SS9402C-LR 980617Compaction
Test Report
Patton, Burke & Thompson
10555 Newkirk Street
Suite 530
Dallas, Texas 75220
CUENT:
CIIY OF COPPELL
225 PARKWAY BLVD.
P. O. BOX 478
COPPELL, TEXAS 75019
DATE. 06/17/98 JOB NO 1532
REPORT NO 9 SHEET t OF ~1
SUBJECT BETHEL ROAD SEWER LINE BACKFILL REPAIRS
COPPELL, TEXAS
UTILrrf TRENCH
BACKFILL OBSERVATION
LABORATORY FIELD
TEST DEPTH TEST MAX OMC DRY MC COM-
NO. LOCATION FEET TYPE DENSITY % DENSITY % ~ACTION SOIL TYPE
FCF PCF %
SANtTARY SEWER LINE; STA: 4 +3&-- CURVE NO. 5
· ..7.v ~ "~.0 ~. ~-~.~ '~ 0.'~ '~0-
40 I $ .NUC T T
SANft'ARY SEWER kINE; STA 3+90 CURVE NO.
41 1.5 ."'."JC !!7.0 '~nr~ ............. 1'~4 '~'~ r~ Tnn
Safl'41TARY SEWER LINE; STA. 5+60 CURVE NC). 5
42. 4.0 NUC 1~.?.~ ~.2.0 !'~_a.5 0~ !nn. ~R~
~SANITARY SEWERUNE, STA. 6+tO .CURVE NO. 6
45 3.~
SANtTARY SEWER LINE, STA: 4+50 CURVE
44 .75 &IHP 11o 191q 191 ~. 11 ,~ ln~-._IQRNt~1532
SANIT.AR~ SEWER LtNE~ 6TA, 3.4- 75 C;U~
-~ k.~ ~o 19~1 191 R 11 ~ lnn-.J~aNt~1~32
45 ............
,~tITARYSE'WER UNE, STA, 3+50 . CURVE N~, 6
SANITARY SEWER LINE~ STA. 8+00 ~ CURVE NO,
1 BELOW TOP OF ASPHALT 295% OF ASTM D-698 REQUIRED
SPEC~HCATIONS: 100 % OF M~3(IMUM ~ ASTM D 698
MOISTURE WITHIN _ % OF OPTIMUM
1~PE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENTAND NO. OF UNITS:
HAMM 22T0 VIBRATORY DRUM ROLLER (1)~ WACKER
PACKER[IT; DYNO RAG VIBRATORY DRUM ROLLER (1]
MOISTURE ADDED BY
~ICKNESS OF LIFT 6~ INCHES
"r~PE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS
DAE~DTRACKH~ ( t},- UNt*L(~DER ( I ]
I~lS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION
OF FILL pLACEMEN[ AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE WE HAVE RELIED
UPON TH E CONTRACTOR TO APPLY ~IE NECESSARY COM PACTIVE EFFORT AND
MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR
OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT AND AT LOCATIONS OTH ER THAN THOSE TESTED.
TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS
SPECIFICATIONS
PROGRESS REPORT AS REQUESTED, PBT MADE A SITE VISIT TO OBSERVE AND TEST THE UTILITY TRENCH
RECONSTRUCTION. A SANDY C_LAY WITH GRAVEL BA,CKFILL MATERIAL WAS PLACED IN THE UTILITY TRENCH
Re"'I~EI~i 5q"A. 5+35 AND 6+11~+ I$ AND 8+00. ~l-IIS MATERIAL WAS PLACED IN 6' LIFTS AND COMPACTED
~T~.-~'1~00% DENSITY WAS OB~INED. PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE FILL MATERIAL, THE BO1TOM OF THE
TRENCH WAS COMPACTED UNTIL SUFFICIENT DENSIIY WAS OBTAINED. AFTER SUFFICIENT DENSrlY WAS OBTAINED
THE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC WAS PLACED IN THE BOTrOM OF THE TRENCH. (CONTINUED ON SHEET 2 OF REPORT NO.
9]
[] ,~gl OUR OPINION. FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFIC-A~,F~I,~,~,~**~ ~I[~iUR O"ERVATIONS AND TEST NO.[S)40'~
[] I~N OUR OPINIO~ EILL COM FACTION DOES NOT ME,~ .f~ICATI~/~S A~'~' .~.~ ID BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO,(S)
A D,"OUEDBS. O""D
SCOPEOPO~SERV^.OU: LJ ~4UU..ME; r~ PERlOt~c.t,a.t~.~-]a;.D.,~t::,O.~?j.' TOR'SO"CUEm'S~E"RESEUTAT~VEADWSED DAN (PAVCO)
/ "7 .......... ''' ""
Compaction
Test Report
Patton, Burke & Thompson
10555 Newkirk Street
Suite 530
Dallas, Texas 75220
ClIY OF COPPELL
225 PARKWAY BLVD.
P. O. BOX 478
COPPELL, TEXAS 75019
DATE 06tt 7/98 JOE~ NO t552
REPORT NO 9 SHEET 20F
SUBJECT BETHEL ROAD SEWER LINE BACKFILL REPAIRS
COPPELL TEXAS
UTILITY TRENCH
BACKFILL OBSERVATION
LABORATORY FIELD
TEST DEPTH TEST MAX OMC DRY MC COM-
2
SANffARY SEWER LtNE~ ST~ 8+60 CURVE NO~30
SANffARY SEWERLINErb'TA~ 6+30 CURVE NO~ 6
49 2.5 HUC ?'~9._ '~_n '~'~a A 1,4 ~ oA Inn Fdt-) 1RR9
SANITARY SEWER LINE,- STA, 5+75 CURVE~IO. 5
RETEST OF TEST N0~49 _ CURVE_NO..5
RETEST-OF TEST NO~ 48 ! CURVENO. 30
~ s~s"'T~~,.,. n~,,v,.n~'~'~"~'~n*~'tl~"~'l ......... klll~"~ 1 lA ""/ 11 a I 1'4 ~ F~ R ~7 IfJR NC) 1~A2
SANFrARY SEWER LINE~ STA. 6+,50- CURYE NO.~5
~. '~f~ IdllP ]17fl l'*)n 111 ~1 179
RETEST OF TEST NO. 51 CURV~ N~5
5~,~ IMI It*' 117n 19n 117') 1fi4 1fl(] JOB N0.1532
1 BELOW TC~ OF ASPHALT 295% OF AS]M D'-69B REQUIRED
SPECIFICATIONS: t00 % OF MAXrMUM ASTM D698
MOISTURE WITHIN % OE OPTIMUM
TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS:
HAMM 2210 VIBRATORY DRUM ROLLER (1 ]~ WACKER
PACKER (t]~ DYNAPAC VIBRATORY DRUM ROLLER [1 )
MOISTURE ADDED BY
THICKNESS OF LIFT ~-8 INCHES
IYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS:
DAEWOODTRACI(HOE (1]i UNI.J~OADER
THiS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION
OF EILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE WE HAVE RELIED
UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACT[VE EFFORT AND
MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR
OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED
TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS
SPECiFiCATIONS
PROGRESS REPORT (CONTINUED FROM SHEET 1 OF REPORT NO. 9]. AN IN-PLACE MOISTURE DENSIIY TEST WAS
PERFORMED PRIOR TO RECOMPACTION AND ANOTHER TEST WAS PERFORMED IN THE SAME I, OCATIONAFTER
RECOMPACTION [TEST NOS. 48 AND 4BAl. ADDITIONAL TRENCH WAS OPENED P BETWEEN ~ 8~F75 ~ 11 +00~
DURING THE EXCAVATION OF MATERIAL FROM THE TRENCH, THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERED TRASH MATERIAL
CONSISTING OF AN OLD SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RING AND PIECES OF OLD CLAY PIPE, AND 4 LARGE PIECES
OF CORRUGATED SHEET METAL.
E]~I OUROPINIOI~ FILLCOMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIO~,~q~,~.~.%..D.~I:~.~OBSERVATIONSANDTEST NO.{S) 48Aj 49A, ~0~51A
,. our O.NIO~. F,LL COM P~CnON DOES NOT MEET sa~;~1 ~.~,es '~I~..~L~ S¥ OUR O~E~r,ONS AN D .~; .O IS, -- 48 49 51
AND SHOULD BE R~RKED
SCO. OFO~E~AnON: ~LLnME; ~ PERIOD'~F~.~~SORCUmrSeEPRESENT*nVEAD~SED D~ [PAVCO)
C