Park West CC(02-2)-CS050308March 8, 2005
PK No.: 1628-05.034
Mr. Gary Sieb
Planning Department
CITY OF COPpFLL
255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas 75019
Re:
16.8 ACRE SITE
Beltline Road (~ Airline Drive
Coppell, Texas
Dear Mr. Sieb:
This letter is to notify you that the enclosed Concept Plans have been revised in
accordance with your February 25, 2005 Review Memorandum. The following items
have been addressed as per the referenced review:
GENERAL COMMENTS - BUILDING INSPECTION
· Show the location FDC's on the drawings.
Response: Done
· Provide verification from the adjacent property owner to the west that allows this
development to connect to the adjacent property's fire line.
Response: The developer has contacted the adjacent property owner and a
letter of permission will be provided if an agreement can be made.
· The screening wall cannot be located in the drainage easement.
Response: The screening wall was moved to be 15-ft north of the centerline of
the existing 10' drainage easement.
The City anticipates beginning construction of a new 16-inch water line adjacent to
this site in mid 2005. There will need to be coordination between this development
and the City pertaining to taps, location, and timing.
Response: A note has been added to the plans stating the tap locations and
timing of construction will be coordinated with the installation of the future 16-
inch water main.
Mr. Gary Sieb
March 8, 2005
Page 2
SHEET C1.1
· Provide manholes where private storm drains meet public storm drains.
Response: Done
· Provide profiles of storm drain including any crossing utilities.
Response: Profiles of the proposed storm sewer will be provided in the permit set for
engineering review.
· The location of the inlet at the northeast corner of the property will need to be relocated due to
the requested mutual access easement.
Response: Done
SHEET A-I.0
· The proposed 50' driveway exceeds the maximum 40' driveway allowed by the Subdivision
Ordinance, You should consider moving the median noses to align the median opening with the
driveway.
Response: The median noses were realigned to the centerline of the proposed driveway
with a maximum 60-ft. median opening.
GENERAL COMMENTS - FIRE ADMINISTRATION
· Fire hydrants in 'service court' must be 3'-6' from fire lane.
Response: Done
· Fire hydrants in 'service court' must be protected by bollards as specified in Engineering details.
Response: Done
· Provide fire lane from one of the openings of the mutual access easement to the west.
Response: It was determined to eliminate this comment at the DRC meeting.
· Fire hydrants required every 300' - inadequate along nodh fire lane.
Response: One fire hydrant was added along the north fire lane to meet spacing
requirements.
Mr. Gary Sieb
March 8, 2005
Page 3
GENERAL COMMENTS - LANDSCAPE PLAN
· A friendly reminder all transplanted materials must retain a healthy, growing condition.
Response: Done
· Indicate flowering and ornamental evergreen species,
Response: Done
· Need sealed landscape plans,
Response: Done
GENERAL COMMENTS - REPLAT
· Please contact Jeff Curry at 972-570-4126 to discuss easement requirements.
Response: Jeff Curry has been contacted about the project. A copy of the plat has also
been mailed to him for his review.
Provide a mutual access easement for the property to the north at the northern driveway.
Response: Done
· Add the floodplain signature block to the plat.
Response: Done
· Onry 10-foot of the 20-foot Utility and Drainage Easement dedicated by Volume 90218, page
3264 can be abandoned. There still must be a minimum 20-foot Utility and Drainage Easement
centered over the existing 72" RCP.
Response: The existing easements are no longer to be abandoned. The screening wall
has been moved 15-ft north of the centerline of the existing 10' drainage easement for the
72" RCP.
· Provide access from mutual access easement from the west.
Response: It was determined to eliminate this comment at the DRC meeting.
· TXU Gas is now Atmos Energy
Response: Done
Mr. Gary Sieb
March 8, 2005
Page 4
· State reason for Replat and shade on plat document.
Response: Done
· Need standard Replat signature block
Response: Done
· Identify Block in Utility/Drainage easement abandonment statement.
Response: The easement is no Ion~ler bein~l abandoned,
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call at your earliest
convenience.
Sincerely,
Ryan C. Safford
RCS/sit
1628-271
cc: Stan Conway - Majestic Realty
Kyle McCullah - Hardy McCullah/MLM Architects