Valley R Plaza 2-CS 930902LI; (��EL
SEP 71993
W. T. "SKIP" LEAKE
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
800 West Airport Freeway
Suite 1020, L.B. 6086
Irving, Texas 75062
(214) 438 -3900
W. T. "Skip" Leake
Michael L. Atchley
FAX: (214) 554 -1219
September 2, 1993
City of Coppell CMRRR# P 053 744 484
Planning Department
P. O. Box 478
255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas 75019
Re: Case No. Replat - Valley Ranch Plaza, Pads B -F
and Case No. S -1070 Boston Chicken Restaurant
Gentlemen:
I represent Curtis L. Graf and Ronald J. Krause the fee
owners of Pad H of Valley Ranch Plaza, hereinafter (the
"Property ").
My clients are the owners and beneficiaries of a non-
exclusive perpetual easement of access (the "Easement ") for
purposes of ingress and egress to Pad H over and across Pad F and
Pad G of Valley Ranch Plaza per the recorded Plat. This Easement
was filed on September 13, 1988 and duly recorded in Volume
88178, Page 5634.
Previously the City believed that a replat of Pads E, F and
G supposedly abandoned the referenced easement. I do not see how
that is the case without the written consent of my clients.
Further in Case No. S -1028, the City Council approved a special
use permit for my clients to construct and operate a self - service
car wash on Pad H. However, the car wash development will now
fail because the Wendy's Construction on Pad G and the proposed
replat and construction of the Boston Chicken Restaurant on Pad F
has and will landlock Pad H and deny access to Pad H for a
meaningful use because of the obstruction of the Easement by
Wendy's and /or the proposed Boston Chicken Restaurant.
it
City of Coppell
Planning Department
September 2, 1993
Page 2
Further, please be advised that the Easement has not been
abandoned, has never been abandoned and that Wendy's
International, Inc. and /or Boston Chicken Restaurant have and
will continue to interfere with my clients' access to and ingress
and egress from their Property, Pad H by way of the Easement.
As a result, my clients hereby protest and oppose the above
referenced cases, because if granted same will destroy any
legitimate use of Pad H as it will be la d without access
due to the interference and obstructs of thesement.
Please contact me should you w rLeake information.
Otherwise I and my clients will se 16, 1993 to
publicly oppose the referenced cas
Sinc
WTL:rm
Enclosure:None
xc: Curtis Graf
Ron Krause
File
1:34:19