First Methodist-LR011119Specimen
umber
Measured
S lump zeal
age
Days;
Dam
coed
Total Load
Lhs_I
Compressive Strength
Remarks
FMC 57
7
11 /16/01
130,460
4
FMC 58
28
12/05/01
FMC 59
3
28
12/05/01
FMC 60
H
HOLD
Test Methods Utilized
Fracture Regular
Cylinders Made By: EA
ASTM C- 31.0 -39 C -147
(Unless Noted Otherwise)
Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
Texas CMT, Inc.
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957 Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com
REPORT OFCQNCRETE MIX OBSERVATION
Report Date: November 19, 2001 Date Concrete Placed: November 9, 2001 Standard 6 "x l2"
Client: First United Methodist Church Coppell Area 28.27 Square Inches
Project: Firsainitnd Methodist Church New Parking Lot Concrete Report No.: 15
Contractor: ill Wilkinson Ltd. Project No.: 201 -0177
Concrete Supplier and Plant: LMC #7
Location of Placement: Paving
MATERIALS
Mix Number:
Cement:
Fly Ash:
Coarse Aggregate:
intermediate Aggregate:
Fine Aggregate:
Admixtures:
1
Added Water:
Remarks and/or Distribution:
6
I1
10 gallons
42
Source( S5D Batch Wts.
Description l Lbs(CuYd)
cc: Mr. John Rosenberg First United Methodist Church (2)
Mr. Ray Larson First United Methodist Church
Mr. Eric Royal Royal General Contractors
Mr. Larry Davis City of Coppell
Mr. Bob Colon Hill Wilkinson
Texas CMT, Inc.
Reviewed by:
OBSERVATION DATA
Time Sample Batched:
Time Sampled:
Sample Location:
Truck/Ticket No:
Temperature:
Ambient Range:
Concrete Range:
Slump Range finches):
Weather Conditions:
Time Started:
Time Completed:
Sample Air Content
Total Cubic Yards Placed:
53 °F
65 °F
3"
Cloudy
06:00 am
03:00 pm
5%
40
Required Strength (Lbs. /so.in.): 4,000
07:13 am
07:40 am
29' N. 20' E. of SW corner of pavement
955/7110559
All letters and reports are fur the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CMT, Inc. The use of our name maxi receive our prior written approval. Our
Henn and reports apply only io the sample tested and(or observed and are not necessarily indicative of she quantities of apparently identical or similar products.
Specimen
'ionizer
niz
Measured
Slump tin.)
Age
Days)
Date
Tested
Total [tad
Lhs. I
Compressive Strength
rl,hs; Sq. l n. a
Remarks
FMC 61
7
11/16/01
113,260
4,0 0
FMC 62
12/05/01
FMC 63
3
28
12/05/01
FMC 64
H
HOLD
Test Methods Utilized
Fracture Regular
ASTM C- 31,C-39.0 -143
(Unless Noted Otherwise)
Cylinders Made By: EA
Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957 Fax (214) 352 -6972 www .texascmt.com
REPORT OF CONCRETE MIX OBSERVATION
Report Date: November 19, 2001 Date Concrete Placed: November 9, 2001 Standard 6 "x12"
Client: First United Methodist Church Coppell Area 28.27 Square Inches
Project: First United Methodist Church New Parking Lot Concrete Report No.: 16
Contractor: Hill Wilkinson Ltd. Project No.: 201 -0177
Concrete Supplier and Plant: LMC #7
Location of Placement: Paving
MATERIALS
Mix Number:
Cement:
Fly Ash:
Coarse Aggregate:
Intermediate Aggregate:
Fine Aggregate:
Admixtures:
1
Added Water:
Remarks and/or Distribution:
42
15 gallons
Source/ SSD Hatch Wis.
Description (Lbs
cc: Mr. John Rosenberg First United Methodist Church (2)
Mr. Ray Larson First United Methodist Church
Mr. Eric Royal Royal General Contractors
Mr. Larry Davis City of Coppetl
Mr. Bob Colon Hill Wilkinson
Texas CMT, Inc.
Texas CMT, Inc.
Reviewed by:
OBSERVATION DATA
Time Sample Batched:
Time Sampled:
Sample Location:
Truck /Ticket No:
Temperature:
Ambient Range:
Concrete Range:
Slump Range (inches):
Weather Conditions:
Time Started:
Time Completed:
Sample Air Content
Total Cubic Yards Placed:
Required Strength (Lbs. (sq.1n.)
08:11 am
09:00 am
20' E. 134' N. of SW corner of pavement
1040/7110568
53 °F
56 °F
3"
Cloudy
06:00 am
03:00 pm
3%
120
4.000
All levers and reporu are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full approval of Trues CMT. Inc. The use of our name must receive our prior written approval. Our
letters and reporu apply only to the sample toted and /or observed and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.
Specimen
Number
Measured
Slump nn _t
Age
Dent
Dale
Tcsled
Total Wad
Lbr.l
Compressive Strength
:I,bs.�Sg.ln.
Remarks
FMC 65
11/16/ 01
92,720
3,280
FMC 66
12/05/01
FMC 67
3
28
12/05/01
FMC 68
H
HOLD
Test Methods Utilized
Fracture Reg tar
ASTM C- 31.0 -39,C -143
(Unless Noted Otherwise)
Cylinders Made By: EA
Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
Report Date:
Client:
Project:
Contractor:
Concrete Supplier and Plant:
Location of Placement:
MATERIALS
Mix Number:
Cement:
Fly Ash:
Coarse Aggregate:
Intermediate Aggregate:
Fine Aggregate:
Admixtures:
l
2
Added Water:
Remarks and/or Distribution:
Texas CMT, Inc.
38
10 gallons
Source/
Description
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352 -6957
November 19, 2001 Date Concrete Placed
First United Methodist Church Coppell
First United Methodist Church New Parking Lot
Hill Wilkinson Ltd.
LMC #7
Paving
REPORT OF CONCRETE MIX OBSERVATION
cc: Mr. John Rosenberg First United Methodist Church (2)
Mr. Ray Larson First United Methodist Church
Mr. Eric Royal Royal General Contractors
Mr. Larry Davis City of Coppell
Mr. Bob Colon Hill Wilkinson
Texas CMS, Inc.
SSD Batch We,
tbs/CuYd)
Reviewed by:
Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com
November 9, 2001
OBSERVATION DATA
Time Sample Batched:
Time Sampled:
Sample Location:
Truck/Ticket No:
Temperature:
Ambient Range: 53 °F
Concrete Range: 65 °F
Slump Range (inches): 33/4"
Weather Conditions: Cloudy
Time Started: 06:00 am
Time Completed: 03:00 pm
Sample Air Content 4%
Total Cubic Yards Placed: 40
Required Strength I Lbs, /sq.in.): 3.000
Standard 6 "x12"
Area 28.27 Square Inches
Concrete Report No.: 17
Project No.: 201 -0177
10:43 am
11:00 am
29' N. 8' E. of SW corner of pavement
955/7110586
All mums and reports are the the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not he reproduced without the full approval of Tenn CMT. Inc. The use of our name must receive our prior written approval. Our
!stun and reports apply only to the sample tested Ind/or observed and are not necessarily imtintive of the Ouanliti S orappveMY identical or similar Produce.