ST9904-CS 970912 TxDOT
Note: Section numbers
drawings.
SH 121 TASK FORCE REPO.,T
in narrative below correspond to numbers on
Sept e~b~e r , ~ 2 'i%~?1997
SH 121 CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS (STAGE I)
A. Section 1:
Tarrant/Dallas County Line to North of
Denton Creek (4-lane divided highway
with 2-lane frontage roads)
Completed -- July 1992
B. Section 2:
North of Denton Creek to IH
lane divided highway)
(CSJ 0364-03-078 & 0364-03-077)
Completed -- November 1993
C. Section 3:
35E (4/6
D. Section
E. Section 5:
F. Section 6:
G. Section 7:
IH 35E to East of FM 1171 (6-lane
divided highway)
Completed -- June 1991
East of FM 1171 to East of the Elm Fork
of the Trinity River (bridges)
Completed -- July 1988
East of the Elm Fork of the Trinity
River to West of the Burlington Northern
Railroad (4-lane divided highway)
(CSJ 0364-03-042)
Completed -- February 2, 1994.
Crider Road Project (0364-03-079)
Completed -- September 1995
West of the Burlington Northern Railroad
to East of Legacy (4-lane divided
highway)
(CSJ 0364-03-043)
Completed -- March 29, 1994
East of Legacy to East SH 289 (4-lane
divided) (including the SH 289
intersection)
(CSJ 0364-04-028 & 0364-04-032)
Completed - May 3, 1995
Section 8:
SH 289 to US 75 (4-lane divided)
(CSJ 0364-04-022)
The Dallas District requested that this project be
elevated to Priority 2 in the 1996 Project
Development Plan (PDP) Update and the 1997 Unified
Transportation Program (UTP) . The project was not
selected by the Commission under either of these
programs. Therefore, Jay Nelson, P.E. (Dallas
District Engineer) has programmed this project in
Category 11 which is a 10-yr programming authority
given to District Engineers to develop district
discretionary projects. This allows the Dallas
District to proceed with plan development and
right-of way acquisition.
order was ~ ~executed
c~nti
a
current 1Y awai ~'[hg
Work on the Draft 1998 UTP is currently underway.
The TxDOT districts have updated project data on
the mainframe for NHS and candidate NHS projects.
Austin re-ranked these projects in February, 1997.
The project was not selected to move up to
priority 2 on the tentative lists received.
4
This project is still a candidate for Category 3A
National Highway System Mobility.
EA re evaluation clearance is pending ~Xp~oT
doqumentatzon of.~ historical
~Ustln Of f zee ms now ~estlmatmng comple~Lon wmthmn
~he next couple of Weeks).
6. Estimated Construction Cost: $28,000,000.
II.
SH 121 (SPUR 553) LEWISVILLE BYPASS (STAGE
(See attached for right of way status)
A. Section 9:
North of Denton Creek to Denton Tap Road
(3-lane frontage roads)
(CSJ 3547-03-002 & 3547-02-003)
This project let on 07-10 96 and J.D. Abrams was
the low bidder at $14,581,681.91. The Commission
awarded the contract at their July 1996 meeting.
Construction began on 11--7 96 and is 62% complete~_
The anticipated completion date is Fe~ruary 1999.
B~ Section 10; Denton Tap Road to L ze Vista (3-lane
frontage roads) ,
Completed -- 1988
Co
Section 11:
Lake vista to IH
roads)
(CSJ 3547-01-002)
35E (3-lane frontage
Opened to traffic on June 1, 1996
Section 12:
IH 35E to Existing SH 121 Near FM 544
(3-lane frontage roads, freeway
constructed where frontage roads are not
proposed)
(CSJ 3547-01-004)
This project let on January 9, 1996 and Brown &
Root, Inc. was the low bidder with a bid of
$45,502,101.11. The Commission awarded the
contract at their January 25, 1996 meeting.
The pre-construction meeting was held on March 7,
1996 and construction began on April 29, 1996.
Construction will take 36 months.
C__onstruction is 3~5~] complete
completion date is July 1999,
recent ralns~
and the anticipated
a small delay due to
Noise walls are proposed on the north side of SH
121 between Huffines and Hebron. To help expedite
the construction of these walls, a change order
will be prepared to add the walls to this project
rather than building them as a separate project
(estimated wall start date: early 1998).
III.
Estimated Construction Costs:
SH 121 FREEWAY IMPROVEM]ENTS (STAGE II)
A. Section Tarrant County Line to North of
Creek (conversion to freeway)
(CSJ 0364-02-017 & 0364-03-064)
This project is currently listed as a Long Range
Candidate for Category 3A - - National Highway
System Mobility.
~%' CSJ County From 'To Cost
0364 02-017 Dallas Tarrant CL Denton CL $16,000,000
0364-03 064 Denton Dallas CL Denton Crk $ 3,000,000
Total $19,000,000
B. Section 14:
Existing SH 121 Near Denton Cmeek to
Existing SH 121 Near FM 544 (Lewisville
Bypass) (Mainlanes)
(CSJ 3547-03-003, 3547-02-004, &
3547-01-005)
1. LRP status for this project has been received.
2. Candidate for Category 3A
System Mobility.
3. Estimated Construction Costs:
-- National
Highway
CSJ County From To Cost
3547-03-003 Denton SH 121 Dallas CL $ 5,500,000
3547-02-004 Dallas Denton CL Denton CL $12,600,000
3547-01-005 Denton Dallas CL FM 544 $73,500,000
Total $91,600,000
C. Section 15:
FM 544 to US 75
(Mainlanes)
(CSJ 0364-04-023, 0364-04-024,
0364-03-066, & 0364-03-067)
o
LRP status for CSJ's 0364-04-024 & CSJ 0364-03-066
has been received. CSJ's 0364-04-023 & CSJ 0364-
03-067 have not received UTP priority 2. However,
the District has programmed these under
discretionary category 11, similar to section 8
above, so as to allow project development to
proceed.
Candidate for Category 4E -- STP Urban Mobility or
Category 3A -- NHS Mobility.
3. Estimated Construction Costs:
CSJ County From To ~ Cost
0364-03-066 Denton FM 544 FM 423 $ 5,209,593
0364-03-067 Denton FM 423 Collin CL $11,832,535
0364-04-023 Collin Denton CL SH 289 $ 6,656,163
0364 04-024 Collin SH 289 US 75 $48,494,116
Total $72,192,407
as Department of Transportation
1998
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
EXHIBIT A
1998 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
The lmermoda[ Surface Transportanon Effictency Act (ISTEA) ()f 1991 significantly restructured
the availability of funds for transportation projects It specified the systems on which certain
funds can be used, expanded the kinds of activities for which funds can be used and sigmficamly
increased the role of the Metropolitan Planmng Organizations (MPO) in the planning and
programming of projects. ISTEA requires each designated MPO to develop a Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP), and the state to develop a Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) as a condition to securing federal funds for transportation projects.
The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) and the Texas Department of Transportation
(TxDOT) use the Unified Transportation Pro_~ram (UTP) as TxDOT's ten year plan for
transportation project development. By updating the UTP annually, the commission and TxDOT
are able to customize the UTP as many of the ISTEA programs become better defined. Annual
updating also enables the UTP to serve as an integral part of the planmng process required by
ISTEA.
ISTEA requires each TIP to have a financial plan which addresses all federally funded projects
inside the MPO's area of responsibility. ProJects listed in the STIP are the only projects which
will be approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) to utilize federal funds. The ST1P, the three year f'mancial plan, and the
UTP are the backbone for developing projects for the intermodal transportation network in Texas
Categories have been established in the UTP to reflect the various systems outlined by ISTEA
such as the National Highway System (NHS), and the Surface Transportation Program (STP) for
metropolitan, urban and rural areas. Most of the Texas Trunk System, as established by the
commission, qualifies for NHS funds. Categories such as NHS are selected on a statewide basis
after evaluations and rankings.
Categories have also been established for the various activities that reflect the intended use of
specified funds (such as safety, rehabilitation, preventive maintenance, Farm to Market ]Roads,
bridges, etc.) Each of these various activities utilize different criteria to determine projects. The
criteria attempts to highlight the projects that will best use that funding. For instance, mobility
projects use cost, traffic; volume, roadway capacity and other factors to evaluate whether a
particular proposed improvement is cost effective as a mobility improvement. (Most mobility
projects are pan of NHS or STP.)
Safety_ projects are evaluated using factors such as accident rate, traffic volume, cost, proposed
improvement accident reduction factors, and others.
Rehabilitation funds are distributed to districts using factors such as pavement condition, traffic
volume, truck volume, and others
Ihe Cong¢~gn Mm~g, at~gm aud A~_r~)~u41~Ix_ mpr0~c~nc~l (CMAQI catc~o~.~ addresses congesmm
m~tigauon and air quality improvement m non-attainment areas of (tie state Funds are dlMrib~ucd
lO those non-altammenl areas based on thmr population and thc scvm ~iy o[ a~r quality non
anaimnenl
The commission authorizes projects in the UTP m several different ways One way is for the
commission to authorize individual projects for inclusion in certain categories of work, and on an
annual basis, review and re-authorize projects as appropriate. These projects are usually mobility
and bridge replacement and rehabilitation projects which typically rake a significant length of time
to develop This is particularly tree of expanded or added capacity, and new location projects.
These types of projects often require feasibility studies, route studies, public hearings,
environmental assessments, assessments of social and economic impact, and the purchase of right-
of-way.
Levels of authority have been established for rrlobiliw projects to allow timely project progression
through the various stages of project development. NHS mobility projects are evaluated statewide
in comparison to other similar NHS mobility projects, based on cost effectiveness ranking and
availability of funds. Levels of authorization are assigned based on the project's stage of
development.
Prioriw 2 is authority for the preparation of plans, specifications and estknates (PS&Es),
and right-of-way acquisition. During Priority 2, project plans should be substantially
complete (geometric, structural, hydraulic, and pavement design approved by TxDOT's
Design Division) and a substantial amount of the required right-of-way acquired. Districts
should establish a proposed fiscal year for construction contract award.
priority_ I is the authority for completion of PS&Es, utility adjustments and consmmtion
(projects let to contract). Generally, Priority I projects are the highest and best ranked
projects that have letting dates within the next four fiscal years. Projects should be
assigned letting dates only in Priority I. Districts should have completed 75 percent of the
design work and right-of-way acquisition before moving from Priority 2 to Priority 1. The
amount of projects in Priority I is constrained to four years of anticipated available
apportionments. The most recent year of Priority 1 (1998) is the current year letting list.
Another way the commission authorizes projects for some of the categories in the UTP is when
tile commission authorizes program amounts (usually once a year) for activities which reflect the
commission's intentions to address a specific activity such as rehabilitation or preventive
maintenance The program amounts for a particular program may be allocated to the districts by a
formula (with the formula also approved by the commission), with eligible projects developed by
the districts on an as-needed basis within their allocation. For other programs such as safety or
railroad signals, the program amounts are distributed on a statewide basis by the TxDOT division
office responsible for the admimstration of that program after the division office has evaluated,
ranked, prioritized and selected projects for the program
The dollar amounts approved by thc conmusston for the programs arc generally based on
anticipated apportionments that will become available in the future. })rojects in programs are
authorized for development so that they will be available for construction when the
apportionments are established annually.
Many of the programs are managed by TxDOT as ~. Projects developed as part of a
bank balance program can be selected for development, developed and let to contract with each
project's cost debited to the bank balance of funds available for that program. Most of the bank
balance programs consists of minor type projects directed towards preserving the current system
and safety. The bank balance way of developing projects for programs allows TxDOT (both the
districts and divisions) the flexibility to respond to modifications requested by the MPO and others
without going back to the commission for every project change or cancellation as long as the bank
balance for that program is not exceeded.
A summary and discussion of each category of the UTP follows. The discussion includes the
description, restrictions, allocation to districts, and policy for each category.
3
C~
0
Z
0
0
Z
L,kl
Z
CO
O~
Z
LLI
0
0
is Department of Transportation
1998
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
EXH~IT C
CATEGORY 3A
NATIONAL I~GHWAY SYSTEM (NHS)
MOBILITY
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
CATEGORY 3A - NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM - MOBILITY
CAT 3A CAT 3A CAT 3A CAT 3A CAT 3A CAT 3A
DISTRICTS FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 PRIORITY2 TOTAL
ABILENE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
AMARILLO $0 $3,200000 $0 $0 $0 $3.200,000
ATLANTA $0 $0 $5076,029 $0 $38 460,400 $43.536,429
AUSTIN $0 $0 $68,684000 $22,000,000 $441.500,000 $532.184,000
BEAUMONT $0 $0 $6,000.000 $0 $204.000,000 $210,000.000
BROWNWOOD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BRYAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $28.625,000 $28,625.000
CHILDRESS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CORPUS CHRISTI $0 $0 $0 $32.159.049 $31,813.544 $63,972,593
DALLAS $27,801.498 $139050,000 $27,879.000 $10,270,000 $525,382,362 $730.382,860
EL PASO $11,000,000 $0 $0 $8,180.000 $45,000.000 $64.180,000
FORT WORTH $0 $18,758.870 $17,500,000 $58.10~,000 $326,260.313 $420,625,183
HOUSTON $110,776,071 $132.956,334 $44,917.000 $4,761,000 $650.322,832 $943.733,237
LAREDO $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,670,900 $1,670,900
LUBBOCK $0 $0 $0 $0 $183.089,000 $183,089,000
LUFKIN $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,000,000 $46.000,000
QDESSA $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250.000
PARIS $4.685,870 $0 $0 $0 $24.326,000 $29,011,870
PHARR $0 $0 $0 $7,100,000 $48,100,000 $55,200,000
SAN ANGELO $0 $0 $0 $0 $13.500,000 $13,500,000
SAN ANTONIO $99,654,886 $614,400 $123,585,100 $50,400,000 $541,273.879 $815,528,265
TYLER $0 $0 $5,340,000 $0 $25.860.000 $31,200,000
WACO $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,401,000 $29,401,000
VVlCHITA FALLS $0 $21,000,000 $0 $0 $12,700.000 $33,700,000
YOAKUM $0 $0 $4,000.000 $0 $0 $4,000,000
TOTAL $253,918,325 $315,579,604 $302,981,129 $192,976,049 $3,217.535.230 $4,282,990,337
.................................................... ~0
DALLAS DALL.~S IH 635 2374 01-069 2 0 2000 1 $0
$27.879.000
$49 000 000 S27 879.000
LIM{TS FROH: AT ~ 15-1H 635 ]lC TO
S7 130.OOO
DALLAS DALL~ IH 635 2374-01-109
LIHITS FROM: AT US 25 IH 635 l/C 1~
EXlSl FACILITY: 6*F PRO~ FACILITY: 10'F ~ ~S~
2 0 2 $0
$14.691.000
$0 $14.691. 000
RECONST US 75-IH 635 INI~RCHANGE WITH H0V CONNECTIO4S
I)~,LLAS OALLAS IH ~ 2374-01-108 2.0 2 $0
S40.364.00~
$0 S40.364. 000
LIMITS F~ AT US 75 ]H 635 I/C TO
DALLAS DENTON SH t)~ 0353 02 0Z9 ? 5 2 $0
$?4 000 000
~? 500 0O0 $Z4 000 000
ti 000 000 $10400 000
$3.800.000
DACLAS ELLIS US 2B7 0172-0~-029 1 3 2 $0
$8.552.250
s614.000 $8.552.250
LIMITS FRC~i W OF MID4_Oll(IAN TO L(](~° 489 SwO~ MIDLOTHIAN (BYPASS)
EXIST FACILITY 0 ~ FACILITY: 4DR PtlOJ D~SOt : COtSTRU[I 4 LANE OIVIDEO RURAL HIC~-&la.Y ON NEW LOCATION
OAkLAS ELLIS US Z87 0172-O4-028 4 8 Z $0
$13.748.700
Il 180 000 $13 748700
LIMITS FROM PROPOSED SM ]60 TO W OF MIOLOTHIAN
DALLAS ELLIS US 287 0172~05-071 2 3 2 $0
$1 100 000 $12180000
DALLAS NAVA,RRO SM 31 0162-04-034 S 6 2 $0
$20.458 000
s Department of TranSportation
1998
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
EXHIBIT D
CATEGORY 3B
NATIONAl_, HIGHWAY SYSTEM (NHS)
TRUNK SYSTEM
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
CATEGORY 3B - NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM - TRUNK SYSTEM
CAT 3B CAT 3B CAT 3B CAT 3B CAT 3B CAT 3B
DISTRICTS FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 PRIORITY2 TOTAL
ABILENE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
AMARILLO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
ATLANTA $0 $10.708.500 $0 $35,561,535 $15,974,524 $62,244,559
AUSTIN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BEAUMONT $0 $0 $33.140,000 $0 $129,550,000 $162,690,000
BROWNWOOD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BRYAN $16.025,000 $17,950.000 $5,000,000 $0 $107,265,000 $146,240,000
CHILDRESS $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,515,939 $4,515,939
CORPUS CHRISTI $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,410.000 $14,410,000
DALLAS $0 $9.000,000 $26.000.000 $0 $25.400.000 $60,400,000
EL PASO $8,000.000 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,500,000
FORT WORTH $29.795.275 $16.355,800 $18.180.000 $30,767.000 $36,000,000 $131.098,075
HOUSTON $0 $0 $15,800,000 $15,700.000 $22,724,000 $54,224,000
LAREDO $0 $7,060,000 $0 $0 $17,107,193 $24.167.193
LUBBQCK $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
LUFKIN $0 $0 $0 $4.401,000 $25.200.000 $29,601,000
ODESSA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PARIS $0 $0 $0 $0 $25.665.000 $25,665.000
PHARR $0 $2,950,000 $0 $O $0 $2,950,000
SAN ANGELO $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,670,000 $15,670,000
SAN ANTONIO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TYLER $0 $11.100.000 $0 $0 $83.570,000 $94,670,000
WACO $0 $16,750,000 $4,950,000 $0 $0 $21,700,000
WlCHITA FALLS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
YOAKUM $0 $0 $0 $0 $11.100,000 $11,100.000
TOTAL $53,820,275 $93,374,300 $103,070,000 $86.429,535 $534,151,656 $870,845,766
,xas Department of Transportation
1998
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
EXHIBIT G
CATEGORY 4G
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP)
RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATION SAFETY PROGRAM
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
CATEGORY 4G - STP RAILROAD GRADE SEPARATIONS
CAT 4G CAT 4G
DISTRICTS FY 1998 FY 1999
ABILENE $0
AMARILLO $0
ATLANTA $0
AUSTIN $0
BEAUMONT $10,000,000
BROWNWOOD $0
BRYAN $0
CHILDRESS $0
CORPUS CHRISTI $0
DALLAS $0
CAT 40 CAT 40 CAT 40 CAT 40
FY 2000 FY 2001 PRIORITY 2 TOTAL
$0 $0 $0 $3.989.000 $3.989,000
$0 $0 $0 $8,000.000 $8.000.000
$0 $0 $0 $3.240,000 $3.240,000
$0 $0 $0 $18.700,000 $18,700,000
$0 $11,800,000 $0 $0 $21,800,000
$0 $0 $0 $6,800,000 $6,800,000
$0 $0 $0 $11,850,000 $11,850,000
$0 $0 $0 $1,595,000 $1,595,000
$0 $0 $0 $10,490,000 $10,490,000
$0 $10,100,000 $3,600,000 $10,250,000 $23,950,000
EL PASO $0 $0
FORT WORTH $0 $8.590,200
HOUSTON $2,200,000 $0
LAREDO $0 $0
LUBBOCK $0 $0
$0 $0 $5,000.000 $5,000,000
$4,944,672 $3,903,050 $6.998,000 $24.435,92~
$2,250,000 $10,068,000 $16.250,000 $30.768,000
$0 $0 $19,000,000 $19,000.000
$0 $0 $0 $0
LUFKIN $0
ODESSA $0
PARIS $0
PHARR $0
SAN ANGELO $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,861.000 $3,861,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SAN ANTONIO $0
'15YLER $0
WACO $0
WICHITA FALLS $0
YOAKUM $0
$6,201.600 $0 $0 $0 $6,201,600
$0 $0 $0 $7,750.000 $7,750,000
$0 $0 $2,700,000 $3.000,000 $5,700,000
$0 $0 $0 $2,300,000 $2,300,000
$0 $0 $0 $4,820,000 $41820,000
TOTAL $12,200,000 $14,791,800 $29,094,672 $20.271,050 $145,893,000 $222,250,522
L[VEL O~PME R PART lC 1PAl ION
LENGTH $CHED OF FED(PAL/STATE
DISTRiCi ~OORIRS COUNTY F~tY NO CONT-SEC.JOB MILLS DATE ALFFrORITY EST ROU COSI EST CONSI COSI
DALLAS EN~LLAS FM 1382 1047 03-049 0 0 ZOO0 I $0
$8. 100. 000
$1 000.000 $8 lO0 000
$1. 800. OOO
$0 $1.800.000
LIMITS FROt~ AT H ~ T C RAILROA~ Lm~ )0 RAILi~3A/) DOT ~ 763 390W
DALLAS OENTON SH 114 0353-02 053 0 0 2001 1 $0
$1 800.000
DALLAS ~ SH 34 0173 04-025 0 9 2 $0
$6.129. 000
$3.200.000
~xas Department of TransportatiOn
1998
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
EXHIBIT J
CATEGORY 8B
STATE FARM TO MARKET ROAD
SYSTEM EXPANSION PROGRAM
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
CATEGORY 8B - FARM TO MARKET ROAD EXPANSIONS
CAT 8B CAT 8B CAT 8B CAT 8B CAT 8B CAT 8B
DISTRICTS FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 PRIORITY2 TOTAL
ABILENE $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,711,668 $9.711,668
AMARILLO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
ATLANTA $1.115,000 $3,030,100 $0 $0 $6,200.000 $10,345,100
AUSTIN $0 $3,939,840 $0 $0 $0 $3.939,840
BEAUMONT $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000.000
BROV~NWOOD $0 $0 $0 $500.000 $1,996,000 $2,496,000
BRYAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CHILDRESS $0 $0 $0 $850,000 $0 $850,000
CORPUS CHRISTI $0 $821.000 $0 $0 $0 $821,000
DALLAS $1,837.000 $0 $0 $6,719,309 $1,151,146 $9.707,455
EL PASO $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000,000 $13.000,000
FORT WORTH $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $0 $225,000
HOUSTON $0 $13,616.779 $0 $0 $0 $13,616,779
LAREDO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
LUBBOCK $0 $0 $5.250.000 $0 $0 $5.250,000
LUFKIN $2,203.300 $1,870,000 $0 $4,030,000 $2,700,000 $10,803,300
ODESSA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PARIS $0 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $110,000
PHARR $0 $0 $6,215,294 $0 $3,787.700 $10,002,994
SAN ANGELO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SAN ANTONIO $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $1.007,000 $1,507,000
TYLER $0 $10,890.000 $3.940,000 $0 $9,000,000 $23,830,000
WACO $8,391,845 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,391,845
WICHITA FALLS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
YOAKUM $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000
TOTAL $13,547,145 $34,777.719 $15,405.294 $13.324.309 $59,553,514 $136,607.981
Department of Transportation
1998
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
EXHIBIT K
CATEGORY 12
STRATEGIC PRIORITY PROGRAM
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
CATEGORY 12 - STRATEGIC PRIORITY PROGRAM
CAT 12 CAT 12 CAT 12 CAT 12 CAT 12 CAT 12
DISTRICTS FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 PRIORITY 2 TOTAL
ABILENE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO
AMARILLO $0 $0 $300.000 $2,800,000 $0 $3.100,000
ATLANTA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 S0
AUSTIN $0 $0 $0 $5,400.000 $0 $5,400.000
BEAUMONT $0 $0 $13,000,000 $0 $0 $13,000,000
BROWNWOOD $0 $0 $790,000 $0 $0 $790,000
BRYAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CHILDRESS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CORPUS CHRISTI $0 $0 $0 $6,100.000 $0 $6,100,000
DALLAS $56,884,498 $4,367.500 $76,300.000 $13,500,000 $0 $151,051,998
EL PASO $0 $23,000,000 $0 $3.800,000 $0 $26,800,000
FORT WORTH $33,918.088 $27.337,700 $17,808,000 $2,320,000 $0 $81,383,788
HOUSTON $42,205,681 $40,850,000 $82,871,000 $34,435.600 $0 $200,362,281
LAREDO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
LUBBOCK $5,100.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,100.000
LUFKIN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50
ODESSA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PARIS $7,633,376 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,633,376
PHARR $0 $0 $0 $20,000.000 $0 $20.000,000
SAN ANGELO $0 $4,640.000 $1,900,000 $5,000.000 $0 $11,540,000
SAN ANTONIO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TYLER $8,340,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,340,000
WACO $13,205,925 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,205,925
WICHITA FALLS $0 $6,400.000 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000
YOAKUM $0 $0 $0 $4,200,000 $0 $4,200.000
TOTAL $167.287.568 $106,595,200 $192,969,000 $97,555,600 $0 $564.407,368
DALLAS DALLAS IR 3SE 0442-02-087 4 8 2000 I $0
$61ZO0.O00
$1 SO0 000 S61 200 000
LIMITS FROI4 NEAR PA$~KERV)LLE RD TO IH 20
EXISI FACILITY 4'F PROP FACILITY 6'F PROJ DESCR WIDEN FR 4 TO 6 LNG & 4 TO 8 LNS & 4 TO lO LNS) NOISE WALL
DAttAS COLLIN SM 289 0091-05-034 0 5 2001 1 $0
$6.000000
$1 000.000 s6000 000
LIMITS FR{]~4 Al PLANO PKWY lO
EXIST FACILITY 6'D PROP FACILITY 6°D PROJ DESCR CONST GP~q~)E SEPARATION (6 LN LI~B~ D]VIOED)
OALLAS DALLAS SP 408 3000 01.006 4 3 2001 I $0
$l 500.000
$50 000 $7 500 000
LINITS FRO~ LP 12 TO IH 20
EXIST FAC[L)TY 4FR PROP FAC[LIlY 6*F PROJ DESER : WIDEN EX]STING 4 LA~ES TO 6 LA~ES
Department of Transportation
1998
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
EXHIBIT N
CATEGORY 17
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL STREET SYSTEM (PASS)
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
CATEGORY 1'7 - PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL STREET SYSTEM (PASS)
CAT 17 CAT 17 CAT 17 CAT 17 CAT 17 CAT 17
DISTRICTS FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 PRIORITY 2 TOTAL
ABILENE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
AMARILLO $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0
ATLANTA 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
AUSTIN $0 $5.113,000 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $10,113,000
BEAUMONT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BROWNWOOD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
BRYAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0- $0
CHILDRESS 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CORPUS CHRISTI $0 $0 $1,083,073 $0 $0 $1,083,073
DALLAS $10.848,358 $8,700,000 $8,000.000 $0 $92,324,301 $119,872,659
EL PASO $0 $2.128,000 $0 $5.320,766 $10.652,720 $18,101,486
FORT WORTH $0 $0 $15.114,916 $6,302,300 $2,155,950 $23,573.166'
HOUSTON $7,200.000 $7,320,000 $3,593,000 $2.778.000 $71,094,360 $91,985,360
LAREDO 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
LUBBOCK 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
LUFKIN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
ODESSA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PARIS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PHARR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SAN ANGELO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SAN ANTONIO $930,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 5930,900
TYLER $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
WACO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
WlCHITA FALLS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
YOAKUM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL $18.979.258 $23,261,000 $27,790.989 $14.401,066 $181,227,331 $265,659,644
$)OO 000 $6 356 358
DA~ LAS DALLAS ~q 8075-18-005 0 1 19~cJ 1 SD
$8 700 000
$600 000 $8,700 DO0
DALLAS DALL.a~ ~ 80S0-18-027 3 9 2 %0
$13 400000
$1000000 $13400 000
LIHITS FRO'I IN G.q.~D PRAIRE & IRVING ON BELT LINE TO ROAD FRC~ IH 30 TO ROCK ISLA.ND ROAD
EXIST FACILITY 4*D PRO(> F~4]ILITY: 6*D PRO.) D('SCR REC(]NSTRLi(T EXISTING 4-LANE DIVIDED RL~.AL ROAD&AY lO
.................................................................................... ISO0 000
40
40
$6.139 000
$6.139000
DALLAS DALLAS ~t~ B245-18 001 0 6 2 $200000
$2 102 678
$413 $00 s2 302 678
DALLAS {)ALLAS SH 310 0092 02.1D4 0 I 2
48 000 000
$50 000 SB 000 000
LIMITS FR(~I 0VERTON RD TO LP 12
O~J_~ DJkLLA.5 SH 342 0C~8 01 039 0 8 Z $0
$16300.000
$630 000 416.300.000
sO
DALLAS DALLAS SH 352 0197-01-010 0 7 2 S4.OO0.000
$1.500.0OO S4,0OO.000
LIMITS FROM: SECO440 AVE TO:I~Si(ELL A~ [N OALLAS
DALLAS DALLAS SP 244 0353-05 083 0 1 2 4320000
48 260 00O
42880.000 $8.580000
0]ST TOTAL $3 820000
IS PROJEL'IS $119.872,659
$13 276,000 $123692,659
cas Department of Transportation
1998
UNIFieD TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
EXHIBIT 0
PROJECTS DELAYED FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
TO RETAIN PRIORITY I AUTHORIZATION
UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
PROJECTS DELAYED FROM PREVIOUS FISCAL YEARS
TO RETAIN PRIORITY 1 AUTHORIZATION
PRIORITY 1
DISTRICTS FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 TOTAL
ABILENE $0 $0 $379,785 $379,785
AMARILLO $0 $0 $3,203,495 $3,203,495
ATLANTA $0 $923,227 $6,199,041 $7,122,268
AUSTIN $0 $0 $14,605,751 $14,605,751
BEAUMONT $0 $0 $11,153,113 $11,153,113
BROWNWOOD $0 $0 $233,008 $233,008
BRYAN $0 $9,300 $753,272 $762,572
CHILDRESS $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
CORPUS CHRISTI $0 $0 $7,140,000 $7,140,000
DALLAS $0 $0 $48,073,892 $48,073,892
EL PASO $0 $0 $12,179,953 $12,179,953
FORT WORTH $0 $5,742,868 $15,721,890 $21,464,758
HOUSTON $0 $921,454 $28,821,897 $29,743,351
LAREDO $0 $0 $10,224,112 $10,224,112
LUBBOCK $200,000 $0 $0 $200,000
LUFKIN $0 $189,700 $19,523,434 $19,713,134
ODESSA $0 $89,260 $0 $89,260
PARIS $0 $0 $2,200,111 $2,200,111
PHARR $0 $0 $31,277,966 $31,277,966
SAN ANGELO $0 $0 $2,005,133 $2,O05,133
SAN ANTONIO $0 $0 $11,248,410 $11,248,410
TYLER $0 $0 $16,430,114 $16,430,114
WACO $2,992,480 $686,802 $6,101,112 $9,780,394
WICHITA FALLS $0 $1,495,683 $0 $1,495,683
YOAKUM $0 $0 $90,010 $90,010
TOTAL $3,192,480 $10,058,294 $247,665,499 $260,916,273
$90 000
~38 220
CAl~G~qY 68 50 %38 220
EXIST FACILITY: 1CR PRO~. FACILITY 2CR pROJ DESCR REPLACE BRIgGE AND APPI~OAFJ4ES
DALLAS COLLIN US 380 0135.03-037 17 1997 1 $0
$6 990. 029
CAIt~DRY 38 $0 $6.990029
LIRIT5 FI~'4 0 2 HILE EAST OF SP RR lO WEST OF Fti 1827
EXIST FACILITY: 2fR PRO~ FACILITY: 4*0 PROJ OESCR : CONSTRUfT 4 LANE RURAL ~ 6 LANE DIVIDED URBAN
DALLAS COLLIN US 380 0~35-03-031 06 1997 ! $0
$3.454.449
CAltGQ~Y: 12 $500.000 $3454449