Loading...
ST0202-MN030623STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR Bethel School Road at Denton Tap Road City of Coppell Contractor: Tiseo Paving, Inc 419 E Hwy 80 Dallas, TX 75227-0040 June 23, 2003 Prepared by: Todd Webster C/o Project Compliance, LLC. P.O. Box 202991 Arlington, Texas 76006 www.proiectcompliance.com Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Summary The purpose of this Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ("SWP3") is to reduce the discharge of pollutants into the waterways of the United States. The General Permit to Discharge Waste under provisions of Section 402 of the Clean Water Act and Chapter 26 of the Texas Water Code outlines the procedures which must be followed in order to remain in compliance. The following are the procedures for those site whose total disturbed area is equal to or greater then one acre but less then 5: · Prepare a site-specific SWP3 which addresses each of the required items found in the TCEQ General Permit to Discharge Waste · Execute and submit a Construction Site Notice Sign to the operator of the MS4 within which the site will discharge. (see Appendix J). · Post a copy of the Construction Site Notice Sign on-site so the public can view the document without having to come inside the project area. · Implement the controls outlined in the SWP3. · Qualified personnel must conduct inspections of the site every 14 days and after a 1/2" storm event. Disturbed areas and areas used for storage of materials that are exposed to precipitation shall be inspected for evidence of, or the potential for, pollutants entering the drainage system. Sediment and erosion control measures identified in the SWP3 shall be observed to ensure that they are operating correctly. Where discharge locations or points are accessible, they shall be inspected to ascertain whether erosion control measures are effective in preventing significant impacts to receiving waters. Where discharge locations are inaccessible, nearby downstream locations shall be inspected to the extent that such inspections are practicable. Locations where vehicles enter or exit the site shall be inspected for evidence of off-site sediment tracking. · A report summarizing the scope of the inspection, name(s) and qualifications of personnel making the inspection, the date(s) of the inspection and major observations relating to the implementation of the SWP3 shall be made. Major observations shall include: the location(s) of discharges of sediment or other pollutants from the site; location(s) of Best Management Practices ("BMPs") that need to be maintained; location(s) of BMPs that failed to operate as designed or proved inadequate for a particular location; and location(s) where additional BMPs are needed that did not exist at the time of inspection. · Based on the results of the inspection, the SWP3 shall be modified as necessary (e.g., show additional controls on map required by Section F.2.(a)(ii). Revisions to the SWP3 shall be completed within 7 calendar days following the inspection. If existing BMPs need to be modified or if additional BMPs are necessary, implementation shall be completed before the next anticipated storm event. If implementation before the next anticipated storm event is impracticable, they shall be implemented as soon as practicable. · A copy of the SWP3 must be kept on-site whenever possible. · All paperwork must be retained for 3 years from the termination of the project. Table of Contents 1. Storn~ Water Pollution Prevention Plan Narrative 2. Appendix A - Intended Construction Schedule-provided by Operator 3. Appendix B - Engineer's Soils Data - If Available 4. Appendix C - General Location Map 5. Appendix D - Detailed Site Map - Hung on board in office 6. Appendix E - Copy of Texas Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit 7. Appendix F - Inspector's Qualifications 8. Appendix G - Sample Inspection Report 9. Appendix H - Erosion Control Detail Sheets 10.Appendix I - SWP3 Certification Statement 11. Appendix J -TCEQ Construction Notice Sign 12. Appendix K - "Delegation of Authority" letter Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("TPDES") Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ("SWP3") for Project Name and Location: Bethel School Road at Denton Tap Road Bethel School east of Denton Tap Coppell, Texas 75019 Contractor: Tlseo Paving, Inc 419 E Hwy 80 Dallas, TX 75150 972.289.0723 Owiler~ City of Coppell 255 Parkway Blvd Coppell, Texas 75019 Start Date: 11/4/2003 End Date: 11/4/2004 Prepared By: Project Compliance, LLC Todd Webster P.O. Box 202991 Arlington, TX 76006 The following documents are to be included as part of this SWP3: 1. The following narrative; 2. Appendices A-K; 3. Erosion Control plan from plan sheets; 4. Drainage Area map from plan sheets; · Existing drainage patterns; · Proposed drainage patterns; · Limits of soil disturbance; · Locations of on-site & off-site storage areas; and · Locations of wet-lands areas (if they exist on or near site). 5. Major Soil Disturbing Construction Schedule; 6. MSDS log required to be kept on site per OSHA regulations; and 7. Daily project activity log as kept by project superintendent. Part IlL Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans ("SWP3") Section A. Shared SWP3 Development Operator City of Coppell Tiseo Paving, Inc Operator City of Coppell Tiseo Paving, Inc Permit # Application Date Responsibilities Owner - Controls Plans and Specifications Contractor - Day-to-Day control of project Section B. Responsibilities of Operators 1. The operator with control over construction plans and specifications will be: City of Coppell (a) The above operator will ensure the project specifications will provide adequate best management practices ("BMP") to meet the requirements of the TPDES General permit. Co) The above operator has operational control over plans and specifications for all areas of the project. (e) The above operator will notify the other operator(s) in a timely manner if any modifications are necessary to remain compliant with the general permit. (d) The operator with the day-to-day operational control of the site is: Operator Tiseo Paving, Inc Permit # 2. The operator with day-to-day operational control will be: Tiseo Paving, Inc (a) The above operator will ensure the project meets the requirements of the TPDES General permit. (b) The party responsible for implementing the BMPs for the project is: (e) The above operator has day-to-day operational control over all areas of the project, (d) The operator with control over construction plans and specifications is operator City of Coppell Permit # Section C. Deadlines for SWP3 Preparation and Compliance The SWP3 will be: (a) completed prior to posting the Construction Site Notice ("CSN"). (b) Implemented prior to beginning any construction activity that will soil disturbance. (c) (d) result in Updated as necessary to reflect the changing conditions of any new operators coming on the site, any new areas of responsibility which may be added during the construction process or any changes in BMPs. Prepared so that it provides compliance with the TPDES General permit. Section D. Plan Review and Making Plans Available 1. This SWP3 will be kept on-site if at all possible. It will be kept in an all-weather container which will allow for the posting of the required signage relating to the general permit. If for any reason this SWP3 is not able to be kept on-site, a notice will be posted describing the location of the SWP3. 2. A Construction Site Notice sign will be posted at the main entrance of the project. This sign will indicate the Contact Name, Contact Phone number, Project Description and Location of SWP3. Section E. Keeping Plans Current This SWP3 will be revised when there is a change in design, construction, operation or maintenance that will have a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants. This plan will also be revised if after the inspection of site operators, operators of a municipal separate storm sewer system CMS4"), authorized TCEQ personnel or federal, state or local agency indicates this SWP3 is proving ineffective in significantly minimizing pollutants in discharges authorized under the TPDES general permit. ~'Section F. Contents of SWP3 1. Site Description The project is located in the City of Coppell, Dallas County, Texas ( 32 57' 37" Lat and 96 59' 37" Long). The total acreage involved is approximately 1.15 acres, all of which will be disturbed at some point during construction. The construction activities will consist of mass grading construction, underground site utility and pavement construction. All activities are to be contained within the property limits of the project. No off-site activity is anticipated at this time. b. The intended construction schedule is attached as Appendix A, incorporated herein for all purposes. c. The total number of acres for the project is: 1.16 Acres. The number of disturbed acres is: 1.16 Acres. There is not data describing any discharges from the site currently. If the project engineer has a geotechnical report, it will be included in Appendix B, incorporated herein for all purposes. e. The general location map is included in Appendix C, incorporated herein for all purposes. f. The erosion control plan and drainage area map are included in Appendix D, incorporated herein for all purposes. These sheets describe the following: i. Drainage patterns; ii. Areas where soil disturbance will occur; iii. Locations of all major structural controls either planned or in place; iv. Locations where stabilization practices are expected to be used; v. Locations of off-site material, waste, borrow, fill; vi. Surface waters (including wetlands) either adjacent or in close proximity; and vii. Locations where storm water discharges from the site directly to a surface water body. g. There will not be a batch plant permitted for activities on this site. h. The name of the receiving water that will receive discharges is: Grapevine Creek A copy of the TPDES general permit is included in Appendix E, incorporated herein for all purposes. The following is a description of the BMPs which will be used on the project to minimize pollution. The operator with day-to-day operational control will be responsible for the implementation of control measures during each of these phases of construction. The approximate activity sequence for the installation of controls is as follows: · Site clearing and grubbing · Grading and excavation · Installation of underground utilities · Grading of Building Pads · Concrete paving · Final grading and landscape Sequence of erosion/siltation protection: · Site clearing and grubbing. a. Provide stabilized Construction Entrance(s); install Sediment barriers and perimeter Silt fences. b. Stockpile areas that are to remain untouched for more than 21 days will be temporarily seeded within 14 days. c. Proceed with site clearing and grubbing activities subject to the pollutant control requirements of this plan. d. Upon completion of site clearing and grubbing, be sure construction entrance(s) are functional and perimeter controls are effective. · Gradin~ a. Repair the Construction Entrance(s). Clean the existing rock or replace it if necessary. b. Proceed with grading and excavation activities subject to the pollutant control requirements of this plan. c. Stockpile areas that are to remain untouched for more than 21 days will be temporarily seeded within 14 days. d. Upon completion of grading and excavation, be sure construction entrance(s) is functional and perimeter controls are maintained and effective. · Utilit~ a. Repair the Construction Entrance(s). Clean the existing rock or replace it if necessary. b. Proceed with installation of utilities subject to the pollutant control requirements of this plan. c. Protect new inlets as required in this plan d. Upon completion of utility construction, be sure construction entrance(s) are functional, inlet controls are in place and perimeter controls are maintained and effective. · Paving a. Repair the Construction Entrance(s). Clean the existing rock or replace it if necessary in order to prevent off-site tracking. b. Repair and maintain silt fences throughout the project. Replace if required. c. Insure inlet covers for the curb inlet tops and grate inlets are installed and maintained according to specs. d. Where indicated on Erosion Control plan, install controls behind curb to prevent wash into street. e. After approaches have been poured, where slopes behind curb requires, install silt fence around approach radius. f. Upon completion of paving, construction entrances can be removed and traffic into and off site must remain on new pavement. Continue to keep inlet controls in place and perimeter controls effective. · Final gradin~ and landscal~e a. Repair and maintain silt fences throughout the project. Replace if required. b. Silt fence will need to be removed in areas where final grading must occur. It is CRITICAL that inlet covers are in good shape prior to this removal. c. Erosion control matting should be used where the slopes behind curb might allow for soil run-off into the street, prior to the final stabilization to obtain 70% coverage. d. Upon obtaining 70% coverage of the preexisting ground cover conditions, erosion control device may be removed and the Notice of Termination should be filed. Locations for structural controls and structural details are shown in the Erosion Control plan which is incoqoorated with this SWPPP. It is the intent of this plan to provide the facilities the ability to reduce the flow of erosion material and pollutants off site. This is a living document. It is the intent at design time to allow site conditions to dictate future changes in this SWPPP and in the Erosion Control plan. (a) Erosion and Sediment controls · The following list of erosion and sediment controls will be utilized on this project: Rock Entrance-Used to reduce exiting traffic from tracking soil onto adjacent streets and parkways. This entrance will be installed prior to stripping this site. It will be installed at a convenient location to be determined by the contractor. Silt fences-Used primarily as perimeter controls on this project. They will be installed prior to stripping the site at the locations shown on the erosion control plan included with this SWPPP. Silt fences will be used to reduce pollutants from leaving the site in sheet flow situations. Dut to right-of-way limitations, silt fence will probably not be utilized on this project. Inlet protection-Used as a last attempt to filter the runoff before it enters the storm sewer system. Inlet protection will be installed immediately after the inlet bottoms are poured and re-installed after the tops have been poured. Grate inlets will be protected with a wire, fabric and sandbag system that will protect the inlet as well as allow for traffic in the parkway. Rock Becms - Used to reduce flows in the outfalls of the storm system. The purpose of the dam is to pond up water behind it to allow for the soil to fall out. Rock berms will not be incorporated into this erosion plan. Sand Bag berms- Used to reduce flows in areas with flows too great for silt fences and inaccessible for rock berms. Sand bag berms may be utilized to help reduce off-site discharge onto adjacent parking and drive areas. Dust Control- A water truck or a broom truck will be employed when the need arises to try to reduce the generation of air borne particulate. Where the controls have their capacity reduced by 50%, they will be cleaned or replaced. If sediment escapes the site, accumulations will be removed at a frequency to minimize further negative effects-prior to the next rain event. Waste receptacles will be used to reduce the offsite transport of litter, construction debris and construction material. Stabilization Practices: Tree Protection-Any trees that will be in the area of construction and are to remain post. construction will be wrapped with orange fence at the drip line. Temporary Vegetation- If the project is to be left untouched for more than 21 days; temporary vegetation will be established by the 14 day. Grass buffer strips- At the property line boundered by existing curb line, a buffer strip in varying widths will be left undisturbed. This is where the silt fence will be established as well. Permanent Vegetation- The landscape plan will show what types of permanent vegetation will be used on this site. Any area left exposed to storm water runoff will be sodded or mulched depending upon the landscape plan. Temporary structures will remain in place until 70 percent coverage is achieved. Subgrade Stabilization- will be used prior to paving, however work will not be performed if the threat of rain exists and the stabilization process will be limited to only that which can be mixed and compacted by the end of each day. Above controls will be removed once 70% permanent vegetative cover has been established and a NOT has been filed. 3. Structural Practices Due to the developed areas surrounding the right-of-way, perimeter silt fence will not be used. Inlet controls will be used on existing inlets both on Bethel School and adjacent intersecting roads. A construction entrance will be installed where feasible and located where it is most beneficial to the contractor's operations. A sediment basin will not be required for this project. The site does not have any common drainage area that serves an area with 10 or more acres of disturbed soil at one time. With all work to be done within the right-of-way of this project, construction of sediment traps will not be appropriate. Proper of the controls listed above will replace sediment trap and sediment basin construction. 4. Permanent Storm Water Controls The site will have a curb and gutter system in place which will tie into existing off- site facilities and discharge into the MS4 of the project city. 5. Other Controls Description of Construction and waste materials stored on site: · Stabilizing Materials; · Concrete and Reinforcing Steel for Structures and Paving; · Concrete Drainage Structures and Pipe; · Waterline and Sanitary Sewer Pipe and Appurtenances; · Sign Materials; · Pavement Marking Materials/Paint; · Concrete wash-out waste; · Landscape Plant Materials; and · Fertilizers. Description of controls to minimize pollution from these materials · Where materials are disposed of in a waste receptacle, there will be a cover used to prevent pollutants from washed out of the dumpster. · Paint containers will be kept in sealed containers and stored when not in use. Excess paint will not be discharged into storm sewer system, but will be properly disposed of. · An area designated for concrete wash will be determined and protected from discharge by using the spoils from the excavation for the pit to build an earthen berm along the down hill side of the pit. If pumps are used to remove excess water from the work area, the discharge hose will be covered with a Silt Sack (Dandy Products) to help reduce discharge. · At this time, it is not known if a temporary fuel tank is going to be left on site. If one is left, it will be contained within a lined berm that meets City Fire Code. · The set of drawings for this project does not contain a tree preservation/removal plan. · Temporary restroom facilities will be located on site. These will be serviced at regularly scheduled times by the supplier. · All stabilization activities will be performed at such a rate so as not to lay down more material than what can be mixed by the end of the day. All mn-off from these stabilizing materials will be contained with on-site controls. Locations of the concrete wash area, restroom facilities, waste receptacle and fuel berm will be noted on the erosion control plan and updated regularly. 6. Approved State and Local Plans (a) This Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan was prepared in an effort to reflect the requirements for storm water management and erosion and sediment control. The contractor will be required to conform to all Federal, State and Local Laws and Regulations whether included in this document or not. (b) If the regulations in the project city change during the construction of this project, this plan will be modified to accommodate those changes. 7. Maintenance The following list describes the maintenance procedures for the measures incorporated on this site. Rock Entrance- remove build-up of mud and debris and replace or re-grade as necessary Silt fences- remove silt once it reaches V2 the height of the fence, repair or replace fence as necessary Inlet protection- remove retained soil and replace fabric as required. Rock Berms-remove retained soil once it reaches a height I/2 the height of the berm. Sand Bag berms- remove retained soil once it reaches a height V2 the height of the berm. This maintenance will be completed before the next anticipated rain event or as soon as practicable. If erosion and sediment controls have been intentionally disabled, mn-over, removed or otherwise rendered ineffective they will be replaced or corrected immediately upon discovery. 8. Inspections of Controls If flooding or other uncontrollable situations arise, inspections will be conducted as soon as access is practicable. (a) Personnel provided by the operator and familiar with this SWP3 will inspect the following: · Disturbed area and areas used for storage of materials that are exposed to precipitation will be inspected for evidence of, or the potential for, pollutants entering the drainage system. · Erosion and sediment control measures identified in the plan will be observed to ensure that they are functioning properly. · Where discharge locations or points are accessible, they will be inspected to decide if erosion control measures are effective. · Locations where vehicles enter or exit the site will be inspected for evidence of offsite tracking. Inspections will be conducted by the designated person at least once every 14 days and within 24 hours after a rain event of 0.5 inches or greater. A report summarizing the scope of the inspection, name of inspector, the date of the inspection, major observations relating to the implementation of the SWP3, and actions taken in accordance with the SWP3 will be made and retained as part of the SWP3 for at least three years from the date that the site was finally stabilized. The report will be signed in accordance with Part VI.G of the General Permit by an owner or corporate officer or by a duly authorized representative. (c) Based on the inspections, the erosion control measures will be revised and the revisions shown on the Erosion Control plan kept on site. Any modification must be implemented within 7 days. It is the responsibility of the operator of the site to maintain effective pollutant discharge controls. Physical site conditions or contractor practices could make it necessary to install more controls than are shown. Localized concentrations of surface runoff or steep areas could require additional high flow controls. (d) A report summarizing the scope of the inspection, name of inspector, the date of the inspection, major observations relating to the implementation of the SWP3, and actions taken in accordance with the SWP3 will be made and retained as part of the SWP3 for at least three years from the date that the site was finally stabilized. The report will be signed in accordance with Part VI.G of the General Permit by an owner or corporate officer or by a duly authorized representative. 9. Non-Storm Water Discharges Authorized Non-Storm water Discharges: · Fire fighting activities · Water used to wash vehicles or control dust in accordance with efforts to minimize offsite sediment tracking · Potable water sources including waterline flushing; · Irrigation drainage from watering vegetation; · Routine exterior building wash down that does not use detergents; Pavement wash waters where spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have not occurred; · Air conditioning condensate; · Springs; · Uncontaminated ground water; · and foundation or footing drains not contaminated with process materials. With the exception of fire fighting activities, appropriate storm water pollution prevention methods will be utilized in conjunction with these non-storm discharges. Part IV. Numeric Effluent Limitations There will be no discharges of storm water runoff related to support concrete batch plant facilities for this project. Part V. Retention of Records All reports, certifications, and this SWP3 will be maintained on file for a period of at least three years after final stabilization of the site. This file shall contain at a minimum: · Copies of Owner and Contractor Construction Site Notice ("CSN"); · This SWP3 narrative. · Erosion control plan from set of drawings · Completed Inspection Reports and Certifications · Record of amendments to the plan Appendix A Approximate Construction Schedule Record of Construction Activities Activity Start Date Date Complete · Site clearing and grubbing · Grading and excavation · Installation of underground utilities · Concrete paving · Final grading and landscape This information may also be found on either the Erosion Control plan or in the Superintendent's daily log reports which are incorporated into the contents of this plan. Appendix B Soil Data (If available from Engineer) Appendix C General Location Map Project: Bethel School Road at Denton Receiving waters: Grapevine Creek Bethel R~d 02003 MapQuest.com. Inc.; 0200:3 Navicletbn Technobclbs Appendix D Site Map - See Erosion Control plan and Drainage Area maps Exact location Construction Entrance to be located by contractor in the fle~d. EDWARD E. GADDY (UNPLAr~D) CAU~ON J USPS BLOCK A, LOT ! PRESCHOOl CENTER ~ F DANA & PAULENE KERRICK BLOCK 14. LOT I EROSION CONTROL PLAN Bethel School Road ..... Reinforced Silt fence. Construction Entrance Inlet protection. DAHA & PAULEIqE KERRICK BLOCK 14; LOT ! 1ST UNITED CAUTION METHODIST [ CHURCH [ ~ LOC~OH LOT IR, BLOCK I BETHEL SCHOOL IVOR ,~ CATHERINE FLANNER Y BLOCK II, LOT I sides of street to be protected. IVOR <~ CA THERINE FLANNER Y BLOCK LOT ZA I VOR ,,~ CA THERINE FLANNERY BLOCK LOT 2B + ROAD IST UNITED ME-I}"iOOIST CHURCH PARKING LOT VENDLA ~ENNED Y BLOCK 1I LOT 3A CA 7HERINE FLANNER Y BLOCK LOT 38 RON ROBERTSON LLC BLOCK 11, LOT4 EROSION CONTROLPLAN T CAU'fiON H! 1ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH BLOCK 1. LOT IR First down stream inlet on both sides of street to be protected, 15T UNITED METHODIST CHURCH BLOCK I, LOT f RILEY V. ~. IMOGENE CARLTON TR. BLOCK 11, LOT 5 First down stream inlet on both sides of street to be protected, TIMOTHY DIANE BARR BLOCK 12, LOT WILLIAM · BECKY SHERIDAN BLOCK I0. LOT I EROSION CONTROL PLAN Bethel School Road Reinforced Silt fence. Construction Entrance Inlet protection. Appendix E TPDES General Permit Language ~o>~>~ Appendix F Inspector' s Qualifications I NSPECTOR~S QUALIFICATIONS The following is a list of the inspectors presently employed by Project Compliance, LLC. Each of these inspectors might inspect this facility at some point during its construction. As new employees are added, their qualifications will be amended to this list. Danny J Miller Danny has been performing the required EPA inspections on permitted sites since October 1992. He has inspected while employed by Rodman Excavation and Project Compliance, LLC. He is certified by the Environmental Assessment Association as a Certified Environmental Inspector. He has attended the North Central Texas Council of Government's "h,spection of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Practices during Construction" course twice. As a company policy, twice during the year, inspectors are required to read the full Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 128 / Monday, July 6, 1998 / Notices. He was involved with the SWP3 inspections of 45 permitted projects during 2001. William W Webster Bill has been performing the required EPA inspections on permitted sites since March 2000. He has inspected solely while employed by Project Compliance, LLC. He has attended the North Central Texas Council of Government's "Inspection of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Practices during Construction" course twice. He is currently involved as a TNRCC stakeholder as it pertains to the TNRCC's development of its permit. He has an MS in Chemistry from TCU. He has tested effluence samples for Mobil Oil in multiple countries throughout the World. As a company policy, twice during the year, inspectors are required to read the full Federal Register/ Vol. 63, No. 128 / Monday, July 6, 1998 / Notices. Todd W Webster Todd has been involved with the NPDES permitting process since June 1993. He has inspected while employed by Knight Erosion Control, Storm Water Management, Inc, and Project Compliance, LLC. He has attended the North Central Texas Council of Government's "Inspection of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Practices during Construction" course and the course provided by the Dallas chapter of the AGC. He has had several sit down meetings with both Taylor Sharpe and Everett Spencer discussing Pollution Prevention plans and other compliance questions. He serves as consultant to APAC-Texas, Tiseo Paving Company, Lee Lewis Construction Appendix G Sample Inspection Report SWPPP 14 DAY SITE INSPECTION REPORT for COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION The following report was generated while inspecting all of the Measures/Areas addressed in the SWP3 or Erosion Control Plan. Project Name: Bethel School Road at Denton Tap Road Date: Permit Number: Contractor: Tiseo Paving, Inc Inspector: Qualifications: See Appendix F in SWP3 Site Conditions Erosion & Sediment Controls Construction Entrance Sediment Traps Inlet Protection Stabilization Silt Fence Straw/Hay Bales Vegatative Buflkr SNips Storage Area Discharge Areas Concrete Wash area Fuel Berm w S there a copy of the permit language ith the SWPPP? Reason for inspection: Installed Effective Notes/Locations of Maintenance needs lis the NPDES construction sign posted at the entrance? Bethel School Road at Denton Tap Construction Schedule: _ Ate site is approximately in the following construction stage: SWPPP Modifications: Describe any modifications necessary to the SWPPP: Describe locations of any new BMP's necessary: Any Spills of reportable quantity: Violations to Report: If "Yes" have proper authorities been notified and the SWPPP been noted accordingly? Recommended Actions: Comments: [ certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluatcd the infom~afion submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those directly responsible for gathering the information, submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief~ tru, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties fbr submittiag false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment tbr knowing violations. Inspector: Date: Bethel School Road at Denton Tap Appendix H Erosion Control Detail Sheets 2" x 4" 14Ga. Welded wire 36" wide filter fabric ~lj~/--4' Metal ''T'' POst .C,o? pacted backfill ~%.~ FLOW 36" wide filter fabnC~ ~//~ 2" x 4" 14Ga. Welded wire 10' On Center Reinforced Silt Fence Project Compliance, LLC Erosion Control Detail Standards DATE filter fabric '~ ; 4' Metal "T" Post or /~ / 4' Hardwood Post Compacted backfill ~ ~, FLOW 36" wide filter fabric ~ g' On (;enter Non-Reinforced Silt Fen¢o Project Compliance, LLC DA*E Erosion Control Detail Standards Feb. '03 ~ Curb Opening LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL%L _LLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLBLLLLL% LLLLL L LLLL L~LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL~ FRONT ELEVATION Ensure 1"- 1 1/2"gap exists between top edge of Fabric and top of Inlet . opening. 36" Wide Filter Fabric to ~--7.,~, ~.¥- ., ~ . wrap under eng of wire. ~. ~/ 4" x 4" 6 Ga. Hog ~=~- I¢ F~'-'~,%, ~l~ Wire Reinforcement. ,~,~ ............. iiiii~i~i~]~'...,~. Wire is cut and attached .' Sandbags hog rings. "~ Curb SECTION A- A Recessed Curb Inlet Protection Ho§ Wire Weir Project Compliance, LLC DATE Erosion Control Detail Standards Feb. '03 Curb ~ ~ Erosion Control MaEing 4'or 8' ~ /~ Varies by city_~,~~L~L;±7 L Install on both sides of driveway Driveway Erosion Control Matting Project Compliance, LLC Erosion Control Detail Standards DATE Feb. '03 N.T.S. N.T.$. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NCTCOG Construction BMP Manue] 9-29 June 1999 I FLOW~ 3 TO 4 INCHES CROSS SECTION N.T.S. WOVEN WIRE ~ ,'F~', I I L"-~../ / /~.~ --'~~~'~'/1/~z.,~,-,~ "~ ' ','.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'-'.'.'.'.'..'.'-.'-'.- ......... ...... ' ~'/l~ll' ISOMETRIC PLAN VIEW N.T.S. ROCK BERM JAN. '98 1060A NCTCOG Construction BMP Manual 9-25 June 1999 ROCK BERM GENERAL NOTES: 1. USE ONLY OPEN GRADED ROCK 4-8 INCHES IN DIAMETER FOR STREAM FLOW CONDITION. USE OPEN GRADED ROCK 3-5 INCHES IN DIAMETER FOR OTHER CONDITIONS, 2. THE ROCK BERM SHALL BE SECURED ~TH A WOVEN ~RE SHEATHING HA~NG A MAXIMUM OPENING OF 1 INCH AND A MINIMUM ~RE SIZE OF 20 GAUGE AND SHALL BE BURIED IN A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 3 TO4 INCHES DEEP. 3. THE ROCK BERM SHALL BE INSPECTED EVERY TWO WEEKS OR AFTER EACH 1/2" RAIN EVENT AND SHALL BE REPLACED WHEN THE STRUCTURE CEASES TO FUNCTION AS INTEDED DUE TO SILT ACCUMULATION AMONG THE ROCKS, WASHOUT, CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC DAMAGE, ETC. 4. WHEN SILT REACHES A DEPTH EQUAL TO ONE-THIRD OF THE HEIGHT OF THE BERM OR ONE FO0~ WHICHEVER IS LESS, THE SILT SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF PROPERL% 5. WHEN THE SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED, THE BERM AND ACCUMULATED SILT SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF IN AN APPROVED MANNER. 6. ROCK BERM SHOULD BE USED AS CHECK DAMS FOR CONCENTRATED FLOW AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN PERIMETER PROTECTION. ROCK BERM NCTCOG Construction BMP Manual 9-26 981 1060B June 1999 Appendix I SWP3 Certification Statement .................................................~0/29/200~ 0~:20 FAX 97232900A7T~seo Pavlng ~'g~O~ ............ ~d'b~ ...... Storm Walcr ?ol/nfion Prevention Plan Certification Certification Statement This ce~tificatiofl/~ 'p~l~,-~- f~ ~aplimc~i~h ~hg C~a~t ~ l~mlt to ~ge W~e arnica' pi'o-.~i~ of S~/ou 402 of thz CIc~ Wa~r Act ~ng Cl~p~r 26 oflhe Texas W~r Co~ and m~y ~ used/n fl~ Sl~m W~ter Po~on ~ ~ (S~). ~ ~ ~ ~Y, ~~=, ~~ I ~ under pep. ally of law tlmal this doo.~meul a~d all altachmv-nts were pr~ami ond~rmy direcIi,m or supervision in a~orchnge with a sysiem d0signed lo as.sum {hat qualified pvr~mmel gathered and evaluated lhe information submirmd. Based on my inquiry of the person ofpelaons who manage l~e system, or ~hose ~ directly n~spomible for g~g submitt~ is, to lhe ~ of my knowledg~ a~d belie/, true, aoom-ate, ami ~mple~e. I am aware thai ~here ar~ si~itic~i p0nalt/es for submi~bag false information~ ir~lud/n~he possibilit~ of fine and impr/som~nt for lmoWing viol~iom. Permit N. 9. '" Company ....... ~l~re- ~ N~me Prated rxRl§ PXR15 Appendix J Construction Site Notice .....................................................................10/29/2003 05:2O F~ 9723290047 Tlseo Paving 4 ......................... STOR~ ~'6'6~ .............. 'fPDE$ ~ pelmit TXRI.~IO00 CONSTRUCTION SITE NOTICE The follo~dng informatio~ is posvad /tx ea~pliatwe with Pm II.D.7~ of the TCEQ General Permit Number TXRI$00O0 fo~ dig~ of Ctocm w~ runoff from comgn~dou sitka. Additional information r~ganting th~ TCF.~ storm wa~r perm/t program may be found on/~© in~ra~t at: I Contact Name and Phone Number. Robed Caixli/l .972.289.07'23 ..... Est.' ~ta~t Date:-11/4/"2003 Project Description: Est Comp Date: 1 '113¢pmj~/~ [0~;¢~ in ~'~e Cityof Ca~ Dallas C~mniyi. T~ca~ ( 32 ~P 37 (Irlc2tidjl~ ef/tJ'ff~ed start date aoo'pro]ec~d ,~ 37' l.~cg). Tl~to~lae~einvelv~:lh aV~3a,tdy 1.15 ~llofwi~hw~lb~ end dat~, or dat~ that disturbed soils will I~ L~ of ~ Wa~r P~{u~ ~ ~ool ~ of~ T~ ~ 4t 9 ~ H~ 80 Prevenffon Plan: ~ T~ 7~19 ~Ua$, T~ 75150 For Construction Sites Authorized Und, ;r Part ll.D.2. (Obtaining Authorization to Discharge) the following certif-,cat/on must be compl~le,d: of l~v¢ that t la~¢ read ami ~ ~ ~li~ibil/t~ ~lu/r~a~nt~ for 0ta/m/ng an authorization und~ PaCt ILD~2~ of TPDE$ General Poz',x~[l ~'RISO000. A storm water pofilutlon prW.,ontion plan has been d~velopod and implemented according lto permit requirements. A copy of th~ signed notice is supplied to ~he op~alor oir th$ M84 if discharge~ gnl~an MS4 sy~t~a- I am a.~.am ~ ate ~ignif'w. ant !a~-t~;~ f~ provhiing ~ inf .o~.~_ou or for orlzcd disoha~ges, inchglmg the poasibility of fine and impdsonmenl for knowing xqolafions, Cgigt~ur~ a~ Title Dat~ 10/29/2003 08:20 FAX 9723290047 Tlseo Paving ~ ........................ STOR~ ~6'5~ ........... :e:cutivc Director" rm Wamr& C~noral P~mit$ Te~m; 1~C-225 Box 130g? stin, Texas 78711-30~7 TILDES Storm Water C~n=ral l~.thdS~hoolRo~latDe~__._~_TapRo~ - CopieR, Tex~ ~r Dircctoc. An emplove¢ of Project Co~.~lian~LLC_ -. 1,4.Da¥',~.,t .!f.21f sim'Om, cvcuI imu~tions By sisning thi.q authorization, I confirm that I meet the following requirements ~o make suoh a ~.~nat/on as set forth in 40 CFR 199.22. Fo~ a ocrporatio~ by a re~poz~le e~rporat$ offi~. FO~ th* ~ of this socaiol~ a ~-ilal$ eoqaaram affumr m~=~ a prm}A~ secretnry, Ixea z,.u~-, or vi~kteat of tho vor~m~on in chin,Se ufa ~,,'M**.**it~l l~s~css f~nct~c~ c~ ~ oth0r porsc~ who p~dorms f~ilifics cmployiz~ more th=~ 250 p~om or lmvi:~ gross .,~,.,,~1 ~l~s or ~xp, a~,ti~ ~xca~;.,g $25,000,000 (ix $ovond qua~or 980 dollo~) ff a,.~-~ ty to sign do~,~.~nt$ ha~ b~m ~ c~ .I.~,.g~.~l to t~ ,,.-,~5.r m ~c~,L~.,,-~ with ~ ~. ~m Of~ ~0~ a p~ipM ~ive o~r of a F~ ~y ~{-~- ~) ~ ~ef ~ve o~r ~ age~y, ~ (2) a "I certify uad~r p~nalty of Law that thin doemmrmt and ~1 ~.~ w~ ~ un~ my ~on or ~mugou su~i~ B~gd on my ~qu~y of~= p~on or ~s ~o mmage ~ s~t~, or ~ p~ons :oily ~sibl= f~ g~g ~c ~'mafi~ ~c ~on su~i~ ~, ~ ~ ~t of my howledgc ~d ~, ~ ~, ~ ~p~. I ~ aw~ ~ ~ ~ s~?ifi~t p~s for submi~g f~c ~n, lu~ng ~ ~ of fine ~d ~p~n~t far ~o~g  SECRETARY TREASURER /O -~. Project Superintendent Checklist/Responsibilities 1 )Schedule pre-construction meeting prior to any soil disturbing activities with Project Compliance inspector to review project scope as it relates to erosion controls shown on drawings; 2) Keep signed copy of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ("SWP3') in truck or in trailer at all times; 3) Review site inspection generated by Project Compliance as soon as possible after the inspection and discuss with inspector, if necessary; 4) Make appropriate arrangements with maintenance personnel based on inspection reports generated by Project Compliance (according to the state general permit, maintenance must be completed within seven days from the date of inspection or before the next anticipated storm event, if practical; otherwise, maintenance shall be performed as soon as practical after such storm event); 5) Update within seven days the erosion control plan with the dates and descriptions of installed/modified/added controls; 6) Update SWP3 and erosion control plan if changes arise in the construction process during the project (e.g., addition of batch plant or any other item not appearing on erosion control plan that is installed/added); and 7) Update the major soil disturbing activities log located within the SWP3. Remember: The purpose of the SWP3 and the erosion control plan is to provide a reviewer of those documents a story and timeline as to when every thing occurred on the project. Someone unl~amiliar with the project should be able to take the inspection repons, SWP3 and erosion control plan, read through those documents and get a clear picture of when activities occurred, what the project looked like and when corrective action was taken for deficiencies in BMPs. www.projectcompliance.com ' ~pR~OJEC, T.'· SWPPP tmns l To: Robert With: Tiseo Paving From: Todd Webster Date: 10/31/2003 Re; SWP3s Inch SWP3 tbr Bethel School & Hardin CC: [] Urgent [] For Review [] Please Comment [] Please Reply [] Please Recycle Robert, Here is the SWP3 for Bethel School Rd and the revised SWP3 for Hardin. The Hardin SWP3 needs a schedule and erosion control plan inserted into it. If you have any questions, please call me. Todd Webster www.projectcompliance.com