Woodridge-LR 810619SOUTIIWESTEI N LABOR ,I'ORILS, INC.
Dallas, Trx a,~
6-19-81
File No. 27126-01
Report of tests on
To
Received from
Soil Compaction
L & N Land Corp.
Attn: Mr. Stephen Crim
Southwestern Contracting Co.
Identification Marks Woodridge Additions III
FIELD DENSITY TESTS: Subgrade-Natural Ground
Date Rec'd. 6-17-81
- Field
Moistu re
Lo, at(on ( % )
1. 9 + 00 South-5 + 50 west 29.9
2. 8 + 00 South-5 + 50 west 30.6
3. 7 + 00 South-5 + 50 west 19.0
4. 6 + 00 South-5 + 50. west 33.3
5. 5 + 00 South-5 + 50 west 15.1
Field Optimum Proctor
Density Moisture Density Percent
(Lbs./Cu. Ft.) (%) (Lbs./Cu. l:'t.) Density
90.8 21.3 95.8 94.8 *
89.7 21.3 95.8 93.6 *
107.4 16.1 108.0 99.4
84.7 21.3 95.8 88.4 *
120.1 9.2 123.0 97.6
Dark Brown Silty Clay
Reddish Brown & Gray Sandy Clay
Lt. Brown Silty Clay
95-.8#/cu. ft. at 21.3% optimum moisture
108.0#/cu. ft.. at 16.1% optimum moisture
123.0#/cu. ft. at 9.2% optimum moisture
*Failed to meet required 95.0% compaction
Technician: C. Mooney (2.0 hrs.)
cc: 2-L & N Land Corp., Mr. Crim SOII'I'IIX~I.;Sl'EllN I,AII()IIAll)HI~;S, IN¢;.
1-Southwestern Contracting Co. ~~
1-Lichliter Co. ~~ ,
Lah. No. D2412 /
Page 3 of 3
SOUTH ff $TERN LABORATOry,,sS, INC.
Dallas, Texas__
File No.
Report of tests on
To
Received from
Identification Marks Woodridge Addition, Phase III'
· FIELD DENSITY TESTS:
Date Rec'd. 6/19/81
Field Field .Optimum Proctor
Moisture Density Moisture Density Percent
(%) (Lbs./Cu. Ft.) (%) (Lbs./Cu. Ft.) Density
'12. West Sta. 7+80, South Sta.
2+00, natural ground elev. 25
'13. West Sta. 7+50, South Sta.
3+00, natural ground elev. 17
14. West Sta. 6+50, South Sta.
4+80, 2nd lift 22
15. West Sta. 6+40, South Sta.
6+00, 2nd lift 22
16. West Sta. 6+10, South Sta.
7+00, 2nd lift 21
97 21.3 95.8 101
109 16.1 108 101
100 20.3 103.8 96
102 20.3 103.8 99
106 20.3 103.8 103
*Natural vegitation removed and compacted per job requirements.
~Ot II ~ · ....
,' "' 'k'll'.llN L.\IR)IJATORI 'S, IN(:.
Lab. No. D3234 my
Om }citers and reports are for the exclusive use of the chenl to whom they are addressed. The u~ of our name must receive out prior written appr,~al. Our
let tc~s and reportx apply lo the ~mple tested and/or inspected, and ate not necessarily indicative of Ihe quali6es of appatently idenlical or simil~ p~oducts