Loading...
Villages of CC 6-CS 941114CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE: VILLAGE AT COTTONWOOD CREEK, #6, FINAL PLAT P & Z HEARING DATE: C. C. HEARING DATE: LOCATION: SIZE OF AREA CURRENT ZONING: REQUEST: APPLICANT: November 14, 1994 December 13, 1994 East of Coppell Road, north of Parkway Boulevard 62.4486 acres, containing 183 lots SF -7 Approval of a final plat which is a replat of original lots 1,2,3,4 Jim Sowell Co. (Owner) 3131 McKinney Ave. Suite 200 Dallas, TX 75204 (214) 871 -3320 Tipton Engineering (Engineer) 6330 Belt Line Road Suite C Garland, TX 75043 (214) 226 -2967 HISTORY: This property was platted for four apartment sites in the mid 80's at about the time the economy began to slow down, and no development occurred. When the Commission called a public hearing to consider proper zoning in the spring of 1994, considerable support was expressed to rezone this land to single - family. Part of that support came from the success of a single - family subdivision developed by this same owner on the south side of Parkway Blvd. Once the rezoning was adopted by Council, this owner elected to replat the property for the 183 lot subdivision being reviewed at this time. Item 16 TRANSPORTATION: Parkway Blvd. is a C413, four -lane divided street, built to standard in a 85 foot r.o.w. Coppell Road is shown as a C2U, but is currently an unimproved two lane asphalt road contained within 110 feet of r.o.w. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North - vacant; A, Agriculture and LI, Light Industrial South - developing single - family; SF -7 East - vacant; SF -12 and SF -9 West - vacant; LI, Light Industrial and SF -7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Plan shows multi - family uses here, although the rezoning efforts of 1994 suggested single - family as most appropriate. ANALYSIS: The history portion of this recommendation outlines the events which have led up to this platting application. As a general comment, staff supports this proposal although there are technical alterations to be made prior to filing of the plat. Included in that list are easement requirements, street name clarifications, screening notations, buildable lot areas, among others. We have included with this Analysis a letter from the engineer dated November 3, 1994 in which it is stated that all staff concerns are being addressed. That being the case, staff recommends approval of this plat subject to conclusion of the issues stated. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve the final plat 2) Deny the final plat 3) Modify the final plat ATTACHMENTS: 1) Final Plat document 2) Screening fence detail 3) Letter addressing staff concerns from applicant's engineer 4) Departmental comments