First Methodist-LR011025Specimen
Number
Measured
Slump tin.)
Age
(Days)
Date
Tested
Total Load
(Lbs.)
Compressive Strength
I Lbs. /Sq.In.)
Remarks
FMC 5
7
10/04/01
100,660
3,560
FMC 6
28
10 /25/01
123,400
4,370
FMC 7
5
28
10/25/01
128,840
4,560
FMC 8
H
HOLD
Test Methods Utilized
Cylinders Made By: EA
Fracture Regular
ASTM C.31,C- 39,C-14
(Unless Noted Otreriise)
Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
10044 Monroe Drive
REPORT OF CONCRETE MIX OBSERVATION
Report Date: October 25, 2001 Date Concrete Placed: September 27, 2001 Standard 6 "x12"
Client: First United Methodist Church Coppell Area 28.27 Square Inches
Project: First United Methodist Church New Parking Lot Concrete Report No.: 2
Contractor: Superior Utilities Project No.: 201 0177
Concrete Supplier and Plant: Custom Crete
Location of Placement: Inlets
MATERIALS
Mix Number:
Cement:
Fly Ash:
Coarse Aggregate:
Intermediate Aggregate:
Fine Aggregate:
Admixtures:
1
2
Added Water:
Remarks and/or Distribution:
Texas CMT, Inc.
CCI065A
0 gallons
Dallas, Texas 75229
Sauce/ SSD Batch Wls.
Description (Lbs/CuYd)
cc: Mr. John Rosenberg First United Methodist Church (2)
Mr. Ray Larson First United Methodist Church
Mr. Eric Royal First United Methodist Church
Mr. Larry Davis City of Copped
Mr. Bob Colon Hill Wilkinson (2)
Texas CMT, Inc.
Reviewed by:
(214) 352.6957
OBSERVATION DATA
Time Sample Batched:
Time Sampled:
Sample Location:
Truck/Ticket No:
Temperature:
Ambient Range:
Concrete Range:
Slump Range (inches):
Weather Conditions:
Time Started:
Time Completed:
Sample Air Content
Total Cubic Yards Placed:
Requ ired SlrenRth (Lbs. /sq.in
03:00 pm
03:00 pm
I (fy east 1 NW sides of parking lot
420/244118
81 F
76 °F
5
Clear
01:00 pm
04:00 pm
2.10%
5
3,000
Fax (214) 352-6972
All letters and reports an for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full approval of Tetra CMT. tux. The use of our same must receive our poor written approval. Our
letters and reports apply only to the sample =WI ad/or obsevd and are not osunrity indicative of the qualities or allParsnty identical or simile pedals.
Y
Client: First United Methodist Church
Coppell, Texas
Project: First United Methodist Church
New Parking Lot
Test Date: October 19, 2001
Report Date: October 25, 2001
Required Density 95% 105%
Required Moisture Opt. +5 %p ±3 %p
Material Description
clay
Maximum
Dry
Density
(Lbs /CuFt)
114.5
109.9
99.4
112.2
103.0
109.9
Optimum
Moisture
Content
Percent
13.0
16.5
18.6
13.0
13.9
10.9
1. Brown Clayey Sand
2. Light Brown Sandy Clay
3. Dark Brown Clay
4. Brown Clayey Sand (YMCA import)
5. Light Brown Clayey Sand w /light weight aggregate
occasional limestone
6. Reddish Brown Clayey Sand brown sandy
Test
No
Mat
No.
Location/Elevation (and/or) Lift
In -Place
Dry Density
(Lbs /CuFt)
In -Place
Moisture
Content
Percent
Compaction
Probe
Depth
10
6
Pavement subgrade
159' W. 9' S. of 8" green sewer pipe
101.7
19.1
92.6
6"
11
6
Pavement subgrade
288' W. of 8" green sewer pipe
104.5
15.4
95.1
6"
12
5
Pavement subgrade
393' W. 12' S. of 8" green sewer pipe
104.5
11.1
95.1
6
Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229
Texas CMT, Inc.
(214) 352-6957
REPORT OF IN -PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL
cc: Mr. John Rosenberg First United Methodist Church (2)
Mr. Ray Larson First United Methodist Church
Mr. Eric Royal First United Methodist Church
Mr. Larry Davis City of Coppell
Mr. Bob Colon Hill Wilkinson (2)
7 D698
Test results do not meet project specifications
Fax (214) 352 6972
Pa 1 of 1
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed. The use of our name must receive our prior written approval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the sample tested and/or observed, and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.
Client: First United Methodist Church
Coppell, Texas
Project: First United Methodist Church
New Parking Lot
Test Date: October 22, 2001
Report Date: October 25, 2001
Required Density 95% 105%
Required Moisture Opt. +5%/ ±3%p
Material Description
clay
Maximum
Dry
Density
(Lbs/CuFt)
114.5
109.9
99.4
112.2
103.0
109.9
Optimum
Moisture
Content
Percent
13.0
16.5
18.6
13.0
13.9
10.9
I. Brown Clayey Sand
2. Light Brown Sandy Clay
3. Dark Brown Clay
4. Brown Clayey Sand (YMCA import)
5. Light Brown Clayey Sand w /fight weight aggregate
occasional limestone
6. Reddish Brown Clayey Sand brown sandy
Test
No
Mat
No
Location/Elevation (and/or) Lift
In -Place
Dry Density
(Lbs /CuFt)
In -Place
Moisture
Content 1%)
Percent
Compaction
Probe
Depth
13
4
Paving
30 N. 60' E. of SW corner of parking lot
114.1
13.2
101.7
6"
14
4
Paving
30 N. 160' E. of SW corner of parking lot
114.6
12.2
102A
15
6
Retest 10
105.1
12.6
95.7
6
16
6
Retest 11
110.7
11.0
100.7
6"
17
4
100' S. 50' E. of NW corner of parking lot
110.4
13.8
98.4
6"
18
4
100' S. 120' E. of NW corner of parking lot
109.0
12.2
97.1
6"
Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229
Texas CMT, Inc.
(214) 352 -6957
REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL
0177) Method: ASTM D2922 D3 017 D698
Fax (214) 352-6972
Page 1 of 1
Test results meet project specifications
cc: Mr. John Rosenberg First United Methodist Church (2)
Mr. Ray Larson First United Methodist Church
Mr. Eric Royal First United Methodist Church
Mr. Larry Davis City of Coppell 1. e Vii'
Mr. Bob Colon Hill Wilkinson (2) Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed. The use of our name must receive our prior written approval. Our leuer, and reports
apply only to the sample tested and/or observed. and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.