Loading...
WA0101-LR050705Construction Materials Testing and Environmental Consulting Texas CMT, 10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957 Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL thod: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Pa~e I of 2 Required Density (%): 95% -100% Required Moisture (%): 0 to +5% omc 5 Water line - 2' below grade 100.7 17.6 98.9 67 Station 65+00 2 Water line - 1' below grade 68 ;ration 65+00 108.3 16.5 97.0 3 Water line - Final 69 ;tation 65+00 106.7 14.8 95.1 5 Water line - 3' below grade 70 Station 67+00 96.6 16.5 95.0 5 Water line - 2' below grade 71 Station 67+00 97.4 17.4 95.7 5 Water line - I' below grade 72 Station 67+00 100.7 16.9 98.9 5 Water line - Final 73 Station 67+00 100.9 19.1 99.1 5 Water line - 3' below grade 74 Station 70+00 99.8 19.6 98.0 Test results meet project specifications TEXAS CMT, INC. DALLAS, TEXAS (214) 352-6957 REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Densit~ ~ort No. 7 (205-0137) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Pa~e 2 of 2 Client: City of Coppell Material Description Maximum Optimum Dry Moisture Density Content Project: Hwy. 121 Water Line (Lbs/CuFt) Percent 1. Orange and Light Brown Silty Sand 117.9 10.5 Test Date: Julle 30~ 2005 2. Brown Silty Clay with Gravel I 11.6 I S.3 3. Brown Sand}' Clay with Gravel 112.2 13.1 Report Date: July 5, 2005 4. Brown Sandy Clay II 1.0 14.5 5. Brown and Yellowish Brown Clay 101.8 15.0 Required Density (%): 95% -100% Required Moisture (%): 0 to +5% omc Mat Location/Elevation (and'or) Lil~ In-Place In-Place Percent No Dry Density Moisture Compaction Test ( Lbs/CuF) Content (%) No Probe Depth 5 Water line - 2' below grade 75 Station 70+00 97.0 16.1 95.3 5 Water line - 1' below grade 76 Station 70+00 97.6 17.5 95.9 5 Water line - Final 77 Station 70+00 100.4 18.0 98.6 5 Water line - 3' below grade 78 Station 73+00 98.0 19.4 96.3 5 Water line - 2' below grade 79 Station 73+00 98.6 16.2 96.9 5 Water line - 1' below grade 80 Station 73 +00 I 01.0 16.7 99.2 5 Water line - Final 81 Station 73+00 100.7 18,9 98.9 Test results meet project specifications cc Ms Suzan C Taylor- Cit~ nfCoppell M Lam,' Da; s - Ci y of Coppell Mr Luis V¢lasquez - Fox Contractors, lnc Mr Douglas K Showers - Birkhoff, } Iendricks & Conway, LLP Construction Materials Testing and Environmental Consulting Texas CM% IBC 10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957 Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL D3017D698 P: elof2 Densit}, Report No. 8 (205-0137) Memoa: Client: City of Coppell Material DescnpUon Maxtmum Opumum DO' Moisture Density Content Prc~ject: Hwy. 121 Water Line (Lbs,,CuFt) Percent 1. Orange and Light Brown Silt)' Sand 117.9 10.5 111.6 IS.3 Test Date: July I, 2005 2 Brown Silty (?la) with Gravel 112.2 13.1 3. Brown Sandy Clay with Gravel lll.O 14.5 Report Date: July 5, 2005 4. Brown Sandy Clay 5. Brown and Yellovtish Brown Cia3, 101.8 15.0 Required Density (%): 95% -100% Required Moisture (%): 0 to +5% omc In-Place In-Place Percent 4 Water line - 2' below grade 106.3 14.6 95.8 82 Station 62+00 5 Water line - I' below grade 83 Station 62+00 I 01.7 17.3 99.9 3 Water line - Final 110.2 13.4 98.2 84 Station 62+00 Test results meet project specifications cc Ms SuzanC Taylor-Cd¥ofCoppell Mr Lar~ Davis - Cdy of Coppell Mr Luis Velasquez - [:ox Contractors, lnc Mr Douglas K Showers - Birkhofi} tlendricks & Conway, LLP Construction Materials Testing and Environmental Consulting Texas CMT, Inc.. 10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957 Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Density Report No. 4 (205-0147) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 1 ofl Client: Fox Contractors Material Descnpnon Maximum Optimum Dry. Moisture Density Content Project: Hwy. 121 Water Line (Lbs/CuFt) Percent Test Date: June 30, 2005 I. Orange and Light Brown Silty Sand 117.9 10.5 2. Brown Silty Clay with Gravel 111.6 15.3 3. Brown Sandy Clay with Gravel 112.2 13.1 Report Date: July 5, 2005 4. Brown Sandy Clay 111.0 14.5 5. Brown & Yellowish Brown Clay 101.8 15.0 Required Density (%): 95% -100% Required Moisture (%): 0 to +5% omc Mat Location/EIe~ation (and Jo0 Lift In-Place In-Place Percent No Test DD Density Moisture Compaction No (Lbs/CuF) Content (%) 5 Retest of # 65 15 93,4 24,4 * 91.7 * 5 Retest of # 66 16 99.7 19.8 97.9 * Test results do not meet project specifications cc: Ms Suzan C Taylor - Citwlf CoppelI Mr LarryDavis CityofCoppell Mr Luis Velasquez - Fox Contractors Mr Douglas K Showers - Birkhoff Hendricks & Conway LLP Construction Materials Testing and Environmental Consulting T xas CMT, 10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352-6957 Fax (214) 352-6972 www .texascmt.com REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE OF SOIL Densit' Report No. 5 (20%0147) Method: ASTM D2922 D3017 D698 Pa~e I of I Client: Fox Contractors Material Description Maximum Optimum Project: Hwy. 121 Water Line (LbmCuFt) Percent 1. Orange and Light Brown Silty Sand 117.9 10.5 Test Date: July 1, 2005 2. Brown Silty Clay with Gravel 111.6 15.3 3. Brown Sandy Clay with Gravel 112.2 13.1 Report Date: July 5, 2005 4. Brown Sandy Clay 111.0 14.5 5. Brown & Yellowish Brown Clay 101.8 15.0 Required Density (%): 95% -100% Required Moisture (%): 0 to +5% omc Mat Location;Elevation (and/or) Lift In-Place In-Place Percent No Dry. Dcnsity Moisture Compaction Test /Lbs/CuF) Content (%) No Probe Depth 3 Retest of # 65 17 106.6 14.5 95.0 Test results meet project specifications cc Ms Suzan C Taylor- City of Coppell Mr Lar~ Davis - City of Coppell Mr Luis Velasquez - Fox Contractors, Inc Mr Douglas K Showers ~ Birkhofl} ttcndricks & Conway, LL?