WA0101-LR050630Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
Texas
CMT,
Inc.
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957 Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com
MOISTURE DENSITY RELATIONSHIP REPORT
Test Report Date:
Client:
Sample Date:
Project:
Identification:
Test Procedure:
June 30, 2005
City of Coppell
June 22, 2005 ~
State ~~er Line, WA01-01
Moisture Density Relationship
ASTM D698
Project No: 205-0137
Moisture Report No. 5
Test Results:
Method ......................................... A
Optimum Moisture Content ............................ 15.0 percent
Maximum Density ................................. 101.8 pounds per cubic foot
Rammer Type ..................................... Automatic
Material Description ................................ Brown and Yellowish Brown Clay
Material Origin ................................... Station 59+00
Moisture Preparation Procedure ......................... Air Dry
Liquid Limit ..................................... 47
Plastic Limit ..................................... 18
Plasticity Index ................. 29
Percent Passing 200 U.S. Sieve . . . 94
Technician:Ms. AT ~
cc: Suzan C. Taylor - City of Coppell
Mr Larry Davis - City of Coppell
Mr. Luis Velasquez - Fox Contractors, hlc.
Mr. Douglas K. Showers - Birkhoff, Hendricks & conway. LLP
Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed. The use of our name must receive our prior written approval. Our letters and reports
apply only to the sample tested and/or observed, and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.
Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
Texas
CMT,
IBC.
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957
Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com
REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL
Density Report No. 5 (205-0137) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Page 1 of 1
CIient: City of Coppell Material Description Maximum Optimum
Dry Moisture
Density Content
Project: Hwy. 121 Water Line (Lbs/CuFt) Percent
1. Orange and Light Brown Silty Sand 117.9 10,5
Test Date: June 22, 2005 z. Brown Silty Clay with Gravel 111.6 15.3
3. Brown Sandy Clay with Gravel 112.2 13.1
Report Date: June 30, 2005 4. Brown Sandy Clay 111.0 14.5
5. Brown and Yellow Brown Clay 101.8 15,0
Required Density (%): 95% -100%
Required Moisture (%): 0 to +5% omc
Mat Location/Elevation (and/or) Lift ln-Place In-Place Percent
No. Dry Density Moisture Compaction
Test
Ntl. (Lbs/CuF) Content (%)
Probe
Depth
3 3' below grade
53 Station 53 +00 113.0 14.7 100.7
3 2' below grade
54 Station 53 +00 112.7 14.7 100.4
4 l' below grade
55 Station 53+00 107.0 14.7 96.3
1 Final
56 Station 53 +00 114.7 11.4 97.2
5 Y below grade ( 9~.3'
57 Station 56+00 ~ 96.0 22.9~
5 Y below grade --- - ~
58 6. Stati°n 59+00 93'""'"~'7r".? ~ ~
5 2' below grade ~ ~~.·
59 6" Station 53+00 98.8 21.7' ( 9"L~
* Test results do not meet project specifications
cc: Ms. Suzan C. Taylor - City of Coppell Mr. Larry Davis - City of Coppell
Mr. Luis Velasquez - Fox Contractors, Inc,
Mr. Douglas K. Showers - BirkhofL Hendrick$ & Conway, LLP