SS9402C-LR 980616Compaction
Test Report
Patton, Burke & Thompson
10555 Newkirk Street
Suite 530
Dallas, Texas 75220
CLIENT:
CITY OFCOPPELL
225PARKWAY BLVD.
P. O. BOX 478
COPPELL, TEXAS 75019
DATE 06/16/98 JOBNO 1532
REPORT NO 8 SHEET I OF 2
SUBJECT BETHEL ROAD SEWER LINE BACKFILL REPAIRS
COPPELL, TEXAS
UTILITY TRENCH
BACKFILL OBSERVATION
SANITARY SEWER UNE, STA. 3+40 CURVE NO. 4
· ~,~ 35 Nuc 119,0 13,0 122.5 12.3 100~.JOBNO. 1532
SANITARY SEWER UNE, STA. 5+75 CURVE NO. 30
,)-~ DDIr~D ~'r~ t-t~npat'~c~ ,l 0 NUC 116.7 11,4 99.3 12.7 85 JOB NO. 1532
CURVE NO. 30
RETEST OF TEST NO. 2Z
· ~'~A~,¢T~:D OI-',""t"'~.4Da~"Th'"""~l~ NIIC 116.7 11,4 113.9 14.7 98 JOB NO. 1532
8ANITARYSEWER LINE,.STA. 4+50 CURVE NO. 5
· -,0 .'to NLIC: 117,1[ 19,Q 118.4 11.7 100 JOBNO. 1532
SANffARY SEWER LINE, STA. 4+00 CURVE NO. 4
· ~,~ 30 NUC 119,(; 13.0 121.6 12.2 100' JOBNO. 1532
SANITARY SEWER UNE._STA. 4+60. CURVE NO. 5
'~n 35 NUC 117.£ 12.0 118.2 13.0 100' JOBNO. 1532
SANITARY SEWER LINE, STA..4+50 CURVE NO. 5
-~ 2.5 NUC 117.C 12.0 117.4 11.1 100 JOBNO. 1532
SANITARY SEWER LINE. STA._4+00 CURVE NO. 5
~,-, 30 NUC: 117.C 12.0 116.~ 11.4 100 JOB N0.1532
1 BELOW TOP OF ASPHALT 295% OF ASTM D-698 REQUIRED
SPECIFICATIONS: 100 % OF MAXIMUM ASTM D 698
MOISTURE WITHIN % OF OPTIMUM
~YPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENTANE) NO OF UNITS
HAMM 2210 VIBI~TOI~ DRUM ROL~R [11
MOISTURE ADDED BY
THICKNESS OE LIFT 6'~8 INCHES
I~PE OF EAR I~1 MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS:
1845C UNI-LOADER (l}, DAEWOOD 220LG T~CKHQE [1)
THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION
OF FILL PI~,C E M E NE AS WE LL A~S THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE WE HAVE RELIED
UPON TH E CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACEIVE EFEORT AND
MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING T~MES WHEN OUR
OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENL AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED
TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS
SPECIFICATIONS
PROGRESS REPORT AS REQUESTED, PBT MADE A SITE VISIT TO OBSERVE AND TEST THE UTILIIY TRENCH
RECONSTRUCTION, A RED BROWN CLAYEY ,SAND WiTH GRAVEL MATERIAL WAS PLACED IN THE UTIIIY TRENCH
BETWEEN ~I'A. 3+30 AND STA. 4+ 65 IN 6" L ETS: EACH LIFTWAS COMPACTED UI~IL A MINIMUM OF 100%
DENSITYWASoBTAINED A SECTION OF TRENCH. .... i_'~."' _~rl_ _ J~ CEMENT TREATED BASE
APPROXIMATELY 4' THICKAND WAS LEFT IN PLACE. A SECTION OF TRENCH WAS EXCAVATED BETWEEN STA. 5+35
AND STA. 6+85 [CONTINUED ON SHEET 2 OF REPORT NO. 8] ......
F~ J~ OUR onn~ON,
AND SHOULD BE REWORKED
SCOPE OF OBSERVATION: E~ ~(ILL TIME; rLj PERIODIC,
ROBSBRVATONSANDTESTNO(Sl 26 27A, 28-32 27
¥ OUR OBSERVAT ONS AND TEST NO IS]
~ OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE ADVISED DWIGHT [PAVCO]
Compaction
Test Report
Patton, Burke & Thompson
10555 Ncwkirk Street
Suite 530
Dallas, Texas 75220
CLIENT
CITY OF COPPELL
225 PARKWAY BLVD.
P. O. BOX 478
COPPELL, TEXAS 75019
DATE 06116/98 JOB NO 1532
REPORT NO 8 SHEET 20E _. 2
SUBJECT BETHEL ROAD SEWER LINE BACKFILL REPAIRS
COPPELL, TEXAS
UTILilY TRENCH
BACKFILL OBSERVATION
5ANEAE¥ 8EWER-LtNE~ STA. 3+50-
-an MIIP 117~ 10~ 11AA 11.4 1~0 .10BN0.1532
~4 an Milt 117~ 19n 1192 11.8 lOOd JOBNO. 1532
~ff~ ~RL~, ~A, 3+70 .-
35 oA mile 117n 12~ 117~ 11.1 100 JOBNO. 1532
~ff~-~ER Ll~, ~A, 4+30
~ en ~11~ 117~ 12D 118.1 11.7 1~0' JOBNO. 1532
~ff~ S~ER L~E, 5TA. 3+95 CU~ NO. 5
~7 ~n ~H~ 117r 120 117.3 12.1 100 JOBNO. 1532
~ ~ERLI~, ~A, 3+60 C~ NO~
3~ ~n ~H~ ~7C 19n 119.2 12.4 100. JOBNO. 1532
~A~ ~ER ~, ~A. 4+40 _C~E NO. 5
3~ 9n NII~ 117~ 19~ 118D 12.8 100 JOBNO. 1532
1 BELOW TOP OF ASP~IALT
~o OE MAX MUM ASTM I)698
SPECIFICATIONS: 100 ° i
MOISTURE WITHIN % OF OPTIMUM
TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS
HAMM 22t0 VIBRATORY DRUM ROLLER [1 ]
MOISTURE ADDED BY
THICKNESS OF LIFT 6-8 INCHES
TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS
1845C UNI-LOADER [1], DAEWOOD 220LC TRACKHOE [1]
THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION
OF FILL PLACEMEN~ AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE WE HAVE RELIED
UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY TH E NECESSARY COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND
MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING qMES WHEN OUR
OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED
TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER TH E FILL MEETS
SPECIFICATIONS
PROGRESS REPORT {CONTINUED FROM SHEET 1 OF REPORT NO. 8).... AND ANOTHER SECTION BETWEEN ErA.
~ 8.t.~L]J~L~.IJ,,SO OPE~.~_,~UI~'. EACH SECTION OF TRENCH WAS EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY 4'
AND ~i1~ AN IN-PLACE MOISTURE/DENSITY TEST (NO. 27) WAS PERFORMED ON THE
MATERIAL DIRECTLY OVER THE EXISTING UTILIW TRENCH PRIOR TO RECOMPACTION AND ONE AFTER
RECOMPACTION. TEST NO. 27 INDICATED THE INSITU BACI~ILL WAS AT~J~i~OF. ASTM D 698 PRIOR TO
RECOMPACTION BY PAVCO. THE CONTRACTOR HIT A WATERLINE AT ST/J~W/I~IJIIJiJ~ I~-IE CiT OF COPPELL WAS
CALLED FOR REPAIRS. WE REMAINED ON-SITE UNTIL REPAIRS WERE COMPLETED.
[] ~JN OUR OPINION, FiLL COMPACTION MEEI~ SPEClEICATIOI~ ~UR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO.IS)
BF '~.~,m:;';'~~ /~ C~