Loading...
ST9302-CS 940526 (2)Karl W. Hodges 925 Sugarberry Dr. Coppell Texas 75019-0157 (214) 393-3759 05-26-94A08:06 RCVD Coppell City Manager Dear Mr I apologize for being late with my suggestions regarding the expansion of Sandy Lake Road, however, I only moved into the area last month. I would like to suggest that you widen the road, a lot. Please don't build a bicycle side path. I am a long time cyclist, and I was the Vice President of the California Association of Bicycling Organizations (CABO) I speak only for the safety of cyclists and motorists alike. Experienced cyclists and municipal Risk Managers decry separate bike trails (termed class three bike trails in the California trails guide) since they increase rather than decrease car/ bike type accidents. This happens because these facilities create new intersections where the path crosses other existing roads or driveways. These new intersections are not of the usual "pattern" of expected roadways which makes things worse for all concerned. In fact, a/most all of the accidents cyclists have with motorists occur at intersections (85% overall). As you no doubt are aware, most of these intersection accidents are a direct result of cyclists violating traffic law. Of the accidents that do occur from motorists passing cyclists, the vast majority occur after dark and are the result of inadequate lighting on the part of' the cyclist, or of drinking on the part of the motorist. It is unlikely that these separate paths would do much to protect the lives of cyclists from drinking motorist, or from their own stupidity in not using adequate lighting. What's more the unusual intersection made by a bicycle trail is not clearly controlled under state law. It also isn't clear to users or motorist just who would have right of way at the intersections. Building separate bicycle facilities may increase the number of legal battles for the city of Coppell as expert witnesses from around the US are ready to testify in favor of those injured or killed because of their use. My own concern is that motorists seem to see the bicycle trail as evidence that cars and bikes can not coexist. I have coexisted without incident with motorists all my life, but I have discovered that motorists often become hostile when they are aware of bicycle facilities that I might have taken instead of the road. Statistics prove that cyclists are safest when they act just as motorists do. Why is it that this is yet another case the old story that what is good for the goose is good for the gander? Because motorists know what to expect if the cyclist acts likes a motorist, and expecting is an important part of perception itself. I heartily recommend that you widen Sandy Lake Road to include as many car lanes as needed plus a wide shoulder to aid motorists in passing cyclists. Wide shoulders are a safety feature for motorists as well as for cyclists. If you stripe a separate lane for cyclists you will once again encourage the prejudice that cars and bikes cannot share the road safely. Still should this be your choice, please allow me to introduce you to the guidelines recommended in the California "Blue Book" that can reduce the amount of conflict that occurs between right turning motorists, and cyclists who intend to cross the intersection. If you have any questions regarding these recommendations, or if you would like to see the statistics mentioned please feel free to call me. In any case I would like to be informed of the actions you will be taking. Sincerely Karl W. Hodges (214) 393-3759