ST9905-CS050802l§uzan Taylor 7 RE: Box Culvert/Sewer Line Conflict Page 11
To:
Date:
Subject:
"Sam Meisner" <sam@freese.com>
<ccbond@transystems.com>
8/2/2005 11:19:31 AM
RE: Box Culvert/Sewer Line Conflict
Craig,
I've attached our three base files that include the survey, road plans,
and profile. I've also scanned in the roadway and storm drain p&p
sheets for the section of the road where our projects overlap.
I was looking at the plans again, and we did not revise the location of
the headwalls for the Bethel Rd culvert in our 90% submittal. That was
on hold until the rest of the culvert design was determined. To avoid
the use of guard railings, the culvert headwalls need to be 18' from the
curb (f-f) to allow the decorative railing to be outside of the required
clear zone. I've included the plans for the railing so that you can see
those. The headwall on the north side of the culvert is a relatively
minor change since the wide sidewalk (hike & bike trail) is on that
side. The headwall on the south side is a larger change, since the
sidewalk is narrower and there is a bend in the culvert. I drew in the
revised versions of the culvert headwalls and decorative railings so
that you can see the options we have. I don't know how these impact
the channel design adjacent to the culvert, but the preferred option is
to use a longer culvert and no guard rail. Please take a look at this
and let us know what you think.
Sam Meisner, P.E.
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
p 214-217-2235
..... Original Message .....
From: ccbond@transystems.com [mailto:ccbond@transystems.com]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 10:41 AM
To: Sam Meisner
Cc: staylor@ci.coppell.tx.us
Subject: FW: Box CulvertJSewer Line Conflict
Sam,
As we discussed, can you please send me you current plan & profile and
topo for Bethel Road. I wanted to check the box culvert width at Bethel
and verify we were matching what you needed.
Craig
.... Odginal Message .....
From: Suzan Taylor [mailto:staylor@ci.coppell.tx.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 11:02 AM
To: DL-Charles Bond
Subject: Box Culvert/Sewer Line Conflict
Craig:
I am attaching F&N's files for Bethel Road. They show the flowlines
coming into the conflicted manhole as 499 and 500. In looking at the
drawings for the 12" sewer line, HDR shows the 8" line coming into the
manhole one foot higher than the flowline of the 12" line. The HDR
plans used a different datum for elevation so they do not have the same
I Sazan Taylor - RE: Box CulvertJSewer Line Conflict Page 21
elevations as F&N The plans for Coppell Trade Center show the flowline
of the 8" line coming into the manhole on the abandoned 8" line as
500.56. This manhole was tied into the new 12" line, so this is
consistent with F&N plans. The 8" line will be relocated to the new
manhole. It appears to me that the top of the 12" line is probably
around 500 as opposed to 501 - you will want to verify this, but this
may give us another foot or so to work with. I know that Ken will go
for a hump in the bottom of the culvert. I gave you copies of the HDR
plans and the Coppell Trade Center. We could probably lower the
flowline of the box culverts a foot or so and maybe use 6'x10' boxes.
>>> "Sam Meisner" <sam@freese.com> 05/06/04 9:33 AM >>>
Suzan,
These are the base files for the project. Give me a call if have any
problems with the files or questions about them.
Sam Meisner
Fraese and Nichols, Inc.
p 214-217-2235
From: Stephanie Henderson
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:44 PM
To: Sam Meisner
Subject: FW: Electronic Files
Importance: High
From: Suzan Taylor [mailto:
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 11:11 AM
To: Stephanie Henderson
Subject: Electronic Files
Stephanie:
Could I get the electronic file for the Bethel & Coppell Road plans.
Planning needs a simplified version of the Old Downtown area for a
~ Suzan Taylor - RE: Box CulvertJSewer Line Conflict Page 3~
powerpoint presentation to the City Council.
Thanks
CC: <staylor@ci.coppell.tx.us>, "Tricia Hatley" <thh@freese.com>