Coppell Trade-LR050414FIELD DENSITY TESTING
~eport Number: 94051081.0025
Service Date: Mamh 30, 2005
Client: Coppell Trade Center LP
Attn: Al Sorrels
5055 Keller Springs Rd Ste 300
Addison TX 75001
'll'erracan
8901 Carpenter Frw,/, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Report Date: April 14, 2005
Project: Coppell Trade Center
NWC Sandy Lake & State St
Coppell, TX
Project Number: 94051081
Material Information
Material Laboratory
No. Test Method
Description and Classification
Lab Test Data Prelect Requirements
Optimum Max. Lab Water
Water Dry Unit Content Minimum Dry
Content Weight Range Unit Weight
(%) (pcf') (%) (% compaction)
1. 510810005 ASTM D 698 Light brown silty clay w/gravel
2. 510810008 ASTM D 698 Tan clayey sand
3. 510810002 ASTM D 698 Dark reddish brown sandy clay
Field Test Data Probe
Test Lift/ Mat. Depth
No. Test Location Elevation No. (inches)
Pad C
66 300' S & 50' E of NW corner At Grade 1 6
67 375' S & 50' E of NW corner 2.5' BFG 1 6
68 425' S at center line 2' BFG 1 6
69 475' S at center line 2.5' BFG 1 6
70 375' S & 25' E of NW corner 1.5' BFG 2 6
71 375' S at center line .5' BFG 2 6
72 400' S at center line 2.5' BFG 2 6
73 400' S & 20' W of NE corner 2.5' BFG 2 6
74 375' S & 50' E of NW corner At Grade 2 6
75 400' S & 60' E of NW corner 2' BFG 2 6
76 500' S at center line 4.5' BFG 2 6
77 525' S at center line 4.5' BFG 2 6
78 500' S at center line 4.5' BFG 2 6
79 550' S at center line 4.5 BFG 3 6
80 475' S & 50' E of center line 4' BFG 2 6
81 575' S & 50' W of center line 4' BFG 1 6
15.4 109.8 >/=+2 93
11.5 117.5 >/=+2 93
15.2 106.2 >/=+2 93
Water Dry Unit Dry Unit
Content Weight Weight
(%) (pcf) (% compaction)
17.7 102.8 94
18.9 103.7 94
17.9 102.7 94
19.4 104.7 95
15.3 110.1 94
15.1 111.1 95
13.8 111.1 95
14.3 110.7 94
16.7 108.9 93
16.4 109.1 93
16.5 111.9 95
15.1 112.1 95
14.6 109.8 93
19.7 100.7 95
15.8 110.7 94
18.1 103.4 94
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the wriffen consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 1 of 2 ~.-~o~.~,.~.~
.FIELD DENSITY TESTING
Client:Coppell Trade Center LP
.Field Test Data Probe
Test Lift/ Mat, Depth
No. Test Location Elevation No. (inches)
82 575' S at center line 3.5' BFG 1 6
83 550' S at center line 3.5' BFG 3 6
84 475' S at center line 3' BFG 3 6
85 575' S & 20' W of E edge 3' BFG 3 6
86 550' S & 40' W of E edge 2.5' BEG 3 6
87 525' S & 75' E of W edge 2' BFG 2 6
88 475' S at center line 1.5' BFG 2 6
89 500' S at center line 1.5' BFG 2 6
90 575' S at center line .5' BFG 2 6
91 575' S at center line At Grade 2 6
'll'erracan
Project Number:94051081
Report Number: 94051081.0025
Water Dry Unit Dry Unit
Content Weight Weight
(%) (pcf) (% compaction)
18,7 102.9 94
18.4 99.8 94
17.4 100.8 95
17.8 100.1 94
18.0 100.0 ( 94
14.7 109,8 93
13.7 111.7 95
13.7 112.1 95
14.1 110.4 94
15.9 110.4 94
Comments:
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Services - Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine degree of compaction and material moisture
condition,
Field Test Method~ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Technician: Michael E. Odom
Field Results Reported To: Charlie in Metroplex
Report Distribution:
(1) Coppe~l Trade Center LP (1) Merriman Assoc Inc //~ ' .
(1) Pritchard Associates Inc (1) McFadden & Miller Reviewed by:
(1) City of Coppell TX Robert D. Ray, S.E.y
(1) City of Coppell TX Senior Project M.~Jer
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use~,f the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 2 of 2