Loading...
Nextel-CS 961121CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: S-1118, NEXTEL TELECOn~IlVIUNICATIONS TOWER P & Z HEARING DATE: November 21, 1996 C.C. HEARING DATE: December 10, 1996 LOCATION: At the northeast corner of Coppell Road and S.H. 121, with the S.U.P. portion located approx. 726' east of S.H. 121 as measured along the north side of Coppell Road. SIZE OF AREA: Total: 7.2 acres Special Use Permit Area: 2,500 s.f. CURRENT ZONING: C (Commercial) REQUEST: LI and LI-S.U.P. (Light Industrial and Light Industrial, Special Use Permit). APPLICANT: Applicant: Nextel of Texas, Inc. 1333 Corporate Drive, #230 Irving, TX 75038 (972) 756-5112 HISTORY: No zoning history. The 1996 Comprehensive Master Plan shows this property suitable for Light Industrial uses. TRANSPORTATION: Coppell Road is a two-lane undivided street within a right-of--way approximately 50 feet wide. Item # 6 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North - vacant, "C" Commercial zoning South - vacant, "HC" Highway Commercial zoning East - vacant, "A" Agriculture zoning West - State Highway 121, vacant, "C" Commercial and "A" Agriculture zoning COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property suitable for Light Industrial use. DISCUSSION: The cellular phone industry is growing very rapidly. It is possible that the City of Coppell could have dozens of radio towers over 100 feet high next to its freeways and thoroughfares within the next three years. For this reason the planning staff thought it appropriate to consult with the newly formed "Committee to Improve the Visual Image of Coppell". That committee's reaction was negative to this proposal. In fairness to the applicant, if the response is to be negative, the City should be prepared to tell the applicant where and under what circumstances the City will approve additional communication towers, so that it can seek an acceptable alternative site. First, we believe that the use of existing monopoles is generally permissible. There are hundreds available, such as electric utility poles, highway light standards, stadium light standards and the like. Second, antennae can be incorporated within buildings of sufficient height, such as church steeples, for example. (St. Ann's currently has such a use in its retail center clock tower. The Fellowship of Las Colinas construction on Highway 121 two miles south might provide that kind of opportunity.) Third, additional monopoles might be permissible if located in relationship to their height a distance sufficiently far from freeways and thoroughfares. We believe an appropriate distance to be at least ten times the height of such a structure. In this case, the antenna is proposed to be 132 feet high at a distance of approximately 600 feet from Highway 121 at the Denton Creek bridge, and clearly visible from that point. Factors in favor of the application include a valley location and the presence of several 110'-high electric transmission poles close by. A valley location, as opposed to a hilltop location, provides a visual backdrop against which a tower is less noticeable. It could be argued that the presence of the transmission poles, in the general vicinity of the proposed use, might be an acceptable alternate location for this proposal. Item # 6 RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The planning staff recommends disapproval of the application in favor of a location that meets one of the three criteria stated above. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request 2) Recommend disapproval of the request 3) Recommend modification of the request 4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Title Sheet 2) Architectural Site Plan 3) Elevations 4) Survey, Legal Description, Vicinity Map Item # 6