ST9301-CS040615Message Page 1 of 2
Suzan Taylor - Re: RE: Scarborough Engineering
From-' "Don Snow" <don@seitexas.com>
To: "Suzan Taylor" <staylor@ci.coppelLtx.us>
Date: 6/15/2004 3:48 PH
Subject: Re: RE: Scarbomugh Engineering
Suzan,
I think an on-site mtg would be beneficial. I am available tomorrow or Thurs or next week anytime after 9:30 to
let traffic die down. If we could get someone from water department there at same time would be helpful.
Thanks,
Don
..... Original Message .....
From: Suzaq Taylor
To: ~gn@seitexas~co_m
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 1:14 PM
Subject: Fwd: RE: Scarborough Engineering
Don:
I asked the engineer about the poles shown on the plans that you did not provide the coordinates for. Please
let me know if you want to me to arrange an on-site meeting. We need to get the utilities relocated as soon
as possible.
>>> "Pembroke, Bill" <BilI.Pembroke@jacobs.com> 6/15/2004 1:08:13 PM >>>
Suzan,
We identified the PP's as proposed by mistake since they are existing now. We interpreted the information
incorrectly.
The existing poles at 23+99.52 and 28+77.75 appear to be non conflicting with exception of minor sidewalk
deflections.
The pole at 34+85.55 will be located in the flowline of the future drainage path. This pole could be relocated
to 34+23.79 which we depicted on sheet 18 but this location will conflict with a future road.
Your proposed relocation would work. It would be best if the center of the pole was setback approximately 2'
from the top of any slope.
Bill
..... Original Message .....
From: Suzan Taylor [mailto:staylor@ci.coppell.tx.us]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 3:02 PM
To: Pembroke, Bill
Subject: Scarborough Engineering
! spoke with Don Snow this morning about the transmission relocation. He and ! are not sure we
understand the information you sent. There is an existing power pole at Sra. 33+85.55 that you
located on the plans using the coordinates provided by Scarorough. You also show power poles at Sta.
file://C :XDocuments%20and%20Settings\staylor~Local%20Settings\Temp\GW} 00001 .HTM 6/15/2004
Message Page 2 of 2
33+47.56 and Sta.34+23.79. Scarborough did not provide any coordinates for these poles. Are the
poles at Sta. 33+47.56 and Sta.34+23.79 locations that Jacobs has identified as possible locations for
the pole at Sra. 33+85.55 to be relocated. Your note on the transmittal indicated that Sra. 34+23.79 is
a possible relocation position - but that it would conflict with the future development. Would it be
acceptable to relocate the pole to approximate Sra. 33+32 and 50' LT. (southwest to the top of the
slope).
Thanks
NOT[CE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged
information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing,
copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended
recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer.
file://C:~Doctanents%20and%20Settings\staylorXLocal%20Settings\Temp\GW} 00001 .HTM 6/15/2004