SS9402C-LR 980626Compaction
Test Report
Patton, Burke & Thompson
10555 Newkirk Street
Suite 530
Dallas, Texas 75220
CLIENT:
ClIY OF COPPELL
225 PARKWAY BLVD.
P. O. BOX 478
COPPELL, TEXAS 75019
D~TE 06t26t98 JOB NO - t-532
REPORT NO 17 SHEET_ 1OF.. 2-
SUBJECT BETHEL ROAD SEWER lINE BACK}:III REPAIRS
COPPELL, TEXAS
UTILIIY TRENCH
BACI~ILL OBSERVATION
LRBORATORY FIELD
TEST DEPTH TEST MAX OMC DRY MC COM-
NO. LOCATION FEET TYPE DENSITY % DENSIIY % PACTION SOIL TYPE
RETES~ OF TEST-NO, 103 ~ CURVE NO.6
'~'~ NUC 11o lOP lO~'1 11 11"1fl I-_IC~R Nt~ IRR9
~I'~ 16+30 CURVE NO..2
· ,-,., $.$ ....
-STA~ 't8+tO CURVE NO.
5t'A. t6+oo CURVENO. 2..
1 BELOW A.SPHALT 2 95% OF/~-~TM D 698 REQUIRED
SPECIFICATIONS:-.. tO0 % OF MAXIMUM ASTM D 698
MOISTURE WITHIN % OF OPTIMUM
1YPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENTAND NO OF UNITS:
HAMM ~2210 SHEEP,SFOOT VIBRATORY DRUM ROLLER
-WAC, KER PACKER [1)
MOISTURE ADDED BY WATER TRUCK
THICKNESS OF LIFT 6-~ rNCHES
TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS
-- CA,~E 1845GUNI-I,OADER (1)
THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION
OF FILL PLACEMENT AS WE LL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE WE HAV~ RELIED
UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NEC ESSARY COMPACTM- EFFORT AND
MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SRECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR
OBSERVER IS NOT PRESE NE AN D AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED~
TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS
SPECiEICAFIONS~
PROGRESS REF~)RT A~ REQUES'rED, PBI' MADE A SITE VISIT TO OBSERVE AND TEST THE UTILffY TRENCH
RECONSTRUCTION. ~EN 51'A. 12+00 .AND Sl'A. 1.~+30, ~,ACKFILL MATERIAL WAS PtACED IN 6' LIFTS AND
WA,,~. RO~ED UNI1L A MINIMUM OF 100.% DENSITY WAS OBTAINED. THE BO1TOM OF 1HE TRENCH BETWEEN STA.
17~"~ STA. 18+30 WA$ ROLLED WNTIL ,SAllSFACTORY DENSIIY WAS OBTAINED, AND THE GEO-TEXTILE
FABRIC WAS SET IN PLACE. THE AREA OF THE TRENCH AT $TA. 26-e-00~VHERE WATER HAD BEEN ALLOWED TO
POND, WAS OBSERVED TO HAVE [CONTINUED ON SHEET 2 OF REPORT NO. 17]....]
....
[~ '~q OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION M EFTS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO-[SI ~ U~L ~ ~'~...1[~?~-
[~ ~N OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED 8Y OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.,S,
~"~r; ·
AND SHOULD BE REWORKED
SCOPE OF OB~ERVATION; ~ILLTIME' ~ PERIODIC, ONCALLBASS; ~:~ONTRACTOR'$ORCLENT'SREPRESENTATIVEADVIS~*'*"I~*~I~-~,~I~,:.
· / .~. J, 'PfAffi.*~I'E'FEfERG ,~,
' ~/// '
Compaction
Test Report
Patton, Burke & Thompson
10555 NPwkirk Street
Suite 530
DaLlas, Texas 75220
CLIENT:
CITY OF COPPELL
225 PARKWAY BLVD.
P. O. BOX 478
COPPELL, TEXAS 75019
DAFE: 06/26t98 JOBNO 1532 ....
F~EPORT NO ..... 17 _ SHEET 2OF_
SUBJECF BETHEL ROAD SEWER LINE BACI~ILL REPAIRS
COPPELL, TEXAS
UTILFIY TRENCH
BACK~ILL OBSERVATION
SPECIFICATIONS: 100 % OF MAXIMUM ASTM D698
MOISTURE WI1~IN _ % OF OPTIMUM
TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENTAND NO OF UNITS:
HAMM ~10 SHEEPSFOOT VIBRATORY DRUM ROLLER
WACKER PACKER [1]
MOISTURE AODED BY . WATER TRUCK
THICKNESS OF LIFT 6'8 INCHES
IYPE OF EAI~1H MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS:
GA,SE 1845C UNI,,LC~,DER
THIS r~EPOF~T PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION
OF FILL PLACEMEN~ AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE WE HAV~ RELIED
UPON THE CONTRACTOR fO APPLY THE NECESSARY' COMPACTWE EFFORT AND
MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING ~MES WHEN OUR
OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENE AND AT LOCATIONS OI~ER PHAN THOSE TESTED
TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOL E BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHE[~ THE FILL MEETS
SPECIFICATIONS.
PROGRESS REPORT [CONTINUED FROM SHEET 1 OF REPORT NO. 17].... SE1TLED APPROXIMATELY 8' AI.ONG THE OLD
TRENCH LINE. THE MATERIAL DIRECTLY BELOW THE ASPHALT WAS OBSERVED TO HAVE SETTI.ED A5 FAR BACK A5
APPROXIMATELY 15' BEHIND THE FACE OF THE ASPHALT.