SS9402C-LR 980623Compaction
Test Report
Patton, Burke & Thompson
10555 Newkirk Street
Suite 530
Dallas, Texas 75220
CI1Y OF COPPELL
225 PARKWAY BLVD.
P. O. BOX 478
COPPELL. TEXAS 75019
DATE: 06123/98 JOBNO t532
REPORT NO 14 _ SHEET ~ 1OF _ 1 -
SUB.~ECT BETHEL ROAD SEWER LINE BAClO:ILL REP.aJRS
COPPELL, TEXAS
UTILIIY TRENCH
BACKFILL OBSERVATION
LABORATORY FIELD
TEST DEPTH TEST MAX OMC DRY MC COM-
NO. LOCATION FEET TYPE DENSITY % DENSITY % ~AC TION SOIL T'~PE
PCF PCF %
STA; 9+60 CURVE NO. 3
' "" _CURVE
STA. t0+25
STA. 10+60 CURVE NO. Z
'"" CUE~E NO
5TA, 9+00 CURVE NO.
1 8~LOW ASlq~LT
SPECIFICATIONS; t OO % OF MAXIMUM . ASTM D 698
MOISRflRE WITHIN % OF OPTIMUM
1YPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS:
~M~tO ~TO~ ~EPS~T DR~ ROLLER
W~ ~C~R [t]
MOIS~RE ADDED BY WATER ~K
THICKNESS OF U~ 6-~ INCHES
~PE OE ~TH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS
C~ UNFL~ (t]
THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION
OF FILL PLAGEMENE AS WELL AS TH E TESTS SHOWN ABOVE WE HAVE RELIED
U PON TH E CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND
MOISTURE TO AC HI~VE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR
OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED
TE ST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FrLL M EET3
PROGRESS REPORT AS REQUESTED. PBT MADE A SITE VISIT TO OBSERVE AND TEST THE~,T~E~H , __
RECONSTRUCTION. BACKFILL MATERLaJ- WAS PLACED IN THE TRENCH BL:IN~EEN ~q~+~!~.~ !] aeC; EACH
LIFT WAS APPROXIMATELY 6' THICK AND WAS ROLLED UNTIL 100% DENSIIY WAS OBTAINED. THE MATERIAL FROM
THE cONTRACTOR'S PiT CHANGED AND WE OBTAINED ANOTHER PROCTOR SAMPLE. NO ADDmONAL TRENCH WA5
OPENED ON THIS DATE.
[] OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.(S)
~ ?N OUR OPINION FILL COMPACT'ON DOES NOT MEET SPECIEICATIONSAS INDICATED BYOU" OI~SERVATLDNSAND TSST NO.I',
AND SHOULD BE REWORKED
SCOPEOFOBSERVAT'O": [~ r~LLTIME; r~ PERIODIC, ON CALL BASIS; ~ ~ONTRACTORSORCLIENTSREPRESENTATI~'EADVI$ ~,I~,~.~.o.,r~WIG~*