Loading...
Freeport NIP(7.0)-LR030506RoneEngi eers 8908 Ambassador Row, Dullus, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING Client: Project: Services: Duke Realty Services, LP Atto: Mr. Jeff Langston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance wffh ASTM Standards. Report No.: 176017 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 05/01/2003 Report Date: 05/06/2003 PROJECT DATA CONTRACTOR: Test Methods: Duke Realty Services, LP ASTM D-2922 ASTM D-3017 Gauge: Troxler 3430 Gauge S~rial No: 32720 Test Mode: DT No. Description Moisture Current: 661 Previous: 652 MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Maximum Moisture % Density pcf Tannish Brown Sandy Clay (Lime Treated) Standard Counts Density Current: 3087 Previous: 3066 Project Requirements Moisture Density 22.0 100.0 Optimum + 95-100 FIELD DENSITY TESTS TEST NO PROBE TEST LOCATION DEPTH M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY ~qo. (%) (pcf) (l)c0 (% max) Lime Subgrade . Building pad, 1300' east by 100' north of 6" 1 22.3 119.0 97.3 97 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade Building pad, 1300' east by 200' north of 6" 1 22.4 120.7 98.6 99 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade Building pad, 1300' east by 300' north of 6" I 22.7 117.4 95.7 96 southwest comer, ~mal Lime Subgrade Building pad, 1300' east by 400' north of 6" 1 22.8 116.7 95.0 95 southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade Building pad, 1400' east by 500' north of 6" 1 23.4 118.7 96.2 96 southwest comer, final LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (coroposi'don, appearance, perfonnance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subj eot roatter provided by persons .or condi.fi, ons over w.hich we have no control. ~ letto~s, ,a, nd reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whoro they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except ro full without the whiten approval of Rone Engineers, l~m. 07DD Page 1 of 2 Report No.: 176017 Project No.: 037333 Client: Duke Realty Services, LP RoneEngineers TEST NO TEST LOCATION PROBE DEPTH M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY No. (%) (pc0 (pc0 (% max) Lime Subgrade 6 Building pad, 1400' east by 400' north of southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 7 Building pad, 1400' east by 300' north of southwest comer, final Lime Subgrade 8 Building pad, 1400' east by 200' north of Southwest comer, final Technician: Lanny Gist Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke R~mlty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building D~t. (1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers 6" 1 22.1 119.4 97.8 98 6" 1 23.8 118.2 95.5 96 6" I 22.3 121.1 99.0 99 Test results on this report meet project specification. Started: 6:30am Finished: 2:30pm (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, perfunnanee, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they ave addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 07DD Page 2 of 2 RoneEn g nee s 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel DHve, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, StP. 1.50, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 CONCRETE BEAM FLEXURAL STRENGTH Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Arm: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Report No.: 175577 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/25/2003 Report Date: 05/05/2003 Project: Services: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parlovay Coppell, TX Obtain samples of fi:esh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field testing, cast flexural sltength samples and bring samples back to the laboratory for curing and testing in accordance with applicable standards. coNTaAcrom Duke Realty Services, LP CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Pot~er PLANT: OD site SPEClVICArION REQUnU~smwrs STRENGTH: 650 psi ~ 28 Days SLt~P (in): 6" max]mum AIR (%): NA TEST METHOD: ASTM C-172 ASTM C-143 ASTM C-1064 ASTM C-78 PROJECT DATA MIX DESIGN I.D.: 9349 PLACEMENT DATE: 04/25/2003 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Clear TIME SAMPLED: 4:05SD1 BATCH TL~: 3:42am TEMPEanT~RE09-AIH 63 F CONC~TE: 80 F T~UCK NO: 108 TIC~C~T NO: 114019 AIR CONTEWr (%): NA t~T wEIGHT (pcf): NA PLACEMENT LOCATION: Slab at grid lines C~N at 11-13, Area 5 ASTM C-31 ASTIvl C-231 SAMPLE LOCATION: ASTM C-138 REPORT OF TESTS Line C.3 ut 12.7 Concrete Flexural Strength 6" x 6" Beams Span Length 18" BEAM MEASURED MAXIMUM MODULUS OF AVG AVG MARKED SLUMP DATE AGE LOAD RUPTURE WIDTH DEPTH SET NO. 0nches) TESTED (days) Obs. force) (psi) On) (in) 1 1 6.00 05/02/2003 7 6830 570 6.03 5.98 1 2 6.00 05/23/2003 28 1 3 6.00 05/23/2003 28 Water added at site: 5 gallons See report %175576 for technician time. LIMITATIONS: The mt results presented hm~in were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing We assume no responsibility for variation ia quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no con,roi. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are sddr~sed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 02DK Page 1 of 5 gineers 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 CONCRETE BEAM FLEXURAL STRENGTH Client: Project: Services: Duke Realty Services, LP At~: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Report No.: 175577 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/25/2003 Report Date: 05/05/2003 Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, p~form required field testing, ca~t flexural strength samples and bring samples back to the laboratory for curing and testing in aeeordanc~ with applicable standards. CONX~CTOR: Duke Realty Services, LP CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Potter P~Awr: On site SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS STRENGTm 650 psi ~ 28 Days SLUMP (iD): 6" rnaximum Am (%): NA TEST METHOD: ASTM C-179 ASTM C-143 ASTM C-1064 ASTM C-78 PROJECT DATA ~XDESIGN I~.: 9349 PLAC~MEwr DATE: 04/25/2003 W~R Co~omONS: Cle~ T~E S~LgD: 5:20~ BAT~ ~g: 5:14~ ~MPE~TU~ ~ - ~ 60 V CONC~TE: 81 g ~VCK~O: 112 TIC~ ~O: 114039 AIR CO~ (%): NA ~T ~IG~ ~0: NA P~CE~ L~ATIOW: Slab ~ ~d l~es C-N at 11-13, ~ea ~ ASTM C-31 ASTM C-231 SAMPLE LOCATION: ASTM C-138 REPORT OF TESTS Line E. 1 at 11.5 Concrete Flexural Strength 6" x 6" Beams Span Length 18" BEAM MEASURED MAXIMUM MODULUS OF AVG AVG MARKED SLUMP DATE AGE LOAD RUPTURE WIDTH DEPTH SET NO. (inches) TESTED (days) 01~. force) (psi) (in) On) 2 1 4.75 05/02/2003 7 7500 610 6. l ! 6.02 2 2 4.75 05/23/2003 28 · 2 3 4.75 05/23/2003 28 Beam specimen's moisture condition was wet at the time of testing, all speclmenz were ground as needed and tested with the use of leather shims. Water added at site: 5 gallons See report #175576 for technician time: LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other fesatre of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control Our letters and ~ports a~ for the exclusive use of the diems to whom they are addrossed and shall not be wproduced except in full without the wtit~m approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 02DK Page 2 of 5 R ineers 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel DHve, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, StD. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 CONCRETE BEAM FLEXURAL STRENGTH Client: Project: Services: Duke Realty Services, LP At~: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Report No.: 175577 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/25/2003 Report Date: 05/05/2003 Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Obtain samples offi'esh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field testing, cast flexural strength samples and bring samples back to the laboratory for curing and testing in accordance with applicable standards. co~r~cro~ Duke Real~y Services, LP CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Potter PLA~T: On site SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS STRENGTm 650 psi ~ 28 Days SLUMP On): 6" maximum nm (%): NA TEST METHOD: ASTM C-172 ASTM C-143 ASTM C-1064 ASTM C-78 PROJECT DATA MIX DESIGN I.D.: 9349 PLAC~ME~Cr DATE: 04/25/2003 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunny TIME SAMPLED: 7:20am BATCH TIM~: 6:54am TEMPEaA~.U~0O-Am 60 F CONC~: 80 F TRUCKNO: 110 TICg~X NO: 114059 nm CONT~N~ (%): NA ~T WEIGHT CmO: NA PLACEMENT LOCATION: Slab at grid lines C-N at 11-13, Area 5 ASTM C-31 ASTM C-231 SAMPLE LOCATION: AS'I'M C-138 REPORT OF TESTS Line G. 1 at 12.9 Concrete Flexural S~rength 6" x 6" Beams Span Length 18" BEAbi MARKED SET NO. MEASURED MAXIMUM MODULUS OF AVG AVG SLUMP DATE AGE LOAD RUPTURE WIDTH DEPTH Ouches) TESTED (days) Obs. force) (psi) (in) On) 3 1 5.00 05/02/2003 7 7250 590 6.06 3 2 5.00 05/23/2003 28 3 3 5.00 05/23/2003 28 Beam specimen's moisture condition was wet at the time of testing, all specimens were ground as needed and tested with the use of leather shims. Water'added at site: 5 gallons See report %175576 for technician time. LIMITATIONS: The t~st results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no conU'ol. Our leUers and reports are for the exclusive use of thc clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the wri~en approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 02DK Page 3 of 5 ,RoneEngineers 8908 Ambnssedor Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630=9745 CONCRETE BEAM FLEXURAL STRENGTH CHeat: Pro;eet: Services: Duke Realty Services, LP Attn: Mr. Jeff Langston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Report No.: 175577 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/25/2003 Report Date: 05/05/2003 Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field testing, cast flexo.mi strength samples and bring samples back to the laboratory for curing and testing in accordance with applicable standards. CONTRACTOR: D%lke Realty Services, LP CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Potter PLANT: OD site SPECmICATION REQt~REM~Wrs STRENGTH: 650 psi ~ 28 Days SLUMP (in): 6" maximum AIR (%): NA TEST METHOD: ASTM C- ! 72 ASTM C-143 ASTM C-1064 ASTM C-78 PROJECT DATA MIX DESIGN I.D.: 9349 ~LACEM~NT DATE: 04/25/2003 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunay X~m SAMVCZD: 9:00am SATCat ~nvm: 8:53am TEMPERATURE (F) - AIR 64 F CONCRETE: 82 F TaVCK NO: 108 TICE~T~O: 114079 AiR cowTEwr (%): NA tr~x v~ta~rr (pc0: NA PLACEMENT LOCATION: Slab at grid lines C-N at 11-13, Area 5 ASTM C-31 ASTM C-231 SAMPLE LOCATION: ASTM C-138 REPORT OF TESTS Line J.2 at 12.4 Concrete Flexural Strength 6" x 6" Beams Span Length 18" BEAM MEASURED MAXIMUM MODULUS OF AvG MARKED SLUMP DATE AGE LOAD RUPTURE WIDTH SET NO. Ouches) TESTED (days) Obs. force) (pal) On) 4 1 4.00 05/02/2003 7 7330 600 6,11 4 2 4.00 05/23/2003 28 4 3 4.00 05/23/2003 28 Beam specimen's moisture condition was wet at the time of testing, all specimens were ground as needed and tested with the use of leather shims. Water added at site: 5 gallons See report #175576 for technician time. AVG DEPTH (in) 6.00 LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for teming. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other fnsmre of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and repons are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addres.~d and shall not be reproduced except in fifll w/thout the written approval of Rone Engineers, L~i. 02DK Page 4 of 5 ineers 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 CONCRETE BEAM FLEXURAI, STRENGTH Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Atl~: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Report No.: 175577 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 04/25/2003 Report Date: 05/05/2003 Project: Services: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field testing, east flexural strength samples and bring samples back to the laboratory for curing and testing in accordance with applicable standards. com~.ncroa: Duke Realty Services, LP CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Potter PLANT: O11 site SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS STm~NGX~I: 650 psi ~ 28 Days SLUMP On): 6" maximum Am (%): NA TEST METHOD: ASTM C-172 ASTM C-143 ASTM C- 1064 ASTM C-78 PROJECT DATA MIX DESIGN I.D.: 9349 p[~nOZMV~NT ~)AX[: 04/25/2003 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunny xram SAM~LEn: 12:00pm SATCa T~: 1 l:49am TEMPEaATtat~ 0~- Ara 79 F CONCRETE: 83 l~ TRVCKNO: 110 TICm~TNO: 114101 Am CONTENT (%): NA . UNIT WEIGHT (pc0:' NA PLACEMENT LOCATION: Slab at g~d lines C-N at 11-13, Area 5 ASTM C-31 ASTM C-231 SAMPLE LOCATION: ASTM C-138 REPORT OF TESTS Line L.2 at 11.8 Concrete Flexural S~ength 6" x 6" Beams Span Length 18" BEAM MEASURED MAXIMUM MODULUS OF AVG AVG MARKED SLUMP DATE AGE LOAD RUPTURE WIDTH DEPTH SET NO. /Inches) TESTED (days) (lbs. force) (psi) (in) (in) 5 1 4.00 05/02/2003 7 7510 610 6.06 6.05 5 2 4.00 05~3/2003 28 5 3 4.00 05~3~003 28 Beam specimen's moisture condition was wet at the time of testing, all specimens were ground as needed and tested with the use of leather shims. See report #175576 for technician time. Teelmleinn: Jeremy Watts Report Distribution: (1) Duke Renlty S~ LP (1) Duke Rmlty Se~,icex, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Potm' Coacm'te Started: Finished: (1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engine~n~ (1) City of Coppeli Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results preheated herein were prepared basedupon the specific sampleaprovided for testing We assume no responsibility for vafiatlonin quality (composition, appearance, performance, eic.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no conu'ol. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. OiDK Page 5 of 5 neem RoneEngi_____ · 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP At-m: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Linc Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Services: Drilled Pier Inspection Report No.: 176095 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 05/02/2003 Report Date: 05/06/2003 Report of InspectiOn On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 6 Technician: Rick Smith Report Distribution'. (1) Duke Realty Ser~cea, LP (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Pacheeo Y~ch Consulting Engineers 6:30 a.m. - 3:15 p.m. (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific sample~ Provided for tes~g. We assume no respousibility for variation in quality (comlmaifion, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and repons are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 99DD Pa~e 1 of 1 RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, 12 Report No.: 176095 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/2/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 6 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification HH-9 GG-9 FF-9 EE-9 DD-9 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 ' 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreamin~ (ft) 12.60 12.90 12.80 12.30 13.00 Depth of Pier After Underreamin~ (ft)* 12.80 13.50 12.80 12.80 13.30 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance 0~es / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casinl~ Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinfominl~ Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Len~h of Reinforcin~ Steel (ft) 11.7 12.5 11.9 12.0 12.2 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:35 AM 8:46 AM 8:57 AM 9:20 AM 9:26 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 10:00 AM 10:13 AM I0:20 AM 10:42 AM 10:46 AM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (f0 12.30 13.00 12.30 12.40 12.80 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.40 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (f~)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (f~)** 86.70 86.00 86.70 86.60 86.20 iBearin~ Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #176096 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not r,quested unless noted. Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual to of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upo~ the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, pan'ormance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by parsons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not he reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176095 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/2/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 6 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification CC-9 BB-9 BB-10 CC-10 DD-10 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 13.10 13.00 12.50 12.50 12.90 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 13.30 13.60 12.80 12.60 13.00 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dr7 I)r7 Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance ()'es / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Len~h (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/~6 6/~6 6/#6 6/#6 6/~6 Len~h of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 12.3 12.7 12.0 11.7 12.1 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 9:42 AM 10:06 AM 10:16 AM 10:35 AM 10:44 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 10:52 AM 11:05 AM ll:12AM 11:23 AM 11:29 AM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 12.80 13.20 12.30 12.10 12.60 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 86.20 85.80 86.70 86.90 86.40 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #176096 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual to of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for tesUng. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, eto.) or any other feature of simller subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the cJients to whom they are addressed and shell not be reproduced except In full without the wdtten approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176095 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/2/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 6 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification EE-10 FF-10 GG-10 HH-10 HH-11 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (f~) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fi) 12.80 13.00 12.40 12.70 12.80 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 13.00 13.00 12.50 12.70 13.00 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) D~ Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Len~h (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/~a5 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Len~h of Reinforcing Steel (f0 11.8 12.0 11.5 11.8 12.0 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 11:01 AM 11:18 AM 11:35 AM 1:01 PM 11:54 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:20 PM 1:25 PM 1:36 PM 1:49 PM 1:54 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 12.60 12.50 12.00 12.30 12.50 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.40 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (f~)** 86.40 86.50 87.00 86.70 86.50 Bearing Stratum (description) ' Tan & Gray Sandy Clay qote: See report #176096 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual to of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shell not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176095 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/2/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 6 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification GG-11 FF-11 EE-11 DD-11 CC-11 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (fl) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underream[ng (ft) 12.70 12.80 12.60 12.80 13.00 Depth of Pier After Underreaminl~ (fl)* 13.00 12.80 13.10 12.90 13.10 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cas[n[[ Diameter (in) / Cas[nl~ Len~h (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcinl~ Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/g6 6/#6 Length of Re[nforcing Steel (fi) 12.1 12.0 12.2 12.0 12.2 Time Drill[nl~ was Completed (am / pm) 1:32 PM 1:27 PM 1:40 PM 1:52 PM 2:06 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:00 PM 2:06 PM 2:19 PM 2:23 PM 2:28 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Cencrete (ft) 12.50 12.40 12.60 12.40 12.60 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 86.50 86.60 86.40 86.60 86.40 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay blote: See report gl 76096 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. *Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. ~Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bear[n# stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual to of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specffic samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engine~, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176095 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/2/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 6 of 6 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification BB- 11 Pier Diameter (in) 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 Required Minimum Depth (It) 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.80 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it)* 13.00 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Len~h (it) NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 Len~h of Reinforcing Steel (it) 12.1 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 2:12 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:35 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (It) 12.60 Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (It)** 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (It)** 86.40 Bearinl~ Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #176096 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. · Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual to of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific sample~ provided for testing. Wa assume no responsibility for variation in :lual/ty (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subJect matter provided by pamorts or conditions over which we have no control. ~)ur letters and reports are fo~ the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.