Freeport NIP(8.0)-LR040930neers
8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247
2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118
6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040
Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745
REPORT OF DRILLED PIER INSPECTION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Mr. Brian Straley
5495 Belt Line Rd., Ste 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport XI & XII
Coppell, Texas
Report No.: 219091
Project No.: 049245
Date of Service: 09/23/2004
Report Date: 09/30/2004
Services: Drilled Pier Inspection
Report of Inspection
On this date, a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative(s) arrived on site as
scheduled to perform Drilled Pier Inspection. The results are attached.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 6
Technician: Rick Smith
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Extranet
(1) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppell
6:30am - 3:30pm
CMT Operations Manager
LLMITAT1ONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
99SS
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 219091
Project No.: 048245
Project: Freeport XI & XII Date of Service: 9/23/2004
Coppell, Texas Page 2 of 6
Driller: Long Foundation
Pier Identification F-11.5 F-I 0.9 F-9.8 F-9.2 F-8.6
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 60 60 60 60 60
Required Minimum Depth (it) Note 1
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 14.20 13.90 13.60 13.00 12.70
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (it)* 14.20 13.90 13.60 13.30 13.10
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (it) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (fi) 13.8 13.2 13.0 13.0 12.5
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:48 AM 9:05 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 9:25 AM 9:30 AM 9:34 AM 9:40 AM 10:35 AM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (it) 14.20 13.80 13.50 13.40 13.10
~levation: Surface (ft)* * 98.00 98.10 98.10 97.90 98.00
Elevation: Top of Pier (fl)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (fi)** 83.80 84.20 84.50 84.60 84.90
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Brown and Gray Clay
Note: See Report//219092 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
· Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. * * Elevation by Others.
Remarks: Note 1: No minimum penetration due to variable sand elevation.
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, pertormance, etc ) or any other feature of similar subject matler provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control.
Our lette*s and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of
Rone Engineers, Ltd
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 219091
Project No.: 048245
Project: Freeport XI & XII Date of Service: 9/23/2004
Coppell, Texas Page 3 of 6
Driller: Long Foundation
Pier Identification F-8 F-6.8 F-6.2 F-5.1 F-4.5
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 60 60 60 60 60
Required Minimum Depth (ft) Note 1
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (ft) 12.80 13.30 12.50 14.00 14.00
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 13.00 13.30 12.70 14.10 14.20
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (ft) NA NA NA NA NA
qumber of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 12.5 12.8 12.2 13.6 13.7
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 9:20 AM 9:36 AM 10:00 AM I0:15 AM 10:36 AM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 10:39 AM 10:44 AM 10:50 AM 11:20 AM 11:26 AM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 13.00 13.30 12.70 14. l 0 14.20
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (ft)** 85.00 84.70 85.30 83.90 83.80
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Brown and Gray Clay
Note: See Report #219092 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. ** Elevation by Others.
Remarks:
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control,
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the wTitten approval of
Rone Engineers, Ltd.
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Really Services, LP Report No.: 219091
Project No.: 048245:
Project: Freeport XI & XII Date of Service: 9/23/2004
Coppell, Texas Page 4 of 6
Driller: Long Foundation
Pier Identification F-3.9 F-3.4 F-2.2 F-1.5 F-1
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 60 60 60 60 60
Required Minimum Depth (fl) Note 1
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fi) 14.10 14.00 12.30 12.70 11.50
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (fi)* 14.50 14.00 12.30 13.00 12.10
Condition of Bottom (wet/dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (fl) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (fi) 14.0 13.7 11.8 12.7 11.6
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 10:44 AM 10:04 AM 9:44 AM 12:10 PM 12:31 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 11:30 PM 11:31 AM 11:35 AM 1:20 PM 1:28 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (fl) 14.50 14.20 12.30 13.20 12.10
Elevation: Surface (fl)** 98.00 97.80 98.00 97.80 98.00
Elevation: Top of Pier (ti)** 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 98.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (fi)** 83.50 83.80 85.70 84.80 85.90
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Brown and Gray Clay
qote: See Report #219092 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. ** Elevation by Othem.
Remarks:
IMITAT~ONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
uality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control.
Dur letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of
Rone Engineers, Ltd.
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 219091
Project No.: 048245
Project: Freeport XI & XII Date of Service: 9/23/2004
Coppell, Texas Page 5 of 6
Driller: Long Foundation
Pier Identification D.5-1 C.8-1 C-1 B.3-1 A.5-1
Pier Diameter (in) 24 24 24 24 24
Bell Diameter (in) 60 60 60 60 60
Required Minimum Depth (ft) Note 1
Depth of Pier Prior to Underreaming (fl) 12.00 12.00 12.40 9.00 8.40
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (fi)* 12.00 12.50 13.10 9.30 8.40
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry Dry Dry Dry Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (fi) NA NA NA NA NA
Number of Bars / Reinforcing Bar Size (#) 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (fi) 11.6 12.0 13.0 9.0 8.4
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 10:31 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:49 PM 1:18 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 1:33 PM 1:40 PM 2:53 PM 2:43 PM 2:34 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (fi) 12.00 12.50 13.50 9.50 8.90
Elevation: Surface (ft)** 96.00 95.00 93.60 93.80 92.50
Elevation: Top of Pier (fi)** 96.00 95.00 94.00 94.00 93.00
Elevation: Bottom of Pier (fi)** 84.00 82.50 80.50 84.50 84.10
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Brown and Gray Clay
Note: See Report//219092 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penelration not requested unless noted. ** Elevation by Others.
Remarks:
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the sPeCific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality {composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control.
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the wdtten approval of
Rone Engineers, Ltd.
RONE ENGINEERS, Ltd.
REPORT OF
BELLED PIER INSPECTION
Client: Duke Realty Services, LP Report No.: 219091
Project No.: 048245
Project: Freeport XI & XII Date of Service: 9/23/2004
Coppell, Texas Page 6 of 6
Driller: Long Foundation
Pier Identification A-1.5
Pier Diameter (in) 24
Bell Diameter (in) 60
Required Minimum Depth (ft) Note 1
Depth of Pier Prior to Underrearning (fl) 8.00
Depth of Pier After Underreaming (ft)* 9.00
Condition of Bottom (wet / dry) Dry
Plumb Within Tolerance (yes / no) Yes
Casing Diameter (in) / Casing Length (It) NA
Number of Bars / Reinfoming Bar Size (#) 6/#6
Length of Reinforcing Steel (ft) 10.5
Time Drilling was Completed (am / pm) 1:30 PM
Time Concrete was Placed (am / pm) 2:25 PM
Depth of Pier From Top of Concrete (ft) 11.00
Elevation: Surface (fi)** 93.00
Elevation: Top of Pier (ft)** 95.00
:~tevation: Bottom of Pier (fl)** 84.00
Bearing Stratum (description) Tan Brown and Gray Clay
Note: See Report #219092 for Compressive Strength Test Specimens.
* Additional Penetration not requested unless noted. ** Elevation by Others.
Remarks:
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in
quality (composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control.
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of
Rone Engineers, Ltd.
RoneEng!neers
8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247
2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118
6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040
Corporate Phone: {214) 630-9745
IN-PLACE DENSITY TESTING
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Mr. Brian Straley
5495 Belt Line Rd., Ste 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport XI & XII
Coppell, Texas
Services:
Perform In-Place Density Test in accordance with ASTM Standards.
Report No.: 219177
Project No.: 049245
Date of Service: 09/23/2004
Report Date: 09/30/2004
CONTRACTOR: Duke Construction
Test Methods: ASTM D-2922
ASTM D-3017
PROJECT DATA
Gauge: Troxler 3430 Moisture
Gauge Serial No: 35519 Current: 684
Test Mode: DT Previous: 686
Standard Counts
Density
Current: 2952
Previous: 2934
No.
Description
Brown Silty Sandy Clay
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONS
Maximum
Moisture % DensiW pcf
20.0 103.0
Project Requirements
Moisture Density
Optimum +4 95 min
FIELD DENSITY TESTS
TEST LOCATION
TEST PROBE
NO DEPTH
Utility backfill
1 Water line, Building 12, 69' north of 6" 1
southeast comer, final
Utility backfill
2 Water line, Buiding 12, 30' west of 6" 1
northeast comer, final
Utility backfill
3 Water line lead-in, Building 11, 70' west of 6" 1
northwest comer, final
Utility backfill
4 Water line lead-in, Building 11,150' north 6" 1
of southwest comer, final
Utility backfill
5 Water line lead-in, Building 12, 100' south 6" 1
of northwest comer, final
M/D MOISTURE WET DENSITY DRY DENSITY DENSITY
No. (%) (pcO (pcfl (% max)
22.5 123.7 101.0 98
23.4 124.0 100.5 98
23.8 122.4 98.9 96
23.7 122.7 99.2 96
22.7 122.7 100.0 97
LLMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
Pace 1 of 2
Report No.: 219177
Project No.: 049245 Client: Duke Realty Services, LP
Technician: Doyle Mackey
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Se~'ices, LP
(l) Extranet
(1) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppell
K. Scott Watson, AET
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc.) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no contzol. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
Page 2 of 2
;rs
8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247
2696 Gravel Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76118
6300 Rothway, Ste. 150, Houston, TX 77040
Corporate Phone: (214) 630-9745
REPORT OF PIER INSPECTION CANCELLATION
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Mr. Brian Straley
5495 Belt Line Rd., Ste 360
Dallas TX 75254
Project: Freeport XI & XII
Coppell, Texas
Services:
Pier Inspection Cancellation
Report No.: 219212
Project No.: 049245
Date of Service: 09/24/2004
Report Date: 09/30/2004
Report of Cancellation
On this date a Rone Engineers, Ltd. representative arrived on site as scheduled.
Upon arrival, our representative was informed that testing/inspection was
cancelled for the day.
Technician Time:
Page 1 of 1
Technician: Rick Smith
Report Distribution:
(1) Duke Realty Services, LP
(1) Extranet
(1) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppall
9:45am
Rone Engineers, Ltd.
CMT Operations Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc) or any other feature of similar subject ma~ter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no control. Our leners and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the w~lten approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
Pa~e 1 of I
RoneEn glneers
8908 Ambassador Row, Dallas, TX 75247
2696 Gravel Drive, Port Worth, TX 76118
6300 Rothway, Sle. 150, Houston, TX 77040
Corporate Phone: (214l 630-9745
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Client:
Duke Realty Services, LP
Mr. Brian Srraley
5495 Belt Line Rd., Ste 360
Dallas TX 75254
Report No.: 218973
Project No.: 049245
Date of Service: 09/22/2004
Report Date: 09/30/2004
Project: Freeport XI & XII
Coppell, Texas
Services: Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field testing, cast compressive strength samples and bring
samples back to the laboratory for curing and testing in accordance with applicable standards.
PROJECT DATA
MEASURED
STRENGTH:
SLUMP (in):
A1R (%):
TEST METHOD:
CONTRACTOR: Duke Construction
CONCRETE SUPPLIER: Southern Star
PLANT: 27
SPEC1PICATION REQUIREMENTS
3000 psi ~ 28 Days
5"-?"
NA
ASTM C-172
ASTM C-31
ASTM C-143
ASTM C-231
ASTM C-1064
ASTM C-1231
ASTM C-39
M1X DESIGN I.D.: 9337
PLACEMENT DATE: 09/22/2004
WEATHER CONDITIONS: Clear
TIME SAMPLED: ll:10am BATCHTIME: NA
TEMPERATURE (F)-Am 84 P CONCRETE: 86 F
TRUCK NO: 1020 TICKET NO: 362617
AIR CONTENT (%): NA UNIT WE1GHT (pcf):
OVERALL pLACEMENT LOCATION:
Piers, see report g218972
SLUMP
(inches)
6.25
SAMPLE LOCATION:
REPORT OF TESTS
Concrete Compressive Cylinder 6" x 12"
C-2/C-3/C-4
MAXIMUM COMPRESSIVE
CYLINDER
MARKED DATE AGE DIAMETER AREA LOAD STRENGTH FRACTURE
SET NO. TESTED (days) (inches) (sq.in.) (lbs. force) (psi) TYPE
1 1 09/29/2004 7 6.00 28.26 103260 3650 Unbonded Cap
1 2 10/20/2004 28 0.00 0.00 Unbonded Cap
I 3 10/20/2004 28 0.00 0.00 Unbonded Cap
1 4 Hold
See report ~218972 for technician time.
Water added at site: 8 gallons
LLMITATIONS: The test results presented herein were prepared based upon the specific samples provided for testing. We assume no responsibility for variation in quality
(composition, appearance, performance, etc) or any other feature of similar subject matter provided by persons or conditions over which we have no con~-ol. Our letters and
reports are for the exclusive use of the clients to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of Rone Engineers, Ltd.
n~nc Page 1 ofl
Technician: Rick Smith
Report Distribution:
(I) Duke Realty Services, LP
( 1 ) Exlranet
(!) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppell
Started:
Finished:
CMT Operations Manager