First Baptist-LR030813Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
Tex s
CMT,
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957
Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com
REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL
Density RepoPt No. 2 (203-0161) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page of 1
Client: First Baptist Church of Coppell ~aterial Description Maximum Optimum
Dry Moisture
Density Content
Project: First Baptist Church of Coppell (LbsdCuFi) Percent
Test Date: August $~ 2003 Reddish Brown Ctaye~ Sand 112.6 13.2
2. Dark Brown Sandy Clay 106.1 15.9
Report Date: August 13, 2003
Required Density (%): Min 95%
Required Moisture (%): Opt. ±5%-Saud
Mat Location/Elevation (an&or) Lift In-Place In-Place Percent
No DO' Density Moisture Compaction
l'est (Lbs./Cu Ft) Content (%)
No
2 Retest # 2
6 101.4 18.7 95.6
Test results meet project specifications
cc: Mr J,W Bales - First Baptist Church ol Copp¢ll
Mr Mark Hi[I- H H Archilccts
Mr James StarLing - Starling-Richardson
Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
Texas
CM%
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957
Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com
REPORT OF IN-PL,aCE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL
'203-0161' Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Pal~e of 1
Client: First Baptist Church of Coppdl Material Dcscnptmn Maximum Optimum
Project: First Baptist Church of Coppell (Lbs/CuFt) Percent
Test Date: August 4, 2003 1. Reddish Brown Clayey Sand 112.6 13.2
Report Date: August 13, 2003
Required Density (%): Min 95%
Required Moisture (%): Opt. ±5%-Sand
2 1" Lift
1 SW corner of building pad 102.9 19.1 97.0
2 1~' Lift
2 Upper sanctuaD floor 93.I 16.4 87.7 *
2 Subgradc ~ cut section
3 NE comer of building pad 104.9 12.4 98.9
2 Subgrade - cut section
4 East/center of building pad 107.6 20.6 101.4
2 Subgrade - cut section
5 SE corner of buildiog pad 102.1 19.2 96.2
* Test results do not meet project specifications
cc: Mr J,W Bales - First Baptist Church ofCoppell
Mr James Starling - Starling-Richardson