Fountain Park 1-AG 920609AGENDA REQUEST FORM
Consideration and approval of a preliminary
north s/de of Sandy Lake Road, and a
request of Matthews Southwest Investments.
west of
located along the
Boulevard, at the
SUBMI'i-IED BY: ~
EVALUATION OF ITEM:
Date of P F. Z Meeting: May Zl, 199Z
STAFF REP.: (3ary L. Sieb. Planning Director
OTHER R~P.:
DATE:
Decision of P [- Z Commission:
Approved (4-Z) (T, mnell and Redford opposed); with the
following co~ditions:
1) with a maximum of 30 single-family residences,
2} the entrance drive be made to line up with $ugarberry Drive
in Lot 1, to the west of the drive,
3 the entrance be as aesthetically pleasing as possible,
4 that there be lighting and benches in the open space, and
the fountain be built if possible: and
5 the minimum building side yards be 6'
6 there be a minimum 1800 square foot house size
7} that there be no alleys
Please see attached staff report for further details.
BUDGET AMT.
AMT +/- BUDGET
FINANCIAL REVIEW BY ~
LEGAL REVIEW BY:
REVIEWED BY CM: ' ~~
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
FOUNTAIN PARK ADDITION- PRELIMINARY PLAT
P & Z HEARING DATE: May 21, 1992
C. C. HEARING DATE: June 9, 1992
LOCATION:
Along the north side of Sandy Lake Road and approximately
836' west of MacArthur Boulevard.
SIZE OF AREA: 8.3 acres platted into 31 sinGle-family lots
REQUEST:
Approval of a preliminary plat.
APPLICANT:
Matthews Southwest Inc.
(Developer)
Mr. Tim House
5220 Spring Valley
Suite #500
Dallas, TX 75240
(214) 934-0123
Lynn Kadleck & Assocs.
(EnGineer)
Mr. Lynn Kadleck
5336 Alpha Road
Suite #5
Dallas, TX 75240
(214) 702-0771
HISTORY:
Last month, Planning Commission denied without prejudice, a
request for SF-0 zoning on this parcel.
TRANSPORTATION:
Sandy Lake Road is proposed to be a four-lane divided
thoroughfare (C4D/6), contained within a six-lane
riGht-of-way (110').
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North - developing single-family; SF-9 & PD-SF
South - developing sinGle-family; TH-1
East - vacant: C
West - developed: SF-9
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Plan shows iow-density,
appropriate for this parcel.
sinGle-familY uses as most
ITEM 8
ANALYSIS:
Because of the negative staff recommendation regarding the
zoning case which preceded this plat, staff must recommend
denial of this plat, and resubmittal which reflects SF-7
platting standards.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Approve the preliminary plat
2) Deny the preliminary plat
3) Modify the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Preliminary Plat
FNTPRK.STF