Loading...
Four Seasons 2R-LR050117FIELD DENSITY TESTING Report Number: 94041388.0054 Service Date: December 29, 2004 'll'erracan 8901 Carpenter F~,W, Ste #100 Dallas~ Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Client: Hill & Wilkinson LTD Attn: Charles Hoagland 800 Klein Rd Ste 100 Piano TX 75074 Report Date: January 17, 2005 Project: BCE Specialties 989 West Sandy Lake Road Coppell, TX Project Number: 94041388 Material Information .Lab Test Data Proiect Requirements Optimum Max. Lab Water Water Dry Unit Content Minimum Dry Material Laboratory Content Weight Range Unit Weight No. Test Method Description and Classification (%) (pc0 (%) (% compaction) 1.413880050 ASTM D 698 Dark brown sandy clay 11.9 110.7 +1/+5 92- 98 2. 413880021 ASTM D 698 Dark brown clay (lime treated) 24.8 94.0 -2/+3 95 Field Test Data Probe Water Dry Unit Dry Unit Test LiftJ Mat. Depth Content Weight Weight No. Test Location Elevation No. (inches) (%) (pcf) (% compaction) 147 Retest of #144, dated 12/28/04 1 6 13.0 106.4 96 148 Retest of #145, dated 12/28/04 1 6 14.1 107.2 97 149 Retest of #146, dated 12/28/04 2 6 24.9 92.4 98 Comments: Test results on this report meet project specification. Services - Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine degree of compaction and material moisture condition. Field Test Method:ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 Technician: Michael E. Odom (1) Hill & Wilkinson LTD (1) TMBP Consulting Engineers (1) City of Coppelt TX (1) BCE Specialties Reviewed by: (1) Hardy McCullah/MLM Architects Inc j The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AAS HTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shah not be reproduced except in fu~l without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials, Page 1 of 1 FIELD DENSITY TESTING Report Number: 94041388.0051 Service Date: December 28, 2004 'lrerracan 8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Client: Hill & Wilkinson LTD Attn: Charles Hoagland 800 Klein Rd Ste 100 Piano TX 75074 Report Date: January 17, 2005 Project: BCE Specialties 989 West Sandy Lake Road Coppell, TX Project Number: 94041388 Material Information Lab Test Data Project Requirements Optimum Max, Lab Water Water Dry Unit Content Minimum Dry Material Laboratory Content Weight Range Unit Weight No. Test Method Description and Classification (%) (pcf~ (%) (% compaction) 1.413880050 ASTM D 698 Dark brown sandy clay 11.9 110.7 +1/+5 92 ~ 98 2. 413880021 ASTM D 698 Dark brown clay (lime treated) 24.8 94.0 -2/+3 95 Field Test Data Probe Water Dry Unit Dry Unit Test Lift/ Mat. Depth Content Weight Weight No. Test Location Elevation No. (inches) (%) (pCO (% compaction) Interior Sanitary Line 144 C.8/3.3 2' BFG 1 6 10.4 * 100.6 91 * 145 C.8/3.3 1' BFG 1 6 9.2 * 101.4 92 146 C.8/3.3 Final 2 6 24.1 88.6 94 * Datum: BFG = Below final grade Comments: An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications. Services - Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine degree of compaction and material moisture condition. Field Test Method~,STM D2922, ASTM D3017 Technician: Armando Rendon Report Distribution: (1) Hill & Wilkinson LTD (1) TMBP Consulting Engineers (1) City of eoppell TX (1) BCE Specialties Reviewed by: (1) City of Coppeli TX (1) Hardy McCullah/MLM Architects Inc The tests were performed in genera[ accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. FIELD DENSITY TESTING Report Number: 94041388,0049 Service Date: December 28, 2004 'll'erracan 8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Client: Hill & Wilkinson LTD Attn: Charles Hoagland 800 Klein Rd Ste 100 Plane TX 75074 Re~,~ga'~,~ary 17, 2005 Project: BC~E Specialties.~ "~'~West Sandy Lake Road Coppell, TX Project Number: 94041388 Material Information Material Laboratory No. Test Method Description and Classification Lab Test Data Project Requirements Optimum Max. Lal5 Water Water Dry Unit Content Minimum Dry Content Weight Range Unit Weight (%) (pc0 (%) (% compaction) 1. 413880002 ASTM D 698 2. 413880021 ASTM D 698 Dark brown clay w/gravel Dark brown clay (lime treated) 21.2 99.0 +1/+5 92 - 98 24.8 94.0 -2/+3 95 Field Test Data Test No. Test Location Interior Sanitary Line 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 Datum: C.8/12.5 C.8/12.5 C.8/12.5 C.8/9.8 C.8/9.8 C.8/9.8 C.8/6.2 C.8/6.2 C.8/6.2 BFG = Below final grade Probe Lift/ Mat. Depth Elevation No. (inches) 2' BFG 1 6 1' BFG 1 6 Final 2 6 2' BFG 1 6 1' BFG 1 6 Final 2 6 2' BFG 1 6 1' BFG 1 6 Final 2 6 Water Dry Unit Dry Unit Content Weight Weight (%) (pcf) (°/o lempaction) 24.4 94.6 ! 96 23.6 92.9 / 94 25.6 92.4 98 22.4 95.0 96 24.6 94.0 95 25.9 93.4 99 23.7 96.1 97 23.9 95.4 96 26.0 93.8 100 Comments: Test results on this report meet project specification. Services - Perform in-place density and moisture content testy condition. Field Test Method:ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 Technician:Armando Rendon Report Distribution: (1) Hill & Wilkinson LTD (1) City of Coppell TX (1) City of Ceppe[I TX (1) Hardy McCutla h/MLM Architects Inc (1) TMBP Consulting Engineers (1) BCE Specialties ~ine degree of compaction and material moisture Reviewed by: ~ The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced an~ are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identica~ materials. Page 1 of 1