Loading...
ST0102-LR030325Ro gineers (214) 630-9819 (fax} 1N-PLACE DENSITY TESTING Client: City of Coppell Artn: Ms. Suzan Taylor PO Box 478 Coppell TX 75019 Project: Ruby Road (ST 01-02) Coppe]l, TX Report No.: 173193 Project No.: 027176 Date of Service: 03/21/2003 Report Date: 03/25/2003 Services: Perform In-Place DensiW Test in accordance with ASTM Standards. PROJECT DATA CONTRACTOR: Tiseo Paving Test Methods: ASTM D-2922 ASTM D-30t7 Standard Counts Density Current: 2990 Previous: 2991 Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture Gauge Serial No: 32685 Current: 666 Test Mode: DT Previous: 674 MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Maximum Project Requirements M/D No. Description Moisture % Density pcf Moislure Density.' 1 Light Brown Sandy Clay (Lime Treated) 18.0 105.5 Optimum +4 95 min 2 Dark Brown sandy Clay (Lime Treated) 29.0 89.5 Optimum +4 95 rain FIELD DENSITY TESTS TEST PROBE NO TESTLOCATION DEPTH bUD MOISTURE BET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY No. (%) (pcb (pc0 (% max) Paving Subgrade 1 Rub5, Road, right of centerline, Station 6" 2 29.5 111.1 85.8 96 9+00 Paving Subgrade 2 Ruby Road at centerline, Station 10+00 6" 1 24.0* 124.9 100.7 95 Paving Subgrade 3 Ruby Road, left of centerline, Station 6" 1 19.7 122.0 101.9 97 11+00 Paving Subgrade 4 Ruby Road at centerline, Station 12+00 6" 1 21.9 122.5 100.5 95 Paving Subgrade 5 Ruby Road, right of centerline, Station 6" 1 18.0 120.6 102.2 97 13 +00 ~) LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing We assume no responsibiliPy for variation in quali~ (composition. appearance, performance, etc.) or any other ~k:amre cf similar subject mauer provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control Our letters and repons arc for thc exclusive use of the clients to whom thc)' are addressed and shall not be reproduced exccpt in fall without thc '~tlen approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 070K Page 1 of 2 Project No.: 027176 Client: CityofCoppetl * ~ .... ~ TEST NO 6 7 8 9 TEST LOCATION PROBE DEPTH M~D MOISTURE WEI DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY No. (%) ~cD ~c0 (% max) Paving Subgrade Ruby Road at centerline, Station 14+00 Paving Subgrade Ruby Road, left of centerline, Station 15+00 Paving Subgrade Ruby Road, right of centerline, Station 16+00 Paving Subgrade 6" 1 19.7 125.9 105.2 6" 1 17.9' 123.1 104.4 6" 1 20.6 126.1 104.6 Ruby Road at centerline, Station 17+00 6" 1 23.8* 124.8 100.8 An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications. 100 99 99 96 Technician: Joe Jemigan Report Distribution: (1) City of Coppcll (1) Tiseo Paving Company (I) Pacheco Koch (I) Wfig}~t Construction Company Started: 10:00a Finished: 12:30p /2/~/~e, En////ff ~ gin eers, Ltd. // //Joh. Mood ~// ~Project Manager 07DK Page 2 of 2 - 14 ."~ 14'59 F~\ 21453o9519 ROneEngineers 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas. TX ';52-~7 2696 Gravel DriYe~ Fort Worth. 1~ 76118 6300 Rothway. Ste. 150, H,u~o-, TX ';7040 Corporate Phone: (g14) 630-9745 MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Olient: Ciff of Coppell Report No.: 1731 t I Atm. Ms. Suzan Taylor Project No.: 027176 PO Box 478 Date of Service: 03/20/2003 Coppell TX 7~019 Report Date: 03/25/2003 Project: Ruby Road (ST 01-02) Coppell, TX Services: Ob~m a sample of material f~om the jobsilc, bring thc sample back to tl;¢ laboratory md perform a moisture density relat,cnship test m ~ccordance w/th ASTM Standards. PROJECT DATA CONnL~.CIOR: Tiseo Pa~sng tssr ~oar Stabilized Subg~ade ~L~ERLa, L: Lime Treated Light Brown Sandy Clay CLAS.SIFICAnON; StabiLLzed Subgrade :z*~ ~n~TI~OD: ASTM D-69~5 ASTM D-4318 Method A DATE SA_~LED: 03/20/2003 MATERi&L PRF~pARATION: Moist IL&MME R TYPE: Mechanical S:LMFLED BY; J. Jernigan SA.VFPLE LOCATION; Ruby Rd., Station 11 +50 REPORT OF TEST Y,L4 ,'~-M L%I DRY DENSITY, pcf: 105.5 OPTLMI~,I MOIST[nRE CONTENT, %: [ 8.0 1,1QtrlD LIMIT: 25 PLASTIC L1MIT: 22 MOISTU/a.E DENSITY RELATIONS 109 107 Densi~ 105 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 MO1STURg COI~fEN-~ (%) Technician: Joe Jemigan Report Distribution: i;) Ciw of Copp¢ll t; ! r~eo Paving Compmay gineers, Ltd. y / John Moody PrQect Man.er Page 1 of 1 ,7 14 2(m3 14~59 FAX 2146309519 ('lient: City of Coppell Ama: Ms. Suxa~ Taylor PO Box 478 Coppell TX 75019 Project: Ruby Road (ST 01-02) CoppelI, TX 8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TK 75247 2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 7611 ~ 6300 Rothway, St~ 150, Houston, IX 77040 Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745 MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Report NO.: 173083 Project,No.: 027176 Date of Service: 03/20/'2003 Report Date: 03/25/2003 Obtain a sample 0fmateHal from the jobsire, bring thc sample back ~o the laboratory and perform a moisture density relafiollship text in accordance v<th ASTM Standards. PROJECT DATA · co~crR.acnr O v,: Tiseo Paving ~: ~.sx FOR: StabLlized Subgrade ~t~ ~'mx,c: LLme Treated Dark Brown Sandy Clay ~:L.*SS~}:tCAnO~: Stabilized Subgrade ~'~s t rd~TUOD: ASTM D-698 ASTM D-431 $ Method A DATE SA2tIPLED: 03/20/2003 NIAIERIAL PREPARATION: Moist P~<,n ~R nceE: Mechanical SAMI~LED By; J. Jernigan s~Mm.g LOC~:r~o.~: Ruby Rd., Station 3+50 REPORT OF TEST DRY DENSITY, pcf: 89.5 IAQL]D LIM.II: 39 PLASIIC I,LMIT: 3 1 5't.ASilCIT¥ DiDEX: 8 Dr~ Density (pc0 DENSITY RELATIONS 93 89 85 24 26 2~ 30 32 34 36 MOISTURE CONWENT (%) Technician: Joe Jemigan Report Dis~'lbutiou; i ) Cky of Coppdl ngineers, Ltd. Page 1 of 1 ' RoneEngineers MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Client: City of Coppell Arm:Ms SuzanTa31or PO Box 478 Coppell TX 75019 Project: Ruby Road (Sq 0I 02) Coppell, TX Report No.: 173268 Project No.: 027176 Date of Ser,~iee: 03/22/2003 Reporl Date: 0V25/2003 accoidancc wit[~ AS;IM 51anda~ds PROJECT DATA CONI RACIOR: Tiseo Paving 'r~ss'~ vt)a: Stabilized Subgrade M \II';RIAI: lime Treated l)ark groxxn Smqcly Clay (~xss~v~cx~m5: Stabilized Sttbgrade ~[s~ m..mo~}: ASTM 1)-698 ASI'M D-4318 Method A ~)~x ~ ~: s,xxn't~v.t): 03/22/2003 IMATERIAL PRIPARATION: Moist s,,,mq,l.:r~ t~',: Richard Btfilion s,t~4ptl;l()~ ~()~: Station 5~00.6~00and7400, combination REPORT OF TEST M\XIMI M 1)1l'~ I)ENSII'~, poi: 90.0 OPqlMI M MOISTIq/I] C()NIENT,%: 2c) 0 PLkSII('IIYINDEX: 6 I)ry (poi) MOIS I tTRE I)ENSFI Y RkI~ATIONS 83 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 ',IOISTURE CON'FEN1 (%) Technician: Richard Bullion Report Distribution: (I) Cit5 ol Rone ~ ~,ineers, Ltd. 6-" / P~ oiect Manage\ Rone neers Dallas, Texas 75247-4510 (214) 630-9745 (214) 630-9819 (fax) IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING Client: City of Coppel} Attn: Ms. Suzan Taylor PO Box 478 Coppel! TX 75019 Project: Ruby Road (ST 01-02) Coppell, TX Report No.: 173254 Project No.: 027176 Date of Service: 03/22/2003 Report Date: 03/25/2003 Services: Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards. PROJECT DATA CONTRACTOR: Tiseo Pa'ting Test Methods: ASTM D-2922 ASTM D-3017 Gauge: Troxler 3430 Gauge Serial No: 25249 Test Mode: DT Moisture Current: 659 Previous: 603 Standard Counts Density Current: 2550 Previous: 2554 M/D No. Description MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Maximum Moisture % Density pcf Dark Brown sandy Clay (Lime Treated) 29.0 89.5 Optimum +4 95 min F1EI,D DENSITY TESTS TEST NO TEST LOCATION Paving Subgrade Ruby Road, Station 2+00, north of centerline Pax4ng Subgrade 2 Ruby Road, Station 3+00, centerline Paving Subgrade 3 Ruby Road, Station 4+00, south of centerline Paving Subgrade 4 Ruby Road, Station 5+00, centerline Paving Subgrade 5 Ruby Road, Station 6+00, north of centerline Paving Subgrade PROBE M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY DEPTH No. (%) (pcl) (pc0 (% max) 6" 1 26.1' 118.0 93.6 105 6" 1 27.4* 116.8 91.7 102 6" 1 31.0 115.8 88.4 99 6" 1 26.8* 115.3 90.9 102 6" 1 26.4* 119.1 94.2 105 LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided fur ;esting We assume no responsibility, for variation m quali~' (composition, appearance, performance, etc) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control Our letters and repons arc for the exclusive use of the cliems to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Roue Engineers, Ltd. 07I)F Page 1 of 2 Project No.: 027176 Client: City of Coppcll TEST PROBE NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH M/D MOISTURE ¥,~T DENSITY DRYDENSITY DENSITY No. t%) (pcb (pct') (% max) 6 Ruby Road, Station 7+00, south of 6" 1 26.8* 117.4 92.6 centerline An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications. Density tests over 102% may be due to mismatch of material or over compaction. 103 Technician: Richard Bullion Report Distribution: (I) City of Coppeil (1) Tiseo Paving Company (1) Pach¢co Koch ( I ) Wrlghl Construction Company Started: 11:30A Finished: 2:15PM ~Rone/F~ineers, Ltd. ~" ~ John Moody / Project Manager LIMITATIONS: The Test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibilit5 for vanafion in quality (composition, appearance, performance, crc) or any other feature of similar subjecl matter provided by persons or conditions o~er which we have no control Our letlers and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shail not be reproduced except in full without the wnrcn approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd 0?DF Page 2 of 2 RoneEngineers 8908 Ambassador Row Dallas, Texas 752474510 (214) 630-9745 (214) 630-9819 (fax) IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING Client: City of Coppell At~:Ms. Suzan Taylor PO Box478 CoppeI1 TX 75019 Project: Ruby Road (ST 01-02) Coppell, TX Report No.: 173216 Project No.: 027176 Date of Service: 03/21/2003 Report Date: 03/25/2003 Services: Perform In-Place Densily Test in accordance with ASTM Standards. PROJECT DATA CONTRACI(JR: Tiseo Paving Test Methods: ASTM D-2922 AS'IM D-3017 Standard Counts Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture Density Gauge Serial No: 32685 Current: 666 Current: 2990 Test Mode: DT Previous: 674 Previous: 2991 No. MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS Maximum Project Requirements Description Moisture % Density pcf Moisture Density Dark Brown sandy Clay (Lime Treated) 29.0 89.5 Optimum +4 95 min FIELD DENSITY TESTS TEST PROBE NO TEST LOCATION DEPTH MfD MOISTURE ~VET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY No. (%) (pcf) (pct') (% max) Paving Subgrade 1 Ruby Road, Station 2+00, right of 6" 1 25.5* 114.1 90.9 102 centerline Paving Subgrade 2 Ruby Road, Station 3+00 at centerline 6" 1 26.0* 117.1 92.9 104 Paving Subgrade 3 Ruby Road, Station 4+00, left of centerline 6" 1 27.1' 114.4 90.0 101 Paving Subgrade 4 Ruby Road, Station 5+00, right of 6" 1 26.0* 115.9 92.0 103 centerline Paving Subgrade 5 Ruby Road, Station 6+00 at centerline 6" i 25.2* 116.3 92.9 104 Paving Subgrade 6 Ruby Road, Station 7+00, left of centerline 6" 1 25.5* 117.3 93.5 104 I.IMITATIONS The lest rcsu!ts presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing We assume no responsibilily for variation in quality I compos~t~on, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject manor provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control Our letters and repo,'ls are for the exclusive use of the cIicnts to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the writlen apprc3val of Rone Engineers, Lld 07DK Page 1 of 2 Project No.: 027176 Client: City of Coppell ~'~ '> - ~a .......... ~:~J 'rEST NO 7 PROBE TEST LOCATION DEPTH M~D MOISTURE ~,T~T DENSITY DRYDENSITY DENSITY No. (%) (pcf} (pcO (% max) Paving Subgrade Ruby Road, Station 8+00 at centerline 6" 1 29.5 I 16.2 89.7 An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications. 100 Technician: Joe Jernigan Report Distribution: ( 1 ) CiD' of C oppell ( I ) Tiseo Paving Company ( I ) Pachexo Koch (I) Wright Construction Company Started: 4:00pm Finished: 6:00pm~gineers' Ltd. // / - John Moody ~"~ / Project Manager LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing We assume no responsibility for xadation in quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature ol'similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control Our letters and repoits are for the exclusive usc of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the '~Titten approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd. 07DK Page 2 of 2