Creekview E21P-AG 930608CONSENT AGENDA
. AGENDA REQUEST FORM
~TY coUNCiL M~ETING June 8, 1993 ITEM lq~MBEI~ ,=
Consideration and approval of a Fi~al Plat oC~re_ekview Addition,
at the northeast and southeast corner of Dento~ap ~uad-~nd-Re.t~
request of ~illiam G. Thompson. -_
SUBMITTED BY: ~
EVALUATION OF ITEM:
Date of Planning Commission Heeting: l/my 20, 1993
Decision of Planniug Commission: Approved (5-1) (Gross
Plannin,
STAFF REP.:
OTHER REP.:
D ATE:
~ I~, located
_R~ad~y~at the
Oirectar. C;arv L. Si,~
See attached Planning CcamJssion report £or
Please see attached
BUDGET AMT.
AMT 4-/-
LEGAL REVIEW BY:
.. - -' ~ORM
AGENDA REQUEST
June 8, ~993
$'fAFF REP.:
OTHER ~P-:
DATE:
(Cross oppos(
report for conditions.
Please ~ee attached :rail report ~or lur~her d~tai!s.
BUDGE~ AI~ L
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTI~NT
C~.~.~CVIEW ADDITION - PHASE H - FINAL PLAT
P & Z HEARING DATE: May 20, 1993
C. C. HEARING DATE: June 8, 1993
LOCATION:
The northeast and southeast corner of Denton Tap Road and Bethel Road.
SIZE OF AREA:
3.902 acres of land being subdivided into four lots; one north of Bethel
Road, three south of Bethel Road.
CURRENT
ZONING: (R) Retail_
Approval of a final plat of Creekview Addition, Phase H.
APPLICANT:
William G. Thompson
(Owner)
8333 Dougla~ Avenue
Suite #1510
Dallaa, Texas 75225
(214) 369-5200
Henneasey Engineering, Inc.
(Engln r)
1409 Third Avenue
Carrollton, Texas 75006
(214) 245-9478
HISTORY:
There has been no recent platting history on the property in question.
TRANSPORTATION:
Denton Tap Road is a P6D, six-lane divided improved major thoroughfare
contained within a 100 to 120 foot right-of-way. Bethel Road is a local,
dead-end road east of Denton Tap within an 80 foot right-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North - single-family; SF-12
South - existing plant nursery; R
l~a~t - new single-family; PD-SF-9
West - vacant; PD for industrial users
COMPREHENSIVE
The Comprehensive Plan shows retail development on all four lots being
subdivided.
ANALYSIS:
City Council recommended approval of the preliminary plat of this request
on Tueaday, May 11, adopting all Planning Commission conditions with
the exception of the ninth one addressing a desire to develop the property
with compatible office uses. The City Attorney po'rated out that Retail
zoning would allow uses other than office, and that such a limiting
condition was not legally b'mding.
At the present time, the only lot scheduled for development is Lot 2,
Block B (a .81 acre parcel), for a 2750 square foot optometrist's office
which may eventually be expanded to a 4000 square foot facility.
The applicant has addressed the initial conditions (with the exemption of
the ninth one discussed above), suggested by staff, Commission and
Council, and has also shown a minimum finished floor elevation on all
lots. We wonld recommend approval of the final plat subject to all prior
conditions being met, and assurance that the 24 foot access easement to
the property to the south be shown on the final plat document. In
addition, at the May 20 Planning Commission meeting, Commission
members again urged Mr. Thompson to complete the sidewalkm on the
bridge structure. The Commission further understood that the owner of
Lot 2, Block B, would work with his residential neighbors to the east
regarding windows (screening, glass block, etc.) on his east bu'fld'mg
facade.
1) Approve the final plat
2) Deny the final plat
3) Modify the final plat
ATrACHMENTS: 1) Final Plat