Park Place-CS 901008
~.
~~~
~~~~L-`7
fhe City With A Beautiful Future
October 8, 1990
Mr. Michael R. Allen
Univest Development Company
12770 Coit Road, Suite 1215
Dallas, Texas 75251
RE: CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PARK PLACE ADDITION AND HEARTZ ROAD
Dear Mr. Allen:
P.O. Box 478
Coppeu, Texas 75019
214-462-0022
At your request, I am addressing this letter to expand on the following
items covered in my letter to you of October 5, 1990. The following
statements are numbered according to the paragraph numbers to which they
refer in the October 5th letter:
~~~`
~~
_~
2. It is the intent of this paragraph to confirm that the Park Place
Addition is exempt from the Roadway Assessment specified in the
October 4th memorandum on City fees attached to the October 5th
letter, based on the contractual provision as conveyed by our legal
counsel.
3. The intent of this paragraph is to confirm that Public Works has
reviewed and approved the engineering plans for providing sewer and
drainage services to Park Place. In fact, these plans were approved
Friday afternoon, October 5, shortly after my letter was picked up by
your representative.
4. The review of the Dowdey/Heartz Plans has now been completed and
~,.,t~ ~~ ;Y. those plans are approved by the City. The City shall be the only
--jr governmental inspection agency for the construction of the facilities
on the Dowdey/Heartz Plans provided, however, that the CMUD will also
inspect the connection of the new Heartz sewer line to the CMUD trunk
sewer line.
6. The reference in this paragraph in the October 5th letter, 'subject
to certain conditions," was intended to refer to only the need to
finally determine the appropriate spacing between the poles to be
used for street light standards. I would add here that we are now
looking at more extensive use of underground utilities and the
eventual elimination of multi-use power poles.
7. With respect to the use of the Mutual Drainage Easement far storm
drainage discharge for Heartz Road and Park Place, there 'are no other
known City requirements at this time for the use of that channel
~-~,
other than those specified in previous correspondence or in the
Dowdey/Heartz Plans.
October 4th Memorandum - Park Fees - With respect to the 50 per cent
due from builders, these fees are collected as each separate building
permit is issued.
October 9th Memorandum - Street Sign Assessment and Street Light
Assessment - these fees include both Heartz Road and the Park Place
Addition. Prior to payment, the separate amounts for each will be
calculated for separate payment. I have included a copy of the
Public Works memo which addresses this item.
The above statements are intended to update and expand upon my letter to
you of October 5, 1990. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Y rs truly
~~
Alan D. Ratliff
City Manager
ADR/GLS/lsg
Attachment
l~~f
MALLEN