DR9101-CS 900531COPPELL PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
May 31, 1990
Steve Goram, Director of Public Works
Larry Da~gt~Construction Inspector
Oak Trail Drainage Project
As requested on this date, I made telephone contact with Mr. Gl~l
Hitt with DeShazo, Starek, and Tang concerning the req~esued
engineering service proposal for the Oak Trail Drainage Pr~'ect.
The proposal addressed to Shohre dated
received. I am currently drafting a letter
your request.
May 1, 1990 b. s t, een
to tn.? city M~n%,~gel ~r
If I can be of further assistance, please .let me ~now. Thank you.
CLD/bb
xc: Shohre Daneshmand, Acting City EngineeI
Ben dela Cruz, Engineering Technician
Per Birdsall, Street Superintendent
]rail
Oak ~' ' '
pZeased %' ~;ub~it 'hhis proposal to provide enqLneerinq
thc (!it'/ o'f-' Coppell for 'tile referenced project.
two _~}:)t]on:; for resolving the conflict between
mug g-5.nch sanitary ,.~ewer and th~ proposed stol:'m
r~i>[['JON I - ?.oute sanitary sewer 'througtl proposed
OPT'ION II Relocat'e tile gas line in the north parkway
of Willow Way Lane and re-route tlse
proposed sto]Fm sewer.
)Lowise the constructkon p].ans to resolve the conflict
.I. te 3. shove
da~;<:ribed in ..... m
],~-cl')are a dra] ~ ~;. (:asement for 'tl~e portion of the
::;<,~c:]: that woulLd be on private )rolper'ty.
L. i4ake periodic visits to the siho, at iht erva'Ls
clehermined by sound engineering practice, to observe the
})uoq~ress and quat 1 it[./ of the executed work and to
determine in qe~eral 5. f the work is proceeding i,n
,~lccorda'l~eo wJ. Uh the Contract DocumerltL; ·
, ;'.~., t and a. dvtse with the Owner; issue ali.
,h;;tr,.~,:'i.ons to thc Contractor requested by the Owner;
,N~d pcepare and i:;sue ~outine change orders with Owner's
app,;oval.
Review samples, catalog ~ata~ schedules, shop drawings,
~ abor~tory, shop ~nd mill tests o~ material and
?qajpmenh and other data which the Contractor submits'.
'l':'J.s l:cvlcw 1..'5 {or %he bent:fit of t:he 'owner and covers
oNf..y gnner~t] c)n['ormance whth the information givem by
· dhq :ont~-act Documents. The Co~qr~otor i$ to review &~d
stamp hJ.s approw~], on submit'hals prior to submitting to
EngilecL~, and review by the Engineer does not relieve
the Contractor of any responsibility such as dimensions
to be confirmed and correlated at the job site,
appropriate :~afet. y mea[.;ures 'to protect, workers and the
public, or thc ncc(,.¢.,.~.t,./ to construct a complete and
workable f~ c:[ ].ity in accordance witl~ the Contract
Cb':ain ~d .rcv .~.~tw montl~].y and final estimates for
payments te Contractors, and furnish to the Owner
.r ec:ommenda tions of payments to Contractors and
SUl)p.l J ors; ~:~scmble written guarantees which are
require([ by E]~c CemqFact Documents ·
Conctuct, in company with 'the Owner, a final inspection
o~ thc Project for co'mpl i~tn(;e wi'th the Contrac. t
Documel%us, an I :-ubmht recommondati, ons concerning pro,eot.
fi; la LtNJ nS ~ [. m.ly a:[[ fec't Owner ~ s final, pay'meet 'bo t:h..~
· Field surveys to check geometric layout, grade, etc.
!?e:~o]uLl. on of dispu'tes between Owner and Cont:~ac~o]"
~xc:eSS Of 10 ~latl-hoLlrs.
3, Ccn%~.nuation of on-site services for more thall one week
be-fond the construction con'tra{:'t completion dnte.
...;~y services not specifically stated in basic services.
3c.r .[o]'m.~.n ~ the'.;e services, thc ISJ%ginoer will endeavor to
........ ~nd deficiencies in the work
tfotecu the Ownot* ag~t.hns, t de.fect~
'.,'.' the ContracLor, bu~ he cannot gua]-L~nteo 'tl~e performanc~ of
t..'%,7. Q.o]ht]'acllor, notf b(. }t~spons.i. blc for %:].le ~otual supe~:vi.3io]l
Ltl homeownerr~ and Cfi ky services will be performed by the
For the services of our staff, the charge will be the "Sala:t:y
{:c.,sk" of. each cmpJ.oycc so engaged times a multiplier of 2.25
~,.>s opt for Principals, whose ti.me will be bill. ed at $125.00
l,,;r hour. "Sal;M:'y cost" is deEincd as the cost of salario:';
-2oku]. hours wouked Limes the time directly chargeable 'to the
Pro }~ct/ plu~. thirty percent (30%) for Social S ecur.['t:y
C ~l~t;]/' J. bLIl,i O~ S , /1D('.n~])].Oy]f~O~l t, cxcisd: and payroll taxes,
[}lconkL,/e ipay, mectJ, c{tl and insurance benefits, sick lea,;~,
va{ati{,]~, amd hol. ic~sy pay applicable thereto). The over'tim~..
p;~ remium (~requJ. red ):)y 'k. he 'Psi r Labor Standards Act for non-.
wo~:}~(:l because of ,::].i(:nt's requirements. For al]. 'telepllone
: b~ o'.]~:' o/~ice~i's nnd staff, allL as required for 'the PUOlper
o,.:ecul:ion of the work, and for ell work subcontracted, the
cha;:ge :ks the actual .invoice cost plus ten percent (10~¢}
service: charge. We es'rime're 'that the charge for BASIC
SF, RVICi;S wJ.l. 1 he approxima'tely $7,100 itemized below).
] . Stud),, options %o ~esolve $ 500
uti 1.i.'ty conflicts
2. l(~.%&s(, construr:h'iof] drawings
1,640
3. Prepare drainage easement ___ 04~
.~'~btotal- - De:;:Lgn Phase
,2,3[0
1. Project ~:¢))rcsentatJon
4; 2 7 0 0
Construction administration
Total 4, 7,100