.8 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:33 AM 9:02 AM 9:18 AM 9:35 AM 9:51 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 10:20 AM 10:28 AM 11:00 AM 11:06 AM 11:12 AM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 11.50 10.60 10.20 10.50 10.40 Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.50 99.40 99.60 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (fi)** 87.50 88.40 88.80 88.50 88.60 Bearing Slzatum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #174918 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: * 12' minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, andbottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as show on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in uality (composition. appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. ~)ur letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of ~one Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174916 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/15/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 5 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification H-9 G-9 F-9 E-9 D-9 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (It) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 10.40 10.20 11.60 10.50 10.30 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it)* 10.50 10.40 11.90 10.50 10.50 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry ?lumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (it) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 9.6 9.6 10.8 9.6 9.7 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 10:55 AM 11:15 AM 11:36 AM 11:53 AM 12:50 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 11:20 AM 1:36 PM 1:41 PM 1:49 PM 1:55 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 10.20 10.00 11.50 10.10 10.00 Elevation: Surface (It)** 99.30 99.40 99.40 99.40 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99:00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (It)** 88.80 89.00 87.50 88.90 89.00 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #174918 for Compressive Strength Test. Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: * 12' minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as show on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174916 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/15/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of $ Driller: Liberty Pier Identification D- 10 E- 10 F- 10 G- 10 H- 10 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (fi) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (it) 10.10 10.60 10.40 10.40 10.70 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 10.30 10.60 10.50 10.90 10.70 Condition of Bottom (wet/dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes 'Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (it) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 - 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 9.4 9.7 9.7 10.0 9.8 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 1:20 PM 1:40 PM 1:37 PM 1:58 PM 2:02 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:24 PM 2:30 PM 2:48 PM 2:54 PM 3:00 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 9.90 10.20 10.00 10.40 10.20 Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.40 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (~t)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 89.10 88.80 89.00 88.60 88.80 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report # 174918 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: * 12' minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as show on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject rn RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174916 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/15/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 5 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification J-10 K- 10 L- 10 M-10 N-10 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (it) 11.00 10.40 11.40 11.50 10.30 Depth of Pier After Underrearning (it)* 11.30 10.70 11.50 11.90 10.60 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 10.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 9.6 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 2:26 PM 2:29 PM 2:53 PM 2:40 PM 3:00 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:05 PM 3:11 PM 3:18 PM 3:35 PM 3:40 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 10.90 10.40 11.00 11.40 10.10 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.30 99.50 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 88.10 88.60 88.00 87.60 88.90 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report # 174918 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: * 12' minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as show on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for vadation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any ether feature of similar subject m 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway C0ppell, TX Services: Drilled Pier Inspection Report No.: 174821 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/14/2003 Report Date: 04/23/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 4 Technician: Rick Smith Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Pacheeo Koch Consulting Engineers 6:30 a.m. - 3:45 p.m. (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for vatiation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 99DD Pa.e 1 of 1 RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174821 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/14/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 4 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification B-5.5 B-6.3 A.3-5.5 A.3-6.3 Pier Diameter (in) 30 30 30 30 Bell Diameter (in) 84 84 84 84 Required Minimum Depth (It) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 11.00 11.10 10.60 11.50 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (It)* 11.30 11.40 10.80 11.60 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6 8/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 10.4 10.5 9.9 10.5 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 9:11 AM 9:42 AM 10:17 AM 12:49 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 10:32 AM 10:47 AM 11:00 AM 1:28 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 10.80 11.00 10.40 11.00 Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.50 99.40 99.40 99.60 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 88.20 88.00 88.60 88.00 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay Note: See report # 174822 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: 12' minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first Section 2 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174821 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/14/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 4 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification D-8 E-8 F-8 G-8 H-8 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (it) 10.50 11.90 10.40 10.00 10.20 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it)* 11.30 12.10 10.60 I0.10 10.20 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (it) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 10.5 11.1 9.5 9.0 9.0 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 11:57 AM 12:53 PM 1:21 PM 1:44 PM 1:28 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am/pm) 12:48 PM 1:16 PM 1:51 PM 2:03 PM 2:18 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 10.90 11.60 10.10 9.50 9.70 Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.60 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (it)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 88.10 87.40 88.90 89.50 89.30 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay Note: See report #174822 for C6mpressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: 12' minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first Section 2 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 174821 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/14/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 4 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification J-8 K-8 L-8 M-8 N-8 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 ' 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fi) 10.40 10.70 11.00 I 0.80 11.10 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 10.80 11.10 11.20 11.10 11.10 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (it) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 '6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 9.7 10.2 10.2 10.0 10.1 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 2:18 PM 1:55 PM 2:34 PM 2:21 PM 2:47 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:40 PM 2:48 PM 3:00 PM 3:05 PM 3:10 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 10.30 10.70 10.70 10.60 10.60 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.50' Elevation: Top of Pier (it)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 88.70 88.30 88.30 88.40 88.40 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Sandy Clay Note: See report #174822 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: 12~ minimum depth or top of sand, whichever is first Section 2 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the spec/fie samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, pen~ormance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m gineers 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Attn: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Services: Drilled Pier Inspection Report No.: 175101 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/17/2003 Report Date: 04/23/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: 6:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Page 1 of 3 Technician: Arty Nickonov Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no msponsibilily for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feaiure of similar subject matter pmvided by persons or conditions over which we have no contml. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 99DD Page I of 1 RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT O~ BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175101 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/17/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 3 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification N- 13 M- 13 L- 13 K- 13 J- 13 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (it) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (it) 10.80 10.30 I 1.10 10.60 10.30 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it)* 11.30 10.80 11.40 10.80 10.30 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 10.5 9.8 10.6 9.5 9.4 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:15 AM 8:50 AM 11:42 AM 11:59 AM 1:41 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 12:54 PM 1:09 PM 1:27 PM 1:49 PM 2:07 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (fl) 10.90 10.30 11.00 10.30 9.80 Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.40 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 88. I 0 88.70 88.00 88.70 89.20 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #175102 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 5/12' minimum depth or top of sand whichever is first ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surfact elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 175101 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 4/17/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 3 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification H- 13 G- 13 F- 13 E- 13 D- 13 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 10.40 11.20 11.40 11.30 11.40 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 10.70 11.40 I 1.50 11.30 11.60 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Rein£oming Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 9.9 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.6 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 12:58 PM 1:16 PM 1:50 PM 1:24 PM 2:07 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:19 PM 2:33 PM 2:41 PM 2:56 PM 2:48 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 10.20 11.00 11.00 10.90 11.10 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.40 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft) ** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (f0 ** 88.80 88.00 88.00 88.10 87.90 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Sandy Clay Note: See report # 175102 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. *Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 5/12' minimum depth or top of sand whichever is first. ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing suffact elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m gineers 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houstoo, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING Client: Project: Services: Duke Realty Services, LP Attn: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards. Report No.: 175283 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/21/2003 Report Date: 04/23/2003 PROJECT DATA CONTRACTOR: Duke Realty Services, LP Test Methods: ASTM D-2922 ASTM D-3017 Standard Counts Density Current: 3090 Previous: 3081 Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture Gauge Serial No: 32720 Current: 659 Test Mode: DT Pre*ious: 655 MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Maximum Project Requirements M/D No. Description Moisture % Density pcf Moisture Density 1 Tarmish Brown Sandy Clay (Lime Treated) 22.0 100.0 Optimum + ~5-100 FlELD DENSITY TESTS TEST PROBE NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY NO. (%) (pcf) (PCO (% max) Lime Subgrade 1 Building Pad, 950' east by 100' north of 6" 1 22.1 116.1 95.1 95 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 2 Building Pad, 950' east by 200' north of 6" 1 22.5 116.9 95.4 95 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 3 Building Pad, 950' east by 300' north of 6" 1 23.0 120.9 98.3 98 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 4 Building Pad, 950' east by 400' north of 6" 1 22.9 117.7 95.8 96 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 5 Building pad, 1000' east by 500' north of 6" 1 22.4 119.6 97.7 98 southwest comer, final LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of sireilar subject reatter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and repons are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 07DD Page 1 of 2 Report No.: 175283 RoneEngineers Project No.: 037333 ~ll~ Client: Duke Realty Services, LP TEST NO TESTLOCATION PROBE DEPTH M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY NO. (%) (pcf) (pcf) (% max) Lime Subgrade 6 Building pad, 1000' east by 400' north of 6" 1 24.7 123.2 98.8 99 southwest corner, final Lime Subgrade 7 Building pad, 1000' east by 300' north of 6" 1 22.9 117.4 95.5 96 southwest comer, fma! Lime Subgrade 8 Building pad, 1000' east by 200' north of 6" 1 22.0 116.4 95.4 95 southwest comer, final Test results on this report meet project specification. Report Distribution: /~/ b(,~.,_~__..~/ (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Engineering Analyst (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (I) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports am for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 07DD Page 2 of 2