WA0101-LR050617Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
Texas
CMT,
Inc.
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957
Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com
REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL
Density Report No. 4 (205-0137) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Pa[ge l of~
Client: City of Coppell Material Descriptmn Maximum Optimum
Dry Moisture
I Density Content
Project: Hwy. 121 Water Line (Lbs/CuFf) Percent
Test Date: June 13, 2005 1. Orange and Light Brown Silty Sand 117.9 10.S
2. Brown Silty Clay with Gravel 111.6 15.3
3. Brown Sandy Clay with Gravel 112.2 13.1
Report Date: June 17, 2005 4. Brown Sandy Clay 111.0 14.5
Required Density (%): 95% -I 00%
Required Moisture (%): 0 to +5°,/0 omc
Mat Location/Elevation (and~or) Lift In-Place In-Place Percent
No. D~, Density Moisture Compaction
Test
No. (Lbs/CuF) Content (%)
3 Water line - 3' below grade
37 Station 38+00 112.3 14.3 I00,0
3 Water line - 2' below grade
38 Station 38+00 112.2 13.5 100.0
3 Water line - 1' below grade
39 Station 38+00 I 10.6 13.1 98.6
I Water line - Final
40 Station 38+00 I 15.1 10.3 97.6
4 Water line - 3' below grade
41 Station 41 +00 101.9 17.2 91.8 *
4 Water line - 2' below grade
42 Station 41 +00 94.6 16.0 85.2 *
4 Water line - 1' below grade
43 Station 41+00 98.3 16.5 88.6 *
2 Water line - Final
44 Station 41 +00 108.3 15.9 97.0
* Test results do not meet project specifications
TEXAS CMT, INC.
DALLAS, TEXAS
(214) 352-6957
REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL
Density Report No. 4 (205-0137) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Pa~e 2 0£2
Client: City of Coppell Material Description Maximum Optimum
Dry Moisture
Density Content
Project: Hwy. 121 Water Line (Lbs/CuFt) Percent
l.Orange and Light Brown Silty Sand 117.9 10.S
Test Date: June 13, 2005 2.Brown Silty Clay with Gravel 111.6 15.3
;l.Brown Sandy Clay with Gravel 112.2 13.1
Report Date: June 17, 2005 4. Brown Sandy Clay 111.0 14.5
Required Density (%): 95% -100%
Required Moisture (%): 0 to +5% omc
Mat Location/Elevation (and/or) Lift In-Place In-Place Percent
No Dry D~nsity Moisture Compaction
Test (Lbs/CuFf) Content (°/o)
No.
Probe
Depth
2 Water line - 3' below grade
45 Station 44+00 107.2 17.3 96.9
4 Water line - 2' below grade
46 Station 44+00 100.0 16.1 90.1 *
4 Water line - 1' below grade
47 Station 44+00 105.5 15.9 95.0
4 Water line - Final
48 Station 44+00 102.8 13.8 92.6 *
2 Water line - 3' below grade
49 Station 47+00 109.5 16.5 98.1
2 Water line - 2' below grade
50 Station 47+00 109.7 17.0 98.2
3 Water line - 1' below grade
51 Station 47+00 112.5 14.0 100.2
3 Water line - Final
52 Station 47+00 112.4 15.1 100.2
* Test results do not meet project specificatio~s ~
cc: Ms SuzanC Taylor-C~yofCopbell
Mr. Lar~ Davis - City of Coppell
Mr Luis Velasquez - Fox Contractors, lnc~ ~ ~
Mr Douglas K. Showers - Birkhoff, Hendricks & Conway, LLP