Loading...
Four Seasons 2R-LR050321CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST Report Number: 94041388.0087 Service Date: March 10, 2005 Client: Hill & Wilkinson LTD Attn: Charles Hoagland 800 Klein Rd Ste 100 Piano TX 75074 1rerracon 8901 Carpenter Frw,/, Ste #t00 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Report Date: March 21,2005 Project: BCE Specialties 989 West Sandy Lake Road Coppell, TX Project Number: 94041388 Material Information Specified Strength: 4000 psi @ 28 Days Batch Time: 9:08 am Plant: 27 Supplier: Southern Star Truck No: 0031 Ticket No: 764511 Mix I.D. No.: 7752 Water Added Onsite Before Test: 10 Gallons Water Added Onsite After Test: 0 Gallons Field Test Data Test Result Slump, inches: 5.00 Air Content, %: 3.1 Concrete Temperature,o F: 64 Ambient Temperature, o F: 58 Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: Sample Information Sample Time: 10:00 am Date Cast: March 10, 2005 Technician: Charles A. Patterson Weather Conditions: Sunny, windy Accumulative Yards: 110 Placement Method: Pump Sample Locations: See attached sketch Placement Location: See page 1 Specification Test Method 5.0 Max ASTM C143 3-7 ASTM C231 ASTM C1064 ASTM C1064 Laboratory Test Data Age at Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) 2 1 6.00 28.27 03/17/2005 7 110,670 2 2 04/07/2005 28 2 3 04/07/2005 28 2 4 05/05/2005 56 Maximum Compressive Load Strength (lbs) (3(,~ Comments: Not tested for plastic unit weight. Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive strength samples. The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST Report Number: 94041388.0087 Service Date: March 10, 2005 Client: Hill & Wilkinson LTD Attn: Chades Hoagland 800 Klein Rd Ste 100 Piano TX 75074 'lrerr can 6901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Report Date: March 21,2005 Project: BCE Specialties 989 West Sandy Lake Road Coppel[, TX Project Number: 94041388 Material Information Specified Strength: 4000 psi @ 28 Days Batch Time: 10:30 am Supplier: Southern Star Truck No: 1883 Mix I.D. No.: 7752 Water Added Onsite Before Test: Water Added Onsite After Test: Field Test Data Test Plant: 27 Ticket No: 764523 0 Gallons 0 Gallons Result Sample Information Sample Time: 11:45 am Date Cast: March 10, 2005 Technician: Charles A. Patterson Weather Conditions: Sunny, windy Accumulative Yards: 220 Placement Method: Pump Sample Locations: See attached sketch Placement Location: See page 1 Specification Test Method Slump, inches: 5.00 5.0 Max ASTM C143 Air Content, %: 4.0 3-7 ASTM C231 Concrete Temperature,° F: 70 ASTM C1064 Ambient Temperature, o F: 71 ASTM C1064 Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: Laboratory Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (lbs) (psi) 3 1 6.00 28.27 03/17/2005 7 107,240 3 2 04/07/2005 28 3 3 04/07/2005 28 3 4 05/05/2005 56 3,790 Comments: Not tested for plastic unit weight. Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive stmngth samples. The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the wr~en consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 3 of 4 ~,.~,~, CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST Report Number: 94041388.0087 Service Date: March 10, 2005 'll'err can 8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Client: Hill & Wilkinson LTD Attn: Charles Hoagland 800 Klein Rd Ste 100 Piano TX 75074 Report Date: March 21, 2005 Project: BCE Specialties 989 West Sandy Lake Road Coppell, TX Project Number: 94041388 Material Information Specified Strength: 4000 psi @ 28 Days Batch Time: 11:25 am Plant: 27 Supplier: Southern Star Truck No: 1883 Mix I.D. No.: 7752 Ticket No: 764532 Sample Information Sample Time: 1:00 pm Date Cast: March 10, 2005 Technician: Charles A. Patterson Weather Conditions: Sunny, windy Accumulative Yards: 310 Placement Method: Chute Sample Locations: See attached sketch Placement Location: See page 1 Field Test Data Test Result Specification Test Method Slump, inches: 5.00 Air Content, %: 3.7 Concrete Temperature, o F: 71 Ambient Temperature, o F: 73 Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: Laboratory Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (lbs) (psi) 5.0 Max ASTM C143 3-7 ASTM C231 ASTM C1064 ASTM C1064 4 1 6.00 28.27 03/17/2005 7 99,160 4 2 04/07/2005 28 4 3 04/07/2005 28 4 4 05105/2005 56 3,510 Comments: Not tested for plastic unit weight. Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive strength samples. Technician: Charles A. Patterson Report Distribution: ~~/ (1) Hill & Wilkinson LTD (1) City of Coppell TX (1) Hardy McCuIlah/MLM Architects Inc (1) BCE Specialties Reviewed by: (1) TMBP Consulting Engineers Robert D. Ray, ~.E.T~ (1,) City of Coppell TX Senior Project Man~er The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use~Sf the client indicated above and sha~l not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the iocation(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 4 of 4 0~.~,~D, F.~..~o~ CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST Report Number: 94041388.0087 Service Date: March 10, 2005 Client: Hill & Wilkinson LTD Attn: Chades Hoagland 800 Klein Rd Ste 100 Piano TX 75074 'll'erracon 8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Report Date: March 21, 2005 Project: BCE Specialties 989 West Sandy Lake Road Coppell, TX Project Number: 94041388 Material Information Specified Strength: 4000 psi @ 28 Days Batch Time: 7:50 am Supplier: Southern Star Truck No: 0031 Mix I.D. No.: 7752 Water Added Onsite Before Test: Water Added Onsite After Test: Field Test Data Test Plant: 27 Ticket No: 764502 0 Gallons 0 Gallons Sample Information Sample Time: 8:30 am Date Cast: March 10, 2005 Technician: CharlesA. Patterson Weather Conditions: Sunny, windy Accumulative Yards: 20 Placement Method: Pump Sample Locations: See attached sketch Placement Location: Paving Slump, inches: Air Content, %: Concrete Temperature,O F: Ambient Temperature, o F: Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: Result Specification Test Method 4.50 5.0 Max ASTM C143 3.7 3-7 ASTM C231 64 ASTM C1064 53 ASTM C1064 Laboratory Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (lbs) (psi) 1 1 6.00 28.27 03/17/2005 7 137,910 4,880 1 2 04/07/2005 28 1 3 04/07/2005 28 1 4 05/05/2005 56 Comments: Not tested for plastic unit weight. Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive strength samples. The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the tcoation(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical Page 1 of 4