The URL can be used to link to this page

Freeport NIP(7.0)-LR030514RoneEn g ne 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION CHent: Duke Realty Services, LP Attn: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suit~ 360 Dallas TX 75254 Report No.: 176540 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 05/09/2003 Report Date: 05/14/2003 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Services: Drill~d Pier Inspection Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone E~gineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 5 Technician: Rick Smith Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty S~rvicea, LP (1) ~ Renlty Services, LP (1) City of Copp~ll BuildinE Dept. (1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers 6:30 a.m. - 4:15 p.m. (1) Engine~xing Analyst (1) City of Coppell Englncezin CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results pres~mtecl herein were prepared bszed upon the specific samples provided for test/nE. We assume no responsibility for variation in qual/ty (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our lette~ and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Ron¢ Engineers, Ltd. 99DD Pa~e 1 of I RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176540 Project No.: 037333 Project:' Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/9/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 5 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification PP-6 NN-6 MM-6 LL-6 KK-6 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (fi) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.70 12.30 12.80 12.90 12.90 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft) * 12.80 12.60 12.80 13.20 13.60 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes. Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (1~) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/g6 6/#6 6/#6 6/g6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 11.9 11.6 11.8 12.2 12.6 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:23 AM 8:53 AM 9:37 AM 10:03 AM 10:28 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 12:10 PM 12:14 PM 12:20 PM 1:20 PM 1:28 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (fi) t2.40 12.10 12.50 12.80 13.10 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.50 99.30 99.40 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (fi)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 86.60 86.90 86.50 86.20 85.90 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay qote: See report # 176541 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. · Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 4 · * - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presentdd herein were prepemd based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in :lUallty (composition, apeeamnce, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject metier provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Dur letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they am addressed and shall not he reproduced except in full without the written approval of Ro~e Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, 12 Report No.: 176540 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Sen, ice: 5/9/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 5 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification . JJ-6 PP-5 NN-5 MM-5 LL-5 Pier Diametvr (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fi) 12.80 12.60' 12.90 12.80 13.00 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 13.00 13.00 12.90 12.80 13.10 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Len~_h (fi) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/f~6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Len~h of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.8 12.2 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 10:52 AM 1:38 PM 11:57 AM 11:32 AM 1:08 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:32 PM 1:40 PM 1:47 PM 1:50 PM 1:54 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 12.50 12.50 12.50 12.30 12.60 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (f0** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ftc)** 86.50 86.50 86.50 86.70 86.40 Bearing Stratum ~description) T~an & Gray Sand~ Clay Note: See report # 176541 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 4 **, Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from exisfmg surface elevation. .IMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for vaflation in luallty (composition, appea, rance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176540 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/9/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 5 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification KK-5 JJ-5 PP-4 NN-4 MM-4 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (fi) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreamin$ (ft) 12.70 12.70 12.90 12.80 12.50 Depth of Pier After Underreamin~ (ii)* 12.70 12.80 12.90 12.90 12.50 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dr~ Dr~ Dv Dr~ Dr~ Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casin~ Diameter (in) / Casint Length (fi) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcin~ Bar Size (#) 6/g6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/g6 Len~h of Reinforcin~ Steel (fi) 11.7 11.9 12.0 12.0 11.5 Time Drillin~ was Completed (am / pm) 11:47 AM 11:18 AM 1:51 PM 2:01 PM 1:46 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:16 PM 2:19 PM 3:30 PM 2:57 PM 3:02 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 12.20 12.30 12.50 12.40 12.10 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 86.80 86.70 86.50 86.60 86.90 Bearin~ Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: Sc¢ report # 176541 for Compressive Swength Test Specimens. * Additional PeneU~ti°n not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 4 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for vadation in quality (composition, appearance, pa~formance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176540 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/9/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 5 - Driller: Liberty Pier Identification LL4 KK-4 JJ-4 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (it) 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (it) 12.90 12.80 12.90 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it)* 12.90 13.00 13.00 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in)/Casing Length (it) NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/g6 6/g6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (it) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 1:45 PM 1:14 PM 12:00 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:51 PM 2:47 PM 2;24 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (f~) 12.40 12.50 12.50 Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.50 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (it)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 86.60 86.50 86.50 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report # 176541 for Compressive Stxength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 4 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results Presented herein were prepared based upon lhe specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, atc.) or any other feature of similar subject m 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630=9745 REPORT OF DRH. LED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Sen, ices, LP Attn: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Services: Drilled Pier Inspection Report No.: 176371 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 05/07/2003 Report Date: 05/14/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. reFresentative(s) was on site to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 4 Technician: Rick Smith Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke R~alty Services, LP (1) C_ity of Ceppell Building Dept. (1) Panheeo Koch Consulting Engineers 6:30 a.m. - 4:45 p.m. (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City o£Ceppen EnNneering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented heroin were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which w~ have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use oftha clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be re'produced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 99DD Page 1 of 1 RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Sendces, LP Report No.: 176371 Project No.: 037333 ProjeCt: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/7/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 4 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification JJ-13 JJ-12 KK-12 LL-12 MM-12 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (It) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreamin~ (It) 12.80 12.80 12.70 12.80 12.90 Depth of Pier After Underreaminl~ (It)* 13.20 12.80 12.90 13.20 12.90 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) : Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casin~ Diameter (in) / Casin~ Length (It) NA NA NA NA NA iNumber of Bars / Reinforeial~ Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/g6 Len~h of Reinforcint~ Steel (It) 12.2 11.8 12.0 12.2 12.0 Time Drillin~ was Completed (a~ / pm) 8:55 AM 9:25 AM 9:57 AM 10:26 AM 11:29 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 11:56 AM 12:13 PM 12:18 PM 1:06 PM 1:13 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (It) 12.80 12.30 12.40 12.70 12.40 Elevation: Surface (fi)** 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (fi)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (It)** 86.20 86.70 86.60 ' 86.30 86.60 Bearin~ Stratum (descril?tion) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Not~: See report #176372 for Compressive SWength Tcst Spccimcas. * Add/fional Penetration not requested unless noted. . Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Ronc Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on thc project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific sempla~ provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation In quality (composition, appearance, parforrnanco, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed end shall not be reproduced excep~ In full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report N°.: 176371 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/7/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 4 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification NN-12 PP-12 GG-14 PP-11 NN-11 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in). 66 66 66 66 66 :Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 13.10 13.00 12.70 12.60 12.90 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (fi)* 13.60 13.30 13.00 13.00 13.20 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) D~ Dry D~ Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/g6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/g6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 12.6 12.4 12.0 12.0 12.3 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 1 t :08 AM 11:45 AM 10:10 AM I 1:57 AM 12:53 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:15 PM 3:23 PM ll:50AM 3:28 PM 3:33 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 13.10 12.80 12.50 12.60 12.70 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.40 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 85.90 86.20 86.50 86.40 86.30 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #176372 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation In quality (composiflo~, appearance, pedormance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176371 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport l0 Date of Service: 5/7/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 4 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification MM-Il LL-11 KK-11 $J-ll JJ-lO ~ier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.70 12.40 12.70 12.60 12.80 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 13.40 13.30 13.00 12.70 13.30 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casin~ Diameter (in) / Casinl~ Len~h (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcin~ Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/g6 Length of Reinforcin~ Steel (ft) 12.5 12.4 12.0 11.8 12.3 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) I:41PM ! l:18PM 12:56PM 11:51AM 2:38PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:37 PM 3:41 PM 3:45 PM 3:49 PM 3:55 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (fi) 13.00 12.80 12.50 12.30 12.90 Elevation: Surface (fi)** 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.40 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (fi)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 86.00 86.20 · 86.50 86.70 86.10 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #176372 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. . Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in :luallty (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 1S0, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630=9745 REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Sexvices, LP Attn: Mr. J~ff Langston 5495 Bolt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 7~254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Services: Drilled Pier Inspection Report No.: 176275. Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 05/06/2003 Report Date: 05/14/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 4 Technician: Rick Sl~th Report Distribution: (I) Duke Realty Servlcc% LP (1) Duke Remlty S~*vices, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Pacheeo Koch Consulting Engineers 6:30 a.m. - 4:15 p.m. (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: Thc test ~suim pr'-,~nted herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, ~c.) or any oth~ f~atur~ of similar subject matter pmvidad by persons or conditions ova which we have no controL Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the writtan approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 99DD Paoe 1 of 1 RoNE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No~: 176275 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Sera. ice: 5/6/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 4 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification JJ-14 KK-14 LL-14 MM-14 NN-14 :Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 ' 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (fi) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.00 12.70 13.00 12.50 12.50 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (i~)* 12.20 12.70 13.50 13.00 13.00 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) D~ Dry D~ Dry D~ Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Len~h (fi) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/~6 Length of Reinforcing Steel (fi) 11.2 11.8 12.5 12.0 12.0 Time Drilling was Completed (am /pm) 9:30 AM 9:47 AM 10:22 AM 10:51 AM 11:19 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:05 PM 1:09 PM 1:14 PM 1:40 PM 1:46 PM Depth of Pier From Top of. Concrete (ft) 11.70 12.20 13.00 12.50 12.60 Elevation: Surface (fi)** 99.50 99.50 99:50 99.50 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (fi)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (i~)** 87.30 86.80 86.00 86.50 86.40 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #176276 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 7 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete firom existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no msponsibil~ for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by parsons or conditions over which we have no control. ~)ur k~ters and reports am for the exclusive use or the cJlents to whom they are addressed and shell not be reproduced except in full without the written approval or Pone Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176275 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/6/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 4 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification PP-14 PP-I5 PP-13 NN-13 MM-13 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ii) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.80 12.50 12.70 12.70 12.60 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ii)* 13.00 13.10 12.80 12.80 13.00 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casin$ Diameter (in) / Casin~ Len~h (ii) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing: Bar Siz~ (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/~a5 6/~5 L~n~h of Reinforcin~ Steel (ii) 12.0 12.2 11.9 11.9 12.0 Time Drillin~ was Completed (am / pm) 1:23 PM 1:49 PM 12:55 PM 11:30 AM 10:55 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:50 PM 2:15 PM 2:19 PM 2:34 PM 3:05 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ii) 12.50 12.60 12.30 12.30 12.50 Elevation: Surface frO** 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.50 99.50 Eleyation: Top o£Pier (ii)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (fi)** 86.50 86.40 86.70 86.70 86.50 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report #176276 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. *Additional Peuetr~fion not requested unless noted. Remarks: ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results pmsanted herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in :luality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176275 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/6/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 4 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification LL- 13 KK-13 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 Requirext Minimum Depth (ii) 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ii) 12.90 12.60 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (fi)* 13.10 12.80 Condition of Bottom (wet / dD,) Dr7 Dr7 Plumb Within Tolerance (),es / no) Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Len~h (ii) NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 Len~h of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 12.2 12.0 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 10:31 AM 2:44 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:32 PM 3:40 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ii) 12.70 12.30 Elevation: Surface (ii)** 99.40 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ii)** 86.30 86.70 Bearinl~ Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Not~: See report #176276 for Compressive Strength Test Specimeas. * Additional Pcaetntion not r~qu~sted unless noted. Remarks: **-- Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. .IMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for tesUng. We assume no responsibility for variation In quality (composition, appearance, pedon'nance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RoneEng, nle 890~ Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 7S247 2696 Gravel DHve, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630=9745 REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Aaa: Mr. Jeff Langston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Services: Drilled Pier Inspection Report No.: Project No.: Date of Servtee: Report Date: 176456 037333 05/08/2O03 05/14/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 6 Technician: Rick Smith Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Sem4eea, LP (1) Duke RImlty Se~deas, LP (l) City of Coppell BuJ. Idlng Dept. (l) Pacheen Koch Conmdfing Eng/neers 6:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept, K. Sc Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test r~suha presented herein were prelnm~ based upon the specific samples pwvlded for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of simiinr subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are fi)r the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not ha reproduced except in full without the written appwval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 99DD PaRe l of ] RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Setwices, LP Report No.: 176456 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/8/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 2 of 6 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification ICK-10 LL-10 MM-10 NN-10 PP-10 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (fi) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreamint (fi) 12.50 12.90 12.70 12.80 12.50 Depth of Pier After Underreaminfg (it)* 13.20 13.60 12.90 12.80 12.70 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casini Diameter (in) / Casint Length (it) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcint Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6///6 Len~h of Reinforcint Steel (it) 12.2 12.7 12.0 11.9 11.8 l~ime Drillint was Completed (am / pm) 8:58 AM 9:20 AM 9:48 AM 10:20 AM 10:07 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 12:46 PM 12:52 PM 1:00 PM 1:05 PM 2:38 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 12.70 13.20 12.40 12.30 12.20 Elevation: Surface (fi)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (fi)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 86.30 85.80 86.60 86.70 86.80 Bearin~ Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report # 176457 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. l- * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 7 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Roue Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of Pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results pmsanted herein were prepared based upon the spoc~c samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for vaflatlen In quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by pe~ons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for the exduslve use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176456 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/8/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 3 of 6 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification PP-9 NN-9 MM-9 LL-9 KK-9 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (It) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (It) 12.40 12.80 13.00 12.60 12.60 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it)* 12.70 12.90 13.00 12.60 12.80 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Lensth (it) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars/Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/g6 6/86 6/#6 ' 6/g6 6/#6 Len~h of Reinforcing Steel (it) 11.7 12.0 12.0 11.6 12.0 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 10:31 AM 10:56 AM 10:54 AM 11:21 AM 11:42 AM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:42 PM 2:47 PM 2:51 PM 2:55 PM 3:02 PM ,Depth of Pier From ToP of Concrete (It) 12.20 12.50 12.50 12.10 12.40 Elevation: Surface (It)** 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 99.40 Elevation: Top of Pier (fi) ** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 86.80 86.50 86.50 86.90 86.60 . Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report # 176457 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 4 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone E~neers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as Shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete fi.om existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176456 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/8/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 4 of 6 Driller: Liberty 'Pier Identification JJ-9 PP-8 NN-8 MM-8 LL-8 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (f0 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreamint~ (ft) 12.90 12.70 13.00 12.50 12.90 Depth of Pier After Underreamin~ (ft)* 13.00 12.80 13.40 12.60 13.30 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casin~ Diameter (in) / Casin~ Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcin~ Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Length of Reinforeinlg Steel (ft) 12.0 11.8 12.5 11.6 12.4 Time Ddllinl~ was Completed (am / pm) 11:24 AM 12:00 PM 1:14 PM 1:05 PM 1:41 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:07 PM 3:42 PM 3:37 PM 3:33 PM 3:29 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 12.50 12.30 13.00 12.10 12.80 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.50 99.50 99.40 · 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 86.50 86.70 86.00 86.90 86.20 Bearinl~ Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report # 176457 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. · Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 4 · * - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test msult~ presented herein w~e prepared based upon the specific samples provided f~' testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176456 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/8/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 5 of 6 Driller: Liberty Pier Identification KK-8 JJ-8 PP-7 NN-7 MM-7 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (fi) 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fi) 12.80 13.00 13.00 12.70 12.80 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (fi)* 13.00 13.30 13.00 12190 13.00 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dr~ I~ Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance ()res / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Len~h (fi) NA NA NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/g6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 Lenff~h of Reinforcing Steel (fi) 12,0 12.4 12.0 12.0 12.0 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 1:33 PM 1:57 PM 2:10 PM 2:40 PM 2:24 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 3:12 PM 3:08 PM 3:48 PM 3:52 PM 3:56 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (fi) 12.60 12.80 12.60 12.40 12.50 Elevation: Surface (it)** 99.40 99.50 99.40 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (fi)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (fi)** 86.40 86.20 86.40 86.60 86.50 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report # 176457 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 4 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility f~' vaflaflon in quality (composition, appearance, parforrnenco, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd. REPORT OF BELLED PIER INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 176456 Project No.: 037333 Project: Freeport 10 Date of Service: 5/8/2003 500 Freeport Parkway Page 6 of 6 Driller: Liberty ,Pier Identification LL-7 KK-7 J J-7 Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 Bell Diameter (in) 66 66 66 Required Minimum Depth (ft) 12.00 12.00 12-00 Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 13.00 13.10 13.10 Depth of Pier After Underreaming (fi)* 13.00 13.20 13.30 Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Plumb Within Tolerance ()'es / no) Yes Yes Yes Casin~ Diameter (in) / Casing Length (i~) NA NA NA Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/g6 6/g6 Len~h of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 12.0 12.2. 12.4 Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 2:06 PM 2:44 PM 3:14 PM Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 4:02 PM 4:08 PM 4:16 PM Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 12.60 12.70 12.80 Elevation: Surface (ft)** 99.40 99.50 99.50 Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 99.00 99.00 99.00 Elevation: Bottom of Pier (it)** 86.40 86.30 86.20 Bearing Stratum (description) Tan & Gray Sandy Clay Note: See report # 176457 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens. * Additional Pene~ation not requested unless noted. Remarks: Section 4 ** - Elevation data not supplied to Rone Engineers. Noted surface, top of bearing stratum, and bottom of pier elevation data calculated using specified top of pier elevations as shown on the project drawings and measurement of actual top of concrete from existing surface elevation. LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the spaoiflc samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation In quality (composition, appesrence, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject m 8908 Ambassndor Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothwoy, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630=9745 REPORT OF REINFORCING STEEL INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Aaa: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Services: Reinforcing Steel Inspection Report No.: 176502 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 05/08/2003 Report Date: 05/14/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Reinforcing Steel Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page i of 2 Technician: Lanny Gist Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (I) Pscheco Koch Consulting Engine.s 2:30 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. (1) Engineering Analyst (I) City of Cuppell Engineering Dept. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented he.in were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We asstone no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our l~ae~s and repoxts are for the exclusive use of the cheats to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 99DD Page I of 1 RoneEn gineers 8908 Ambassador Row Dallas, Texas 7S247 (214) 630-9745 121 North Rayner Fort Worth, Texas 76111 (817) 831.-6211 Client: Project: Report of Reinforcing Steel Inspection Report No.: Project No.: Date of Service: Page '~ of ~ Locations and Items Inspected: Item lnspe~ed: Coaformlu~ Non Item l~q~qed: Confomlug Non Item h]q~:ted: ~ N~ Co~lng Confombg Coub~ug Pl~ ~ B~ L~ ~ ~o1~ ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ s~ n~ ~ s~ ~ B~ S~ ~ ~ B~ Pl~t ~ ~fi~p S~ ~d ~ ~ ~ CI~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ P~ ~ ~ Spli~ ~ F~ C~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~h~ Spli~ Inspector's Signature: Time: to Client/Contractor Signature: Client/Contractor Copied with Results: Yes / No 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 REPORT OF REINFORCING STEEL INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Arm: Mr. Jeffl. angston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freepor~ 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppeil, TX Services: Reinforcing Steel Inspection Report No.: 176439 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 05/07/2003 Report Date: 05/14/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Reinforcing Steel Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 3 Technician: Lanny Gist Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) Duke Realty Sen, ices, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (I) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers 4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. (I) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dopt. CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results prasanted here/n were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for te~ting. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject maim' provided by persons or conditions over which we have no conlrol. Our letiem and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are ~ and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval ofRone Enginecl~, Ltd; 99DD Page 1 of 1 R=ne, Enugineers 8908 Ambassador Row Dallas, Texas ?524? (214) 630-9745 121 North Rayner Fort Worth, Texas 76111 (817) a314211 Report of Reinforcing Steel Inspection Client: r-~ o V-. & Report No.: Project No.: Project: ~ceeDor¥ /o Date of Service: Page 175q3 ? LoeafionsandItemsInspected: '"T'~e ~e~ /_~;ne .JTJ. bJ ,q~ dJne, q 7t~,$'- Itm~s Inspected: Conforming Non [*ems Impectmi: Cum%;~;ng Non Items la~.~..;~,~; C~.I'v. --;-S Hca Onnfflrulng ConformlBg Couforming Placing Drawings Bar Length Column T~es ~si~ ~ P,o~ s~r Pb~=eme~ t,,-- surruv s~clns nd ~ Ba~s ele~n ~ Dowel Bars in Place ~ W¢ldcd Splices Form Clan (./ Proper Bm' Supjxxts ~ Mechanical Splices D~.repancies / CoTrb-nents: Inspector's Signature: Z. ~ ,'5 /: Time: to Client/contractor Signature: Client/Contractor Copied with Results: Yes / No RoneEn gineers 8908 Ambassador Row Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-9745 121 North Rayner Fort Worth, Texas 76111 (817) 831-6211 Report of ReinforCing Steel Inspection Client: fJ///<~e' Report No.: Project No.: Project: /~cee,,Oa/~ !,~ Date of Service: Page Locations and Items Inspected: Items Inspected: Conforming Non Items Inspected: Conforming Non Items ln~l~cted: Conforming Non Conforming Conforming Conforming Placing Drawings Bar Length Column Ties Properly A~oved ~ and Sha~e ~ Tied and Spaced .~ Bar Size ~ Proper Bar Placement ~ Stirrup Spacing and Typa ~ [~ar Grade ~ Properly Tied ~ Lapped Splices ~ [~am Clean ~ Dowel Bars in Place ~ Welded Splices ~ Form Clean ~ Proper Bar Supports ~ Mechanical Spline~ . _ Number Bars ~ Proper Cover ~ Discrepancies / Comments: ;',~ ~,o.~,~.~ Inspector's Signature: Z, ~,'!f Time: to Client/Contractor Signature: Client/Contractor Copied with Results: Yes /No ,:lneers 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothwny, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630=9745 REPORT OF REINFORCING STEEL INSPECTION Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Arm: Mr. feffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Services: Reinforcing Steel Inspection Report No~: 176501 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 05/08/2003 Report Date: 05/14/2003 Report of Inspection On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) was on site to perform Reinforcin9 Steel Inspection. The results are attached. Technician Time: Page 1 of 3 Technician: Lanny Gist Report Distribution: (1) Duke R~alty Services, LP (l) Duke Pcealty Services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Pacheoo Koch Cousuiting Engineers 2:00 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. (1) Engineering Analy~ (1) City of Coppeu Enginez~ing Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The ~t results presented herein were prepared based upon thc specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no contwl. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients m whom they are addrnssed and shall not be r~procinced except in full without the written approval ofRone Enginesrs, Ltd. 99DD Pave 1 of 1 8908 Ambassador Row DaRas, Texas 75247 (214) 63O-9745 121 North Rayner Fort Worth, Texas 76111 (817) 831-6211 Report of Reinforcing Steel Inspection Client: D,d< ~" Report No.: Project No.: Project: ~'r e C jgo f7z / c2 Date of Service: Page Locationsandltemslnspected: -'7--;e /~e~.~/ d/,~e /-/f/ q-J-~','~ Items lmpeeted: Conforming Non It~a~ lmspeetecl: Conforrain~ Non Coaforminj Conforming C~fomi~ Fo~ C~ ~ ~ ~ S~ ~ M~ Spli~ _ Discrepancies/Comments: Inspector's Signature: Time: to Client/Contractor Signature: Client/Contractor Copied with Results: Yes / No RoneEngineers 8908 Ambassador Row Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-9745 121 North Rayner Fort Worth, Texas 76111 (817) 831~211 Client: Project: Report of Reinforcing Steel Inspection Report No.: 17~g-o/ Project No.: O 37333 Date of Service: ~-~_ ~o_ ~_~ Page ~ of ~; Locations and Items Inspected: Discrepancies / Comments: Inspector's Signature: Time: to Client/Contractor Signature: Client/Contractor Copied with Results: Yes / No Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Attn: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 Dallas TX 75254 Project: Services: Freeport 10 500 Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with AS'I'M Standards. 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING Report No.: 176455 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 05/08/2003 Report Date: 05/14/2003 CONTRACTOR: Test Methods: Duke Realty Services, LP ASTM D-2922 ASTM D-3017 M]n No. Description PROJECT DATA Gouge: Troxler 3430 Gouge Serial No: 32720 Test Mode: DT MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Maximum Moisture % Density pcf Moisture Current: 657 Previous: 656 Standard Counts Density Current: 3082 Previous: 3065 Project Requirements Moisture Density 1 Dark Brown Clay 19.5 104.5 Optimum +4 95 rain FIELD DENSITY TESTS TEST NO TEST LOCATION · Backfill 1 Sanitary sewer trench, Line 3 at Line K, 3' below grade Backfifl 2' Sanitary sewer trehch, Line 3 at Line N, 3' below grade Backfill 3 Sanitary sewer trench, Line 3 at Line IL 3' below rgade Technician: Lanny Gist Report Distribution: (1) Duke Realty Se~ices, LP (1) Duke Reelty services, LP (1) City of Coppell Building Dept. (1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers PROBE DEPTH M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY No. (%) (pc0 (p~0 (% max) 6" 1 6" 1 6" 1 22.6 124.2 101.3 97 22.9 123.6 100.6 96 21.0 120.6 99.7 95 Test results on this report meet project specification. Started: 6:30am (1) Engineering Analyst (1) City of Coppell Enginecring Dept. Finished: 2:00pm CMT Operations Manager. LIMITATIONS: The te~t results presanted herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We azsume no rnsponsibility for varialion in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our leRers and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of gone Engineers, Ltd. 07DD Page 1 of 1 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118 6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING CHent: Duke Realty Services, LP Atln: Mr. JeffLangston 5495 Belt Line Road, Suite 360 ProjeCtr Freeport 10~~ / 5~.~rt Parkway ~ ~'E"dppell, TX Services: Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards. PROJECT DATA Report No.: 176539 Project No.: 037333 Date of Service: 05/09/2003 Report Date: 05/14/2003 zt, Project Requirements Moisture Density CONTRACTOR: Duke Realty Services, LP Standard Counts Te~t Methods: ASTM D-2922 Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture Density ASTM D-3017 Gouge Serial No: 32720 Current: 660 Current: 3066 Test Mode: DT Previous: 657 Previous: 3082 MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Maximum M~D No. Description~Moisture % Density pcf 1 . Dark Brown Clay 10~ 4.5 Optimum +4 MOISTURE DRY DENSITY Backfill 1 Sanitary' sewer trenc~ Line L at Line 3, 2' 6" 1 19.7 124.0 103.6 below grade Backf'ffi 2 Sanitary sewer trench, Line M at Line 3, 2' 6" 1 20.7 123.0 101.9 below grade Backf'fll 3 Sanitary sewer trench, Line R at Line 3, 2' 6" I 23.0 126.7 103.0 below grade Backf'ffi 4 Sanitary sewer trench, Line M at Line 3, i' 6" 1 20.3 121.4 100.9 below grade Baekf'ffi 5 Sanitary sewer trench, Line P at Line 3, 1' 6" 1 19.6 124.9 104.4 below grade 95 TEST DENSITY NO (% max) 99 98 99 97 100 LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were p~pared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance,, perfonnance~ etc.) or any other feature of similar subject mat~er provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our lelters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in foil without the writtsa approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 07DD Page 1 of 2 Report No.: 176539 Project No.: 037333 Client: Duke Realty Services, LP RoneEn~lineers TEST NO TEST LOCATION PROBE DEPTH M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY 1~o. (%) (1~0 (P~0 (% m~x) Bacldill Sanitar~ sewer trench, Line S at Line 3, 1' below grade Technician: Lanny Gist Report Distribution: (l) Duke Realty Services, LP (l) Duke Realty Services, LP (1) City of C°pPell Building Dept. (1) Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineels 6' 1 23.4 129.0 104.5 100 Started: 6:30am Finished: 2:00pm Ro~l~~ (1) City of Coppell Engineering Dept. K. Scott Watson CMT Operations Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject mailer provided by persons or cond/tions over which we have no control. Our letters and reports are for thc exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 07DD Page 2 of 2